« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama campaign breaks anti-soft-money commitments

How many commitments does he have to break?

The LA times has exposed a nice little bit of hypocrisy from Barack Obama’s campaign. His campaign is now directly soliciting high-six-figure checks from unions:

In an example of the campaign’s late-innings effort, a very senior Obama campaign official called the political director of one of the largest labor unions about two weeks ago and asked for a $500,000 contribution on top of a similar amount that had been committed just a few weeks before, according to the union official.

The campaign, further more, refuses to deny whether Obama is doing it directly:

A spokesman for the campaign, Hari Sevugan, declined to say whether Obama himself had become involved in these fundraising efforts or to confirm any details of work done by others from the campaign.

Now, my problem here isn’t that he is doing it. It is the hypocrisy of attacking it and then doing and claiming that he is clean. This “say Mister Clean, do Mr. Washington” pattern is the pattern of his campaign. Read on for details.


First he says that he will take public financing. Then he doesn’t. His argument is that he gets most of his money from small donors. It’s not true, as noted by Open Secrets.

In the primary, he attacked outside groups for attacking him, but thought it was fine that they attacked Obama. He also invoked Republican outside groups — and there are none this year — when he dropped out of public financing. At the same time, AFL-CIO is dropping $54m, and just last week the the Obama campaign started sending signals to outside groups that they should turn it on.

Indeed, as a comical exercise, just google “obama outside groups”. Here’s what you get:

The only “Change I Can Believe In” there is the changing on the dime for his own political advantage.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • bk

    “In the primary, he attacked outside groups for attacking him, but thought it was fine that they attacked Obama.”

    Obama should be Clinton I think (if you’re talking about the primary, otherwise McCain).

  • simpson316

    for promises he will break.

    I’m too lazy to list them all, but if I broke even a fraction of the promises he has I wouldn’t be married, I’d be unemployable and I wouldn’t have very many friends. Ah, the perks of being a politician and the low expectations that come along with the job.

  • everydayjoe

    in Obama’s campaign. It is important to note that after you sign up to be one of the first to know who the “chosen one’s” VEEP pick is, Obama immediately solicits a donation. However, the solicitation video is him talking about all of his small donors and how he is against special interests. I am not sure what as more phoney-ness, the Olympics or Obama’s campaign.

  • itrytobenice

    And don’t question Opossum.

    • Jeff_Emanuel

      …he has hundreds, thousands, even millions of people making every effort to rationalize and defend every lie, broken promise, and 180° he makes.

      Is it any wonder politics attracts the narcissistic and dishonest, and goes to the heads on any who aren’t already of very poor character?

  • Adjoran

    is that ALL of his statements have an expiration date (subject to change without notice).

    I can’t recall who first observed this – it may have been Geraghty at NRO – but it is most certainly verifiably true.

    Not only does Obama reserve the right to effect a 180? turn on any issue at any time, but he also refuses to acknowledge any change at all when he pirouettes, insisting that the new, reversed position is “what I’ve said all along.”

    It’s reasonably effective, too, since his pool of potential voters consists of only two groups: those too mind-numbingly stupid to notice the lies, having been beguiled by the comforting sounds of the “hope, change” mantra, and the hard America-hating neo-communist left, who heartily approve of lying and any other tactic which might help them regain power.

  • goalie40

    Sounds like someone is upset because Obama raised twice as much money compaired to the old man.

    Its an easy fix Open up the check book. Big oil cant pay for everything.

    For $25.00 you can even have a $.89 tiregauge.

    • SteveLA

      Bye bye troll.

      • phred

        I also find the Obamassiah enthusiasts falling into one of those two categories. Primarily the ignorant and totally unaware species.

  • goalie40

    I see you like echo chambers.

    • NightTwister

      It must keep you awake at night wondering what you’re going to lose tomorrow.

      • ConservaGeek

        1) Go to DailyKOS and post a conservative opinion.

        2) See how long before you’re banned.

        Then you’ll have a valid basis for comparison.

        • bs

          Unfortunately, you failed on both fronts. Now go back and watch SpongeBob, and make sure you ask permission next time you use your mommy’s laptop.

          • simpson316

            the numbers are so dramatically different.

            You see, it makes very little sense to donate to McCain’s campaign now. We should be ponying up to the RNC to keep their ads on the air. McCain has the guaranteed money via public financing. the RNC needs the cash.

            So really, who cares if Obama doubled McCain. The DNC is so bad at raising money that the RNC can make up for just about any shortfalls in cash.

  • goalie40

    So what you are saying is you are on the same level as kos. Not better than it.

    That is what you are saying right? I cant talk here because You cant talk at this other place.

    Aim higher ever rightwingnews.com will debate a Dem.

    I dont go to kos because of that. I like to hear from both sides.

    not you I see

    • NightTwister

      -nt-

      • SteveLA

        Monday, bright and early, get up, go see your local Armed forces recruiter, they will talk to you.

        But please; Sunday, go to bed early, try to leave the herb alone, red blood shot eyes are a turn off for recruiters.

        • David_Hinz

          you posted ..big oil can[']t pay for everything.

          you were not interested in “debate” you were interested in poking a stick through the bars of the cage and riling up the silly conservatives.

          You got what you deserve — snark — so either take it or leave…

          • David_Hinz

            otherwise you would NOT be laughing, you would be CRYING at the prospect that Obamessiah might end up in the Oval Office — we are STILL paying the price of that fool…

          • ConservaGeek

            I’ll debate any reasonable, intelligent person, regardless of political affiliation, race, gender, creed, or what brand of cola they prefer.

            Trolls who only want to stir up stuff, however, get treated like… well… like trolls.

            Now, you wanna start over, Goalie, or continue to act trollish?

          • Tim_Schieferecke

            Obama peaked in June. He’s on the downslide because of his radical views and associations. He can throw as much money as Soros has at trying to win, but he’s still just radical Obama in the eyes of the majority of Rs, Indies and blue-collar Ds. He will lose in November. Wacky libs will then have to re-create another tiresome narrative and lick their self inflicted wounds for another 8 years.

          • David_Hinz

            but only through a series of 501, 503c, 507 and a whole series of numbered accounts in friendly Caribbean Island nations.

          • Tim_Schieferecke

            We conservatives have truth on our side. Obama will be playing protect defense for the rest of the campaign. He’s got so many skeletons and dope bags and radical associations and draconian abortion votes and so on that he’ll never mount an effective offense. That’s not a good strategy to win on.

  • goalie40

    I work for the Army, The 25ID in Hawaii. Been there done that Steve.

    David you should not call grown adults “child” that could get you banned for not respecting users here.

    Since we are talking about money and Obama.

    Why are deployed military giving more money to Obama. Military vote something like 75% Republican? What gives thats macks money. He is the big war vet.

    • Tim_Schieferecke

      I am strongly inclined toward believing Obama’s so called small donors are being given the money to contribute. I do not accept the fact that he’s garnering all of these small donations without some type of very sophisticated hanky panky behind it. I don’t think I’m misjudging America’s tendency to avoid overt marxism. There’s some payola scheme going on with them.

      • NightTwister

        We’re making fun of you too. That’s what we do with trolls, before a moderator comes and gives them the boot.

        I not sure you’ve met the criteria yet though. Moe has a certain standard to uphold.

        • speciallist

          n/p

          • ConservaGeek

            You got a verifiable source for that little claim, Goalie?

            By “verifiable,” I mean a source not already in the tank for Obama. No Kos or DU links allowed, give us an unbiased source.

            Or, you can prove that you’re not interested in a real debate by refusing to name your sources.

            Ball’s in your court, Goalie.

          • simpson316

            Sure he got more than McCain, but Republicans received more than Democrats.

            Democrats $63,882
            Republicans $76,027

          • David_Hinz

            nearly every one of the “watchdog” websites, and “citizen” sites and all “progressive” sites can be traced indirectly back to Soros and/or a couple of other fatcats. A whole $#itload of liberal bloggers are also funded with Soros money — spreading the talkingpointsmemos.

            An awful lot of BIG donors are bundlers who take donations from all these smaller donors — often their own employees — however they want to reimburse those employees is your own guess — I DO know that the Feds TRIED to go after Goeffrey Feiger the sleazy trial lawyer for paying his employees $2000 extra for them to donate to Democrats (it was Kerry) but he freaking WON the case by convincing the jury (Detroit — what can I say) that the Feds had it in for him (TRUE for crying out loud — he’s a scumbag) and that EVERYBODY does it — he even had other lawyers testify that they do the same thing.

          • simpson316
          • Tim_Schieferecke

            I think the Justice Department’s lack of curiosity in this and matters is stunning. It seems there is no will to do anything to protect our great nation from all enemies foreign or domestic. I hope we start hiring some officials with brass sets, and soon.

          • David_Hinz

            I’ll stop calling you child when you stop acting like a child — and I can tell by your post that I have sweatsocks older than you…

  • goalie40

    I dont need to call people names or insult thats what you guys do. Im better than that.

    I think if you need to call names to get a rise you already lost.

    Anyway again, Why are military giving more to Obama

    Whats wrong nothing to say……………… thats not name calling.

    • ConservaGeek

      I guess the old “the military is Republican” meme has been disproved, then.

      • ConservaGeek

        The whole “the military is Republican” canard appears to have been disproved.

  • goalie40

    Well thats great Dave, I collect things too. But having socks over 30 years old is kinda gross.

    Its ok live a little, get some new ones.

    Brian for a group leaning (R) $12205 difference Is not a very big number. For a group of voters that are 75% republicans. Am I wrong? It should be a blow out.

    • speciallist

      n/p

      • speciallist

        skidattle…..Look what you did!!..arrrg

        • David_Hinz

          The HINZ RULE

          • gamecock

            Obama’s ears may fall off if this goes on much longer

  • goalie40

    It must be important you used big letters.

    my rule is wait 1/2 hour before you swim.