LA Times caught in yet another lie
Kind of shocking that they’d lie, I know Patterico popped the LA Times writer Peter Wallsten attempting to blatantly change what John Cornyn of Texas said on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” regarding probing further into past statements made by Sotomayor. What Wallsten originally said; Only days earlier, Cornyn said in a radio interview that it was “terrible” for conservatives to be attacking Sotomayor as | Read More »
Just a reminder: Democrats wanted Bush to fail in 2006.
Links via Hot Air. Here’s the first question, exactly as it was offered: Contra Ed, though, the Sister Toldja post actually indicates that a bare majority of Democrats were pro-victory in 2007. Which is nothing to be proud of, considering that we were right and they were wrong, but expect the shouting to start over that. Besides, it’ll keep them from admitting to this: 21. | Read More »
Murdoch rumored to be after the New York Times.
(Via Patterico) Not at all likely, but definitely funny: Murdoch on the prowl for print sales NEW YORK — Rupert Murdoch’s counterintuitive quest to invest in print media helped drive away longtime lieutenant Peter Chernin. And now that Chernin can’t intercede, does Murdoch want to follow News Corp.’s $5 billion buyout of Dow Jones by gobbling up the struggling New York Times Co.? The answer | Read More »
The 2009 Pelosimobiles are in!
He was joking. I’m certain of it. Iowahawk was joking.
Patterico Strikes Again
Perhaps the most relentless and determined blogger this side of Beldar, the great and good Patterico has his yearly review of the Los Angeles Times out for your perusal. This is just a guess, but I am thinking that the Times editors are . . . well . . . not happy to have Patterico focus his spotlight on them. Read the post and you | Read More »