The US and NATO-backed side in the Libyan Civil War is Requesting a Cease-Fire
By: Jeff Emanuel (Diary) | April 1st at 05:00 PM |
On the heels of the Obama administration’s declaration of its readiness to go to war Kinetic Military Action on both sides of the Libyan civil war comes a report that the rebels have requested a cease-fire from the Qaddafi government. According to Bloomberg: Libyan rebels called for a cease- fire as forces loyal to Muammar Qaddafi drove them back for a third day after sandstorms | Read More »
Voting Present on Steroids: The Obama Administration Prepares to take Both Sides in the Libyan Civil War
By: Jeff Emanuel (Diary) | April 1st at 02:00 PM |
Let me begin by saying, though the date on this post is 4/1/2011, this is not an April Fool’s gag – it’s real. I. Fresh off claiming victory not over Qaddafi, but over responsibility itself, with its touted handoff of the war kinetic military effort to itself-under-different-name, the Obama administration is now swinging the guns around on those on whose behalf we have, until now, | Read More »
Happy ‘Handoff of Libya War from American-Led Coalition to American-Led Coalition’ Day
By: Jeff Emanuel (Diary) | March 30th at 11:51 AM |
In Barack Obama’s Monday night address on Libya, which took place well over a week after he began waging offensive war on Libya, the president touted the fact that the U.S. military, which had been responsible or the vast majority of military action to that point, would soon be handing off the mission to allies and, apparently, fading into the background to let those allies | Read More »
Obama’s Not Just Bombing Libya: The Main Course Speech That Felt More Like an Appetizer
By: Jeff Emanuel (Diary) | March 28th at 09:38 PM |
You might have heard that President Obama (finally) gave a speech about the shelling of Libya he ordered well over a week ago. Or, you might not have; he’s been trying pretty hard to keep our involvement in it out of the public eye, despite the US having the leading role in every phase of this “kinetic military action” except (1) decision-making, and (2) actually | Read More »
More Libya Muddling from the White House (and from President Obama)
By: Jeff Emanuel (Diary) | March 28th at 05:15 PM |
Exactly a week ago, Kevin Baron of Stars and Stripes wrote the following about Libya and the Obama campaign administration’s “plan” there: The U.S.-led coalition is slowing its bombing campaign over Libya and pushing the boundaries of a no-fly zone westward toward Tripoli, but it will not provide close air support for opposition rebels, its commander said. There is no sign, however, that a handoff | Read More »
Obama administration: It’s not war, it’s Kinetic Military Action!
By: Moe Lane (Diary) | March 25th at 10:00 AM |
Background: our adventure in Libya is apparently the War That Dare Not Speak Its Name. At least, the White House seems absolutely, completely determined to avoid the ‘war’ word, to the point where administration officials actually used the laugh-out-loud weasel term ‘kinetic military action‘ to describe the situation. ‘Kinetic’ is definitely the buzzword in play, here: Defense Secretary Gates himself said that if our ad | Read More »