Nancy Pelosi comes out strongly for… limiting federal court jurisdiction over the states?
By: Moe Lane (Diary) | November 16th at 02:30 PM |
No, really: when asked a question about the debt ceiling/so-called “fiscal cliff” today Nancy Pelosi decided to respond by talking about how she was on the side of the Eleventh Amendment. For those of you who need reminding, that’s the one that limits the ability of federal courts to permit private citizens in one state from suing other states as a whole (they can still | Read More »
On this “Natural Born Citizen” Issue, Part II: From William Learned Marcy to Wong Kim Ark
By: Jake (Diary) | June 21st at 01:06 PM |
Promoted from diaries. Having discussed in Part I of my series the view of Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution‘s “natural born citizen” requirement in the days of the early republic, and provided a digression on the role English common law played in American law, it is now time to look at how the clause was viewed in the latter half of the | Read More »
Tags:
14th Amendment,
andrew johnson,
blackstone's commentaries,
civil rights act of 1866,
edgar cowan,
edmund bates,
edward fallon,
emer,
emerich de vattel,
Fourteenth Amendment,
george williams,
indians not taxed,
jacob howard,
james conness,
james falconer wilson,
james ho,
joel hylton,
john bingham,
lyman trumbull,
Lynch v. Clarke,
minor vs. happersnett,
natural-born citizen,
paschal's annotated constitution,
solomon chase,
United States Constitution,
william blackstone,
william learned marcy,
wong kim ark
The 14th Amendment Canard
By: Erick Erickson (Diary) | August 13th at 05:00 AM |
“Lindsey Graham …. just wants to save himself by looking like he is doing something without actually doing anything.” I have spent a lot of time on TV and radio this week talking about amending the 14th Amendment to deal with birthright citizenship. It is a non-issue, will not happen, and is unnecessary anyway to deal with the issue. For starters, let’s remember that birthright | Read More »