Meet Democratic Super-delegate Steven Ybarra.
A man who knows what he wants.
By Moe Lane Posted in 2008 | Barack Obama | Hillary Clinton | superdelegates | The Best Democratic Primary EVER — Comments (11) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
And a man ready to name his price:
DNC Superdelegate Puts His Vote Up For Sale
Steven Ybarra Wants $20 Million For His VoteSACRAMENTO, Calif. (CBS13) ― In this tight battle for the Democratic nomination we've heard a lot about the candidates courting superdelegates.
But, one superdelegate is courting the candidates. He says he'll sell his vote for a price. A very high price: $20 million.
Steven Ybarra of Sacramento says that eight-figure price is peanuts for the presidency.
This is not going to be an attack on Mr. Ybarra, by the way: he's just an example. The real problem for the Democrats are the super-delegates who are being quiet about their special needs.
Read on.
First off, let's establish something: what Mr. Ybarra wants is not precisely a bribe. He's looking to use that 20 million to register Mexican-American Democrats in the Southwest, which is a project that the DNC should be getting involved in. They can't, because Howard Dean spent his Party's cash reserves making Democrats in Montana feel better about being surrounded by all those Republicans, but that's only Ybarra's problem in the abstract. Naturally, he's not really a disinterested party in this: Ybarra wants to be the guy who can hand out the dozen or so jobs that a project like that entails, which will benefit him indirectly, and on a more local level, and in the long run. Put another way: Ybarra is looking to parlay this suddenly-important status of his into increased influence in the California Democratic Party; and he's probably smart enough to do that while being scrupulously remaining within the letter of the law. As he said, it's done all the time.
That's the issue, really.
The Washington Times put out a story today - "Superdelegates hold back" - which is ostensibly about the problems that Hillary Clinton is having getting SDs from districts that she's won to endorse her. Good news for Obama... except that they aren't endorsing him, either. There was a good deal of talk around the blogosphere about how the super-delegates were going to flood over to the junior Senator from Illinois after Tuesday's results, but it's still at the usual trickle. And here's an interesting factoid from the Times:
Of the more than 200 undeclared superdelegates, just 23 are from places that have yet to vote: West Virginia, Kentucky, Oregon, Puerto Rico, South Dakota and Montana.
The Obama campaign is, of course, planning to act as if 50% of pledged delegates will ensure him the nomination (instead of the 62% that the rules actually require*, and which he will not get): it's the best hand that they have to play, particularly now that their run of the demographic tables have not quite put them over the edge. That's for public consumption. What's going to happen in private is that both he and Clinton are going to be carefully, very carefully: finding out the reason why each one of the remaining delegates won't get off the fence; finding out what the price is for getting off the fence; seeing what they can do to get that price; and of course making certain that the people that they've already got off the fence aren't getting restless.
And this will happen all the way to the convention. Bottom line: if the remaining races break 50/50, and even assuming that the Democrats will actually be stupid enough to keep Michigan and Florida from counting, Obama will walk into that convention with about 1,700 guaranteed votes and Clinton with about 1,550. The best of a set of bad choices for the Democratic candidates right now is to lock in as best they can the super-delegates that both need to win this on the first ballot (because nobody - and I mean nobody - knows what will happen if this goes to more than one). It only remains to be seen how many of those super-delegates are like Mr. Ybarra: ready to deal, and already having a hand out.
And how many of them are ready to renegotiate, now that Mr. Ybarra has put the idea in their heads.
Moe Lane
*OK, let's walk through this. You need 2,025 [(4,049/2) + 1] delegates to win, right? There are 3,253 pledged delegates total. The Obama campaign plans to declare victory once they get half of that, or 1,627 pledged delegates. They should get that, no problem. Unfortunately for them, the system has been set up - whether deliberately, accidentally, or some oddball combination of both - to make it the responsibility of the super-delegates to decide if no candidate gets 62% (2,025/3,253) of the pledged delegates.
One thing is for certain: no matter who wins in August, the Democrats are going to drastically overhaul their primary system. It has catastrophically failed in its first real test in forty years; worse, it has embarrassed a good number of people who do not like to be embarrassed in public. Also: this is almost certainly the zenith of Howard Dean's career, and his fall from grace will be surprisingly swift when it comes. Rightly or wrongly, he's the one who will be blamed for this mess.
« Getting just a little testy about West Virginia and Kentucky, are we? — Comments (21) | Economists Back McCain — Comments (15) »
Meet Democratic Super-delegate Steven Ybarra. 11 Comments (0 topical, 11 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
...after Stevie Y does his liberal duty by voluntarily paying 50% of his new riches in taxes, donates another 25% to help foster dependence in the poor, and gives Soros his mandatory vig on all intraparty bribes, the poor guy will be lucky to walk away with a cool million.
--
"We want great men who, when fortune frowns, will not be discouraged." - Colonel Henry Knox
He wants it to go to some foundation that he has set up for GOTV efforts.
Now also found at The Minority Report
ABC is reporting that Obama has just pulled ahead in the super-delegate count 267 to 265, the trend being distinctly in his favor.
Those Super-Delegates aren't locked in to Obama, though they may have made a public statement that they "support" him. They are completely free to change their mind up until the votes are cast. And don't think their public declaration will shame them into keeping their word. All they have to do is point to some gaff that Obama made and say "My commitment was made before I found out about X." and they're gone.
He's got a slight advantage in the apparent votes, but it ain't over till the voting's done.
Socialism doesn't work. It looks nice on paper, but it's been tried and it's failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
To offer the Obama campaign some (unsolicited) advice: if they want to resolve this, there's precisely one person that they need to work on, and that's Hillary Clinton. It's not enough to pull in front of her: they have to beat her. They have to break her heart and make her run, and so far they've failed miserably at it.
Best.
Primary.
EVER.
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
Please, please put your votes on E-Bay, Superdelegates.
I fully expect to see ordinary voters selling their votes on EBay this year.
There's no law against it.
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
I never expected anyone to openly announce it.
for his investment?
because Howard Dean spent his Party's cash reserves making Democrats in Montana feel better about being surrounded by all those Republicans
I.e., Senator Jon Tester. The one who enabled Harry Reid to pick Pat Leahy for Senate Judiciary Chair? (And, in so doing, de facto guaranteed that Justices Stevens and/or Ginzburg need not fear Bush 43 filling their seats with another Roberts or Alito, were they to step down during this Congress).
I'd say Dean got good positive return on his investment in Big Sky country. Good for him and the liberals, that is.
"Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?" (Macaulay)
blog advertising is good for you
Washington Times
Recent comments
Save a tree, don't buy this leftist rag. n/t
by Tim SchiefereckeGolly Wally, Gee Beav. n/t
by Tim SchiefereckeWell then...
by Warner Todd Huston"Based on history, I think
by HearMeRoarNot just women;
by AchanceI think there
by Xraxnd CaracarnGlobal cooling.
by CowboyHousing
by exitsfunnelYou have captured my thoughts exactly.
by Michael HandleyI'll give it a try
by JoliphantHow things have changed
by bsJeff,
by cdmI haven't been back since
by FlagstaffGilmore
by exitsfunnelLooks like just an opinion piece, not a policy statement
by civil truthalright :goes back to studying: nt
by Zombie FlandersRecomended
by JoliphantArticle III, Section 2,
by FlagstaffI read the target is a 10
by Chris-64
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



That though Mr. Ybarra has certainly staked out his corner to walk in the manner of the world's oldest profession, he is distinguished only by the low price he asks.
--
Gone 2500 years, still not PC.