Just a Company of American paratroopers, a guitar plugged
into the outpost's PA system, and a whole lot of demolitions.
Tart Tongue
By Pejman Yousefzadeh Posted in Policy | The Soft Bigotry Of Low Expectations — Comments (4) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Jim Hoagland issues the worst insult imaginable at the Democrats' direction. He accuses them of making George W. Bush look responsible:
Democratic leaders in Congress are riding to the rescue of an unlikely beneficiary: the reputation of George W. Bush. They seem determined to exacerbate problems that he has created or long ignored.
They would deepen a budget deficit that, on Bush's watch, has lurched out of control. They undermine U.S. leadership in global trade negotiations. They champion politically rewarding but economically damaging agricultural subsidies during a world food crisis. On energy, the congressional Democrats seem intent on battling Bush to a draw on who can accomplish the least.
Okay. So Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and colleagues have seized their chance to out-pander the Republicans and are doing well in performing that uphill task. This is not exactly grounds for shock and awe, I hear you muttering.
But their actions allow Bush to pose as a fiscally responsible, veto-wielding leader -- a feat akin to enabling Typhoid Mary to pose as Florence Nightingale. This could help Bush inch up the ladder of the dank cellar of approval ratings expressed by his fellow Americans and much of the rest of the world.
The fallout is actually wider: The Democratic push on Capitol Hill for more budget-busting spending and greater protectionism bleeds into the presidential campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who promise to deconstruct NAFTA and to avoid almost all new taxes from here to eternity.
Perhaps they dissemble. But even this causes allies and rivals abroad to water down expectations that changing administrations will automatically make for a more reliable and cooperative American partner. A clear advantage that the Democratic Party had in world opinion is withering, according to foreign officials and professionals I have encountered recently.
Read it all. This is sure to incite the rage of the netroots, of course. But given that the Democrats have been irresponsible on issues like trade, perhaps Hoagland's lacerating editorial is precisely the tonic needed to get Congress to act responsibly.
Either that, or George W. Bush may have Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to thank if he ends up looking better in the history books.
« No Talent Need Apply — Comments (7) | The Nanny State Pigs Out — Comments (1) »
Tart Tongue 4 Comments (0 topical, 4 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
But even this causes allies and rivals abroad to water down expectations that changing administrations will automatically make for a more reliable and cooperative American partner. A clear advantage that the Democratic Party had in world opinion is withering, according to foreign officials and professionals I have encountered recently.
"A clear advantage that the Democratic Party had in world opinion is withering"
OK, say I---so what? Is that the same world that thinks of Israel as a "sh!@ty" little country?"
Pray tell, why would you value the opinion of folks like that anyway?
American soldiers wear the flag on their right sleeve with pride. They spend their time, effort and energy showing it off. Not apologizing for it.
Jim Hoagland, there are flights overseas any day. And, I'm pretty sure that some DC-area Redstaters will gladly help you pack. We might even drive you to the airport.
Anything, Jim-bo, to enable you to finally go where your heart apparently belongs.
"Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?" (Macaulay)
This is what happens when our snobs talk only to their snobs.
I get around the world a lot more than he does. He's full of ****....
Of course, when Hoaglund goes here to complain about W to French snobs, they probably don't let him get a word in edgewise because they are too busy complaining about Sarko!
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
You can't make a living in this country
by kowalskiI don't see the connection
by JoliphantIf you do agree with it
by kowalskiI just disagree with it.
by kowalskiTell the Character of a man by his enemies
by Matt SanchezI'm putting the troll in a bind
by Neil StevensJust for a laugh on this day
by Neil StevensPunishment trumps pandering now.
by gandolphxxMay I also suggest...
by birdmojoExcellent reminder, haystack! n/t
by Vegas RickGOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!
by GOP4EverI have no opinion re Webb.
by redneck hippieyou mean this one?
by pilgrimI'm reluctant to answer that question ;)
by kowalskiThanks
by zerodivisorIt's my favorite stupid movie. <nt>
by jonlesterI could have made it through the 4th just fine
by jonlester
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



With the possible exceptions of Harding and Hoover (and am not 100% sure with Harding; historians are now saying he just surrounded himself with bad people), the fortunes of every single one of them improve after they leave office (yes, even Nixon). One cannot say the same about Democratic presidents, with, again, possible exceptions of JFK and Truman.
"No matter how much lipstick you put on the taxation pig, it's still a pig... and it's currently snout-down in your wallet." - Michael Fisk