Earmarks in the Amnesty Bill: Trading Votes for Pork

How Sen. Bob Bennett -- and Utah -- Would Benefit

By Bluey Posted in | Comments (20) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

There are all sorts of goodies in Sen. Harry Reid's clay pigeon amendment, but two pork projects -- one in Utah and the other in Alaska -- stand out. Why? Three of the senators who would benefit from the earmarks voted in favor of cloture.

Let's begin in Utah, where Republican Sen. Bob Bennett would get a satellite U.S. attorney office in St. George, Utah. "The primary function of the satellite office shall be to prosecute and deter criminal activities associated with illegal immigrants," reads the amendment. By the way, it's not the only government office in St. George. Bennett has a district office there, too.

Then there's the new Immigration and Customs Enforcement office, which, according to Reid's amendment, would be located "within the vicinity of the intersection U.S. Highway 191 and U.S. Highway 491 to reduce the flow of illegal immigrants into the interior of the United States." It doesn't identify where that intersection is located, so I looked it up. Sure enough, it's Monticello, Utah.

If those projects in Utah aren't enough to raise your suspicion, then there's always Alaska to suit your fancy. Although it's separated from the continental United States, Alaska's pork-loving Republican senators, Ted Stevens Lisa Murkowski, still managed to bring home the bacon. According to Reid's amendment, they'll get a Citizenship and Immigration Services office in Fairbanks, a city that's located in the middle of the state.

You, too, can have fun finding these projects. A searchable version of the clay pigeon amendment is now available on the Heritage Foundation website thanks to the hard work of N.Z. Bear.

« Republican Moderates May Walk Away From Veto ThreatComments (17) | Reid's Rules of OrderComments (13) »
Earmarks in the Amnesty Bill: Trading Votes for Pork 20 Comments (0 topical, 20 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Silly government. by Jon Sandor

If they would just offer me some generous kick-backs I might be persuaded to go along with this as well. But I guess only certain people can get in on this action.

Shocked, Shocked I say by rblack198

That our elected people (leaders is WAY too complimentary and not at all deserved) can be bought and sold SO cheaply. I could run on a platform of "My Price is Higher, I will sell your trust and confidence only to the highest bidder". No fire sale bribes here.

"Cowards cut and run, Marines never do"

US 666 (numbered as such since it was the 6th branch of old US 66) had serious problems because people kept stealing the road signs, so it was renumbered to US 491:

(Leave it to me to find and make a serious road geek reference, heh.)

---
(Formerly known as bee) / Internet member since 1987
Member of the Surreality-Based Community

I live in Utah and this clown is supposed to represent me. The thing I can't get over is how little he is getting for selling out. I mean come on, if you're going to sell your soul you should get something more than a satellite U.S. attorney office and another immigration office.

Fairbanks, AK by Leon H Wolf

It is indeed in the interior of Alaska, but consultation of an atlas will tell you that there is only one road that leads into the part of Alaska that is connected to the rest of Alaska with road* (the Great Alaska Highway or Alcan Highway). Interestingly enough, it comes through a foreign country, which is Canada. The first town of consequence on that road is Fairbanks. I suppose that you might rather put an immigration office in Delta Junction or Tok, but that'd be pretty unreasonable to anyone who's ever been to either of those towns. Plus, you're pretty much going to get to Fairbanks anyway, unless you're on your way to Gak Junction.

In other words, insofar as Alaska needs an immigration office, especially for people coming from Canada, Fairbanks is an eminently reasonable place to put it.

I have no comment on any of the Utah stuff.

*IIRC, there are roads that lead into the Steward/Juneau area from Canada, but from thence you can't get to the rest of Alaska without taking a long boat and/or plane ride.
------------
[F]or by the fundamental law of Nature, man being to be preserved as much as possible, when all cannot be preserved, the safety of the innocent is to be preferred...

-John Locke

Still using the 'we've only been a state for 48 years and need to get services up to the standards of the rest of the country' scam.

====
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." -- James Madison

Scam? by Leon H Wolf

I'm not going to defend every piece of pork that goes into Alaska, but if you don't recognize that Alaska has a rather special set of infrastructure needs, then you're just ignorant of Alaska. And it's not exactly like the rest of the country doesn't get anything out of Alaska.

The point of my comment, as you will notice, was merely to address Bluey's contention that it didn't make sense to have an immigration in Fairbanks, since Fairbanks is in the middle of the state. If you have some information as to why an immigration office in Nome makes more sense to service immigrants coming in from Canada, then I'm all ears. Otherwise you can cut the snide remarks.

------------
[F]or by the fundamental law of Nature, man being to be preserved as much as possible, when all cannot be preserved, the safety of the innocent is to be preferred...

-John Locke

streaming into Alaska? Heck the population in Anchorage is more diverse than any city I've ever visited. But given that the population of Alaska is only 700K or so, are there really that many illegals there to worry about? We want to protect oil fields and oil lines and such from terrorists, but how much border protection dough does it make sense to put there?

I don't think by Leon H Wolf

that a "Citizenship and Immigration Services Office" is exclusively or primarily for illegal immigrants.

------------
[F]or by the fundamental law of Nature, man being to be preserved as much as possible, when all cannot be preserved, the safety of the innocent is to be preferred...

-John Locke

Also, please note by Leon H Wolf

That I don't have enough information to say with any certainty whether Alaska needs such an office, period, I'm only saying that if you're going to give them one, Fairbanks would not only be a reasonable place to put it, but probably the best place to put it.

------------
[F]or by the fundamental law of Nature, man being to be preserved as much as possible, when all cannot be preserved, the safety of the innocent is to be preferred...

-John Locke

But the office in Fairbanks makes about 10,000 times more sense than an immigrations and custom enforcement office in Monticello, UT. You might as well put it in Bismarck, ND.
---
Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman

the expense and need for this in Alaska. Wouldn't it make more sense to add offices where there is more illegal immigration volume.

Another 'bridge to nowhere', and yes it looks scammy. Alaska has been a state for 47 years, the "we're a young state and need more earmarks per citizen" argument is a tired one.
And certainly NOT a conservative one.
====
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." -- James Madison

Oh? by Leon H Wolf

I wasn't aware that it was non-conservative to suggest that government should be in the business of providing infrastructure, especially where the private sector lacks sufficient incentive for doing so. Silly liberal me advocating that the government should, for instance, build roads.

Again, your comments indicate that you know basically nothing about Alaska. Not only is 47 years about 100 less years than most states have had, but also unlike other states, there wasn't significant settlement in Alaska before statehood that would have started the process of infrastructure-building. Not only that, but Alaska is a state that's more than twice as large as Texas geographically, and is which has a whole lot of permafrost, which makes building difficult, and mountainous territory, which compounds the problem.

But you're right, it's truly a scam that we keep sending money to Alaska at all... the bastards should be on their feet by now. I wonder if Russia would be interested in having it back?

------------
[F]or by the fundamental law of Nature, man being to be preserved as much as possible, when all cannot be preserved, the safety of the innocent is to be preferred...

-John Locke

Alaska is the wealthiest state per capita by far of all the states and has a large amount of tax revenue from oil. So, yea, let them build their own roads.

"Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty"
Kyle

One presumes by Leon H Wolf

Under this theory that other states with high per capita wealth get to pay for their own roads also, or is only Alaska getting singled out? Also, since they are now to be responsible for their own infrastrucutre, will they be given restitution for the raw materials that have been extracted from the state for the benefit of the "lower 48"?

------------
[F]or by the fundamental law of Nature, man being to be preserved as much as possible, when all cannot be preserved, the safety of the innocent is to be preferred...

-John Locke

on infrastructure and Invest in the state's future.
====
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." -- James Madison

Oh come on by bk

It only has a little over $39,000,000,000 in it. What's wrong with setting aside a tiny bit of money?

To get this office up and running I will only require 2.5 million. I can enforce immigration law just as good as these other offices and I won't require any continuing funding.

___________________________________
The CIA has better politicians than it has spies - Fred Thompson

A Ferrari 430 buys my vote by Common Cents

A Ferrari 430 buys my vote for the next 50 years (50 one year options to renew by me). I am catching on to the Capitolese.

Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what your country can do for you. Washington Elected Elite

Since Bennett is such a big supporter of his, maybe we should ask Mitt to lean on Bob or at least give him a call. I like Mitt so I'm not trying to stick a sharp stick in him, but perhaps we can get some help.

Romney or Fred.


blog advertising is good for you



blog advertising is good for you


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


Image

image

Get RedState by E-mail



Delivered by FeedBurner

©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service