« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Are MA voters rejecting MA’s universal health care?

Turns out that all politics may be local after all

All politics is local, or so said former Speaker Tip O’Neill (D-MA). One wonders if Democrats lost the thread of what was happening in Massachusetts when they tried to nationalize the Massachusetts Senate special election around Barack Obama’s universal health care plan.

You see, Obama’s plan borrowed much conceptually from Massachusetts plan that Ted Kennedy and Mitt Romney worked on. The key concepts: a mandate implemented through the tax code, exchanges, and an increase in the regulatory burden on insurance plans and therefore costs. Indeed, the costs of health care in Massachusetts are rising and people are dissatisfied.

Read on …

Peter Suderman wrote at the Daily Caller that the costs of Massachusetts health care are already 20% higher than projected three-and-a-half years ago when it was passed::

And in summer 2009, the state announced plans to drop coverage for 30,000 legal immigrants with a goal of cutting $130 million in health-care expenses.

One problem the state has faced is that it failed to accurately anticipate the true cost of the program. At the time the program was signed into law, estimates indicated that the cost of Commonwealth Care, which is responsible for the program’s biggest single cost, its health insurance subsidies, would be about $725 million per year. But by 2008, those projections had been revised. New estimates indicated that the plan was to cost $869 million in 2009 and $880 million 2010, an upwards increase of nearly 20 percent.

In November, Rasmussen found that only 32% of the state, less than Democratic registration, agreed with the statement that the reform had been a success. Brian Faughnan wrote at the Daily Caller that Democratic polling firm Democracy Corps is finding a deep rejection of Democratic health care plans. It is unclear how different Massachusetts is from the national pattern on this issue.

However, by nationalizing this race around universal health care of the Massachusetts model, albeit with the Obama label, Massachusetts voters finally have the option to express their feelings about their own health care plan in addition to the national plan. This could end up being a strategic blunder of the first order. Hopefully the exit polls will give us the opportunity to discern the degree to which this is the case.

COMMENTS

  • 1stRichard

    Mass Care would be good but in places like Mass, the whole state is blue, there is no balance of power, it is very corrupt. I have talked about this with Jennifer Nassour, now Chairman of the Mass GOP that was a Romney aid at the time. Trust me, I am no fan of Romney and I maintain the stance that he had should have been much stronger against many things. Jennifer Nassour has the argument that it was impossible in such a one sided state and it could have been much worse, I tend to agree with this. However, it has gotten worse, additional mandates and with people and companies voting with their feet, it has made it much worse. With any luck we may be on the way to restoring some of the much needed balance, turn Mass Care back in to healthcare and not the corrupt welfare it has become. Brown has said many times in his campaign that the one size fits all from a federal healthcare is wrong. I was surprised to see a bit if Reagan Conservatism from a Mass politician, people do get to vote with their feet. Overall, Mass healthcare is an example of what happens when we do not have balance. There are many misconceptions out there and this is much more complicated then many think.

    • 6eorge Jetson

      That part is not complicated.

      Had she brought more than “I’m the Democrat” to the race, I don’t think we’d be discussing this.

      But given that Coakley let it become competitive, I agree with the notion that all politics is local, and that the within-the-margin-of-error dynamics of Scott Brown’s views versus Coakley’s “I’m the Democrat” emptiness is more complicated than what we outsiders can distill in a few generalizations.

      And that’s good for Brown. Great, Scott!

    • http://www.helpawhiteguy.com livefreenh

      A governor’s hands are tied in a place like Mass. because the fact is that the lawmakers make the laws, not the Governor.

      This is the US model as well, and the only reason it’s called Obamacare is because our lawmakers are following the leader, that is, they are representing Obama instead of representing We the People.

      I believe that if someone like Ron Paul had been elected president he would have had similar troubles trying to drag the Congress along to bend to the will of The People. In Massachusetts, Romney was understandably confused what the will of the people might have been.

    • Marcus_Traianus

      I am certainly no fan of RomneyCare. Nor am I here to defend him. Nonetheless, the current Mass. health care model is much different than what was originally envisioned/passed. I suppose this speaks in many ways to the reasons why government should not be involved directly with health care. As times goes on, it grows exponentially out of control.

      I personally believe this may be mostly about not wanting Obamacare; period. Mass.Care has about a 98% enrollment rate and people in Medicare are generally happy/don’t want to lose what they have. Combined with higher costs, loss of coverage, rationed care and all the other despicable things in Obama’s bill- the Massachusetts voters don’t want it, like almost everyone else in this country.

  • piratecoastbucs

    Read your headline and tell me if it makes sense… It’s one thing to be an opinionated site, it’s another to represent an ideal and make everyone involved look like an idiot by not checking your grammar.

    • USNJIMRET
    • Alberta
    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.

      • IJB
        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

          I picked the scariest, most destructive force I knew of, and used the name of its leader as my Quake 2 name.

          Donna Shalala.

          • piratecoastbucs

            When things that are so important are on the line, little things like grammar matter, especially when it is going to be used as ammo on the left.. Mock me if you feel the need, but it will not impress any liberal who already likes to mock RED STATE Americans as not being intelligent. They will take anything and everything they possibly can to win, INCLUDING THIS!

          • piratecoastbucs

            Nice!

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            The nit uses “lol” as well.

  • hampa

    There are hospitals in Boston that will not accept patients who are covered by Mass Health.
    They do assist them to find a hospital that will. I don’t know if they charge for that assistance

  • http://nanosecondinv.proboards.com/index.cgi? irondiopriest

    ….that the Left’s attempt at taking over the health care system and redefining every citizen’s relationship to government is in jeopardy – because the seat occupied by Ted Kennedy for decades might go to a Republican?… AND, that Ted Kennedy died before the realization of his legislative dream, making this special election in his home state what appears to be the deciding factor?… AND, the very special election that will decide the fate of this legislative agenda is being held in the one state that has already experienced a governmental health care takeover, and has had a few years of living under it?

    The ironies here are very rich. It has developed into a converging series of events that could hardly punctuate the distaste Americans have for this debacle any more succinctly.

    • earthmover

      That Ted Kennedy’s death leads not to the passage of Obamacare, but it’s demise.

      • http://www.helpawhiteguy.com livefreenh

        I don’t know of many people who could have had more plentiful healthcare at any cost, and yet he too died.

        So would his life and health been any better if Obamacare had been in force at the time? No, and it probably would have been worse, on the outside chance that elected officials were required to participate.

        How about Michael Jackson, speaking of dead rich people? No amount of healthcare could save him either, at any cost.

        So are we talking about healthcare here? Or are we talking about…. ahhh yes. Follow the money trail.

  • dnlchisholm

    Win or lose, Mitt?s getting some credit for Brown?s big MO: htp://mittromneycentral.com/2010/01/17/win-or-lose-mitts-getting-some-credit-for-browns-big-mo/

  • jano4

    Being a devout catholic, and considering all of Teddy’s trancretions with the church, could this be the Lord working in mysterious ways?

    • JadedByPolitics

      …….

    • medicineman

      Also the name of a Matthew Sweet song, I’m never amazed how things work out.

      I remember taking a bike ride the day after the election. It was beautiful here in Western Michigan. It was sunny and about 65. Eventhough I was down, I had this inner sense and feeling that everything would be O.K. because God is in control.

      What has happened in this year (being a part of the 9/12 project and going to D.C., seeing how people are rising up) makes me realize that nothing happens in Gods world by mistake.

  • sarge324

    massachusetts will start the great migration of americans,just like they did at the boston massacre.to the american that believes in freedom in 1776 to 2010.live liberty,and the pursuit of happiness will aways be at the forefront of the american life.god bless you massachusetts.

  • ctyankee44

    All we have to do is drive all the nails home.

    PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE go to the polls and VOTE Brown!

    The message this sends will be unmistakable.