<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/streiff/2011/11/03/the-romney-flip-flops-get-national-coverage/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:12:25 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Romney Flip Flops Get National Coverage</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Often the opinion pages of the Washington Post foreshadow the line of attack the Democrats will take on particular candidates. I was a little surprised yesterday morning when I read Ruth Marcus&amp;#8217; column entitled Campaign 2012: Welcome to the slugfest. It in, Obamabot David Plouffe (rhymes with fluff) makes a very candid assessment about Mitt Romney that we, ourselves, have made over the years:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:42:03 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[streiff]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/streiff/2011/11/03/the-romney-flip-flops-get-national-coverage-n41005</link></item></channel></rss>