Of Course We Should Oppose Judge Sotomayor
We must oppose Sotomayor, because she is a weak addition to the Supreme Court. While in a partisan strategic sense it is quite possible that having an inferior mind installed as the next Justice is a net positive, that may not be what is best for the country.
Read More »
So, what does Obama NOT want you paying attention to?!?!
Pay no attention to what is happening, we (Obama Administration) want you to focus on the “Hysterical” … oops, I mean, of course, “Historical” (read: RACE-baiting Identity Politics+, which isn’t new for Democrats/Liberals) Latina/Hispanic SCOTUS pick (not really+, maybe and maybe not, read on to discover why, but don’t expect the MSM to bother to provide any Facts)…. This is about “their side” the ObamAgenda, | Read More »
, Barack Obama
, judicial activism
, Liberal Incremental-ism
, Sonia Sotomayor
So it’s Sotomayor; another liberal who can save us
Not too much of a surprise– although a few political writers have noted that with the Obama’s selection criteria would have made Paula Abdul an equally good a choice. Sotomayor’s New Haven firefighters decision is so scary, and in my mind it mostly speaks to conservatives’ inability to communicate ideas to the masses effectively. Any educated person would realize that it is unconstitutional to favor | Read More »
It’s Common Sense to Select a Conservative for SCOTUS
Although I’m a conservative, I’d like to argue for a concept here not on the basis of a political agenda, but more on the basis of supporting the logical strands the Founding Fathers used to establish our Constitution. I think it is easily supportable that those original Framers intended to set up the framework of the constitution to be self-supporting, and internally protective. | Read More »
Could Obama Stack The Supreme Court
With the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice David Souter, the pundits and Senators are making speculation as to who is on Obama’s short list to become the first SCOTUS appointment for the 44th President. According to Utah GOP Senator Orrin Hatch who met with Obama on his pending appointment, the nomination could come before weeks end. Whoever Obama picks will obviously be of the | Read More »
Justice Ginsberg Would Rather be Liked by Foreigners Than be Right
Ever since Justice Sandra Day O’Connor began babbling about it several years ago, the talk of Supreme Court Justices of the United States of America using foreign court rulings to base their decisions upon has been a topic of dread for those interested in adhering to the U.S. Constitution. It should be shocking to see a U.S. Supreme Justice talking about using foreign precedent but | Read More »
SCOTUS appointment imminent?
Elections have consequences: The SCOTUS Chronicles. Today "Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 75, had surgery on Thursday for pancreatic cancer" a court spokesman said. Spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said in a statement that Ginsburg showed no symptoms of pancreatic cancer before the initial discovery of a lesion during a routine annual check-up in late January. Arberg said Ginsburg had surgery for "apparently early-stage" pancreatic | Read More »
Time for the NRA and Gun Owners to Fight
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has stated that the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution does not apply the Second Amendment to the states. We need to fight this ruling. The NRA needs to file a cert petition with the SCOTUS to get this under control. We need to get this before Obama and the socialist justice department get their way and appoint new justices to the Court. We did not win | Read More »
Philip J. Berg Files Writ With Supreme Court Over Obama Qualifications
Yesterday afternoon, Philip J Berg, Esq. whose recent civil suit filed in Federal Court in Philly Case No. 2:2008cv04083 was dismissed not because evidence, but on standing of the plaintiff, has taken his case to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Issues RECAP, categorized reasons why BHO would be dangerous as our next President
The land of a thousand Issues, well maybe not that many…[UPDATED: April 2009, to correct/fix links (that were getting errors) to RS4.0 Directory locations. (RS:Help 4.0)] Friends/Associates – “You have to know where you’ve been, if you want to know where you’re going.” Barack Obama nice how he admits/tells us his past associations matter. Hear Obama himself say it at: Caleb (absentee) Diary – Obama | Read More »
, Barack Obama
, Hillary Clinton
, Joe Biden
, Sarah Palin
Via scotusblog:In re: Brunner v. Ohio Republican PartyThe Supreme Court, acting on the case after the Circuit Justice, Justice John Paul Stevens referred the matter to the full bench, not only granted the secretary of state’s plea to stay the federal judge’s temporary restraining order, but actually vacated it, thus removing any legal obligation spelled out in that order.
Nine Blind Mice
The Supreme Court does not hear all cases that are brought to their attention. Take these latest two cases.The first case involved the Natural Resources Defense Council’s attempt to block the Navy’s use of sonar in their antisubmarine warfare exercises on the coast of S. California, citing the deleterious effects on whales (evidently someone’s watched Star Trek IV too many times). Another caseinvolved David Parker’s | Read More »
Scared Straight: Granholm to Supreme Court Should Motivate EVERYONE to Vote McCain
Cross-posted on Right Michigan at www.RightMichigan.com.And to bring five or six friends with you when you go to the polls. MLive is reporting this morning that Governor Granholm may well be on Barack Obama’s short list for a nomination to the Supreme Court. Of the United States of America. For life. Say the Barackstar wins. Say John Paul Stevens decides next year, at 89, that | Read More »