Does Time know what either “fact” or “check” mean?


A brief diversion into history

Since the indictment and conviction of Ted Stevens, Time ran a series on indicted Senators. One that they discussed was John Smith from OH 1803-1809. They describe him as a “Republican” from Ohio.

That’s funny.

First of all, his party affiliation, as described by the Congressional Bioguide as “Democratic Republican”. Any person who knows anything about American political history knows that this was the predecessor to the modern Democratic Party.

Second of all, there wasn’t actually a Republican Party at the time. It was founded, depending on your story, in either Ripon, Wisconsin or Jackson, MI in 1854.

The point isn’t a partisan one. The point is that the reporters, editors, and fact-checkers seem to be sloppy about their facts and historical illiterates.

Not a good sign in a leading American magazine.

Category:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments Leave a comment

Media in decline

RestonCon Friday, October 31st at 7:30AM EDT (link)

And to think the mainstream media can’t figure out why ratings and circulation is down. They just don’t get it.

 

One small quibble....

NickLevi86 Friday, October 31st at 8:44AM EDT (link)

You are right. But they are not completely wrong just mindnumbingly unclear: The Democratic-Republican party did refer to themselves more often than not as “Republicans.”

But then, Time still conveniently fails to clarify.

“Any love letter is incomplete without a Ronald Reagan quote”
–my sophomore year roommate

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.