Like His Policies, His Attacks Are Not Working Either


Barack Obama’s economic policies have failed to do anything except drive up the national debt. He has not created or saved jobs. He has not gotten Americans back to work. About the only significant industry he has expanded is the printing industry printing all the extra food stamps Americans now depend on.

His campaign attacks do not seem to be working either.

He is winning women, but not by the overwhelming margins he needs to get elected.

He is now losing Catholic voters, a key constituency he won in 2008.

He is even losing Democrats on his Bain Capital attacks. His campaign has spent more time explaining itself to Democrats this week on those attacks than it has been able to level the attacks. It doesn’t help when the Obama campaign is raking in money from Bain Capital and private equity firms while trying to demagogue them.

In a nutshell, the Obama campaign must convince Americans that Mitt Romney would be a worse option on the economy than Americans already believe Barack Obama is. Running a campaign on the message of “you think I’m bad, just look at him” is not really a winning message.

Last night, Barack Obama got a lower percentage of the vote among Democrats in Kentucky and Arkansas than Mitt Romney did with his base. Over 40% of Democrats in Kentucky voted against Barack Obama. Even at 11pm ET last night, the Associated Press had called the Arkansas Republican Primary for Mitt Romney, but still had not called the Democratic race for Barack Obama.

Read More →

Category:

Like His Policies, His Attacks Are Not Working Either


Barack Obama’s economic policies have failed to do anything except drive up the national debt. He has not created or saved jobs. He has not gotten Americans back to work. About the only significant industry he has expanded is the printing industry printing all the extra food stamps Americans now depend on.

His campaign attacks do not seem to be working either.

He is winning women, but not by the overwhelming margins he needs to get elected.

He is now losing Catholic voters, a key constituency he won in 2008.

He is even losing Democrats on his Bain Capital attacks. His campaign has spent more time explaining itself to Democrats this week on those attacks than it has been able to level the attacks. It doesn’t help when the Obama campaign is raking in money from Bain Capital and private equity firms while trying to demagogue them.

In a nutshell, the Obama campaign must convince Americans that Mitt Romney would be a worse option on the economy than Americans already believe Barack Obama is. Running a campaign on the message of “you think I’m bad, just look at him” is not really a winning message.

Last night, Barack Obama got a lower percentage of the vote among Democrats in Kentucky and Arkansas than Mitt Romney did with his base. Over 40% of Democrats in Kentucky voted against Barack Obama. Even at 11pm ET last night, the Associated Press had called the Arkansas Republican Primary for Mitt Romney, but still had not called the Democratic race for Barack Obama.

Read More →

Category:

Electoral implications of the Obama Administration’s War on Coal.


Will this be the 2012 election map?

If the Obama administration keeps up their War on Coal (literally: they consider coal more dangerous than terrorism), quite possibly. And it may be at least partially because of coal.

Read More →


Electoral implications of the Obama Administration’s War on Coal.


Will this be the 2012 election map?

If the Obama administration keeps up their War on Coal (literally: they consider coal more dangerous than terrorism), quite possibly. And it may be at least partially because of coal.

Read More →


NATO’s (1%) left Chicago; we (99%) are recovering


While Rahm, David and Barack congratulate themselves over a successful Summit, the rest of us 99%-ers are recovering.  I’m a born and bred Chicagoan still residing in the “land”, and the Rahm-bo version of the “we’re going to keep everyone safe” police state that came along with the Summit didn’t quite appeal to me, or to much of the populace.  

Police, Activists in Chicago (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

While the 2012 NATO Summit was intended to provide a backdrop showcasing the foreign policy smarts of our current President (although it’s said France’s Hollande stole the show), the Summit proved to be a nightmare for the 99%-ers who are fueling what economy Chicago has left.  The closing of the major museums affected tourism, and many businesses urged their employees to work from home Friday and Monday because of the ridiculous rules that Metra rail adhered to (no beverages, food, backpacks allowed on board-only one 15 x 15 carry-on) not to mention K-9 units at certain stations, when they weren’t closed, and the miles of roadways shut down over the Summit period.

Now what effect do you suppose this had on the businesses, and people who run them, whose livelihoods depend on the office workers for the $$ to be able to pay for rent and groceries.  I’m sure the Four Seasons and The Peninsula made out very well, and Tru and Spiaggia had their restaurants humming through the early hours of the morning.  But the lady who sells pizza from her small restaurant truck on Madison and LaSalle didn’t make out so well, since the Loop was a reported “ghost town” for four days.  And the couple who own the dry cleaners/shoe shine in the Mercantile, the Loop restaurants that rely on the breakfast/luncheon crowds, their waiters who rely on tips….you get the picture.  

According to the Mayor, Chicago has impressed its foreign guests, which in turn, will be a boon for tourism.  We can just imagine Belgium’s secretary for international affairs tell his wife, “mon amie, this year we are not going for our vacation to San Tropez, we are going to Chicago.”  

But for all the hype and hoopla, what bothered me most about this visit was, as I mentioned earlier, the “police state” syndrome that the City took on.  Yes, I understand we hosted foreign heads of state, and it’s a dangerous world we live in.  However, the police presence in Chicago and the measures taken, in relation to other cities who have hosted Summit-level events in the past, was in my not so humble opinion over the top, and showed how parochial this “major” city became to help Rahm ensure that absolutely nothing would mar or embarrass his former boss. 

Looking at any of the photos seen during this Summit, and it appears there are 10 police officers for every protestor.  The Chicago Police Dept. spent over $1 million dollars in riot equipment according to the City’s procurement website, including two expensive long-range acoustic device (LRAD) vehicles.  And let’s not forget the five Blackhawk helos that were training over the city a month beforehand.

Not all protestors are violent.  They have a right to peacefully assemble; our Constitution guarantees it.  However, even those rights were curtailed by special edict passed by the City over the number of permits issued, as well as the venues used.  While NATO was a success, the average citizen’s rights to work, to walk, to drive, to speak, were curtailed.  

We miss you, Richie.  

 

Cross posted at www.political-woman.com

 

 

 

 


On this “Natural Born Citizen” Issue, Part I: From Alexander Hamilton to Lynch v. Clarke


Promoted from diaries.

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President…

–Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution

This is a passage that has weighed heavily upon us in recent years. There are those among us, known commonly as “Birthers” who dispute the eligibility of various politicians to be President or Vice-President of the United States. The most popular target of the Birthers is Barack Obama, of course, but of late, Birthers have been training their sights on the cases of Marco Rubio, Nikki Haley, Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz, and probably others.

Leaving aside the birth certificate issue, which is unique to Obama’s case (and for the record, I do believe he was born in Hawaii), the main sticking point for the Birthers is that all four of the politicians have at least one parent who was not born in America (indeed, Obama is the only one who had a parent who was an American citizen at the time of his birth, his mother). They are fond of quoting the line from Book I, Chapter XIX of Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations: “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

While they are not wrong in that the Founders were fond of the book, there’s one problem with trying to apply this interpretation to our Constitution: the United States’ legal history.

I am planning this to be a mutli-part series. Part II will deal with the interpretation of this clause in the latter half of the 19th century, with particular emphasis placed on the 14th Amendment and later court cases. Part III, meanwhile, will deal with how the clause has been dealt with in the 20th century and in our day. So, let’s jump right in.

Hit the jump for more.

Read More →


On this “Natural Born Citizen” Issue, Part I: From Alexander Hamilton to Lynch v. Clarke


Promoted from diaries.

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President…

–Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution

This is a passage that has weighed heavily upon us in recent years. There are those among us, known commonly as “Birthers” who dispute the eligibility of various politicians to be President or Vice-President of the United States. The most popular target of the Birthers is Barack Obama, of course, but of late, Birthers have been training their sights on the cases of Marco Rubio, Nikki Haley, Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz, and probably others.

Leaving aside the birth certificate issue, which is unique to Obama’s case (and for the record, I do believe he was born in Hawaii), the main sticking point for the Birthers is that all four of the politicians have at least one parent who was not born in America (indeed, Obama is the only one who had a parent who was an American citizen at the time of his birth, his mother). They are fond of quoting the line from Book I, Chapter XIX of Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations: “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

While they are not wrong in that the Founders were fond of the book, there’s one problem with trying to apply this interpretation to our Constitution: the United States’ legal history.

I am planning this to be a mutli-part series. Part II will deal with the interpretation of this clause in the latter half of the 19th century, with particular emphasis placed on the 14th Amendment and later court cases. Part III, meanwhile, will deal with how the clause has been dealt with in the 20th century and in our day. So, let’s jump right in.

Hit the jump for more.

Read More →


Obama for America… provides Team Romney with its latest ad.


For free.  Here’s Mitt Romney‘s latest strike-while-the-iron-is-hot attack ad “Big Bain Backfire:”

Nice to see that they’re keeping up with events, huh?

Read More →


Obama for America… provides Team Romney with its latest ad.


For free.  Here’s Mitt Romney‘s latest strike-while-the-iron-is-hot attack ad “Big Bain Backfire:”

Nice to see that they’re keeping up with events, huh?

Read More →


‘Afghan good enough’ Obama lowers the bar for victory in Afghanistan


American-led combat operations will cease in summer 2013, whether the Afghan military can secure the country or not.

According to the New York Times, president Obama has “significantly lowered” the bar on how success in Afghanistan is defined.

In four years Obama has gone from ”we must never forget, this is not a war of choice, this is a war of necessity” and “this is a war that we have to win” to “Afghan good enough.” According to the Times, Obama’s new definition of victory in his war of necessity that must be won is Afghan stability and no unimpeded Al Qaeda safe havens:

“The goal is to have an Afghanistan again that has a degree of stability such that forces like Al Qaeda and associated groups cannot have safe haven unimpeded, which could threaten the region and threaten U.S. and other interests in the world.”

In today’s New York Times, David E. Sanger reports that Obama will announce at the NATO summit that “all combat operations led by American forces will cease in summer 2013, when the United States and other NATO forces move to a ‘support role’ whether the Afghan military can secure the country or not.” Worse, Obama planned this retreat without the benefit of military advice:

“When the president and a half-dozen White House aides began to plan for the withdrawal, the generals were cut out entirely. There was no debate, and there were no leaks.”

Read More →