« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Hope-n-Change Watch: Obama to Bankrupt the Coal Industry!

Staying true to his moniker as most liberal member of the Senate President Obama today, makes good on a campaign promise he made about bankrupting the coal industry.

Here come Carbon Caps

The choice to make the issue a fixture at the task force’s first summit — administration officials asked EDF to hold off on releasing the study so it could coincide with today’s meeting — is meant to grease the path for passing legislation in Congress to create a federal emissions trading system that puts a mandatory cap on carbon dioxide pollution. Such a bill, which Obama has asked for, is sure to meet resistance. It was a non-starter in a Republican Congress, where GOP members said it would decimate the economy and cause job loss. And although Democrats now hold the majority, those representing manufacturing states have held fast to the argument that an emissions cap would harm their local economies.

Remember this?

Let me sort of describe my overall policy.

What I’ve said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else’s out there.

I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.

That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.

The only thing I’ve said with respect to coal, I haven’t been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.

It’s just that it will bankrupt them.

As Dave Hinz said when this video was first released during the campain:

Sen Obama talks about “Cap and Trade” and then goes on to say that under his administration an energy company could build a coal fired power plant, but he guarantees it will be bankrupted for doing it.

Sen Obama is against nuclear power, he is against oil exploration and he is against coal. I have news for everyone, there are not enough windmills to power our present energy needs much less our future energy needs.

This guy is death to the American economy.

Cross-Posted from The Minority Report

COMMENTS

  • izoneguy

    I thought a president of the United States was supposed to work for the people? It seems like Obama is in a war with most of the people?
    Don’t liberals use power also? Don’t they get cold in the winter and hot in the summer just like conservatives? You can talk all you want about green energy but it just doe not magically appear.

    Now all those laws they are passing are just ink on paper and we can make those disappear.

  • Brian Hibbert

    I think he’s a true believer in the cause. Especially when he’s the guy at the top of the pile….

    Of course that is only a guess.

  • Praying

    And it will be entertaining to watch all those successful suburbanites who drive around in their BMWs and voted for Obama because he was cool and hip and said he would bring “change,” wake up to just how much change he is bringing. I don’t think most of them had a clue. $4 gas will seem like a happy memory by the time this cap and trade crap gets enacted. And I love the timing – Obama decides to move forward on Cap and Trade the same week that Al Bore retreated somewhat from his global warming faux science, after he was taken to the task by Roger A. Pielke, Jr., a political scientist focused on disaster trends and climate policy at the University of Colorado. Interestingly, this was reported in the New York Times here: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/23/gore-pulls-slide-of-disaster-trends/?ref=science

  • Aaron Gardner

    but thought that may be too real to be snarky

  • Brian Hibbert

    that we’ll need to repeal the 22nd amendment so Obama can continue the work of reforming this country. Of course he will be the only One capable of carrying out the reform.. Elections will change from secret ballot to an observed vote to make sure that the votes are “counted correctly” because after all, everyone knows that Republicans rig the elections.

    It’s the normal game plan for the left…..

  • janis

    to happen at some point. What I wonder about is all the rich folks that voted for this tinhorn dictator. What happens when their wealth just wafts away under the burden of so many tax increases? Will they still be singing the praises of the Zero who made it so? How about all those slobbering reporters? Their financial ox is going to get gored pretty well, too.

    Something’s got to give somewhere……

  • David123

    since people exhale CO2

  • From ME to You
  • Brian Hibbert

    It is the standard socialist playbook.

    That’s why we HAVE to defeat the Dems in the midterm and defeat Obama in 2012.

  • 6eorge Jetson
  • izoneguy

    http://www.careerjournal.com/article/SB123336500319935517.html

    ….Now, as the Golden State prepares to implement this regulatory scheme, employers are howling. It’s become clear to nearly everyone that the plan’s backers have underestimated its negative impact and exaggerated the benefits. “We’ve been sold a false bill of goods,” is how Republican Assemblyman Roger Niello, who has been the GOP’s point man on environmental issues in the legislature, put it to me.

    The environmental plan was built on the notion that imposing some $23 billion of new taxes and fees on households (through higher electricity bills) and employers will cost the economy nothing, while also reducing greenhouse gases. Almost no one believes that anymore except for the five members of the California Air Resources Board (CARB). This is the state’s air-quality regulator, which voted unanimously in December to stick with the cap-and-trade system despite the recession. CARB justified its go-ahead by issuing what almost all experts agree is a rigged study on the economic impact of the cap-and-trade system. The study concludes that the plan “will not only significantly reduce California’s greenhouse gas emissions, but will also have a net positive effect on California’s economic growth through 2020.”

    This finding elicited a chorus of hallelujahs from environmental groups. The state finally discovered a do-good policy that pays for itself. Californians can still scurry around in their cars, heat up their Jacuzzis, and help save the planet. But there was a problem. The CARB had commissioned five economists from around the country to critique this study. They panned it…………..

    So – as America gets closer to implementing hope & change on a national scale let’s see the howls of protest as Obama’s plans start taking money out of the liberals pockets as well.