<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/soren_dayton/2010/12/21/the-green-movement-of-no/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:17:25 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The green movement of no</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[The Washington Post has a great story about the meltdown of the green movement. It is about the need of the movement to refocus because, at a critical point, voters &amp;#8212; you &amp;#8212; rejected their ideas and the people who carried their water in Washington and in the state capitals. What really struck me was that the Sierra Club is shifting focus from raising the cost of energy in Washington to raising it in the states and making less of it:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:23:22 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Soren Dayton]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/soren_dayton/2010/12/21/the-green-movement-of-no-n37404</link></item></channel></rss>