« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Palin Fear

they're running and they're on fire

A lot of us have wondered why Obama spokestoad Robert Gibbs has been taking every available opportunity to belittle Sarah Palin. It is always unseemly when a paid representative of the President uses his position and taxpayer time to slag on a private citizen or a new organization. Unseemly, of course, is part of the ambiance that you get with the current administration but the frequency of Gibbs’ criticisms stood out even by the cesspool standards of the White House press operation.

Today what we’ve long suspected was the truth has been revealed. The White House fears Sarah Palin.


David Broder has this to say on Palin:

Her lengthy Saturday night keynote address to the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville and her debut on the Sunday morning talk show circuit with Fox News’ Chris Wallace showed off a public figure at the top of her game — a politician who knows who she is and how to sell herself, even with notes on her palm.

This was not the first time that Palin has impressed me. I gave her high marks for her vice presidential acceptance speech in St. Paul. But then, and always throughout that campaign, she was laboring to do more than establish her own place. She was selling a ticket headed by John McCain against formidable Democratic opposition and burdened by the legacy of the Bush administration.

Blessed with an enthusiastic audience of conservative activists, Palin used the Tea Party gathering and coverage on the cable networks to display the full repertoire she possesses, touching on national security, economics, fiscal and social policy, and every other area where she could draw a contrast with Barack Obama and point up what Republicans see as vulnerabilities in Washington.

Her invocation of “conservative principles and common-sense solutions” was perfectly conventional. What stood out in the eyes of TV-watching pols of both parties was the skill with which she drew a self-portrait that fit not just the wishes of the immediate audience but the mood of a significant slice of the broader electorate.

I don’t know what Governor Palin’s plans are. While many might wish for her to run for office my view is that as a spokesman she is a strategic asset for conservatives that would be greatly diminished if she was serving as an elected or appointed official. Having her out on the stump for our candidates is a much greater boon to conservatives than seeing her essentially silenced by the work load and legal requirements of government service.

Be that as it may, the White House, far from dismissing her has pulled on its brown trousers in anticipation of this fight. They are trying to use Alinsky Rule 5 on Palin and it is failing because their opinion doesn’t matter to an increasing number of Americans.

Broder gets that ridicule won’t work. He’s seen her in action and he respects her ability to connect with Americans, many of whom are fairly apolitical. At some level he knows the attempts at ridicule are going to rebound against the coterie of thugs in the White House.

Those who want to stop her will need more ammunition than deriding her habit of writing on her hand. The lady is good.

Note: the genesis of the subtitle.

COMMENTS

  • TheSophist

    And rightfully so.

    If you were the White House, and in charge of the Democratic Media-Political complex, who else would you be scared of?

    I stand by my comment from back in 2008 that Sarah Palin is the most naturally gifted politician I have seen since Ronald Reagan.

    I stand by my thought that Gov. Palin should be the next chair of the RNC if the GOP cares about things like winning races and solidifying the next generation of conservatives.

    -TS

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      I hope she stays away from running…above the fray, so to speak…and trhe RNC may be just be ther place.

    • Tbone

      ” Palin should be the next chair of the RNC”.

    • leehazel

      I was raised on people like Bob Taft (Ohio), Evert Dirkson, (Illinois), Homer Capehart, (Indiana) and Jerry Ford, (Michigan). I watched Dwight Eisenhower, Dick Nixon, and Ronald Reagan. I applauded Barry Goldwater as he took on the Democrats and LBJ

      Sarah Palin is her own person. She brings to the table a level of charisma equal to any of those listed above.

      I shudder every time I think about how close John McCain and his stable of half wits came to destroying this woman

      I also agree with Erick, for her to take political office now or in the near future would rob the American conservative and independent movement of a very important and potent power and leader.

      PC is Thought Control
      LEE

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    for using their public office as part of a political campaign? It seems the O is in constant campaign mode anyhow… bashing a potential political opponent from the pulpit of his position seems like campaigning to me…

    Although they’ve gotten away with using their offices/public funds for their campaign work there are some folks in the PA legislature finally facing corruption charges for their actions…

  • Hera

    Rush has often said the left will always let you know who they fear and they fear Sarah Palin.I saw Chrissy Matthews actually demean her for selecting George Washington as her favorite founding father rather then Thomas Paine.Chrissy being an elitist doesn’t know that most Americans would have chosen Washington or Jefferson and not Paine.Sarah Palin understands average Americans which is something that Obama and other elites do not .That’s why average Americans love her and why the left fears her.

    • mikerazar

      Washington inspired his troops by reading to them from the famous Paine pamphlet “The Crisis” (These are the times that try men’s souls…”). Who knows? Perhaps Paine was Washington’s favorite. But the founding citizens left no doubt that Washington was their favorite, giving him the title of “Father of his Country” . Chris Mathews’ opinion is about as important to me as that of a tory who sat out the war in Canada.

    • idealjoe

      She is not perceived as a elite, life long, professional, me first, I know what’s best for you, and my all time favorite………..TRUST ME………… Yeah right, sure, we believe you.
      Americans are sick, I mean throw-up, headache,diarrhea sick of the present crop of political hacks that we now have in Washington. We are sick of lawyers. analysts and advisers and a White house spokes person who has the personality of a clogged septic tank.
      We want a real everyday person who lives the same lifestyle that most Americans live. Someone who has a family that gets up every morning and makes breakfast and packs lunch for their children. Someone who has actually been to a real grocery store and bought milk and bread. Someone who pumps their own gas. Someone who knows how to wash dishes and vacuum. Someone who thinks about others and helps their neighbors. I pick SARAH.
      You just go ahead and keep picking the losers like we already have.

  • snowshooze

    And I agree that she is right where she needs to be, a cheerleader, motivator and private citizen free to express her opinions without the encumbrances of office.
    When the administration starts blazing away at her, their target is a “concerned citizen”. Sort of puts them in a corner…

    • jenniferjmilleresq

      A great administrator. I think she would be excellent in the Oval Office.

  • paramedichess

    I agree wholeheartedly that Sarah Palin is right where she needs to be. She excels at getting the base excited and raising money. She needs to keep doing these things, and traveling to help get conservatives elected across the country. She MUST not confuse the tea party excitement with a mandate to run for POTUS in 2012. She CANNOT win. Sadly, she is hugely unpopular with the middle 20% that decide every election. If we want 4 more years of BHO, we should nominate Palin 2012, if we want the madness to stop, we need Mitch Daniels, Tim Pawlenty, Haley Barbour or Jim DeMint. TS might be right that Palin would make a good RNC chair.

    • Scope

      but your list of choices can? Which one of them in particular (except DeMint) has the support, and fundraising ability of the millions that Palin does? I left out DeMint because DeMint is a great conservative spokesperson, but, Senators rarely win the Presidency. After, Obama, I think it will stay rare. Besides, DeMint has never voiced a desire or interest in running for the Presidency.

      I’m still in the undecided camp for Palin as President, but, I love when some make these fantastic announcements that Palin CANNOT win. Did you read that in your crystal ball?

    • audax

      too landslides later……

    • Warrior

      to that 20% figure, or did you just pull it out your a**?

      • Tbone

        came right off the top of his head.

        • Warrior

          You’re a panic…

    • edwlstr

      this far in advance of an election. Those who do reflect a rigidity that enables our corrupt RNSC to select the Dem/RINO so-called “moderates” like Scrofo-nazi (Scrofulous Nazi) for NY 23 and who bilked the GOP out of $900,000 only to throw her support to a Democrat when she withdrew. Numbers change and what is certain today, often, is not tomorrow. And unpopularity, huge or otherwise, is a negative. Negatives are difficult to impossible to measure, even in that penumbric region of statistics called polls. I suspect the role of unpaid cheerleader for an ungrateful and left leaning GOP might NOT appeal to Sarah. Where Sarah OUGHT to be is where Sarah WANTS to be. OK? I believe we ought to let the girls play in this sport, too. DeMint I know, these others you mention are largely “products with no name recognition” except Pawlenty who is best known for his sudden shift to the right after deciding to run.

  • bk

    is that Gibbs’s little stunt, which it seems no one in the press corps found funny, should backfire in two ways:
    1) He seemed to be saying that as a woman, Palin’s only job should be as a housewife. That should really win over the Hillary supporters and independents.
    2) All it did was remind people that his boss needs to read speeches from teleprompters while the ignoramus Palin blows one away with just a couple of notes.

    • Scope

      and everyone knows it’s a woman’s job to do the grocery shopping. NOT

      • normusa

        I thought writing on your hand was just using a Palm Pilot.

    • winterhawk

      you meant press “corpse” did you not. We wouldn’t want to be called racist for not saying it like the one.

  • Scope

    and it was well worth the beeitchin’ to get it fixed. Great diary.

    I can easily go along with Broader’s summation of Palin, and, where she may prove to be the most valuable, a strong voice for conservatism. Whatever she chooses to do with her future, I don’t want her to stop what she is doing now, and, that is taking good common sense government ideas on the road. I doubt there are many that are not loving her making the Democrat’s heads explode.

    Like Cavuto’s fill-in said last night, to see Gibbs standing in front of the White House sign, and showing his mocking written on hand, is a total embarrassment and mockery of the White House and the Presidency. No one has ever accused any of them of being too classy.

    • irishgirl

      Gibbs can’t seem to grasp the fact that he’d just given her more publicity. What was hilarious is that she had “hi Mom” on her palm the next day or so in Texas. The more the left goes afte her, the better she looks. I don’t know about running in 2012, but there can no longer be any doubt, Palin is a huge force for the conservative movement.

      • jyalai

        She has successfully created a situation where the press will be looking for messages she writes on her hand. What other politician would be able to actually make news by just writing something on her hand? She has already demonstrated she can make news just by twittering or fbing. Now she’s down to the size of her palm. This woman is good!!

  • wilfranc

    Gibbs represents the way this administration diminishes the office by stooping below behavior expected of the office of the president. The grocery list wasn’t just juvinile, but embarassing.

    I agree Palin’s biggest strength I see is in fortifying the conservative message and communicating with Americans.

    Most people, including those who habitually vote Democrat don’t realize their values are more in line with conservative principles. Obama and his gang realize that and that is why he is back on the campaign trail. The press’ more critical tone means his movement is losing its mass appeal.

    He will wear a couple sets of tires off AF1 from now until this November. That’s the plan: Ridicule, campaign, blame.

  • archer52

    They fear her because she is growing. Not only in stature, but in knowledge. She has a ways to go as do I and many others, but from the time she first stepped on stage with common sense and a instinct that most of us possess which tells us when something doesn’t smell right, she has developed knowledge that allows her to explain what she knew in her gut was bad. For example, she has a fairly good grasp of energy but needed more “in the weeds” information to round out her argument. Her understanding of history both here and in places like China, Italy, Germany and Britain was thin, but now you can see she is getting the connections between those times and ours. As Beck is doing, she is educating, in her own way, the people to the fact that we are AMERICANS, not Germans, Chinese or Italians. This is the left’s biggest threat as they continue to target our kids in an effort to dumb them down even further. Take a look at the newest attempt in Texas via Doug Powers- http://dougpowers.com/2010/02/11/no-child/

    Apparently, the state board is going to vote on whether to accept a text book that will do the following-

    According to Liberty Counsel, some of the suggestions that have come forward at various times include:

    ?Removing references to Daniel Boone, General George Patton, Nathan Hale, Columbus Day and Christmas.

    ?Including the cultural impact of hip-hop music, ACLU lawyer Clarence Darrow and the Hindu holiday of Diwali.

    ?Replacing the term ?American? with ?global citizen? ? stating that students need to be shaped ?for responsible citizenship in a global society? without any mention of citizenship in American society.

    ?Replacing expansionism and free enterprise with imperialism and capitalism.

    Where in the world are the parents in Texas?

    • mdd1956

      with her in her own development.
      It is often difficult to make conservative ideas attractive in sound bites, especially when we are delivering the message “work harder / expect less / you will be better off in the end”.

      Sarah is so damn attractive and appealing she is able to score points when very few others can.

      Bernie Goldberg is right when says we are “The United States of Entertainment”.
      We need to fight in that arena.

  • portlandon

    Sarah Palin has weathered the storm these past 2 years. The liberal left has thrown anything and everything they can to try and destroy her. It hasn’t worked.

    I don’t know what the future holds for Gov. Palin, but if she chooses to run I will volunteer, and campaign like I never have for any other candidate to ensure she wins.

    There are many Republican candidates who could beat Obama, but Sarah Palin seems to be the only one who won’t change 30 seconds after she takes the Oath.

    Fair or not, she has been damaged by the Liberals. However, truth always prevails and I have a hunch that people will come around to her in the end. She is sharpening her message, and with time I hope to hear real policy specifics from her.

    • Warrior
      • winterhawk

        and a communist for the same amonut of times

        • Warrior

          have any kind of meaning?

    • renny

      Go, Sara!

    • edwlstr

      I would retire so that I could work for her. I will vote for her. The enthusiasm she generates is unsettling to the stodgy old GOP types and terrifying to the liberal cesspool around 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. I am an old GOP type who craves clarity, coherence, and honesty. No, she doesn’t have all the answer but Obama and the Dems do, they’re just the wrong answers. If you encounter a pol that professes to know all the answers for tomorrow, you have met a liar or a dangerous meglomaniac. More important is a clear set of values to guide you through tomorrow. Fundamental morality and common sense are very important, remember?

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    over the slavery of government control. That’s what scares them.

    I had a “look/don’t look” moment when I saw this diary. But, still, Palin fights. We should support her.

  • rec0n

    Thank you. And for mentioning the substance of her speech vs. the notes on her palm, thank you again. I am so sick of the media playing along with that particular game I could spit nails.

  • jeffreywturner

    I love her in her current role. But you have to admit, it would be HEAVEN to see the liberals on the nightly news squirm from having to refer to her as Madame President.

    • eburke

      as a presidential candidate.

      But I tell you, whether she’s necessarily our best choice or not, the thought of watching liberal heads exploding on a daily basis because of the scenario you just envisioned would be absolutely delightful.

      Can you imagine perky Katie, tingling Chrissy, obtuse Olberman, and Gabby Gibson having to refer to her as Madame President? The words would gag in their throats.

      And Helen Thomas?

      Heh. Heh.

  • inspectorudy

    I think if she calls ALL of her opponents out to debate R’s and D’s she will win over the squishy middle. She will have to be seen holding her own or beating the field before the undecideds make up their minds.

    • Scope

      I would imagine is not on her side would be the Ron Paul Libertarian types. Palin is very strong on national security, and, she has a deep appreciation and love for our military members. The Paulites are closer to the Liberals on matters of security and war. Like Reagan said- as to some, just let them go their way.

  • RedBeard

    …we should probably note that Sarah Palin, in addition to being right on almost every issue, looks nice in her little red running shorts, while the mere thought of Flabby Gibbsy dressed similarly is too horrible to contemplete.

    How’s that for sexism?

    • RedBeard
    • Scope

      hanging on your refrigerator. It’s called the Gibbs diet.

      • RedBeard
        • eburke
  • smitch61

    In this administration is quite low, we are not surprised.

    Mr. Gibbs can have anything he wants written in the palm of his hand, unfortunately he has STUPID ASS written all over his face for the entire world to see.

  • E Pluribus Unum

    Hear me out. I’m serious.

    He has incredible gravity in directing, shaping, educating the conservative wing of America. His radio show holds more muscle than most of us realize.

    Yet even he could not steer the Republicans away from nominating the worst GOP presidential candidate since Alfred P Landon, though he tried mightily. His campaign to drive the national partisan media into oblivion has had made a dent, but is not succeeding.

    So here comes Sarah. She’s not Rush in drag. She’s not a true conservative scholar like Rush. But she is extremely eloquent, perhaps uniquely gifted in drawing common people in and speaking what they believe. Rush is a recluse, and rightly so. But Sarah is the bearer, for better or worse, of the conservative banner to the masses.

    And she’s good at it.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
      • E Pluribus Unum

        I actually debated between Landon, Dewey, and Gerald Ford in 1976, in making that comment.

        I figured at least Dewey made a fight of it. Landon could not campaign his way out of a wet paper sack and got creamed, by the guy who had ridden herd over the Great Depression for 4 years.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      Actual slogan.

      • Section9

        A brilliant guy, relentless prosecutor, and a decent NY Governor.

        But he could not connect with the Common Man. Lost the 1944 election to Dr. “Win the War” Roosevelt, then got tagged by Alice Roosevelt Longworth as “the Man on the Wedding Cake”.

        Truman was home free after that.

        So no, Dewey was not the worst candidate we ever put up. That would be a tie between George Bush the Elder’s 1992 Reeelect and Bob Dole. Landon was a sacrificial lamb in 1936. Everyone knew this.

        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

          One big problem with Dewey though is that he was way left of the party mainstream, such that Truman challenged the Republican Congress to pass elements of Dewey’s agenda, but they refused.

          So they got tagged the Do Nothing Congress, and both Truman and Congressional Democrats won in 48.

          Dewey being so far left I’d say qualifies him as being awful.

        • Warrior

          is not brilliant and never was a prosecuter or a governor.

          • Section9

            …..or somesuch nonsense. I know.

            The University does this to buy swag from the Daley Machine downtown. They hand out jobs to favored politicians and in return get state grants form the State of Illinois and the City.

            Jesus. It’s as if Obama was a Supreme Court Justice or something. By the way, that’s a fight we’re going to have in future. Some Dem President is going to want to put him on the High Court.

          • Warrior

            sayit’s not so. The idea of this airhead on the Supreme Court is just too much to bear. I want several issues cleared up first:

            Dear Obamayomama,

            Could you help me locate the following:

            1. Occidental College records — Not released
            2. Columbia College records — Not released
            3. Columbia Thesis paper — “Not available”
            4. Harvard College records — Not released
            5. Selective Service Registration — Not released
            6.. Medical records — Not released
            7. Illinois State Senate schedule — Not available
            8. Your Illinois State Senate records — Not available
            9. Law practice client list — Not released
            10. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate — Not released
            11. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth — Not released
            12. Record of your baptism — Not available
            13. Why your wife, Michelle, can no longer practice law as an attorney? (Insurance Fraud?_
            14. Why your wife has 22 assistants, when other First Ladies had one?
            15. Why were you getting “foreign student aid” as a college student?
            16.. Which countries “passport” did you have when you visited Pakistan in 1981?

            Oh and one more thing Mr. President, I can’t seem to find any articles you published as editor of the Harvard Law Review, or as a Professor at the University of Chicago. Can you explain that to me, Sir?

            Thanks,
            I won’t hold my breath…

          • Achance

            Republican Governors and Legislators should pay a LOT more attention to who gets on state boards of regents because the Democrats have turned state universities into sinecures for Democrat pols who are out of office. We’ve had a Republican Legislature for the last twenty years or so and three of the last five gubernatorial terms were Republican, yet the chancellors of all three major campi of the University of Alaska are former Democrat officeholders or party offiicals who politicize everything the University does. The University’s Anchorage campus has the Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER), which the Executive Branch used to be able to rely on for good science on various issues facing the State. Then, a former Democrat Lt. Governor gets first appointed to head ISER then becomes chancellor of that campus and, consequently, ISER does work for greenies and socialists instead.

          • Warrior

            …like Obama pal & domestic terrorist Bill Ayers (U of I at Chicago), Charles Manson admirer Bernardine Dohrn (Northwestern U Sch. of Law) and Herbert Marcuse scholar & avid communist Angela Davis (UC Santa Cruz), among many others.

            This kind of thing stinks like a whorehouse at low tide. To think that these criminals are living large on the public dole makes me want to retch…..

  • tngal

    Washington is gridlocked because of the snow plus the President’s holiday next week. Alaska has snow. Sarah Palin came from Alaska and is use to tons of snow.

    Ergo –

    She brought the snow causing the gridlock and following this logic must be considering a run for the presidency,

    (this woman can do almost anything:)

    • Achance

      practically none at sea level here in Southeast Alaska. It was 42F, above zero, here yesterday when temps in the teens would be more common. Must say I’m enjoying the hysteria on TV, though I’ll admit that a foot or more in a day would slow things down here for a day or so, too.

      • Scope

        n/t

      • E Pluribus Unum

        about how being shut down is costing American taxpayers $100 million a day. Probably about 1/100th what it’s costing us when they’re open for business.

  • azaeroprof

    That’s what Obama/Axelcrook/Emanuel and their media lapdogs have been pushing for over a year now. And they’ve failed. They’re now trying “dangerous”, and they’ll fail at that too.

    Right now, her decision to resign as Governor is looking like pure genius. Close your eyes and try to imagine the state of Palin if she had not resigned.

    She is obviously working VERY hard to improve her knowledge and political skills. She is definitely perfect in the role she is currently occupying, but she WILL run at some point. My money is on 2012.

    Oh, and one more thing. Art has been cautioning us about the release of the Palin emails for quite some time. The bulk of them were released a week ago, contained some content that could have been embarrassing, and never made it past the MSDNC web site. She just keeps looking stronger and stronger.

    • Achance

      and are claiming Executive Privilege on them. NO court has ever upheld an executive privilege against disclosure of State records. The closest is a deliberative privilege for matters in which a decision is still pending. With that privilege, as soon as the decision is reached, the material is public record unless it involves some very narrowly tailored exceptions.

      The real issue will be whether somebody wants to contest it anymore. The State has done its usual good job of grinding down anyone who sues it, and that isn’t really all that critical; I did enough of that myself. I used to routinely tell people who wanted to contest something I did that I had a couple hundred lawyers who needed something to make them earn their pay for the next couple of years. So, maybe somebody is interested enough, maybe not. If it goes to the AKSC, she and the State lose, but who knows if it will go.

    • Third Street

      …I’m not sure what Team Preschool up in Washington is trying to accomplish with this crap, given that there isn’t a human being in this country who doesn’t already have a strong opinion about Sarah Palin and didn’t entrench it a long time ago.

      This polarization has made serious discussion about Palin within any group impossible, which is unfortunate for a prospective presidential candidate — because I really would like to know for certain whether she’s for or against amnesty, whether she’s for or against government bailouts, and whether she’s for or against windfall profits taxes on corporations.

  • Section9

    I’m an admirer and I respect her ability to campaign, but she has work to do among the General Public, even as biased and skewed a poll as ABC’s today shows.

    This is what campaigns are for. She either has it, or she doesn’t.

    • Warrior

      Sarah Palin deliberately chose to take, and took a lot of flack for taking, the time to “work on her Natl Game.”

  • Ann_W

    She had a record in AK. That record was way too short to get a great picture of how she would govern, but it included, among other things, using eminent domain to build a sports complex in Wasilla, putting higher taxes on oil companies in Alaska, including windfall profits taxes.

    Now on a good day I could imagine seeing a discussion about how windfall profits taxes would discourage oil and gas exploration by not letting them have good years to off-set the low price years and to draw more companies into oil and gas exploration because of the money to be made there, but no one here has been too interested about her past when they see how exciting she is as a candidate.

    I love the all the “Hi, Mom” sticking-it-to the media moments, and I railed to my family about how stupid for people to talk about the notes on her hand when we have TOTUS largely ignored. But all this support or excitement could blind us from who she is.

    It’s like when you first date someone and all the things you don’t know about them are filled in with the awesome characteristics that you expect to find because they’re so cool. Then as you get to know the person sometimes flaws emerge. I see people pouring all their fantasies about the next Ronald Reagan on her, but we need to keep our eyes open.

    I see as problems some of these policies she implemented in Alaska; her general lack of a track record to review; her quitting when things got ugly in Alaska (we know the presidency is a very hard position) and how she appeared to geniunely not really get the issues in the debate with Biden (yes, this is subjective, maybe you guys thought she seemed on top of the issues in that debate). I also have a problem with her politicking the “retard” issue by calling out Rahm on it but giving Rush a pass. Either she feels strongly about the issue or she doesn’t; she shouldn’t use outrage as a tool.

    I think it’s really great to see the excitement Palin has brought to conservative politics and hope she can continue to do that at the RNC or something like others have suggested, but I don’t think she is a good conservative candidate for president.

    Because conservative ideas are what really work I think that in 2012 voters will be way more open to give a conservative candidate another try. We all thought George W. Bush was a conservative but he gave conservatism a black-eye by not being a fiscal conservative. Do we know that Palin really understands and would implement conservative ideas. Could we find someone who has a track record of being conservative and has the skills to really turn the government around? I suggest maybe Daniels, Ryan, maybe even Jindal with some PR coaching. Sarah Palin isn’t proven enough to be that person IMO.

    This is a really important topic. I know some of you feel strongly about this issue. I’ll prepare myself for the slapdown I’ll get now, but I think we should have our eyes open, not just caught up in the excitement of a charismatic personality.

    • Warrior

      And remember, Reagan had his flaws too. Also, I’ll give her a pass on many decisions relative to Alaska because it is a special case. The entire state, far larger geographically than TX, has about 500,000 people in it. Far fewer than Atlanta for crying out loud.

      And Alaska is of vital natural security interest.

      Finally, if Hill runs in ’12, NO WHITE MAN ALIVE WILL BEAT HER.

      Got that?

    • Section9

      Art Chance is going to love your post.

      Besides, last I heard, Sean Parnell is trying to change the ACES law to make it more producer-friendly.

      My biggest disagreement with you is that I believe Palin was, by and large, a fiscal conservative in her governance of the State. The notion that Palin is not a fiscal conservative is, to put it mildly, somewhat humorous to me. Her problem was, as Art has pointed out, being largely unwilling to clean out the Democratic apparatus that Tony Knowles left behind and alienating the RPOA.

      One of the reasons she stood largely alone against Rahm Emanuel and the ethics komandos he sent after her was rather simple: she had very few friends in the Alaska Republican Party because she gave few people in the RPOA a stake in her success.

      I admire Sarah to death, and I think she would make a great national candidate once she gets past the MSM gatekeepers. But that just is what it is. I doubt she will make the same mistake again.

      Lastly, you are looking for the Unknown Conservative. Sorry, but everyone is tainted. If you think that Mitch Daniels or John Thune are going to come barnstorming out of nowhere and sieze the day, then govern like Ayn Rand, then I have some serious bongwater for you to drink. It ain’t happenin’. Not after Captain Unknown has driven the country into the ground. And please don’t mention Romney, at least to me, not after RomneyCare.

      BTW. Mr. Fabulous has a better than 50% chance of being reelected, even in this environment. Even Art will tell you that.

      • Achance

        he has really stepped on it in a way that she can unequivocally blame on him and campaign directly against him, she won’t run. She’s not going to let something make her into damaged goods. She left the Governorship when her political and market value was at its peak and was certain to deteriorate. She can raise Hell and funds and stay in the public eye and take the shot if the opportunity presents itself in ’12. If not, she has ’16.

        • Section9

          ….and looks at two things: Job trends and O’s approval trend. If it looks like it’s headed north to 51 percent, she let’s Romney cater to his massive ego and fly his Zero straight into Obama’s Flak Carrier.

          Right now she has massive maneuvering room; she’s where Nixon was in 1965, without the obligation Nixon had to run in 1968. Her reasoning will be that a Republican Majority in one of the Houses will allow Obama to triangulate his way back into the good graces of the American public with the help of the wretchedly partisan news media. And she will be right.

          People keep comparing her to Reagan. I like the Nixon comparison a lot better, simply because I think Palin and Nixon are a lot alike. Palin is a lot more plainspoken, as Dutch was, but operationally, Sarah is much more like the Mighty Trickster. She’s a believer in the Conservative Cause, but Timing is Everything.

          Spot on, Art. I love Palin to death, but I can see her putting timing above everything as Romney or John Thune makes the banzai charge. Especially Romney; I can see a whole cohort of Movement Conservatives sitting home for that election, sad to say.

          One last thing: keep your eye on Jeb Bush. La Familia wants a Restoration.

          • aesthete

            Kind of reminded me of Nixon’s “Checkers Speech”.

        • Finrod

          The latest Gallup poll of Obama vs Generic GOP Candidate has Obama up 44-42, and that’s among registered voters; change that to likely voters and that’s even-money or worse for Obama. Most tellingly independents are against Obama 45-31 in it.

          Reagan’s old line, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” is going to be pretty devastating to Obama in 2012, IMHO.

          • Achance

            will still be powerful enought to keep the weak-minded in his camp unless he has really, really, really stepped on it.

          • Finrod

            He hasn’t been above 50 percent in Rasmussen for a while now, and I don’t see that improving any time soon. The unemployment rate alone will probably be enough to take him down; it’s easier to be idealistic when you have a job.

          • aesthete

            Truman, FDR, Bush, Clinton, and others are just a small series of unpopular executives who were considered vulnerable early on.

    • MathMom

      Especially the part about getting caught up in the excitement of a charismatic personality. That’s the way Obama got elected, and we must keep that in mind with Palin. But Obama had nothing to say on the campaign trail, except “hope”,” change” and “yes we can”, and had never run anything but his mouth. Palin is not an empty suit. She has specific points to make, especially about her primary area of expertise, oil production, and as she said I think to Chris Wallace, when she was brought onto McCain’s ticket, national and international concerns were not on her radar. She was focused on governing Alaska and bringing oil and gas to market. She is now broadening her focus to national and international issues, and so far I like what I hear. I’m hearing more of an outline than a policy paper, but interviews are finite things, and one only has so much time to cover the topics at hand.

      But as to windfall profits taxes on oil companies, she did take “excess” profits and return them to the citizens of Alaska. But the Alaska constitution gives the riches of Alaska to its citizens, so she was following the rules. We used to get a check every year from the Permanent Fund, which was set up to make profits from oil and give it in cash to Alaska citizens. However, she also insulated oil companies against loss when the markets fall, a totally new idea. This encourages exploration and production, a mind-bogglingly expensive and risky endeavor. So it was not a populist take-from-the-rich-and-give-to-the-poor situation.

      I was there last month. My best friend, who has lived there all her life, since before Statehood, showed me the dramatic improvements Palin made to Wasilla. When we lived in Alaska I spent a lot of time looking for a house out there. I could barely recognize it now. So, if you want to see a track record, get photographs of Wasilla in the late 80s, and compare them to now. It is an impressive change.

      My friend told me about the single blogger who filed so many ethics complaints, who had to spend no money to file these complaints, but could bring government to a stop because of the requirement that the complaints be answered. She lost every single suit. Still, she was ready to file more, and continue to drain the treasury and continue to bring the business of government to a halt to soil Palin’s reputation and attempt to bankrupt the Palin family. That’s some nasty sh*t. So, Palin removed the target from her back by her resignation. I support that part of her explanation for her resignation, but when she added the part about being a lame duck blah blah, that caused my BS meter to twitch. Gotta say, the ethics suits have stopped, because she’s no longer governor.

      With respect to the “retard” issue, she said the other day, I believe to Chris Wallace, that several groups had asked since August for an apology from Rahm Emanuel and the White House, but were ignored. So they approached her and asked for her help. She helped them. This says something about her effectiveness, and though I think people should be able to say what they want, and should be raised by parents who teach them to be polite and not say nasty things, she gets results.

      She is studying, because she knows she has gaps in her knowledge. She was not expecting to be catapulted to the national spotlight when she was, but now that she’s there she needs to polish her game. My friend in Alaska, who served on boards with Palin, says she made some lame mistakes early in her term, but is a quick study, and is the Real Deal. We’ll see.

      • aesthete

        Accepting that AK’s constitution establishes the state as the owner of minerals and other natural resources, profits taxes are an inefficient way to revenue long-term, are a more unstable source of funds for the AK government, and discourage development. (Besides that, it’s easy enough for corporations to relocate profit centers, long-term.) While I wouldn’t go out of my way to call it un-conservative, I wouldn’t say that it’s particularly conservative, either, especially in light of the fact that Hollis French, a progressive Dem (for AK, anyways), and the AK Dems in general lined up behind this tax scheme. Currently, Gov Parnell and the AK Repubs are “rethinking” ACES as a result of the drop-off in exploration and production which were the result of this tax; that doesn’t sound like a success to me. At best, it was a moderate/technocratic attempt to enact a superior taxation scheme which didn’t end up working out. In that case I’d say that, although it was foreseeable, it’s not an unforgivable crime (Reagan himself famously failed to foresee the effects of the abortion bill that he signed as Governor of CA). At worst, it was, as you described, a populist, tax-the-rich scheme which provided a short-term surplus, and whose consequences would be someone else’s problem.

        • Ann_W
        • Section9

          A danger signal to Palin should have been the fact that the D’s lined up behind it. I think she has learned, to her sorrow, that when D’s line up behind you, something is Rotten in the State of Denmark.

          And someone is wielding a blade.

          Parnell is now trying to pull it back by a percentage point or two, as I recall Art writing several weeks ago. The general structure of the state’s take will remain the same, but the state will be more forgiving to juice development and exploration.

          Art probably has the messy details. BTW, recently , there was this unrelated ruling that Conoco Philips couldn’t build an access bridge out to Point Thompson, iirc. I believe that was one of the Federal weenies sticking their nose in.

          Everyone has to wet their beaks. Reminds me of that famous scene from Godfather II when young Don Vito meets the Old Don and decides to whack him.

          • aesthete

            and I don’t have a problem with that interpretation of what happened, at all. OTOH, considering the Ethics Act which she escaped from, the TransCanada vaporware deal, and a record of increased government spending in both Wasilla and AK, I am genuinely perplexed as to why many conservatives want her as President. Judging from her record, it’s accurate to say that she was an inexperienced moderate pol who made a few rookie mistakes. If she were still running AK, one could say that her executive career still has a ways to go before we write her off, but given her resignation, it’s likely that we’re stuck with her unimpressive two-year stint as AK’s governor.

            I suppose I just don’t see why one would want to take her from something that she’s good at (fundraising and speechifying), and put her somewhere that she doesn’t have a good track record (a political executive position).

          • MathMom

            Please explain why the Trans Canada Pipeline is “vaporware”. Because it’s not finished yet?

            It is progressing:

            http://www.transcanada.com/news/2010_news/20100129.html

            The Alaska Pipeline took more than two years to build. Was it vaporware because it wasn’t finished right after the contract was signed?

            Did you know that a woman may become pregnant, but not deliver a baby for nine full months?

            Dude! Things take time.

          • Achance

            on its own. TC has no gas and has no agreement with the producers to ship any gas. The producers will never agree to ship without some certainty regarding Alaska’s taxation scheme in future years; the major source of Palin’s criticism of the gasline deal that Gov. Murkowski negotiated and which she repudiated by enacting AGIA.

            Under any circumstance, a natural gas line from Alaska through Canada to an Alberta hub will be the most expensive private or semi-private if Alaska takes an equity position construction project in history. It is now projected at around US$50 Billion and at current and projected gas prices is at the limit of economic viability. The producers are not going to chance another Alaska Governor or Legislature with bent for populist pandering hiking the taxes to the point where the only participant making money is the State of Alaska. Before a pipeline through Canada can come to fruition, there will have to be a departure from the AGIA structure and some way found to guarantee the producers a stable taxation regime.

          • MathMom

            still need to be jumped. Thanks for your reply.

          • Achance

            many elected Republicans were afraid to openly oppose it for fear that the corruption laser would be turned on them. Between the FBI’s leaks and innuendo and Palin’s accusations, elected and appointed officials wouldn’t even be seen talking to anyone in those days. Juneau’s usually lively political watering holes were empty because everyone had to assume that everyone else was wearing a wire.

            Palin was still the Anchorage Daily News’ favorite Republican so she got far better treatment from them than a Republican would normally expect, plus, she was actively aligned with the Democrats on her major initiatives regarding taxation, a gas line, and ethics act changes. A tax scheme based on profits rather than production had long been a Democrat objective and they were poised to get that long held objective with the help of a popular Republican governor. Consequently, anyone who opposed the ACES scheme was tarred by both Palin and the Democrats as a corrupt tool of Veco and the oil industry.

    • Beasley Beesmeal

      look forwards….look at the positives

      we’ve memorized your talki……your points, so you can stop now

      look forward

    • jenniferjmilleresq

      Really?….And what makes you think Jindal ran LA with more fiscal conservatism than Palin? I would love to compare their records…

  • audax

    Reagan, crowned “The Amiable Dunce” by the MSM waltzed into the White House with 2 Landslides. He excited us, the youth of the day, and we got involved to make this man our President. He promised 3 things. 1.) He would reduce the rate of growth of government and cut taxes. 2.) He would make America the strongest country in the world so no other nation would walk over us like they did Carter. and 3.) He would consign Communism to the “Dustbin of History”.

    Sarah only needs those three things too. 1.) Cut taxes and SLASH government spending. 2.) Rebuild American military might (we Americans like to win) and 3. Consign Islamofascism to the “Dustbin of History”.

    God I wish I were 22 again!

    Greg Wilson
    Reagan Delegate (MI At-Large)
    GOP National Convention, Kansas City, 1976

  • oldphart

    “If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”

    Sarah draws huge crowds and they all want her to run for and win the Presidency. Those hand-painted signs say “PALIN- 2012″, not ‘Do you have a good recipe for moose stew?’ She gives those people something Obama only talked about — HOPE! They want to fight now, not at some nebulous point in the future. Those people are tired of being talked down to, of being put off until “a better time.” They are “Mad as Hell and Won’t Take Any More!”

    For those of you who think she should take an administrative position within the Republican Party and let a better qualified person run… Which “better qualified person?” I could ask ten of you that question and get ten different answers. But not at a Tea Party. There, they all know who the “better qualified person is.”

    Allow me to draw a simile: Freedom and Liberty will always win in the end but not without cost. Back in the mid ’40s our military was battle hardened and preparing to land on the shores of the Japanese Home Islands. There are many estimates of the losses we (and they) would have incurred. Sufice to say, they would have been astronomical. Instead, just in time, we came up with a new weapon. Two cities and thousands of people were destroyed but those losses were orders of magnitude less than we expected from a conventional invasion.

    Sarah is our big weapon. We’ve tested her inasmuch as we can and while we are moving her to the front line we’ll keep tweaking and improving her some more. We know what our enemy will do when they face her and we’re getting ready for them too. But we have to use that weapon now “with all the odds against” us or “live as slaves.”

    Some of my ancestors lived in Culpeper County, Virginia during the revolution. They were members of “The Culpeper Minute Men” and I have a reproduction of their flag behind me as I type this. It has the coiled rattlesnake framed by the words “LIBERTY OR DEATH.” If they could live and die by that slogan, I can too. Right now we’re talking about an election. This is the time to speak of winning, not whining about what might happen if we lose.

    • TheSophist

      Is two-fold.

      One, 2012 is too early. Like it or not (and I don’t like it, coz I love me some Sarah Palin), her negatives are way high thanks to the media-industrial complex controlled by the Dems. Most non-activist non-conservative people have never heard her speak, but think she’s an idjit based on a sketch that Tina Fey did on SNL. They don’t remember that was Fey, not Palin. What can you say about the American public? /shrug

      It will take time for those negatives to fade away, and it may be that she’ll never get over them completely. But 2012 is too early.

      Two, I want her as the RNC Chair not so much for her sake, but for our sake. I don’t want a charismatic leader who convinces 51% of American voters to pull the lever for her; I want a charismatic leader who rebuilds the GOP from the ground-up and ensures decades of non-compliant resistance to creeping socialism. Bush (God Bless him) did significant damage to the cause of conservatism, as did the Republicans who spent like drunken sailors when they held the reins of power. We need a clean break from them, a house-cleaning, followed by a rebuilding.

      Of all of the political figures of national prominence I can think of, only Sarah Palin can do this job of rebuilding the party. There’s a reason why she was the keynote at the TPC; there’s a reason why the White House fears her and hates her.

      Three, as things stand now, she is still too much the outsider viz the GOP. The party leadership has no reason to get behind her; she threatens their power. The Precinctman project (Cold Warrior?) and other grassroots movements will eventually change that, but if she is at the helm of the GOP, we can accelerate the process significantly and more or less own the tea party movement.

      Four, if she can spend a few years rebuilding the party, ensuring that conservatism is once again the reigning principle of the Republican Party, driving out those who deserve to be driven out, and bringing in those who deserve to be brought in, then she can run for POTUS, whether that’s 2016 or 2020. Don’t forget that she’s still relatively young and has young children.

      She is our big weapon… for now. But she’s an even greater threat to socialists without elected office. We’ll have good candidates to run against Obama in 2012, and the mood of the country will be vastly different from 2008.

      Let her, instead, reform the GOP. That will pay dividends for decades.

      -TS

  • crosley

    Republicans REALLY wanted to run against Hillary Clinton in 2008, and I think Democrats REALLY want our nominee in 2012 to be Sarah Palin

    I really think the biggest reason why Hillary had so many admirers in the Democrat Party was simply because she infuriated so many conservatives.

    It was a badge of honor among liberals that she must be the right candidate That’s a terrible way to pick a leader, by gauging the amount of hate she garners from the opposition, and Hillary was the one Democrat in my opinion that could have blown the election in 2008 for Democrats, because regardless of what voters thought about her on the issues, she was an overwhelming, polarizing personality that rubbed a lot of people the wrong way.

    I know a lot of die-hard Democrat friends that swore up and down they would never vote for Hillary Clinton, simply because they thought she was a you-know-what. Now Palin has more charm and charisma in her fingernail than Hillary has in her entire body, but I’m amazed how many conservative friends (particularly women) I know that really dislike her. I’ve defended her countless time, but I get a queasy feeling when I’m having to defend her to fellow conservatives that she might not actually be our strongest nominee.

    I think liberals attack Palin relentlessly so Republicans will rally around her as our leader, sort of a rope-a-dope. They want to legitimize her as the de facto head of the conservative movement because they think she’s a very beatable candidate for Obama in 2012.

    They may be completely misreading the situation and bite off more than they can chew, but I really sense that Democrats are salivating at the prospect of Palin as our nominee and are doing everything they can to raise her profile.

    • Third Street

      I think that’s exactly the strategy. This is not “the Dems are telling us who they’re most afraid of”, as Rush has suggested, but a belief on their part that this is the most beatable candidate the Republicans could field, one who would enter the race already defined, with negatives as high as her positives, and capable of spurring the kind of negative turnout from the left that could keep Obama in office. So it’s in their interests to keep the drumbeat against Palin going.

      • Section9

        Were it not for the fact that Obama decided to run this cycle, Hillary would be President now. Indeed, the only reason he beat her was because her inept staff refused to master the caucus rules and organize to beat Obama’s Alinskyite organizing strategy in the small states.

        They mastered the rules. Hillary didn’t. End of story. It had little to do with her popularity. She got almost (by the hair of the last dead dog) as many votes as O did.

        So I’m not sure that their drumbeat against Palin is them telling us who they want to run against. Distinctions always matter in politics. When we nominate Casper Milquetoast Moderate, why do we give ANYONE any reason to vote for us?

        Why vote for New Coke, when you can vote for Coke Classic? This is what I think Palin gets that a lot of the people in the GOP forget.

    • renny

      and I am a cons. woman who is a reg. Rep. Party card carrier in my town and county, a tea partier this year, and cons. among a sea of lib. twits, as a teacher/professor and NEA member.

      The libs. do hate Sara for reasons they often cannot rationally explain because the atavism is so basic and emotionally ingrained. They hate her because Palin is EVERYTHING libs. have said a woman should be and can have but she is NOT one of them.

      It’s like the reaction to Clarence Thomas in many ways. The “Negro” who was to fill Thurgood Marshall’s seat HAD to be an ACLU, NAACP, and Planned Parenthood graduate of the civil rights movement and not an “oreo” Uncle Tom who worked his way out of segregation into conservative success. They still write of Thomas how unqualified he was, because he was not one of them.

      Palin is NOT one of them. So, they hate her. She is better looking and funny. She is quick at the mouth and keeps her foot out of it. She has the same kind of “gift” Big O (more like seeming Little O) brags of, except hers is really natural and does not demand handlers and teleprompters. Worse, Palin has a middle American voice: betcha, gotcha, which is better than “speaking without a dialect” Obamanation.

      I think Dems. didn’t vet O and didn’t care because they thought they only needed a light-colored “black” who graduated Harvard, and they thought that was the ultimate they could achieve and how could he fail? The hole card would always be ?racism.? He was one of them. Palin ain’t. They never figured that in short order no one would care about the epithet ?racist,? and the right would produce millions who will take to the streets (a la student leftists) AGAINST their own gov?t. They still cannot grasp it.

      Right now, she could likely beat O, without machinations by ACORN and the usual suspects. To make her win, or any next win, clean, those voter rolls need purging, we need our own voter reg. drives, Rep. have to get out and man the polls as judges and challengers, and Rove’s on-the-ground organization has to be resurrected (McCain ignored it).

      Go, Sara.

      • ReaganLives

        Here’s just one of many:

        Conservative columnist Kathleen Parker calls Palin ignorant of economics and foreign policy, out of her league, and unfit for national leadership.

        http://article.nationalreview.com/372474/palin-problem/kathleen-parker

        My sister is the most conservative woman you can imagine, and she thinks Palin is a disgrace. She can rant for hours about why Palin makes conservatives look bad.

        I’m just saying, we have to be careful when we think Palin has a whole demographic in her pocket — she doesn’t.

        • azaeroprof

          She is a faux conservative elitist more concerned with getting invites to the right parties with her NYT friends.

          Try again.

          • kuksool

            We may scoff at the David Brooks, Colin Powells, Kathleen Parkers, Chris Buckleys, and Dede Scovafavas, but we need to win them back if we are to beat Obama in 2012. Vote shave come some where and we won’t be winning socailly conservative minorities anytime soon. Big reason why Obama won was due to suburbs that voted for Bush in 2000 an 2004 , then flipped to Obama in 2008. The key to beating Obama lies in winning back the surburbs.

          • kuksool

            We may scoff at the David Brooks, Colin Powells, Kathleen Parkers, Chris Buckleys, and Dede Scovafavas, but we need to win them back if we are to beat Obama in 2012. Vote shave come some where and we won’t be winning socailly conservative minorities anytime soon. Big reason why Obama won was due to suburbs that voted for Bush in 2000 an 2004 , then flipped to Obama in 2008. The key to beating Obama lies in winning back the surburbs.

          • jyalai

            We need independents. RINOs are why independents reflexively vote against Republicans when they don’t see fiscally conservative policies being passed in Washington by RINOs. We lost in 2006 and 2008, because of the RINOs. The independents left in droves because they couldn’t see the difference between the two parties and they thought it was time for a change.

            Well, they got change, and now they are scared spitless. The independents will come out in droves for conservative candidates, not RINOs. We need to go after the independents who want the government to stay the heck away from them!!!

        • jenniferjmilleresq

          She may not have the establishment “conservative” female punditry demographic (who wants a bunch of elitist pseudo-intellectuals anyway), but the actual voting conservative female demographic…oh yeah, you better believe she’s got them.

        • scubadiver49er

          And Barry IS as well!!! Quadrupling our spending in his 1st year, sitting on his hands on Iran, making security gaffes with the Chinese, etc.; I could go on and on. He gets an “F-” from me for the way he’s run the USA so far. Sarah at least has run the state of Alaska effectively, and speaks intelligently without the teleprompter. Barry hasn’t even run a snow cone stand. Have her tell us why Barry is doing such a great job!!!! Can you pronounce “corpsman” correctly, Barry? I know Sarah can. He’s said it wrong four times so far and counting.

      • Section9

        This is what Campaigns accomplish. Despite the inherent bias of the ABC poll, it does reveal Palin’s branding problems with the General Public. Time and action can heal these wounds, and only Palin can do this.

        Fortunately, she has a couple of years to work this issue, and indeed, to decided whether or not 2012 is her cycle.

      • Ann_W

        Honestly curious, because you said that the Dems didn’t vet Obama.

        • ReaganLives

          And somehow I suspect the answers are going to sound convoluted.

          I don’t think McCain vetted her, so why would we just assume the RNC is vetting her now that she’s not even on a ticket anywhere?

          • Ann_W

            I feel like we’re being stampeded toward this. Conservatives are just running along with all the excitement and “if the MSM hates her by golly we’re going to throw her in their face”. I wish the qualities that get someone notice around here were more in line with the qualities that make someone a good elected official.

            I wish we could start discussing other people as often as we discuss Sarah already. There needs to be critical mass gathering around someone who has demonstrated competence.

          • Aaron Gardner

            I notice in your two years here you have only written one. If you would like to see your opinion as a diary, you have to write one.

            It’s a community site, take advantage of that. Or don’t complain about content.

          • Ann_W

            I just don’t have a lot of time. But you’re right.

          • Achance

            are not those “that make someone a good elected official.” Good hair and a mastery of quips and 15 second contrived soundbites get one elected in this Country. All the elites complain about lack of depth in Sarah and in politicians generally, except Comrade Obama who we all know is the smartest man who ever lived, but NOBODY in America would listen to an indepth discussion of anything. When it comes to public policy the whole Country has ADD and simply won’t sit still for more than a few seconds.

            One thing that does distinguish Palin is the fact that she doesn’t have the compulsion to be liked by everyone that drives most Republican politicians. She relishes having an enemy and if she doesn’t have one, she makes someone into one. She’s very much like anAlinskyite in that regard; she loves to fix someone and then structure her campaigning around vilifying that person.

        • streiff

          if you did, then you know she has been vetted.

          • Ann_W

            You’re right that as far as combing through her trash, and finding out about disgruntled librarians who think she pulled library books off the shelves of Wasilla, the media was very thorough. But I thought vetting was traditionally done by the people thinking about hiring her; i.e. the Republican Party in ’08, conservatives now. Vetting is supposed to evaluate a candidate for character, record, skeletons, etc. “Ra,Ra” doesn’t do that. Little surprises like, “Pres. Obama declaring war on Iran would change the 2012 election,” make me think she hasn’t been vetted. That was such a careless, pointless remark (that could be used as propaganda) about a very volatile subject. What other surprises would we be in for with Palin?

          • Section9

            Palin meant what she said when she spoke about Iran policy and its effect on our national elections.

            If Obama takes out the Iranian weapons program, that sets them back, maybe three to five years. It also buys us a lot of hostility from the Iranian regime. But they don’t get the atomic bomb, at least through Barack’s first term; which may be what matters to him.

            Such an attack would wipe away in an instant the image of fecklessness that has built up around him in the past year. Don’t think for a moment this hasn’t occurred to the people in the White House.

            She knew what she was doing. Just because you and Peggy Noonan don’t like her saying that in public doesn’t mean she wasn’t right.

          • Beasley Beesmeal

            you don’t……you fail

    • Ann_W
  • mikenad

    Make no mistake about Sarah Palin is a movement Politician and can absolutely overcome the onslaught of the media just simply hanging in there and going the distance. The more she is out there in the public and speaking in depth on Fox News the better she will be. The ABC Wash Post poll is rigged, but Palin has a skeptical public and some skeptical conservatives as does Mitt Romney. Palin has time to hone her game and has a better chance without the Governorship. She would have had to wait until January of 2011 to get her National Game in gear. The left lies and smears Palin unlike anything I have ever seen. She is building a better inner circle and right now is well ahead of Huckabee and Pawlenty and in the thick of things with Romney. She is still standing. The media is out to destroy Palin and if she stayed in Alaska the might have succeeded. She is not Quayle or Ferraro. I think she should talk more about faith and stay on message and raise the big money. We must not let the media continue to get away with Alinsky tactics against Palin. Palin must speak clearly and have no mixed messages. Unflincing Conservatism. Palin is not out of touch with America, it is the Liberals in the Media that are out of touch are she shout that message in order to win. She must be the great defender of real American values and not just an attack dog. She must sell an optimistic vision for America and American exceptionalism.

    • scubadiver49er

      I agree 100% of what you said. Get her opponents to tip their hand now instead of waiting until 2011. The song “Hit me with your best shot – fire away” comes to mind. They keep firing and she’s still standing. Give this 6-12 months and we’ll know. She’s got time. I also like the idea of her being the the next RNC Chair. She’d be great at that.

  • traversecityconservative

    The White House is at a laughable point right now – or at least laughable if they weren’t in charge of the economy and our national security. They are pissing off the right, they are pissing off the left and the independents/moderates know that the Obama on the campaign trail was a sales trick and they were duped. Sarah Palin is the easiest target for the White House because she gets so much press.

  • Martin Knight

    … with the aid of four words written on the palm of her hand. While the man journalists often mistake for a deity goes nowhere without a teleprompter.

    If I were a Lefty, even if I wasn’t afraid of her before, I’d be somewhat nervous right now.

    • jayburd

      I mean, was he ever a REAL lawyer?

    • ReaganLives

      Palin read her speech off notes on the podium. There’s no debate about that; it’s simple fact, and there’s nothing wrong with it. It’s how speeches are given! If you watch just the first few seconds of this video, you can see her carry the speech with her on stage and then she refers to it though the whole speech. Which I think is fine! For ANYONE.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7gVp3diPbI

      The stuff written on her hand was for the Q&A session after the speech.

      She was asked for “three things” and she had those “three things” written on her hand. That’s one of the reasons the MSM went into attack mode — she was given the questions in advance and still had to write answers on her hand.

      That, to be honest, bothers me. If, say, Newt Gingrich did that I’d be shocked. I’d expect him to know his stuff in a Q&A.

      Palin worries me.

      • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

        Good prophylaxis against mental lapse after giving a lengthy speech. After such a concentrated effort, one’s mind can do funny things, and writing down those notes ensured that she would remember to cover the key points she wanted to cover. Good forethought, I’d say – especially given how she’d been crucified if she’d stumbled.

        I have concerns about Palin, but writing notes on her hand is not one of them. Certainly nothing that would come close to “worrying” me. Let’s stick to substance.

        • aesthete

          Had to look that one up. Thanks c_t; that my new word of the day :)

  • Beasley Beesmeal

    I trust Sarah..

    • Ann_W

      it doesn’t mean that the two of you are an item or something, right?

      I think some of these guys just want to be assured of seeing her on the news night after night. Get a poster instead.

      • Beasley Beesmeal

        is Mitch Daniels…..who?

        Why don’t you write a diary called ‘Alternatives to Palin’

        Don’t make the diary about Sarah…..I want to hear about who you like, I sick of hearing about who you don’t like…ok?

  • sarge324

    a class act on stage in front of drunken audience.not on thr pres

    no place for that comedy act gibbs put on in front of the presidental seal.that shows you the disrespect mr gibbs has for the people and the office.keep it up sarah,we love you and respect you.you have the left going nuts.stay mad in 2010 and 2012 and vote them out.only then we will have our country back.

  • http://www.pmm.nl/philo/philo.htm#really roncdeweijze

    Today’s politics are, more than ever, about elitism (D) vs populism (R). Same is true in Europe. Palin said the Republicans don’t need leaders and I applaud her for that statement. For we need followers, pursuing the truth and Western values. That will clean out the stable and put the economy on track again and nothing else!

  • darjon38

    Gibbs has always reminded me of “Baghdad Bob”, Saddam’s spox who never knew the truth or spoke truthfully.

    Yes, they fear Palin, who was emminently more qualified than Obama-who had run nothing other than his mouth.

    One can only wonder why when they are in power and she is not.

  • darjon38

    It’s Friday morning, and Baghdad Bob is still at work.

  • Tbone

    is in full voice with their amusingly ignorant and stale lyrics. LOL

    • Scope

      and louder, with Republicans who fear Palin, as much as the D’s fear her. The D’s begin the song, and, the R’s finish with the finale, hoping to knock her out before she goes too many more rounds.

  • http://www.nixonsghost.wordpress.com hondav65

    I think that most Americans were shocked at how quickly the Obama machine and the LSM used the nuclear option on her after she was announced as John McCain’s running mate.

    And, although the “nukeing” she took was more intense than anything we’ve ever seen done to a individual – ninety percent of the crap they tried to paint her with was just petty or far out. Like the accusations that Trig isn’t her son – but her daughters. It was absolutely crazy.

    And … it hasn’t stopped – they keep doubling down on this lunacy without realizing that they’re responsible for making her a HERO. People really LIKE to see a strong woman flipping professional politicians the finger and then breaking their jaws with a political roundhouse kick – and yet, they keep giving her the opportunity to be Wonder Woman. And by the way – she even LOOKS a lot like Wonder Woman.

    If they had ignored her in the beginning … “Yeah sure, she’s okay – but she’s inexperienced … good luck to her” … then they would have never crystalized her support beyond the campaign. But by attacking her – they made her into hero. And, since she’s an expert politician – she took supreme advantage of the opportunity they gave her.

    At this point – I don’t think, even if they found a legitimate scandal on her – there’d be no one to believe it. They’ve squandered all their credibility on stupid stuff. And – no one’s listening anymore anyway because no one likes THEM anymore.

    She’s bullet proof, and she NEEDS TO BE on the GOP ticket in 2012.

    However, I’m favoring putting her back in the VP position second to Jim DeMint. Her experience is still an issue (though she has GOBS more experience than Obama and certainly a lot more actual business experience than the #2 and #3 in the line of succession now – Biden and Pelosi). We’ll be able to elect Jim DeMint president for eight years – and then we’ll still have a young Sarah Palin to turn to. We need to start thinking in dynastic proportions – because quite frankly – the Democrats have taken off the mask and exposed themselves as liberty grabbing socialists – I don’t think they’ll be around much longer. Hopefully the Dem’s will be replaced with a more centrist party that adheres to the Constitution. I really like the two-party system – but the Dems have to go the way of the Doh-Doh bird.

  • mosander

    They would rather have control than ethics in politics. Sara Palin has the best instincts on politics and throwing out bad politicians regardless of political affiliation. That is what the RNC is afraid of. And John McCain has no business being president. I believe it was constructed for him NOT to win by some within his own party. Jim DeMint would be a good choice and so would Michele Bachmann but it would be a problem having two women run together. Personally, I would like to see Jesse Ventura running. He is incredibly smart and I believe he is uncorruptible. I would rather have that than an empty suit that performs well with a teleprompter!

  • soljerblue

    BUT — of all the left of center “pundits” writing today, and many of the “right” ones — he has always had a balanced view of his subject, and is — I believe — truly an American first and a Democrat or lib last. I have heard him speak on a couple of occasions, and always his presentation has been like his columns: clear-eyed, balanced, and honest. I realized this in 1993 when he was on a panel at(then) Birmingham Southern College in Alabama discussing the “new” Clinton presidency. Broder had strong doubts about Clinton’s performance, laid them out clearly, and was subsequently proved correct in his assessment of Clinton’s character. Broder is in a class by himself, or at least with a few other Dems. I’m sure others may differ, but I’m a Broder fan long since.

  • irbobert

    That’s why you just have to consider the source and let go at that . There’re just croaks !!

  • rickindenver

    Sarah is a good and descent person who has courageously jumped into the cesspool of national politics. The way she keeps her head and shoulders above the surface is by standing on the shoulders of the nation’s founders, all the while bieng guided by a moral compass based in her deep Christian faith.
    I can not think of any other national leader that I would feel as comfortable as I do in referring to them by their first name. Can you?

  • MotherofThree

    If Sarah were a man you would be printing up your Sam Palin 2012 T-shirts right now. Admit it! All women politicians are considered “polarizing” — unfairly I might add. In case you didn’t notice, politics is very polarizing. Half the country hates Obama, but it is ASSUMED he will run for re-election.

    Sarah had a few mis-steps on the campaign trail, aided by a supremely inept McCain campaign and a deranged media. But let’s give the lady her due, and why the hell wouldn’t she run for president? As the reigning VP candidate for the GOP, she is perfectly within historical precedent to run for president. Unless of course she’s a woman. That’s right. Nobody encouraged Geraldine Ferraro to run for Prez in ’88, and now people on our side are suggesting that the most exciting leader in the GOP in a generation simply go out there as a spokeswoman, raise money, and let the men do the heavy lifting. Um, yeah, ok.

    Sarah is an excellent administrator. She’ll make an excellent president. And just think. If you get on the Sarah bandwagon now, you can avoid the rush. :-)

    • http://slcliberty.blogivists.com randy streu

      because that’s just dumb. And ignorant.