The Sunday Morning Talk Shows - preview
(There's no Joe Biden-mentum this week.)
By Mark Kilmer Posted in Face the Nation | FOX News Sunday | Late Edition | Meet the Press | Special Features | This Week — Comments (9) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
For Sunday, October 28, 2007
Meet the Press (NBC): Tim Russert interviews Chris Dodd, perhaps to find some relevance to the man.
FOX News Sunday (FNS): Host Chris Wallace interviews first lady Laura Bush and Louisiana's Governor-elect Bobby Jindal.
This Week (ABC): Host George Stephanopoulos talks to John McCain about campaign finance reform and then to Duncan Hunter & Diane Feinstein about the California wildfires.
Face the Nation (CBS): Host Bob Schieffer interviews Crazy Carl Levin and the ever-dependable Lindsey Graham.
Late Edition (CNN): Host Wolf Blitzer will host the return of the IAEA's clueless Mohamed ElBaradei about Iranian nukes. He'll then have Babs Boxer and Trent Lott by to discuss stuff, and he'll then turn to Mike Huckabee.
===========
Who wants to be President? Dodd, Hunter, McCain, and Huckabee are running. I'm not sure what one can take from a (relatively) long sit-down with Dodd other than that the man wants to be President and that he will never be President. In fact, none of these men will every be President, and it's too bad the sundry producers did not line up appearances from Senator Biden-mentum.
Perhaps the "new" John McCain will, for political reasons, pledge to lead a push to rescind the more onerous sections of the BCRA. Perhaps pigs will liftoff from Cape Canaveral and assume a low Earth-orbit. Hey, one never knows.
Jindal, as always, is a breath of reality. Nothing is to be gained or gleaned from such as Boxer and Levin, with emphasis on the lack of merit of the former. Perhaps Boxer has established "internet proof" that her State's wildfires were set deliberately by Halliburton-Blackwater, as directed by the Tri Lats and the Bilderbergers.
« The Sunday Morning Talk Shows: The Review — Comments (16)
The Sunday Morning Talk Shows - preview 9 Comments (0 topical, 9 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Where do you get off with yours?
You are welcome to your own opinions, but attacking MK is a decidely stupid way of expressing them!
=========
About the Author
Lord Vegas is a true American. some would call him a Mutt, but he prefers the term mixed breed.
I write previews, and I daresay that you are far below your level of competence in trying to assign intent and motive to what I write.
That being said, I took no "gratuitous shots" against any candidate; rather, I offered a few observations.
I'm doing nothing I have not done since I began this. If you do not like it, you are free either to leave or not to bother me.
If you would like your candidate to be praised, let him be praiseworthy. It's clear you have issues, and I'm not certain if I can help you.
..that the local obituaries don't have a comment section, redcheeksinguystate.
So, is Joe Lieberman's primary contribution to political discourse adding "-mentum" after a candidates name? That and the virtual 3-way tie for 3rd place...
________________________________________________________
Halls of Justice Painted Green, Money Talking.
Power Wolves Beset Your Door, Hear Them Stalking.
in discussing politics of the Presidential nominating process was Lieberman's primary contribution to political discourse -- he has had a lot of sobering and very real things to say about the erstwhile Saddam Hussein regime -- but it's certainly the most fun.
The virtual 3-way tie for 3rd place was, I thought, kind of sad. I felt bad for the guy.
HTML Help Central for Red Staters
Let's nominate the Nash Equilibrium for President.
I like John McCain, and I think any fair observer would at least recognize that his once stagnant campaign has gained at least some small degree of momentum. With that in mind, why on Earth would he go on a Sunday morning talk show and talk up Campaign Finance Reform? He's running as a Republican, and much of the GOP hates McCain-Feingold.
My point is that it would help him with the base if he had a change of heart, if not on the need for CFR, then on what he did about it.
Seems to me you should stick to previewing the Sunday morning talk shows rather than handicapping the Republican primaries.
I say that in part because I find your gratuitous shots against the candidates offensive.
But mostly I say that because I find your analysis and conclusions tired, unoriginal, and humorless (despite your futile effort to adopt a cheeky 'tude).
Turning now to the local paper's obituaries for more inspiring prose.