« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Actually, Bush VETOED the 2008 bill slipping in the end-of-life provision

I’m going to take the death panel  end-of-life planning conundrum down one point at a time to make this very clear for Americans to understand what the Pelosi-led Democrats have done to your healthcare and attempt to take cover under a Bush-era law–the Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act of 2008.  The Hill reported that the Obama White House attempted to calm Americans’ fears of the dreaded death panels:

The Medicare policy will pay doctors for holding end-of-life-care discussions with patients, according to the Times. A similar provision was dropped from the new healthcare reform law after Republicans accused the administration of withholding care from the sick, elderly and disabled. However, an administration spokesman said the regulation, which is less specific than the reform law’s draft language, is actually a continuation of a policy enacted under former President George W. Bush.

“The only thing new here is a regulation allowing the discussions … to happen in the context of the new annual wellness visit created by [healthcare reform],” Obama spokesman Reid Cherlin told The Wall Street Journal.

In 2003, Medicare added a consultation visit for seniors new to the program, according to the Journal. Another 2008 law, enacted under Bush, said the visit can include “end-of-life” planning discussions.

However, what The Hill’s Jason Millman forgot to mention in his article was that President Bush VETOED the 2008 bill and the Democrats, along with some “good-willed” Republicans OVERRODE Bush’s veto forcing him to sign the legislation into law.*  The bill dealt with doctors’ reimbursements and more, but the Democrats slipped in the end-of-life planning by opening up the Social Security Act, which I have stated many times is dangerous, because once changed, it is difficult to amend again and allows for tinkering with the Medicare fee schedule and covered services definitions and requirements.

For the record, here is the text that the Democrats changed:

(b) Revisions to Initial Preventive Physical Examination-

(1) IN GENERAL- Section 1861(ww) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(ww)) is amended–

(A) in paragraph (1)–

(i) by inserting ‘body mass index,’ after ‘weight’;

(ii) by striking ‘, and an electrocardiogram’; and

(iii) by inserting ‘and end-of-life planning (as defined in paragraph (3)) upon the agreement with the individual’ after ‘paragraph (2)’;

Comedy gold indeed, when Democrats blame Bush for, um, everything wrong in America, and then use him for cover on healthcare.

Crossposted at HotAir’s GreenRoom

* President Bush did not sign this bill into law as the congressional record mistakenly notes.  After Congress overrode Bush’s veto, President Bush was not required to sign the bill to enact it.

COMMENTS

  • williamjameson

    I was going to look up that bill thinking Bush vetoed. Magically all the liberally corrupt MSM continue to hawk the lies that Bush signed the bill. Its quite obvious the media are intentionally lying to protect Obama again and again.

  • http://www.redstate.com/tnjim TNJim

    I heard about this on Hannity last night, with Tucker Carlson guest hosting. Kirsten Powers was the lib shill pushing the claim about this coming up in the Bush admin, conveniently leaving out that he vetoed it. Tucker and the other guest, Matt Schlapp called her on it, and the game was afoot!
    Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com
    Here’s the link in case the vid doesn’t work:
    http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/index.html#/v/4475823/death-panel-deception/?playlist_id=86924

    • SusanAnne Hiller

      Poor dear. /sarc She should really do her research.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        the economy. We always refer to the “Clinton” years and the Bush Admin, but the 90s were made better by a GOP congress and the 2000s were made worse by Dems in congress before there was a President Obama, who along with super-majorities of Dems have made matters exponentially worse.

      • fpete13527

        The extent of the TRUE zero integrity shill, that Powers really is, got really clear to me in this older clip.

        Sweet mannered Powers seemed to find energy to distort, lie, and shill for law breakers and racists. Here she defends(shills) her non-defend-able idiotic position that Black Panthers with billy clubs are perfectly fine at the voting booth.

        http://bit.ly/ggFdAQ

        Great work as usual on this article, SusanAnne

    • http://seekingliberty.wordpress.com fmaidment

      …that the libs don’t think we’ll immediately remember this stuff when they start lying this way.

    • earlgrey

      I loved the look on her face. She just looked so dumb.

  • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil_truth

    I was wondering if you could explain the phrasing here:

    However, what The Hill

  • SusanAnne Hiller

    In the Congressional record it does refer to the bill being signed by Bush–even though there was a veto override.

    “This bill became law. It was signed by George Bush.”
    But with the gov’t I guess vague is vogue.

    The data and votes CLEARLY state there was a veto override. Clearly. It also appears tha this fact should be clarified on the actual and accurate record.

    I can only use information that is provided according to the record.

  • Pingback: Religio-Political Talk (RPT) Death Panels All The Rage Again