« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A Huge Mistake and a Wasted Opportunity to Save the Country

No, I’m not talking about the rush to anoint Mitt Romney as the Republican nominee.  I’m talking about a mistake I’ve made, in my lack of vision. I’m talking about how we treat each other in a critical phase of the political process.

To lay my cards on the table: I’m a Rick Santorum delegate to the Republican National Convention, having been elected in the Illinois primary March 20. I’ll see you in Tampa, and intend to live tweet the convention both from the floor and from any smoke-filled rooms I find there.

We at Redstate have been saying for years that we need to grow the conservative movement. We have come a long way here, starting from a smallish group of dedicated navel gazers to become a much larger group of real-world activists.

And we’ve done that with the leadership of Erick Erickson, Coldwarrior, Steven Foley, and many others who have stepped up to the plate to enter the Republican Party as Precinct Committeemen, launch other web sites or become active in paid media, and run for office ourselves.

But now we come to crunch time, and we’re losing sight of the big picture. This site’s mission is to grow the conservative movement within the Republican Party, and what are we doing? We’re missing the single best opportunity to do so that we’ve had during its entire existence.

As the primaries have gone on, we’ve slowly drifted into five camps:

  • The Romney faction of those resolved to accept inevitability
  • Rick’s Army
  • The Gingrich camp
  • The Paulites
  • The Defeated, who may vote but will not be active

This post is not about the merits of the candidates.

What it’s about is capturing fervor. We’ve got a brief moment now, while there is still reasonable doubt of who the nominee will be, to engage the supporters of each candidate and get them to commit to supporting the Republican nominee.

The way to do that is specifically not to say who it’s going to be.

This is the perfect time for people in the remaining states to turn their volunteer energy into permanent, real involvement. We don’t have to fight to coalesce behind one guy just yet. That will naturally happen as the delegates pile up, or it won’t. Why push it? Let the voters decide.

For us in the states that have already had our primaries, we can begin organizing our November effort “for whomever the nominee will be” and leave it at that. We should not squelch the volunteer spirit of the Romney or Newt or Santorum or Paul fans  by telling them their guy can’t win the nomination or a particular state. What on Earth is the point of that? Get them to commit to act now, while they can hold out hope that it will be their guy.

And yes, I include the Paulites in that. If Ron Paul were just a little bit different, I’d vote for him and so would you. His fans are just able to ignore stuff we can’t. They should be in the Party.

Doing otherwise, by being condescending or insulting the candidates you believe cannot win, will result in people moving into the Defeated camp, or worse: becoming disillusioned and leaving politics to jerks like you.

Doing otherwise runs directly counter to the mission of this site. There is no better time than now to grow the movement for the long term. But we must harness the energy candidates have created for the good of the movement overall. Convince people that even if their guy doesn’t win, his ideals will be represented in the Party and are best furthered by joining the coalition.

Failure to do so risks disillusionment and disappointment, or worse: the kind of formal break we all want desperately to avoid.

COMMENTS

  • funwithknives

    that is not counterbalanced by what is right with Conservatism”

    Loren has *The Point*, people.The time is now and this is it.

    As the famous Writer Robert Heinlein wrote:” ….when the ship lifts, no regrets…”

    We have the capability to do what must be done. But will we……..?

    • naharu89x7

      Considering that many of them are disenfranchised Liberals who are upset that Obama isn’t anti-war enough for them.

      Considering that many of them are rabid Anti-semites who display open contempt for both Jews and Israel.

      Considering that when it comes to social values, Ron Paul’s supporters have liberal, not conservative or “traditional” positions.

      One of the problems with the Republican party is this attitude that it has to be a “Big Tent” party. The party has stated values and postions, but does not expect party members to adhere to them.

      This “Big Tent” mindset is what leads to the Republican Party being defeated in elections. What the Republican Party needs is not “compassionate conservatives”. What it needs is Conservatives…period. That means a party undeluded by those who don’t really belong in the party.

      Ron Paul and his supporters shouldn’t be allowed within a lightyear of the GOP. Liberals are the ones who scream for tolerance and diversity, if the Republicans also cry for that, they are just bad versions of the so-called opposition.

  • Viet71

    A position I respect but do not envy.

    When looking at the grass, for bugs or whatever, one must get down close.

    From a possibly more advantageous view above, detail is lost but big picture is maintained.

    I think both views are important, but that in a national election, one should have a view from above.

    • http://teapartisan.wordpress.com Loren Heal

      On second thought, your implication is that my urging people to begin forming the groundwork for November without kicking their future allies in the teeth is missing some point?

      If I am missing something, please explain how kicking my once and future friend and allies in the dental work improves our chances of winning.

      • Viet71

        n/t

        • http://teapartisan.wordpress.com Loren Heal

          I should have suspected you were responding to something I didn’t write when what you said confused me. I’ve done it before myself. There’s too much to read even on one site.

          Thanks for recommending.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      Agrees with the healer

  • YnotNOW

    Colorado Republicans have registered almost 6,000 more voters than Democrats since the beginning of 2012 ? including almost 2,000 new voters in March alone.

    GOP leaders say the successful numbers are in part thanks to high gas prices and an aggressive grassroots effort to get people registered. Volunteers have canvassed neighborhoods and county fairs.

    http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/2012/04/04/beltway-blog-gop-registers-6000-voters-dems-year/66122/

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    setting up tables at and booths on the weekends at festivals, markets, etc., with a big sign that simply says:

    STOP OBAMA
    HERE!

    in front of it or above it. They then make voter registration materials available to them and give them information about when and where the local Republican clubs and committees meet. They invite them to come to at least one meeting. They’ve had great success in registering new Republicans and getting people to come to the meetings to either learn how to become a PC or to just commit to volunteer for GOTV activities.

    Thanks for sharing with us what you are doing in CO.

    CW

  • lastgopinillinois

    “that if their guy doesn’t win, their ideals will be represented by the PARTY” as you stated.
    That would be like trying to convince me that Romney is “seriously conservative”, or that Santorum is fiscally conservative.

    I frequently read FreeRepublic in the Topic sidebar labelled “Politics/Elections”. There, you’d find many folks who are dissillusioned with Romney as the “inevitable” nominee. My guess is, those people will stay home on election day, no matter what you tell them.
    I also read in at least a half dozen other conservative sites and I am beginning to get the same message. Tea Party conservatives particularly feel like the PARTY has stabbed them in the back with their support of Romney.

    It would be great though, if everybody would stop pushing the panic button and jumping on board the Romneywagon because he is supposedly the “inevitable” nominee.

    Me? I’m holding out for a conservative in the WH.

  • kowalski

    It was a BIG MISTAKE for Conservatives to try and split themselves off from Republicans in the middle of the Obama Administration. It will be proven to be a big mistake when he is reelected President.

    The problem with all of the rhetoric against RINOS here at Redstate is that it has ignored the fact that you are going up against – for the second time in history – the only person in the world who could actually *beat* Bill Clinton and his Wife.

    What has happened in the past few years, sadly, is that in the interest of ideological purity you’ve fractured the Party and now everyone is scrambling to pick up the pieces in time. And it’s going to be a DISASTER.

    • kowalski

      But I’m going to say it anyway.

      The stupidest thing the Conservatives could have done in the past 2 years was try to divorce themselves from mainline Republicans and moderates when facing the person in the Oval Office they are now. It’s an example of horrendous judgment, and it was a matter of hubris on the part of a few people. What you’re going to get, if you’re lucky, is to hold onto the House…and MAYBE pick up a seat or two in the Senate and in the meantime all of the separatist Conservative energy is going to accrue straight to the Democrats’ benefit.

      Conservatives didn’t need to try to split the Republican Party when they were faced with the best messaging machine since the invention of messaging machines, but that’s what they’ve done. And they’re going to lose this Presidential election because of it.

      • snowshooze

        If you don’t have any, the sky is the limit.

        • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

          when you have allowed your country to become a third world nation because you couldn’t rally behind a person to beat an incumbent who hates his own nation.

          • kowalski

            In my view have already bought and sold themselves. Truthfully, more than half of them are still waiting for the Government to be their Savior.

            They want Big Government and they’re going to get it. A few people protest against it but when you really look at what people believe – not what they say they believe – government has surpassed the 50% mark. Everyone has a brother, an aunt, a sister or a cousin who works for the Government and moreover everyone has a brother, an aunt, a sister or a cousin (more often two or three) who are dependent upon the government.

            They are going to vote Barack Obama back into the Presidency this November, so he can continue to take care of them.

            I keep arguing about this with my father – a man from the ’50s – and he keeps thinking: “This is going to backfire” (he said that about Obamacare) and “Eventually the American People will Wake Up” – and they don’t – and they won’t.

            Right now, the economy is really so bad that most of the American people who aren’t independently wealthy are dependent upon the government in one way or another, and that dependency is only going to become more marked.

            Look at Britain, that’s our future. High taxes, complete surveillance of the population, a handful of people in charge of everything, and a population that pretty much doesn’t know what it is, all the time, and basically likes to get drunk and screw. That’s America 2020.

          • snowshooze

            But you have to stick it out or quit, kid.

          • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

            I think Obama has a real hard time getting reelected. But if you are so pessimistic then please don’t come here on this site anymore, because you are only bringing us down when we need to be encouraged.

          • avgjo

            Go back 100 years ago or so.

            The nuts who now run the country and have almost succeeded in remaking her in their image were largely in the same boat we’re in, except…

            There are far more of us than of them.

            How did they do it?

            I remember a story from Roman history, I think it was from Caesar’s campaign in Gaul, but I’m not sure.

            Anyway, their enemies were, on average, physically much larger than the average Roman. Further, many of the Northern peoples the Romans fought had a habit of trying to ‘psych out’ the Romans before the battles, often by showing up in scary paint and yelling a lot. Anyway, these guys tried something different. They got the largest guy they had to go out with a weapon and taunt the Romans. He talked about how no Roman would have the gall (sorry) to fight him, and if one DID make that mistake, he’d lose big. Well, the Romans being the Romans (that’s usually a good thing in my estimation), they sent out a short fellow to fight this guy. Long story not as long, the short Roman made quick work of the big barbarian. Why? He was, so the story goes, associated somehow with the gladiatorial games and was particularly proficient at single combat.

            Point is, what wins an ‘asymmetrical’ conflict is wits, planning, focus and discipline. The progs did this. They took over the institutions and went from there, incrementally. That’s what we’re going to have to do. I keep saying that while all the activism is great, and I commend people who are in it, there are other things that must be done, especially in media and academia. I myself am currently using my spare time to put together a respectable newspaper/site, and other, classified projects. As I work on this, and I talk to lots of local conservatives, educated, concerned people, i am amazed how few have ever even considered these two areas as a serious area of endeavour. We have to move beyond expecting short term solutions and interpreting the lack of such solutions as the end of the game. No. All it means is we have to start thinking long-term. In other words, we have to start planning to win.

          • snowshooze

            Look, apparently, I have a higher standard.
            I have to live with my decisions.
            Obama is a detail;as is Romney.
            When all is accounted for, the only remaining standard is:
            Did I do the right thing. In sincerity to myself, and everything else.
            Apparently, to the average Romney supporter… these thoughts never even occur.
            Hey, if I gag on Romney, it isn’t for arbitrary bias.
            It is for all the stuff we ALL know about

          • snowshooze

            It just doesn’t work for me.

          • snowshooze

            If the general electorate had a ball one, we wouldn’t be in the mess we are currently in.
            I consider that beyond my ability to fix.

          • snowshooze

            I expect you shall run and hide. It’s the way of a coward.
            C’mon, coward. Chicken. Man up.
            mittsucker.

          • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

            You are an idiot and what you think of as honor is a joke.

            You think that all you have is a choice between perfect and imperfect but that is not true, in fact that is almost never the choices we get.

            So stew in your juices and hold on to your precious honor and meanwhile I and the rest of us will be fighting and working to try and actually make things better. Dolt.

          • snowshooze

            I mean if we have a shot at putting anybody but Obama in office, and I believe we do.. why not put our best foot forward rather than sending a squish?
            We could have it all.

          • snowshooze

            And spelling was never my long suit…

    • http://teapartisan.wordpress.com Loren Heal

      I think any number of people could have beaten Obama last time. McCain was ahead in the polls until he failed to state that health care is not a right — that rights are what government can’t do to us, not what government must do for us. And as I argued at the time, he had particular moral authority to say that, considering the health care he’d received from the government — of North Vietnam.

      And any number of Republicans can beat Obama this time. The fact that you don’t think so doesn’t bother me.

      And besides, beginning to come together is the point of the post. If not coming together is so colossally stupid, I would think you’d approve.

      • texashistorian

        that Clinton would never have become President if not for Ross Perot. The man was far from invincible. He got re-elected because we nominated Bob Dole, not because Clinton was so loved by America.

  • kowalski

    .

    • snowshooze

      Dead wrong…
      sorry. I ain’t getting your drift.
      Can you make that statement in laymen s terms, so I can determine weather or not we are on the same page:?

  • Wayne

    other than of course, the bickering between those focussed on being right.

    I can’t give this thread justice in a short response. But I will try.

    I have a wide political spectrum of friends and family. We came together at a local restaurant this week to celebrate one’s birthday. 1/3 of the group are Democrats that believed, supported and voted for Obama in 2008.

    On that night I was provided a glimpse of hope in that to the person, they have made a gradual transformation in recognizing their mistake and misplaced idealism manifested in Obama.

    It may only be antidotal, but it gives me hope that while the odds are against us (for many of the reasons expressed here), if we stay the course, and unite, we could be victorious in November, though by the slimiest of margins. And, if by some chance the conservative message is given divine intervention, then the real work begins.

    Here’s to recognizing that “hoping” isn’t enough. And, that hope with action may just be enough to start over and reverse the course we are on.

    God bless you all.

  • http://lukos.com Ed54

    It happens every 4 to 8 years like clockwork, in both parties. By fall, we’ll have put the memories of the bruising primary behind us and will be united in opposition to the Dems, just as they were against us 4 years ago. Same as it ever was.

    Not that I’m criticizing what you said or what you intend to do, mind you. If it wasn’t for people like you, the process would not happen.

  • damianvincent

    Lets not forget why the party is in this shape. Mitt Romney the weakest ‘front runner’ in my lifetime. This process would be a whole lot easier had Romney not carpet bombed his own people. When you spend your time telling Seniors in Florida Rick Perry will take away your SS, or the good people of South Carolina that Newt Gingrich was run out of Congress for criminal ethics violations,

    Mitt Romney is the weakest so called front runner in my lifetime, and to save his political life he trashed everyone else, now we’re supposed to unify behind him. It’s one tall order, and just one of many reasons I don’t think Romney can win this thing.

    • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

      Please note that Gingrich and Perry didn’t whine about it, Santorum has but he’s a professional whiner. If you can’t take the heat, go find a tiddlly winks game.

      If an ad runs and it’s not true it can be corrected. If it is true, tough.

    • acat

      but had no chance of a successful run himself, leaving an open field.

      Twelve little conservative candidates ran onto the field and pitched little tents. One squish pitched a big tent and proceeded to watch (and help…) as the conservatives eliminated one another.

      This race was over in 2010. The only way to change the outcome was for Romney to stumble badly .. and Perry had him on the ropes until Santorum bought Van Der Pantaloons in Iowa.

      Mew

  • radicalrighty

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-live/2012/04/gingrich-romney-and-i-are-at-peace-119902.html

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Once again he’s the only adult in the room. The election process is already over in Colorado. If nothing else, I hope they finally get rid of the stupid caucuses here and move to a system where our votes count (and where Republicans will become more involved).

    • Common_Cents

      Under circumstances to have Gingrich on board. I hope he is a prominent part of the admin. Perhaps the only Czar, hatchet czar, appointed to root out all lifer liberals in govt and can them so they don’t sabotage Romney. Then start cutting out large swaths of additional govt garbage organizations, programs etc….

      • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

        *no*text*

  • kowalski

    Here’s the deal: the attempt at distancing the Conservatives from the Republicans and splitting them off into their own third party was an honorable thing to do and probably, ultimately it has to happen at least on a cognitive level. But on an electoral level it *sucks*. It splits the Party and it has allowed people who *cannot possibly win* the majority in a national election to rise to a false sense of prominence.

    You might not like Romney. I’m not sure I like Romney myself. But we’ve got a lot more than Romney to worry about!

    People here on this blog – people who I otherwise respect – have said absolutely nonsensical things like: “Romney would be no better than Obama on judges.”

    That’s *#*$&@#$*CRAZY*#&@&$(# folks.

    Moreover, we’ve done a lot of work to differentiate the Conservatives from the Republicans and a lot of it has been destructive in *this particular* election cycle.

    Let’s make no mistake about it — I want to be pefectly clear – without a unified group of people behind our Presidential candidate we will lose. We cannot get it with Rick Santorum and we cannot get it with Newt Gingrich. Romney is not going to be everyone’s wondrous candidate and he’s certainly not going to be someone I love to vote for, but he is (and has really always been, at least after the others bowed out) our best choice.

    The task is to convince the hardcore separatists in this Party to vote for him. It’s tough, I know. I’m not a Romneybot and I know it’s tough. But in my view this whole anti-capitalist thing, this wholesale rejection of him has been very badly misguided.

    We’re going to need the middle in this election and we’re going to need someone with Romney’s drive and yes – his money – to make a real contest of this in the General.

    Think carefully about the alternatives and tell me whether you think any of the other three could *even possibly* win. If you’re honest with yourself, you know they can’t. Rick Santorum is a lightweight and a big-government Social Conservative based on his record. Newt Gingrich just cannot find any traction whatsoever. Ron Paul is a freaking flake, and a lot of his supporters are flakes (which is why Ron Paul has always been the darling of the New York Times).

    What we have remaining is Romney. He’s exceptionally dangerous to the Obama Administration because he’s the only one who can plausibly win.

    Enough is enough and the time is past for the infighting. It’s time to help our nominee win the election.

    • kowalski

      I know they’re here. I know they’re being paid or encouraged to put the message out here on Redstate but I can *absolutely assure you* that I am not one of them.

      Eventually though, you face reality. And the reality in this election cycle is that Romney is the man with the money, the backing, and the message who is our single best choice for President.

      There will be other elections. This isn’t going to be the one to defeat Obama with an arch-Conservative. It’s just not going to happen.

      • kowalski

        Not only have I never given a nickel to any of the Romney campaigns, I’ve never volunteered any of my services to them. In fact even in my private conversations I don’t think I’ve ever even spoken to a Romneybot.

        At this point however, we’re going to have to face reality. We need a war chest of several hundred million dollars, something approaching a billion dollars, even to think about mounting an effective campaign against the Obama Machine in this cycle, because their money is going to BE there.

        So let’s dispense with the unpleasant facts – Rick and Newt are not going to collect that much money – it’s just NOT going to happen. And we’re NOT going to support Ron Paul.

        Mitt Romney is the Last Man Standing and he’s standing well above any of the others. That’s how this primary race has played out on our side, like it or lump it but don’t give up.

        • kowalski

          I happen to think Romney “gets it” from the Conservative Base. There are lots of people who vehemently disagree with me but I can tell you that people really *do* have changes of heart and mind. Our task is to hold him to his promises, to hold him to his words, and to make the best we can out of this hugely divisive primary season. We might have needed the Silver Bullet Conservative (and I’m not talking about Coors Light) but we are going to get the Mormon Latecomer to the Party.

          Sometimes it does happen that the latecomers are the best dressed and ultimately the best ones to be alongisde. We should encourage them.

    • http://teapartisan.wordpress.com Loren Heal

      This is not about who is best.

      It’s about the particular tactic of saying “It’s over”.

      You want people to unite? Start making plans for November.

      • kowalski

        There, I said it.

  • krish

    to be disapponted! I understand everyone’s predicament……..but do not get your hopes high…

    Hoping that .”people really do change of hearts……” – are you suggesting that Romney will stick to his positions that he espoused during the primaries? I hope you are Not that naive!

    at the same time, I do not want conservatives to start making excuses for his positions about his heart, etc. Most of us know his MO …..from MA

    “Que sera sera”…..

    • kowalski

      Romney has invested tens of millions of dollars of his own money in the contest so far. That’s a lot of tea bags. It’s possible he’s strining people along, but I don’t think so given what’s at stake for him.

      Moreover, I think he’s fundamentally a decent person.

    • kowalski

      When you elect a President, everyone is eventually disappointed regardless of the party you’re talking about. Reagan’s supporters were disappointed to a certain extent. So were Clinton’s. I know for sure that Kennedy’s supporters were disappointed because an assassination took from them the most important person they’d ever known. Even some of Ford’s supporters were disappointed and it was very hard to be disappointed in President Ford, since he did such a great job of it for himself.

      Clinton had a great disappointment with Laurence Tribe on Charlie Rose and an entire Impeachment.

      As a Conservative-leaning Republican (right of Center right but just a little) I was disappointed by George Bush on a number of levels.

      We’re all going to be disappointed on one level or another. It’s a big country and basically people have lots of different views. So I don’t think that’s a preemptive reason not to vote for our strongest candidate.

      • kowalski

        Look at the Left: They’re TERRIBLY disappointed in Obama because he hasn’t followed through on what they thought he guaranteed them – to transform America into a mostly Socialist State. That’s where their disapproval rating is coming from.! He hasn’t been far left enough!

        People really thought that what Obama was going to do when he won election was to take property from landowners and just give it away to people who didn’t have any. I know, because I had to evict two of them.

        • kowalski

          There is a neat exchange line at the end of Woody Allen’s “Sleeper” that I have to admit is funny and if I had been there with Diane Keaton at the time I probably would have said the same thing, maybe, if I was 22 years old again:

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_Woa-oFy_Y&feature=related

          But then again, although I love Woody Allen I think he’s also an aresh**e. And I impersonate him very well, and he’s not hard to understand.

    • kowalski

      When is anyone *not* disappointed in their elected officials? Every time candidates come up for election they promise “reform” and “change” and “straightening things out” and almost every single time, the electorate is sufficiently disappointed in them to seek new candidates.

      It’s really the basic central truth of politics that every politician knows: “Nobody is ever going to be satisfied with your performance. That’s why they always want new faces, and almost always want to see an electoral contest.”

      For the most part, skilled politicians take advantage of that fact to move to the next level of the political hierarchy while the less skilled (or the more honest) just decide to stay away, or they get whupped or caught up in circumstances and decisions they’ve created or can no longer control.

      It’s the basic turnover theory of Democracy.

      • kowalski

        Once you get into office, the most important thing in politics is to seem clueless or helpless or both. And then to have enough base of support to carry you through the reelection crisis you will inevitably face.

  • http://www.unifiedpatriots.com/ Brian Hibbert

    There are hundreds of people I’ve met who “should” be in the party, but they’re not. It’s tough to get people to understand that unless they’re a Precinct Committeeman, they’re not actually IN the party. Oh, they may VOTE Republican and may even donate money to support candidates, but they have NO influence on the direction of the party.

    Please people, call your local county GOP office and find out what it takes to become a Precinct Committeeman! In most states, the county chairman can appoint you to fill an open slot until the next election. Once you’re in, you’ll start to MEET people and make contacts. If you bother to show up at county events (breakfasts, meetings, parades, etc) you’ll become know to all the elected officials in your area. They’ll listen to what you have to say and will even start to seek you out. You may even end up as a delegate to the national convention!

    • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

      Any precinct committeeman in Arizona, either elected in the primary election in 2010 or appointed to a vacancy before Dec. 31, 2011, has the right to vote for the delegates to the state convention. Any registered Republican can nominate themselves to be a delegate at tomorrow night’s caucus meeting, but it’s unlikely the precinct committeemen would vote for them unless, for example, the registered voter made some huge donation to the Party or the LD committee.

      The elected delegates to the state convention get to vote on Party resolutions, vote for the delegates to the national convention, and vote for who gets to be the national committeeman and national committee woman.

      By contrast, but in similar fashion, those precinct committeemen who were elected to be state committeemen back in 2010 had the right back in Jan. 2011 to elect the AZ GOP chairman, who also serves as an RNC committeeman. In January of this year those same committeemen elected other of the Party officers.

      It will be interesting to see how many of the 135 or so precinct committeemen in my legislative district will run for a state delegate slot (we get 28, one for every 1,000 registered Republicans in our district, another incentive to register more Republican voters). Today I volunteered to show up a little bit early to help with the credentialing of the PCs — we will be checking everyone’s voter registration data (PCs and any non-PC candidates) and photo IDs.

      It should be fun and interesting.

      I hope this helps.

      Thank you.

      ColdWarror

    • shawny

      Guys, I understand your needing everyone under the big tent to win. Now understand this; even those that didn’t totally reject Romney as any kind of a conservative or Republican nominee have been totally disgusted with how he actually has gotten here. Apparently the caucus leaders or committee members or the GOP themselves didn’t think he was popular enough to get the nomination fairly even with all his bankroll so mainstream media had a field day with all of the voting anomalies and shenanigans used in the process to put him on top. Hell, this is the kind of stuff the DNC pulled to get Obama nominated and real voters do not want any part of it. They got to see how precinct committeemen were treated on national T.V. and how entire counties were disenfranchised, not by the DNC but by the GOP. There have been no apologies, no do overs, no assurances or any sign that the GOP thinks there is even a problem. It’s “the ends justifying the means” and voters do not want to engage any more than the Hillary supporters got screwed in 2008. Conservative voters also want to know why the Republicans allowed the voter tabulations process to be sold out to a firm in Barcelona, Spain. All of this breeds even greater voter apathy. So go ahead and shake your pom poms and get your pep rally together but try not to underestimate the challenge you’ve created, not just by pissing on each others candidates but by pissing on the integrity of the process itself. I’ll vote for whoever says they’ll fix that or even recognize it’s wrong.

  • krish

    & did the ultimate dream of real lefties ….Obamacare –it is huge! After the great society, no president was ever able to pull such a thing! I do not know why liberals are unhappy! If GW Bush had done half off what Obama did, we would be praising him (remember he had republicans controlling senate & house) & may be we would have a different president!

    Clinton never believed in the cause! HW Bush — empty suit …..& he reminds me of Romney! wants to be president – may be groomed for it or wants to show his dad that he could do something that his dad could not do?

    Coming to my point — Romney does not believe in anything! He is not animated by principles & spouts what his handlers are telling him to do! The only way to make a case for Romney is after the primary – pros & cons of Obama 2nd term.& make the case! At the same time, making Romney to be conservative & trying to do a hard sell is what irritates many who have followed his record! What is appaling is asking everyone to forget his record & trust his based on his words! Then we should all love Democrats because they are all about right words, thoughts, attitudes rather than actions & results!

    Request to everyone on the conservative side — Let us not lose our principles & buy the new Romney! As so many others have said, we will do what we have to do after the primaries with a heavy heart & with our eyes open knowing fully well that it will be a choice between slightly lesser of the two evils… but not because Romney camp & Rombots (Kowalski, you are not one of them!) were able to fool the conservatives…..Que sera sera

  • Pingback: Melaine Mcmenamin

  • Pingback: Wai Youngren

  • Pingback: Alexis Fyler

  • Pingback: Robin Engram

  • Pingback: Hien Jou

  • Pingback: wine

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: Investment Opportunities

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: βιβλιο

  • Pingback: znajdz milosc

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  • Pingback: najlepsza randka

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: distilling wine

  • Pingback: rubinetterie

  • Pingback: wedding planner tuscany

  • Pingback: Tune Up

  • Pingback: Why Not Try This Out

  • Pingback: Check These Guys Out

  • Pingback: breastactives breast enhancement pills

  • Pingback: property in jaipur

  • Pingback: madamelux

  • Pingback: working from home jobs uk

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Wilfredo Longfield

  • Pingback: Julie Leiendecker

  • Pingback: Rolf Brais

  • Pingback: Union Flooring Installations

  • Pingback: www.loansandbadcredit.org

  • Pingback: free reverse telephone directory

  • Pingback: Trina Hartranft

  • Pingback: growing aloe vera

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: Emanuel Swim

  • Pingback: thel Addison

  • Pingback: Anisha Nissen

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: Valarie Pyette

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: http://loansandbadcredit.org

  • Pingback: call center in California

  • Pingback: stills

  • Pingback: weight loss

  • Pingback: custom made uniform

  • Pingback: Car Forum

  • Pingback: air compressors

  • Pingback: randki