« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM! – For them not us.

Perspective and Principle

*The perspective of an individual is more often shaped by their skewed perceptions, not their objective observation.
*A principle is something that was, is, and always will be true.

Conservatives shouldn’t be giving in to Romney just yet

Given the state of the primary so far… I’m not so convinced that Mitt Romney is the worst of the pack by ideology, rhetoric, or record.

However, based on Principle, I’m supporting Rick Perry, because I trust him to boldly govern by conservative principles. Out of all of the candidates, his record and rhetoric squares the circle better than any other candidate in the field. I still believe this is true, even with his most recent egregious strategy to go after Romney with a populist’s class warfare argument.  Elections are elections. I disagree with the strategy, but I still believe Rick Perry is the best conservative in the pack.The media have done their part to dismiss him in the eyes of voters. The campaign handlers have done their part to fail in their messaging. The candidate has done his part to make mistakes along the way.

I am part of the “Anti-Romney” crowd by default, because I am Pro-Perry.  As such I have to recognize that time is short, and Romney has momentum that can’t be ignored. If I were a weak-minded fearful cuss, I’d likely accept the narrative of Mitt Romney’s inevitability. But I won’t. However, any other conservative out there should be aware, that if consolidation doesn’t happen sooner rather than later, Romney wins. It’s that simple.

The fact is this primary season is different, and nobody has been looking at the process. Primarily because we’re all caught up in the very dangerous game of attempting to bend reality to the narrative. This primary season has gone from weak arguments of electability to even weaker arguments of inevitability. With the first 4 major primaries completed by January 31st 8PM EST, we’re left with the presumed ‘inevitable’ nominee. THIS IS NONSENSE.

  • 1,142 Delegates is what is needed to win the G.O.P. nomination before convention.
    • The first 4 events leads to a total of 115 delegates (that’s with the penalties of moving primaries up)

 

  • Super Tuesday isn’t so super this year.
    • Total delegates available at the end of “Super Tuesday” is 874… Romney will not be getting 100% of all delgates up to this date.
    • Super Tuesday also includes states that are less likely to pull a New Hampshire, and back a squish based on “electability” arguments.
    • There are some caucus events between Florida and Super Tuesday that will likely not get a lot of media attention regardless of the results, rather I’m predicting that televised debates, and narrative will be the biggest factor in this period.

 

  • There’s only 1 thing that causes a conservative candidate to drop out. Lack of Money.
    • Consolidation will happen, because eventually someone is going to foolishly lose their mind and then become untenable to the conservative electorate.
    • I’m going to go ahead and predict that South Carolina will not be the hill to die on for Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, or Rick Santorum, or even Jon Hunstman Jr. They’ll each have enough in the war chest to go on to Florida, and likely ride things out to Super Tuesday at least before they are winnowed down to 1-2 conservative alternatives.

A word concerning the Weeping, Wailing, and Gnashing of Teeth

Some conservatives are giving up. Some out of desperation are flailing about with all the negative they can, hoping that Romney will be hurt by populism, or hoping that the other “conservative alternatives” will drop out making this a 2-man and a Loon race. Look folks… consolidation will happen… the question is, when it does… will it have been too late?

I have had enough of the ridiculous bemoaning that has been going on lately. We can NOT allow the media to shape the narrative. Are you so FEARFUL that you’re willing to give in? They want to use YOUR fear, YOUR doubts, YOUR ignorance to drive you to do silly things, such as MAKE LEFTIST ARGUMENTS AGAINST CAPITALISM… Are we that desperate? I think not!

Let’s attempt to view things objectively for a moment.

Should Mitt Romney become the G.O.P. nominee, it will be the DUTY of EVERY FREEDOM LOVING, LIBERTY EMBRACING, CONSERVATIVE OF ANY STRIPE, to not only vote for Mitt Romney, but to DONATE, AND WORK WITH THE FURY OF FIRE FROM THE SKY to get him elected. Why? Because the alternative choice is President Obama for 4 more years.

This country has LOST THE SENSES IT WAS BORN WITH! All it took was 3 years of a hell bent socialist-reformer™ in the office of President of The United States to change the narrative of political battles of “how do we make the country better” to “how do we keep from driving off the cliff”. The arguments went from “socialism vs. capitalism” to “fairness vs. wealth”. Your everyday American can’t make the distinction, because your everyday American most likely isn’t wealthy… so naturally they’re going to assume that they side with “fairness”.

If the choice is between a “vulture capitalist” and a “socialist-reformer™”… I’m gonna take the vulture capitalist and be darn glad I had a choice. I’m not defending Romney or Bain here, I’m defending capitalism. There simply is no excuse for any conservative that tries to make Bain the Bane of Romney’s existence. Romney had a successful career at Bain, he did turnarounds, and slash and burns… but as an unapologetic believer in freedom and liberty… let me say this…

There is a whole lot of piss poor analysis going on. Some of it may even be dishonest attacks by ignorance or arrogance. When Romney spent his private sector career building wealth with his ability to make an enterprise prosperous or break it down and sell it off for profit… it really has little to do with job creation or destruction.

Economics is what drives job creation and job destruction. Government and Private sectors are but vehicles in the process. Capital destruction processes are just as necessary to economic systems as termites in a forest of dead wood.

The TRUTH is going after Romney and Bain is a POPULIST ARGUMENT no matter how you dice it. This is the problem with comparing a private sector record with a governance record. Romney’s comparison of Bain to GM is appropriate… the difference is, had the GM bailout been structured by Bain and not the Government. A capital investment firm would have not negotiated for the Unions, they’d have restructured the company without throwing the shareholders with preferred shares under the bus, they would have been subjected to bankruptcy laws, and all precedents in the exchange. Unlike how Obama made the tax payers the creditors, and handed the company over to the Unions, and knew going into the deal, that they were just kicking the can down the road.

The REAL Alternative

That’s just it… Obama’s plan is ‘kick the can down the road’ on any issue that can’t be fixed without inflicting some real pain on people, his plan is to kick the can down the road, and get Republicans to agree to more spending out of necessity to keep things moving. Look I’m not heartless. I’m not rich. I’m not envious. And I’m certainly not persuaded by arguments of false charity, false hope, and false faith. But I have to say it, LIBERTY CAN’T EXIST WITHOUT OPPOSITION. You CAN’T enjoy the merits of opportunity, without the realities of risk, failure, and pain.

THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A JOB. So reserve your moral judgements for moral issues. Any Job that exists… exists because someone had the liberty to innovate, create, and pursue their happiness. Government can’t exist without generating revenue from its citizens. I have empathy to those that lose their jobs. However, I don’t blame any capitalist for turning profits in any way they can, while the government does nothing to seriously put a stop to the unethical practices through damn fine policy and legislation. If you want to prevent ALL situations where someone might lose a job… You may as well have joined the socialist team. Giving credence to these narratives of the media is giving credence to their creeds of a socialist nature.

Folks sometimes you have to rely on the fact that the sparrow doesn’t fall without the Father(Matthew 10:29), and when considering the lilies of the field (Luke 12:27) in all their non-spinning and non-toiling, even Solomon was not arrayed like one of these. Populism is not conservatism. Conservatism is based on principles. It’s based on life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I’m not defending Bain or any other capital firm for practices that may be unethical when you live in a Joe Biden Recession/Depression. I’m am talking about the fact that WE SHOULDN’T be involved in this narrative AT ALL. IN NO WAY is it appropriate. Joining the stream of the narrative, effectively causes us to lose sight of what is important. It causes us to view things from a very skewed perception. The more skewed our perceptions are, the more our ignorance will blind us to what is really important.

Maybe the ignorance of my youthful idealism is blinding me to the fact that we should somehow be supporting populism, anti-capitalist, and class warfare views… This narrative is exactly the medicine the media wants us to take. It deflates the T.E.A. Party, It presents Obama as a caring, nurturing, bleeding heart for the ‘little guy’ that got laid off, and had to either find another job with his current skillset, or re-tool the skillset, and go after a diffferent job. Well LA-DEE-FRICKIN’ DAH… I’m 31 and have already had to face economic realities of job loss, poor employment opportunities, and having to move from state to state, losing the value of my home to a vacuum created by the housing bubble…I don’t blame capitalists… I blame the government regulation and legislation that led to INTERVENTION of the Free Market. Call me quixotic, but I don’t have time to misdirect my energies on “Government Solutions”… I want a President that will make the best decisions from a conservative view, not from a socialist’s view.

This election is about DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM for them… Not us…

*WE NEED TO REMEMBER THAT* Conversely THEIR ONLY WINNING STRATEGY… is to cause the base to become discouraged, demoralized, disaffected, and disengaged. If Obama wins re-election, it will be due to failure to turn out the vote… if the enthusiasm to vote against him is removed… then the incumbency wields the victory.

*IF* Mitt Romney is the Nominee… I’m prepared to fight the good fight for his election. What I’m not prepared to do is give up on nominating the most conservative candidate that we can. We do that by convincing every person we know that is age 55 and above that votes Republican to vote conservative, and not for the tall guy with the nice hair.

COMMENTS

  • pjpetzold

    I’m an ardent Perry supporter. I will not vote for Romney. I will not vote for any of the other liberal republicans running. If we can’t manage to nominate an actual conservative as our nominee, then I have to questioned how many Republicans are actually bothered by Obama’s policies, and not just by the name of his Party. Why support candidates who have supported the individual mandate in the past? Or who have said that earmarks aren’t so bad? No, I would suggest instead that supporting known liberal candidates, with records PROVING their support of left wing policies isn’t a duty of conservatives but instead a betrayal of the very virtues they themselves claim to love so dearly. No Compromise. Perry or Bust 2012.

    • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

      I must be so dumb, and dense that I can’t see the point of handing Obama the election…

      so please, enlighten me, explain how uncompromising hyperbole and sitting back on your “virtues” will ever improve conditions generally?

      Every inch of ground ceded to anti-liberty, or progressive socialism in anyway serves any purpose but to cause misery among the children of men?

      You seem to have an odd sense of Duty…

      Don’t confuse Duty with some ridiculous notion that shrugging Atlas’ shoulder is going to resolve anything…

      I should wonder when you expect to see a nation rise again like the one we already have. Is America not worth fighting for?

      I’m sorry but I find your view to ignorant… by all means, I’m open to being proved otherwise if you can.

      • pjpetzold

        I agree entirely with you entirely in that it is inexcusable to give ground to those who hate our liberty and have a socialist agenda. That is precisely the reason I can’t bring myself to vote for another liberal Republican. How was Romneycare not Socialist? Gingrich isn’t innocent of supporting the individual mandate either and I see nothing in Santorum’s record to show me that he would be in any way inclined to get spending under control. My point is that while this country may, by some miracle, be able to survive another Obama presidency, I do not fool myself into believing that should the Republicans fail to deliver on their promises of smaller government when we are next elected, that we will be given the opportunity to repeat that mistake again.Then we would be forced to watch helplessly as our once Great Nation crumbled under mounting incompetency and debt.

        • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

          My point is that while this country may, by some miracle, be able to survive another Obama presidency, I do not fool myself into believing that should the Republicans fail to deliver on their promises of smaller government when we are next elected, that we will be given the opportunity to repeat that mistake again.Then we would be forced to watch helplessly as our once Great Nation crumbled under mounting incompetency and debt.

          This view can only be based upon the presuming that a definitive lurch to the left by a leftist, is better than a potential slide to the left through failed policies that may or may not come back to haunt the G.O.P.?

          The choice is simple then isn’t it? Either let the leftist win now, or win later. Your choice.

      • pttx333

        you’re caught between two of those moby thingies. You know what I mean?

    • joshdunn

      You sound like you work for the Campaign to Re-Elect Obama.

      We have a clear, stark choice here: Romney is for reducing taxes, Obama is for raising them. Romney is pro-life, Obama is a Margaret Sanger disciple (pro-abortion, pro-infanticide). Obama is for gay marriage (he’s being a little coy about this but there is a reason why all of the gay rights organizations are giving him money and are trash talking Romney).

      If you can’t see the difference, then I don’t believe that you are conservative at all.

  • pjpetzold

    The problem lies in nominating someone who you have strong reason to believe will lurch to the left. I’m not saying we should never again nominate a moderate. But right now we can not afford to lose the confidence of the American people by nominating someone who will toe the same line as those we claim to oppose. The only way to WIN is to nominate a conservative. Why would you want to nominate someone likely to slide to the left in any case?

    • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

      What part of

      *IF* Mitt Romney is the Nominee? I?m prepared to fight the good fight for his election. What I?m not prepared to do is give up on nominating the most conservative candidate that we can. We do that by convincing every person we know that is age 55 and above that votes Republican to vote conservative, and not for the tall guy with the nice hair.

      Did you not understand?

      • pjpetzold

        As I can’t see the sense in supporting a liberal in the white house, just because he’s less liberal than another and is a part of a different political party. I may be wrong. It could be that any or all of the other candidates really HAVE seen the light and become true conservatives. If that’s the case and they win, then I’ll be the first to donate to their reelection campaign. But until I see an actual conservative record to back up their talk, I will not vote for them.

        • jakeofalltrades

          his death panels will kill you?

          Seriously: vote or die.

          • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

            no text.

  • morstar150

    He’s done. Finished. It’s over. Stop crying. He is not the answer.

    • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

      nt.

      • morstar150

        but it still doesn’t change the fact that Perry is not a good choice. Your argument doesn’t hold up no matter how many times you repeat it. I agree that it would be nice to vote for the most conservative candidate. One could argue that Ron Paul fits that slot, but I won’t be voting for him either. I may vote for a conservative as a last act of defiance to a Republican Party Elite that has once again taken the conservative voter for granted, but it will not be Rick Perry. I can give you three good reasons why but I can only remember two. Nuf said!

        • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

          It’s not my problem if you’re incapable of mustering the attention span necessary to get through the diary.

          One could argue Ron Paul — SQUIRREL!

          Sorry… one could also spend time thinking of witty ways to say… “I don’t really have anything to say, I just wanted to dig at something to see if it annoyed you.”…

          So by all means, let’s just start with your *two* arguments.

          You could also avoid this non-sense and just tell me why you think Newt Gingrich would be the better conservative candidate.

          But you can’t… and therein lies my advantage. Because unlike yourself, I READ things BEFORE I make judgements.

  • morstar150

    All you have left is with Perry is the right to vote voice a protest vote. That is fine in the Republican Primary, but do not protest against the eventual nominee (whomever that is) when it comes time to make a choice between socialism and capitalism, between the expansion of government and downsizing this bloated govenment.

    • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

      notext

      • jakeofalltrades

        I thought it was against the site rules to read before commenting…

        • jakeofalltrades

          n/t

          • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

            nt

          • jakeofalltrades

            but one of our fellow site-dwellers has proven today that his/her delicate feelings will shatter in the absence of sarc tags.

      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

        .

    • pttx333

      assuming you are a trial lawyer protecting your own nest? Especially if you are from Texas?

      Just curious.

      • pttx333

        m

        • morstar150

          My problem with Rick Perry has nothing to do with his stance on lawyers. I am a lawyer, I don’t know how you know that but that doesn’t make me the devil. I could go into a long discussion about law and what is wrong with the legal system in this country but that is not the point.

          Rick Perry May be a great guy. I actually was supporting him until I heard him speak. I will try not to be insulting. He is the governor of one of the greatest states in the nation and he deserves respect for that, but in the arena of national politics a candidate better be prepared to deal with a bias media. He has shown that he is not up to the task.

          And gentlemen, I think we can just agree to disagree.

  • luvnthebigsites

    This quote did wake me up though:

    “We can NOT allow the media to shape the narrative.”

    Epic statement deserving praise. /salute

    Keep em’ coming.

    G’night. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz

    • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

      always appreciate the feedback… I plan to unwind in February, there’s really not much to catch between Jan. 31st and Super Tuesday…

  • SoFiMil

    The exit polls and actual returns in non-panhandle Florida “clearly” showed Gore in a landslide. One of Rove’s most lasting achievements was mitigating somewhat, albeit slightly, the MSM’s rush to proclaim Gore the winner in November 2000.

    *If* people had gone out to vote regardless of what the MSM was proclaiming as an inevitable fact, Bush would have won FL by several % , and also won New Mexico, and probably a few other states.

    Let’s continue to ignore the Debbie Downers.

  • freedomthink

    How can everyone sit here and debate conservative records and principles and not mention Ron Paul? He is the most conservative person we have seen in this country since Goldwater. And not this neoconservatism either, where we call for empire yet somehow try to lessen spending, that is an impossible joke.

    None of the candidates hold a candle to the actual plans that Paul has to decrease the size of government, a trillion in the first year! If anyone other than Paul is elected, we can rest assured that we will see more of the same. ALL of them are puppets and are beholden to one special interest or another.

    • APA Guy

      Good grief…there is more to being president than cutting government. Ron Paul is a disaster on too many things important to the country.

      • pttx333

        joined by his bud below this post who has been insulting a lot of folks here. I’m certain that neither of them will listen to anything rational that is posted here. Just a heads up, friend.

        • APA Guy

          Won’t waste another moment dignifying their ravings with responses :)

          • pttx333

            learned to spot the b*stards a mile off! You learn to detect that distinct foul stench that precedes them. ;-)

            Looks like avagreen has one of her famous posts below with all sorts of good stuff on Ron Paul.

          • APA Guy

            cuttlefish… flipper conories little sausages :)

            I’m off to spy the fun below. Thanks again for looking out for a fellow conservative!

          • pttx333

            world will go down the tubes.

            Don’t know where the mods are. This dude No Longer Perry is posting everywhere … really, really a pest and very mouthy. Maybe you can take him down a few feet. He’s really full of himself.

            Thanks guy!

    • avagreen

      How about this Paul fans?

      http://www.americanindependent.com/160697/ron-paul-one-of-only-four…

      And, this?

      http://www.haaretz.com/news/u-s-elections-2012/ron-paul-is-not-anti…

      Or,

      http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/12/ronpaulussh…

      or,

      http://ace.mu.nu/archives/325080.php

      God forbid that this man should ever become president, or his followers become a majority. The man who stood by and watched a live abortion and saw the baby weighing 2lbs cry and gasp for air after it was tossed into a bucket until it died. WHAT DID HE DO BESIDES LOOK AT IT??? SURE HE’S AGAINST ABORTION NOW……..THAT DOESN’T HELP TAHT BABY!

      THIS IS THE MAN YOU ALL WANT FOR PRESIDENT??

      He on record stating that he would have stood by during World War II and let the Holocaust happen. Sure, he might believe that Israel has a right to self-defense?and as President he would stand by and watch them burn without U.S. military support, money, or weapons. Great guy, that Ron Paul.

      • Scope

        a caring, compassionate, defender of the right to life person would be sickened by. The Paulies are emotionally numb, and care only about a person having the right to do with their bodies, which is their own personal property, to do as they please.

      • pttx333

        If he cannot honor his own Hippocratic Oath, how in the hell could anyone assume that he would honor any other oath??? I cannot even think of enough words to describe such a despicable man! Maybe I should consult with some sailors and get their advice …

        ava’ – I’m going to dive into your posts that you are so famous for – and I am so thankful for both you and my dear friend Scope for educating those who are not so blind that they refuse to see (there is no hope for them!).

        God bless you both in all that you do, dear friends.

        • Scope

          but, he still has his medical license because of two names Roe and Wade. I’m sure that is one SC decision he agreed with. Hey it’s a personal choice of what you do with your body, or any life growing within it.

          If the creep believes that property owners should be allowed to do as they wish with their owned real estate, including building a mosque at Ground Zero, with those that want to kill us in mass, do you think he cares about one tiny little living soul? When he says that we should never have gotten involved in stopping the barbaric killing of the Jews by Hitler, do you think he cares about one tine little living being with a soul?

          The creepy old senile guy, along with the fruit he dropped under the tree, must be thrown the hel! out of the Republican party. I saw a clip of a speech he gave just a few days ago. His wife was standing behind him cheering him on. When he finished the speech, to loud cheering and screaming for their master, he ran down the steps, off the stage to go and be among his flock. His wife, also elderly, was not even a part of his realm at that point, and it showed her making her own way down the steps and off the stage. It truly showed the uncaring part of the guy, and the fanaticism of his supporters devotion to him, and his devotion back to them. They were more important than his wife.

          • pttx333

            don’t they play a part in medical licenses? Every single thing that abortionists do is a violation of the Oath they took as a doctor – “First, do no harm …”

            No, I didn’t see that clip, but I don’t doubt for one second that his wife is a brow-beaten, subservient, obedient woman who does as she is told. The shoe fits there … I am familiar with the type, and he should be the poster boy for their particular “club.”

            Have been trying to watch/listen to the Texas straw poll crap but the audio/video is horrible. I did notice that they had a text vote, so we both know who will win – the one we DO NOT want! This so-called straw poll hasn’t gotten much play down here (it is in Houston), couldn’t even find anything in the Houston rag. This is the most vile and dirty thing … but I will stick to my guns and will not give up, relent, back down or waver. I’m “FED UP!”

          • avagreen

            The doddering old guy grew up in a generation when women were subservient to men, especially here in Texas where the good ole’ boys reigned until around the mid ’80′s (the LBJ types). She probably did, too.

            What a total twitchin’ jerk.

          • pttx333

            w

  • No Longer For Perry

    This is a virulently anti-Paul website. Personally, I would NOT vote for him, but most here are super-opposed to him. One poster here even thinks Rand and Ron are putting together some kind of dynasty.

    • APA Guy

      …nut job who would empower nations who would pay to see us (and Israel) blown off the map forever…among other reasons.

      Just a guess…