« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Are we in this to win, or sleep well at night.

Thinking about Sandy Hook School

The first step in getting what we want in Washington is to stop arguing about what is the best way to do everything and concentrate on the need for power. The Democrats understand this. Who is our Diane Feinstein? Who is sitting in the wings just waiting for an opportunity to advance power grabbing legislation that will help weaken the grip of the establishment progressives? Who can step up? I want to see our own legislation advanced immediately to help protect our children. Not just any legislation. These specific proposals.

1. Propose that all education block grants be distributed to parents of students in the form of education vouchers, to be spent on the schools where the parents feel their children will be the safest and best educated.

2. Someone else should propose that the education department be eliminated, since the Obama administration has eliminated all funding for school security. That the funds be returned to the states (or better yet let the states collect them and offset them against federal tax obligations proportionately). Parents can then insist that the local education administrations protect their children, without interference or neglect from the Obama administration of this very important responsibility.

I am for smaller federal government, are you? Lets start doing some things to make that happen. There has to be someone who has sat in the congress for a long time that is not afraid to take on these tough challenges. The democrats are the establishment, we need to push back against the federal establishment the way Diane Feinstein does at every opportunity.

Lets point out that prohibition doesn’t work. Alcohol prohibition didn’t work, drug prohibition didn’t work, and with millions upon millions of arms in former soviet bloc nations gun prohibition won’t work. The federal government can’t control the border any way, it won’t even try. The federal government can’t control the flow of prohibited drugs across the border, or illegal immigrants coming across the border, again it won’t even try. In fact it doesn’t know how to control it’s own spending let alone control guns or protect schools. That is the responsibility of the local government anyway, and if the feds would get out of the way and stop bleeding the tax payers dry, there might actually be something left for the school boards to use to pay for a guard, a security contractor, security departments, or real in depth protection.

As for vouchers, parents should be able to send their kids where ever they feel they will be safest, and think they can get the best education. The federal government has a lot of distractions and we can’t hold them accountable simply because they stopped paying attention to the safety of our children. That should be our concern, the decision and the responsibility should be made locally. We don’t need more federal intervention, we need the federal government to admit their failure and step aside so we can protect our most children ourselves. Time to cut out the middleman, Washington. Time to cut out the middleman’s profit that they keep in Washington, and time to cut out the middleman who has fallen asleep on the job.

And if in the process Catholics and other church leaders that run alternative education programs, Hispanics, Asians, and families with school age children happen to notice that Republicans are offering solutions that give them more control over things that matter to them and that maybe voting Democrat isn’t such a great thing, it might change the colors on the map. That is what Feinstein is trying to do. Where is our champion?

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • funwithknives

    Living in Detroit, the honorary home of ‘Savoir of the Week’ mindsets and expectations, I see the writer’s point but respectfully disagree with the premise of having a singular figurehead, for this, or most topics.
    We’ve got a very large team out there but unification and teamwork could [geometrically multiply these efforts ,& ] get us where we need to be.
    Is an’ Umbrella .Org ‘ what is needed? Here is where I am torn and need guidance.
    I have attempted to serve on various commitees and causes and invariably there appear
    C M-F’s I C ( i.e. : Chief Blankety-Blank’s In Charge) that wind up becoming The Man by lack of all member’s initiative or burnout.
    In my experience [limited, yes it is true] Committees [vs. A Leader] allow tag-teaming and series-wired intelligence to be always available and much more broad-based.
    How to channel efforts effectively over time, is the biggest headache and quandry.
    If anyone sees a better way,has suggestions, or forwards alt. action plans, I welcome the discussion.
    This is a search for effective action, not a chest-bumping pissing match. The stakes are too high for mechanizations, of the many sorts we are all too aware of.
    Freedom and Liberty is the Goal. How do we get there?
    Oh,BTW, outstanding diary WmCraig. You got me fired up, for sure.

    • WmCraig

      Not so outstanding if you thought I suggested we need a single figurehead. Feinstein is nothing more than a “nut with a bull horn”. She will make a lot of noise demanding outlandish restrictions (everything but single shot muzzle loaders should be banned, and every gun owner finger printed and recorded in a single national database.)

      Someone will come along and say she is nothing but a nice old lady getting carried away but point out that while she is way over the top, maybe something should be done. The way they used Malcom X against the people to make Martin Luther King, Jr’s demands palatable.

      We have plenty of wedge issues. What we don’t have is enough nuts with a bull horn. People who can be relied upon to put forth a lot of noise when Democrats are in hot water. And these murders were all about failed liberal/progressive establishment policies. Public service and education unions looking out for their reputation and not the safety and best interests of the children or the public, The Democrats in Washingtion DC risking school safety by using money that should have been used for security to buy votes among teachers or Auto workers, or to fund Acorn activities. It is about the mental health industrial complex or the the revolving door justice system that won’t or can’t keep anyone confined for their own good or ours. All liberal failures

      I did not mean we should have one voice on this. We need to use the tactics that the Activists use. Get a nut with a bull horn out there exposing the vulnerabilities, and get legislation started that is absolutely ludicrous. The papers will pick up on it, and only then can we have a rational discussion about “reasonable safe guards”

      Of course we have to learn that people that don’t 100% agree with us should be tolerated, and that people who advocate for radical implementation of our beliefs need to be tolerated, not ostracized.

      If Ron Paul demanded that the mentally ill be confined, tested, and only released under supervision until they can prove beyond a shadow of the doubt that they were not dangerous, people would scoff and discount what he said. But they probably wouldn’t demand he resign, and they shouldn’t.

      But the leadership could use that as a reason to talk about failed liberal policies toward the mentally ill, the criminally insane, and the dangerous repeat offenders that our children are being exposed to by the establishment. From the tuberculosis infected schizophrenic that makes the local parks and library their home, to the repeatedly arrested gang banger shooting up the streets, to the drug dealer praying on the young, to the outcast striking back by killing kids they all have one thing in common. They people are in the system at some point, they are arrested, monitored, treated, and released. The system doesn’t work. The liberal/progressive controlled Democrat establishment that runs the system is failing us. Maybe it is time to look at reasonable constraints on the most dangerous people in our society instead of always blaming the guns.

      • funwithknives

        To WmCraig : In your 4th Paragraph I noted the phrase : “…there has to be someone …”, and it went on from there. That is where My initial comment came from and it was for clarification, not any kinda’ slam on your diary.
        I Repeat : Outstanding Diary, and I did not intend to slight nor demean.
        *Excelsior!!*