<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/soren_dayton/2011/11/07/nyt-editorial-page-editor-struggles-to-examine-the-record-on-voter-fraud/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 02:32:04 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>NYT Editorial Page Editor struggles to examine the record on voter fraud (UPDATED)</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[For a number of reasons, I tend to avoid claims of media bias, as I am often reminded of Silberman&amp;#8217;s Law, from Rumsfeld&amp;#8217;s Rules, that notes that we often overstate &amp;#8220;conspiracy,&amp;#8221; while &amp;#8220;underestimat[ing] incompetency and fortuity.&amp;#8221; However, I have trouble explaining this one any other way. The New York Times editorial page editor, Andy Rosenthal, says, &amp;#8220;A half-dozen times or so I’ve asked followers of my Twitter feed for examples of voter fraud – particularly of a scale that would justify erecting barriers against whole groups of voters. Haven’t gotten any.&amp;#8221; Now, this was the first that I had heard of it because, well, I don&amp;#8217;t follow Mr. Rosenthal. However, I am not convinced that I will start following him, as he seems unequipped with the basic tools of research.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:35:56 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Soren Dayton]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/soren_dayton/2011/11/07/nyt-editorial-page-editor-struggles-to-examine-the-record-on-voter-fraud-n41049</link></item></channel></rss>