« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Parental consent for TSA pat-downs, but not for abortions

Outrage over the video posted on YouTube of a six-year old girl being “patted down” by a TSA employee triggered this potential change to TSA procedures:

In response to a YouTube video of a 6-year-old girl receiving a pat-down from a Transportation Security Administration officer, Congressman Jason Chaffetz is drafting legislation that will require parental supervision during the pat-down of a child.

“They claim there is a modified pat-down for 12-year-olds and younger, but when you see those videos, you realize that just isn’t true,” Chaffetz said.

The proposed legislation would require that a parent must give their consent before a child receives a pat-down, and that the child must remain with the parent while the pat-down is performed.  emphasis mine

While the outrage continues over the pat-downs of minor Americans for “security” purposes, what is ironic about this new concern is that the parental consent/notification issues are completely dismissed and ignored when dealing with abortions.  Most recently, LifeNews reported that a 16-year old girl was sent to the hospital after a botched abortion at a Planned Parenthood facility in Everett, Washington:

The Planned Parenthood caller, in the 911 phone transcript, says, “We have a patient bleeding. She’s 16. We just did an abortion on her.”

Hubert is very concerned about the impact this revelation has on concerns about young girls getting abortions without any parental involvement.

“This is extremely important because of a massive loophole in Washington state law which means that a minor of any age who is pregnant may get an abortion without any parental or adult protections or involvement. It could be your daughter,” he explained. “There is no need for anyone to be there with a girl while an intimidating adult at Planned Parenthood bullies them, lies to them, and manipulates them into getting an abortion that will kill their baby and, as we see here, put them in hospital, possibly rendering them permanently infertile.”

It is important to note that Planned Parenthood has not come forward to say that the girl was escorted by anyone and has not been cooperative in providing that information.

The point here is to question whether Americans have become so desensitized to girls having abortions that we direct our outrage at other more “fresh” instances–like the TSA pat-downs?  Would these same people be just as outraged if a 12- or 13-year old girl had abortion without parental consent?  Planned Parenthood has been under fire for some time, but the laws in place protect their business under the guise of health care and choice.  We all know that.  But, when do parents stand up in the states that have no laws on the books for parental consent/notification and say enough with this ruse.  Or, are they only to foot the ambulance and hospital bill after the fact?

States with no parental consent or notification laws include:  CA, CT, IL, ME, MT, NH, NJ, NY, OR, VT, WA, and Washington DC. While I am not suggesting legislation at the federal level (I’m all about states’ rights) but, it is disturbing that so much emphasis is placed on the TSA (and rightly so), and the issue of minor girls having abortions and their parents’ right to know are repeatedly ignored and challenged.

Crossposted at TMR

COMMENTS

  • lineholder

    But it would mean going after the entire abortion industry as a whole via regulatory measures to get it done.

  • Menlo

    Just last year, the state’s health department issued a new regulation that all medical facilities would have to adhere to various new and more rigorous standards and undergo routine state inspections.

    They actually EXPLICITLY included in the regulation that abortion centers could instead be regulated and inspected by Planned Parenthood or the National Abortion Federation.

    • lineholder

      Accreditation involves the establishment of standards regarding the quality of care that is provided. It is also involves credentialing of providers performing abortion procedures.

      In other words, the quality of care standards regarding abortion in the state of Washington is getting ready to bottom out big time. PP isn’t going to regulate the industry within the state to include the regulatory measures needed to maintain high quality care standards.

      It would eat into their bottom-line profits, so PP will let it slide. Who’s going to stop them? The federal government won’t do it. The state obviously won’t do it. PP has been given carte blanche to do this.

      Every time I hear PP whine about how much they care about a “woman’s right to choose” I want to vomit. Not kidding, either.

      • Menlo

        Rather they used to whine about wanting abortions to be “safe.” That was supposed to be the reason to legalize it.

        The only real difference between Planned Parenthood and a back alley is taxpayer funding.

  • http://itsaboutliberty.com bigalsouth

    Why would a 16 year old seeking “Women’s Health” information end up at Planned Parenthood getting an abortion?

    “Planned Parenthood promotes women’s health and well-being, based on respect for each individuals right to make informed, independent decisions about sex, health, and family planning.”

    (I know, I know. It’s a federally funded abortion mill.)