Just a Company of American paratroopers, a guitar plugged
into the outpost's PA system, and a whole lot of demolitions.
Playing Games with the Troops
Posted at 10:53am on May 16, 2008 Present Instead of No
By Erick
Having blasted the House GOP this week, let me praise them today.
They got fed up with the Democrats playing games with the lives of our troops. The Democrats, in pushing their war supplemental, highlighted their real priorities. In order, they were tax increases on the entrepreneurial class, spending on liberal social programs, tying the hands of the Commander-in-Chief, and screwing the war criminals in Iraq troops.
The GOP did the only thing left they could do -- they refused to participate in the game. Instead of even voting no, they voted present. It had a lot of people scratching their heads, but these people paid attention and asked why.
And, again, the answer is simple: the Democrats are playing games with the lives of our soldiers in harm's way. They do not want to fund the troops, but they know they have to. So they are trying to fund everything else first and daring the President to veto the funding.
He will. He should. And the GOP continues to be the party that stands up for the troops. Here's Roy Blunt on the matter:
the bottom line on this week's bill was it was never designed to fund the troops. The Democrats knew that this would not be a bill signed into law. It was designed to be a package that used the troops to do other spending that they know they can't get done without the troops.Republican members voted present on that section of the bill. We then demonstrated we had the veto-sustaining strength that everybody knew we had on the other two sections of the bill.
Posted in Congress | John Boehner | Playing Games with the Troops | Present | War — Comments (10)/ Email this page » / Read More »
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



Recent comments
Do any
by dglennI couldn't find the quote. Show me the quote and link and this
by gamecockFL-16 was Mark Foley's seat.
by swami7774And playtime's over. Blam.
by Neil StevensYes. You are clearly crazy.
by Reggiehamen on all that - nt
by gamecockka klick... nt
by mbecker908Patriotism
by bobbymikeagreed - nt
by gamecockAlthough I have less and
by FlagstaffHow am I contradicting myself? Try to actually read my comment!
by Cheetah772Mary Jo Kopechne could not be reached for comment, but
by gamecockATTN: Neil Stevens
by ReggiehReggieh, how about Kennedy murdering a woman? Think twice!
by Cheetah772"I don't want to downplay
by ReggiehI know why Carter left the SBC. The SBC insisted that seminary
by gamecockI know!!!!
by ReggiehI agree
by TomlinsonDouthatYes, Reggieh, read on to find out:
by Cheetah772Wow, sounds like Senator Helms
by Reggieh