« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The race has shifted as the general public has started to pay attention

Peggy Noonan is right, but maybe a little late in noticing it

The incomparable Peggy Noonan is right. There has been a perceptible shift in the presidential election.

She just may be a little later than we normally would expect her to be in noticing it.

In today’s online Wall Street Journal, Noonan writes:

This thing is moving. Things are shifting around a bit. That’s what I see looking back at the past four weeks…

For the first time the idea began to take hold that John McCain can win this thing. You saw the USA Today-Gallup poll this week, with Mr. McCain gaining six points since late June among those Gallup dubbed likely voters. Mr. McCain took the lead, 49% to 45%. Among registered voters, it’s still Barack Obama, 47% to 44%. A poll came out saying people are tired of hearing about Mr. Obama. Mr. McCain took the lead in YouTube hits. Small stuff, and there will be a lot of twists and turns before this is over, but there’s movement down there beneath the crust of the Earth…

There’s a thing that’s out there and it’s big, and latent, and somehow always taken into account and always ignored, and political professionals always assume they understand it. It has been called many things the past 50 years, “the silent center,” “the silent majority,” “the coalition,” “the base.” The idea of it has evolved as its composition has evolved, but the fact that it’s big, and relatively silent, and somehow always latent, maintains. And watching that McCain event—vroom vroom—one got the sense it is perhaps beginning to pay attention to the campaign. I see it as the old America, and if and when it reasserts itself, the campaign will shift indeed, and in ways you can even see from 10,000 feet.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121813852996621575.html?mod=todays_columnists

All campaigns ebb and flow, and this one has been no different. In fact, given all the hype, it has been remarkable in just how conventional this election has turned out to be. Battles will be fought on the same turf as 2000 and 2004, and the same issues and presentations of them will be debated and made.

The left-wing media bias has been more pronounced this time, of course. If this has paid any dividends for Sen. Barack Obama it is difficult to ascertain. In fact, if the bias has paid dividends Obama is in serious trouble if this is the best it can buy him.

The exact moment when a campaign turns or tightens is difficult to pinpoint. When historians look back at this election, they may decide that moment happened during the primary when the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and the “clinging to their guns and Bibles” tapes surfaced. After that happened, Obama went on to lose eight of the next 13 contests against his primary opponent, Sen. Hillary Clinton. Observors might decide the shift was more recent and was a backlash to Obama’s presumptuous Middle Eastern and European tour.

I suspect, and God knows this is probably wrong, that Obama could have lost this election the night he secured the nomination. Rather than lay out specific proposals and the direction in which he intended to take the nation, he reverted to platitudes about “hope” and “change” and even managed to assure his fans that this marked the night oceans would recede. In other words, he continued to act as a celebrity rather than a serious candidate.

As Peggy Noonan wrote, “Middle America,” “The Silent Majority,” whatever you choose to call it, started to ask about whether there was a there there outside of the lofty rhetoric. Obama’s qualifications started to be questioned outside of the left-wing echo chamber. The last few months have resolved nothing, answered nothing, and clarified little about Obama.

Anyone who claims they know as a certainty how this election will turn out is a fool. It is no surprise most of those claims are made by the Left.

Sen. John McCain has started to show he has the determination to win. For many of us, this was the unanswered question about him. His campaign has shown a new discipline, McCain has stayed on message, and the senator has surprised many of us with his willingness to combat the lies and distortions that emanate from his so-called “friends” in the MSM and the political Left.

The cheering motorcyclists Noonan referenced symbolized the distillation of several things–the increased uncertainty about Obama, the increased determination of McCain, and the public’s increased focus on this election.

Most Americans aren’t like those of us who participate in campaigns, visit and contribute to Internet blogs, and participate in political rallies. No, they go to work, raise children, and a short time out from an election decide who will get their vote. That is a good thing, really, because it means most Americans aren’t so wrapped up in partisan politics that they can’t make a dispassionate, rational choice. Of course, their decision will be based on events they didn’t really notice at the time that led up to the point where a decision had to be made. Some time ago, Obama was the master of those events. He no longer is.

That, my friends, bodes well for the McCain camp.

COMMENTS

  • janis

    tardiness on this, I think that she, like so many of the usual pundits, doesn’t want to go out on a limb against the prevailing wisdom that this guy’s got it in the bag.
    She’s not as out of touch as often as so many of the “conservative” pundits are, but all of them could do with some prolonged time in flyover country.

    Most of us out here in the hinterlands know a phony when we see one. As infuriated as I have been with JMac, he is the real deal, warts and all. Americans tend to value experience over hope and proven values over change. Obama represents nothing more than the triumph of identity politics—and, hopefully, his loss in November may at long last represent an opportunity for real change in the Democrat party.

    • mbauer

      Obama could have lost this election the night he secured the nomination. Rather than lay out specific proposals and the direction in which he intended to take the nation, he reverted to platitudes about “hope” and “change”

      I do a lot of lurking at left liberal sites- fivethirtyeight.com being one of my favorites.

      Never ever ever ever ever EVER is the central point of discussion policy, how it works and why. Always it’s about feeling, hatred of the right. They will never be main stream until they do more than hope their big ideas will work. Analysis of every step and ramification of a process must be the left’s greatest weakness.

  • Susannah

    This is a very well-written diary. Recommended!!

    By the way, I agree Spainishirish that Obama had actually started to lose the GE during the Democratic primary when Reverend Wright first surfaced, and Obama’s infamous “bitter comments” came to light. However, if Obama does go on to lose the GE, I think that, in retrospect, the arrogance of his “European Vacation” might have put the final nail in his coffin.

  • Volunteer

    Spanisirish.
    Faith and begorragh a great post.
    My Opine. Obama lost it when the Silent Electorate found out who was actually running his show. When he paraded his kids in front of the Media and then recanted within 24 hours. the die was cast. Folks began to understand that his campaign was not his, rather a cadre of Soros generated money operatives and the Leftist of the 60s. A few sites opened the door to the funders, controllers, and directors of his teams that are already planning the Oval Office take over. The Net sites focused on the controllers and thier direct influence on his campaign, his speeches, his tours and the future he planned for the USA.IE: a Leftist Sovietiezed USA.
    This opened door sealed his election.
    end

  • Rod_Patrick

    Highly recommended!

    You have explicitly stated what seems to be NOT SO OBVIOUS to many people including us:

    1. Almost half of the majority [the other half are the partisans] are more skeptic and non-partisan…but they still possess the wisdom of great, older America;

    2. That Great American people, i.e., the Governed, are more powerful than any of us,the partisans. I agree. May I add they are far more potent even against the MSM. They are resilient. They are the people whom we should all serve; and,

    3. This non-partisan group is beginning to see the wisdom of voting for McCain.

    In conclusion, McCain can really win this election… as long as he continues and sharpens his policies and programs to serve the greater majority of the people, especially the non-partisan. Votes of the pure-blooded reps/cons are not enough.

    I am really proud of McCain admonishing the members of the Congress to cut short their vacation and join the GOP Revolt in the House to once and for all address the energy crisis and serve the interest of the people. THIS KIND OF PARTISAN ACTION OF THE reps/cons is what catches the attention of the the general majority of the people… a kind of partisan campaign that directly serves the interests of the people.

  • tankertodd

    Don’t know how I could do that…late night dinners and early morning Guinnesses! :-)

    I’ve been out on a limb for awhile predicting McCain will win big. The trend is built into the race because of external events – improving economy but international unrest – and the poor quality of the Democratic candidate.

    I think a California win is also possible if things stay more or less the same. Californians may be crazy but they’re not stupid.

  • FrankLucia

    My friend thinks Obama is going with a really out-of-the-box pick, like Cantwell or Herseth.

  • spainishirish

    Obama will poll slightly better while he is on vacation and out of the spotlight. He does great as a concept and poorly as an actual candidate. Unfortunatley for the very junior senater from Illinois, democracies elect flesh and blood people and that great apolitical middle does pay attention to resumes and accomplishments.

    Once he gets back into the public arena and bleats banalities, Obama’s numbers will fall again. Unless the Obama campaign can find a way to run him as an idea rather than as a man, he is in trouble. McCain needs to hit the man hard while he is invisible to soften the ground for when Obama gets back on the trail to lecture us about tire pressure and what we should eat.

  • IJB

    McCain will not win CA.

    No Republican will win in CA, likely for a long time (until the underlying demographics change in a significant way, and the loony, loony people who live in all the coastal communities here (esp. the Bay Area) disappear from the face of the earth).

    I would encourage any national republican to steer clear of CA – it’s worth neither the time nor the effort.

    (If you’re going to target any west coast state, the only one worth any effort is OR, and even that is a long-shot.)