« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Friends, We Are Being Suckered

“It’s the economy, stupid.”

Those words were supposedly written as a note from James Carville to keep Bill Clinton on message during his successful 1992 campaign. Like everything else in the kind of stage show political campaigns have become, outsiders can’t be sure how the story actually unfolded. But that’s not important.

What is important is that we are suckers if we hold Barack Obama accountable for the economy, unless we also say that we know he can’t help the economy. He can only harm it, or allow it to fix itself. By demanding of Barack Obama “Jobs!”, we are inviting him to tinker with the economy, and more importantly, we are abandoning our principles to score political points.

Holding Mr. Obama accountable for his promises is all well and good, but it must be coupled with “We told you so!”. We knew that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (AKA “Porkulus”) would not work. It cannot work, because it is based on faulty, outdated, and disproven economics. The part of the money spent stimulating the economy will simply cause people to be dependent on government, rather than on themselves. And as importantly, that money has to come from somewhere, whether it’s taxed, borrowed, or simply printed.

And once we hold Mr. Obama accountable for creating jobs for the people, unless we say now that it can’t be done, it will be demanded of us also when we shortly return to power. It may take years to repair the damage of an Obama Administration, and without clear economic progress our guy or gal will have trouble implementing the very agenda which would make it happen: slashing government spending, deregulating everything but traffic lights, and cutting back on governmental power.

We mustn’t cede the ground that the economy is the government’s to control. The only legitimate concerns of government are defending liberty and settling disputes.

So let’s not open ourselves to the charge of hypocrisy, or tu quoque. Let’s make clear the acid behind our snark as we demand those jobs he can’t produce. Let’s make clear how little we expect of him, while demanding every bit of what he promises.

COMMENTS

  • 6eorge Jetson

    • Xasteius

      Newsweek ran an article on how Chavez and other South American countries that have taken a sharp leftward turn politically have cause the emigration of his white-collar workers. If you insert “Obama” for Chavez, you get a possible future for the US.

  • http://www.scottbomb.com scottbomb

    I want it to recover, but we all know who’s going to be taking credit for it come 2010 and 2012.

  • http://web.mac.com/mayo99/iWeb/Site/VladBlog/VladBlog.html Vladimir

    Six months ago we were all wringing our hands about the death of the party.

    Now we’re fretting about taking over & not having a plan.

    All things considered, things are looking up.

    As the pendulum swings, and it inevitably will, let’s hope some new, focused committed conservatives fill those seats.

    In 1994, Rs swept into power and the committee chairmen were the Bob Doles, Bob Michels, Denny Hasterts etc. whose seats on the back bench were form-fitted to their backsides. They were firmly committed moderates who judged their success on the “bipartisanship” they were able to accomplish.

    Another way to look at that is they hadn’t a clue how to govern & how to run a chamber like a committed ideologue.

    No, when this pendulum swings back, it’s going to be a shot at the Reagan Revolution, Part II. We can help the party be ready.

    • wordsarepower

      Dems are, at this point, ineffectual as leaders. Not one good thing has been accomplished since the Regime takeover in January. It’s been complete chaos, and that’s a good thing, as long as we can stop it in the end. I don’t generally like the expression, “I told you so,” but in this case…

      Republicans would do well to adopt Robert’s response above: ?Big-government ?solutions? are what Democrats propose. We don?t have one of those, and we?re not going to propose one. We don?t believe government can do much about Problem X except make things worse.? I could respect a response like that.

  • Robert A. Hahn

    I have the same problem with R’s who apologize for our side not having a big-government “solution” ready to counter the Ds’ big-government “solution.”

    When the reporters ask the R’s, “Where is -your- solution?” I want them to say, “Big-government ‘solutions’ are what Democrats propose. We don’t have one of those, and we’re not going to propose one. We don’t believe government can do much about Problem X except make things worse.”

  • http://socratesbox.blogspot.com Socrates

    Lynn Cheney comes to mind as one who challenges that kind of premise consistently.