<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/snarkandboobs/2010/10/04/shorter-virginia-ironside-most-adopted-kids-would-rather-be-dead-anyway/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:59:42 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Shorter Virginia Ironside: Most Adopted Kids Would Rather Be Dead, Anyway</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[According to author and columnist Virginia Ironside, most adopted kids would be better off dead. As would most children she considers “unfit”. In fact, she says, a “loving” mother would  smother a sickly child with a pillow, because the “suffering” of being  ill makes that life meaningless and not worth living. She made these  vile assertions in defense of abortion while appearing on the BBC’s Sunday Morning Live during a discussion grossly entitled “Can abortion be a kindness?”  First, her odious attempt to argue that abortion is a “loving choice”  because some kids, in her mind, are unwanted. Her tunnel-visioned, sad excuse for a mind can’t seem to fathom the fact that the children are always wanted, by someone. You know, like people with hearts and compassion.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:00:17 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Lori Ziganto]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/snarkandboobs/2010/10/04/shorter-virginia-ironside-most-adopted-kids-would-rather-be-dead-anyway-n36483</link></item></channel></rss>