« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Inescapability of Death Panels

Q: Will ObamaCare use a death panel to decide who lives and who dies?

A: There are no death panels.

Q: It’s true that they do not exist, currently.  That is how we’d like to keep it.  Does ObamaCare contain them?

A: The bills before Congress to reform our health care system do not create death panels.

Q: I’m not sure that is the case, given the Porcine creation of one.  But for the sake of argument, I will grant that no such thing as a death panel is envisioned in ObamaCare.  How does it save money?

A: Well, we have to save money where it is spent, I suppose.

Q: And where is health care money spent?

A: In the first few hours of life, and in the last few months of it.

Q: And it’s cheaper to abort a child than to bring it to term?

A: Yes, I suppose.  But we don’t talk about it in those terms.

Q: Of course.  But at the end of life, that is where the money is?

A: Yes.

Q: So will Congress pass a law saying which medical procedure can apply to whom?

A: Of course not.  That would be too cumbersome.

Q: And would it expose Congress to politically radioactive decisions?

A: Yes.  Congress does not like to say “no”.

Q: So they would appoint a commission of some sort.

A: Yes, I suppose that’s right.  It’s the typical approach.

Q: Now, would such a commission or panel decide which set of symptoms require which kinds of treatment?

A: Yes, that would be a great innovation, saving trillions of dollars over the next thirty years.

Q: And so they would decide that a broken bone required a cast, but a twisted ankle did not?

A: Yes, that would probably be the case.

Q: And if someone contracted pneumonia, they would give the correct treatment, and bar the incorrect one?

A: Yes, of course.

Q: If someone had a certain type of cancer, the panel would have a standard treatment for it?

A: Yes, efficiency and mercy would demand it.

Q: So no other type of treatment would be allowed?

A: Yes, I suppose that would have to be so.

Q: And if a person had multiple conditions, such as cancer and heart disease — would those treatments be the same, or different?

A: They might be different, if the treatments conflicted with one another.

Q: Conflicted?

A: Yes, if the treatment for the cancer would create the risk of heart failure, we might not treat the cancer.

Q: Or if the treatment were only extending the painful conditions of life, would the treatment differ?

A: The authorized treatment might be palliative.

Q: I see.  I am glad you have instructed me.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • nessa

    “Commission of some sort” sounds warm and friendly, definitely non-threatening, much like “overseas contingency operation.” I’m still amazed that the right was going to be responsible for bringing about 1984, Brave New World, Logan’s Run, we’re living Animal Farm right now where “some animals are more equal than others.”

    • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/blog/loren_heal Socrates

      Doctors commit their formative professional lives to understanding our biology on a deep level. Soon they will be told that a panel of experts has subsumed much of that work, so that doctoring will be centralized by the State, for efficiency.

      Somehow “emergency room” and “government commission” don’t go together very well.

      • nessa

        Always looking at the bottom line. Curious about the value of a human life? They’ll be able to tell you, its on page 493, figure 3.

  • Leopard1996

    Sometimes they call a spade a spade in the best way possible.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    and quacks like a death panel, it’s a death panel.