Ironic: Teamsters Called For Secret-Ballot At Hostess While Pushing To Eliminate Secret-Ballots
By: LaborUnionReport (Diary) | November 18th at 10:00 AM |
Oddly enough, with 6700 members jobs at stake, the Teamsters rightfully recommended a secret-ballot vote be taken among striking bakers’ union members.
However, while pushing a secret ballot when it served the Teamsters’ interest, the union bosses within the Teamsters’ Marble Palace want to deny everyday Americans their right to vote on unionization via secret ballot.
Read More »Tags:
BCTGM,
Employee Free Choice Act,
Hoffa,
Hostess closure,
hostess strike,
International Brotherhood of Teamsters,
irony,
James P. Hoffa,
no-vote unionization,
secret-ballot elections,
teamsters,
union hypocrisy,
Unions
The Demise of Twinkies? Yes, It’s True. Parasitic Unions Kill Their Hosts (or, in this case, Hostess)
By: LaborUnionReport (Diary) | November 13th at 09:00 PM |
Back in September, following acceptance by the Teamsters. the bakers’ union (BCTGM) at bankrupt Hostess brands—makers of the iconic Twinkies, Ding Dongs and Wonder brand breads—rejected a company proposal to help keep the company in business. By a voice vote of its members, the union opened the door to conduct a company-killing strike and potentially putting 18,500 Hostess workers onto the streets. Well, on Friday, | Read More »
NLRB To Union-Busting Teamsters: Stop Harassing Organizers For Wanting Their Own Union
By: LaborUnionReport (Diary) | September 6th at 08:45 AM |
Union bosses who pretend they’re fighters for the working class often are accused by their own employees of committing the same sins that they accuse employers of doing. Very often, when push comes to shove, union bosses become the worst kind of union busters there are–because they should know better. Take, for example, the Teamsters who, back in 2009, threatened to operate their union business | Read More »
Teamsters’ Push For Shorter Hours May Leave Drivers Very Short On Pay
By: LaborUnionReport (Diary) | July 5th at 12:00 PM |
It is axiomatic—a given, if you will—that unions do not like workers to work overtime. Sure, they’ll do it, but if unions had their druthers, the work week would be limited to 40 hours—in some cases unions prefer 35 hours. The reasoning is simple, the fewer hours worked, the more employees an employer must employ and, in a workplace where unions can require dues, the | Read More »