Democrats’-Smoke and Mirrors Presidential Campaign


http://lafango.com/blog/brightfame_63/91311-the-democratic-party-agenda-is-hidden-in-smoke-and-mirrors

When a Democrat spokesman was asked if same sex marriage would be on the Democratic platform he said that it was being considered because “government” should not be allowed to determine the definition of marriage.  What he means is “state(S) government should not be allowed to determine same sex marriage in its’ own state.

Apparently, the liberal Democrats believe that the Federal Government should be able to govern and rule over state legislation if it doesn’t support their agenda of legislated social change.


2012 Elections-Americans Making It Right In America


http://lafango.com/blog/brightfame_63/72611-2012-presidental-elections-americans-making-it-right

We need a president holds ethical and moral values as the highest priority in this country.  Mit Romney is focused on economice recovery, as we all are, but what good is the best thought out plan if there is no integrity to follow through?

Mitt Romney has already proven that he will compromise his integrity and lie to the American people as well.

We already have that type of President and we don’t need a business manager. We need a president of integrity, honor, and duty. Rick Santorum is that man.


A Vote For Newt or Paul is a Vote For Mitt Romney


http://lafango.com/blog/brightfame_63/76251-a-vote-for-gringrich-or-paul-is-a-vote-for-mitt-romney

It is evident who will be the Presidental nominee if the Republican primay doesn’t become a two man race.

America, Do we really want elect another person as President who has already been proven that he will lie to the American people?

Gov. Jon Huntsman said that he supports Mitt Romney because he feels Rick Santorum is too honest. ” Too honest”……right!  “Too honest”.

Mitt Romney will continue to hold the lead as long as this is a four man race and since Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul have their own interests at heart and won’t drop out to make this a two man race, the American people will have to throw their support behind Rick Santorum, that is, if they really want to have the choice of electing the best man for the job in the General elections in November.

 


Governor Perry, I have the ‘temerity’ to suggest: Will you change the horse you ride out on?


Temerity-Excessive confidence or boldness; audacity: “no one had the temerity to question his conclusions.”

The first time I heard a living person use the word, The Speaker described the ‘rebellion’ that came from the house leadership and removed him from his position as Speaker. Old words, old ideas from a different age of black and white, right and wrong, an age where the Speaker’s authority was unquestioned.

It was Sean Hannity’s show, the Speaker’s first interview after the dirty deed. It showed me a side of Newt Gingrich that seems incredibly self important. At no time, in that 10 plus year old interview, did Newt considered the ground he had laid bare to allow Dems to take back the House. Giant violation of the ‘don’t c**p in the punchbowl’, maxim. His words seem even more egotistical and hypocritical now as the current revelations of Callista and terms like  ‘open marriage’ are tossed about. There was cause, good cause, and The Speaker’s response was, ‘Temerity’. Somehow he failed to see it wasn’t all about him.

Skip forward to days before the South Carolina primary. Rick Perry (who I dismissed out of hand before understanding there was a conservative, Mitt Stream Media) gave a speech from that old time of honor and responsibility; ‘I understand the mission is more important than the person, the mission of election a conservative to the White House. I terminate my campaign and give my support to Newt Gingrich to carry that mission forward.’

With that honorable endorsement Newt won the only state he has carried, outside his home state of Georgia. I suggest Newt won SC because he had the endorsement of an honorable man, not from his debate performance. That endorsement was burned off in, what can easily be described as, temper-tantrums in FL. Newt is polling neck and neck with Rick today in AL. Even in the South, the power of that endorsement is gone.

Just for giggles imagine with me a 60 second advert that shows Newt being asked a question and the flash of anger that crosses his eyes and face, no words. New question, new flash, and again, and again (there is plenty of raw material). The Angry-Newt face, face, face, flipped on the screen. Cut to the ‘Daisy’ commercial from the 60′s and the announcer asking how we can trust him with…. cut to the thermo-nuclear-explosion-mushroom-cloud???? Super Tuesday exit polling shows Newt with 45% plus negatives. Every day he stays in this race those numbers are getting worse. Does he ever ask why?

Most of the people that spend time here at Redstate believe that replacing o’bama (wish I could make the ‘o’ smaller, as it’s vaporware) is key to restoring the prosperity of our nation. With the issues on the table, Mitt Romney is the worst of all the choices.

The Virginia vote for Ron Paul of over 40% is staggering. So subtract the Pauliacks (ducklings quacking and following their mother) at around 10%. Can it be true that some 30% of Republican voters supported the nut job, who believes nuclear holocaust in the Middle East is an acceptable form of conflict resolution, rather than vote for Romney? I can understand. I would have been tempted with those choices.

So after Super-Tuesday we find ourselves with: Gov Romney’s whack-a-mole, carpet bombing (12 to 1 dollars in Ohio), of only the candidate that rises to challenge him; Adelson’s dog leash support of Newt (to maintain the division of conservative voters), the Mitt stream Media’s continuing drumbeat of his inevitability (we have to make it look like Mitt’s the victor of something).

All this will give us a candidate that has engineered a hostile-take-over of the Republican Party nomination with 35% support. Quite an accomplishment for Mitt, not a winning strategy for US (as in the country we all love). The way a person wins says a lot. The soulless accusations that are being directed at Rick shows me a campaign that is willing to win at any cost. Not someone I want leading the country.

Can I make this point any stronger? Mitt is the worst candidate running with the situations that confront US today:

  • Unemployment beaten back and the economy restored by the man whose ‘soulless vulture capitalism’ made money on the backs of the 1,000′s of peasants. He left the shards of companies that had to be paid for by the government saviors, and enjoys firing people to boot? That is already the MSM narrative, do you believe the ‘occupy’ cretins are gone for good?
  • o’bama-care defeated and liberty restored by the man who 2 years ago, in video on all the networks, supported it? Chris Mathews suggested all o’ needs to say is, ‘thank you for Romney-care’ to win the debate point.

Adelson’s support will shift to Mitt (check the WSJ) but o’ will have liberal loony left, George Soros, and company. The carpet bombing/divide and conquer approach that has worked, so far, for the nomination, can’t work when there is only one well funded opponent. A third of Republicans didn’t vote for Mitt in Virginia. How can he hope to win? The Mitt stream Media ignores the fact that Newt in the race (funded by Adelson, btw, Who is the candidate of the Billionares?) has produced those supposed game changing Mitt ‘wins’.

No amount of Newtonium (a newly discovered substance that blinds normally rational people to the self destructive nature of a national Newt Gingrich campaign) can overcome the fact Newt’s negatives are long established and getting worse. He can’t get the nomination in Tampa without the waiving of a magic wand. Newt and o’ will never be on a stage together. Even if they were, would the MSM or o’ give Newt a ‘softball’ to get ‘the flash’ that helps?  But wait, not a big enough ‘flash’ to melt down Newt’s campaign? When I hear someone say, ‘Newt will win the debate with o’. Oh really?! You’re willing to bet the next 4 years on Newt’s tempered-temper?

The Romney campaign seems to be the political version of a vampire (do you see anything in the mirror?) that no one can stop. Newt could have put a stake through the beast 10 days ago and had the same undying respect that Governor Perry has earned and really restarted his political career. But, Adelson gives Newt 10 million and the egotist sees it as approval to continue on.

Did Newt ever consider the bigger question about ‘The Mission’, to elect a conservative President? Were there just 1 1/2% in Michigan and 1/2% in Ohio voters tilted by Newt’s national media buys?  I’m frustrated and disgusted about how non-mission focused Newt is. It’s getting harder to mention Newt’s name without a catch in the back of my throat that has a bile taste to it.  The conservative punch bowl has a putrid odor coming from it, again.

So, Governor Perry, with temerity, I ask. Is the mission still the most important thing? Because of the sacrifice you’ve made for your fellow warrior, your future in conservative politics is bright. The horse you came in on keeps stumbling in the same gopher holes. It will keep him from winning this race.

There is another scrappy battler who has the possibility to turn purple states red and fights for freedom. The conservative ideas put forth by Rick Santorum will overwhelm the Romney vampire machine and put it out of its misery. Conservatives banded together can stop the o’ train. Will you change the dynamics of this race and give the conservative mission a chance? Will you change the horse you ride out on to Rick Santorum?

Thanks for your time and consideration.


Hangover Wednesday


It’s All Over But The Veepage, Baby

Well, Super Tuesday didn’t quite pan out the way I hoped it would. Like most supporters of a guy who came in “Not First,” I could spend Hangover Wednesday trying to spin. I prefer not to bother. It’s better just to suck the lemon. Lemons are rich in Vitamin C.

I still stand by my endorsement issued a couple of weeks back. I would prefer that Senator Rick Santorum win the primaries and rise to the challenge of taking Barack Obama out like yesterday’s garbage. It would also be cool if somebody gave me a pony. (Not really, but I always tell my kid that when he wants me to buy him a Hot Wheels car at Kroger.) It feels good to go with my heart, but some days life just sucks and you have to engage with your brain instead.

Read More →


Hangover Wednesday


Well, Super Tuesday didn’t quite pan out the way I hoped it would. Like most supporters of a guy who came in “Not First,” I could spend Hangover Wednesday trying to spin. I prefer not to bother. It’s better just to suck the lemon. Lemons are rich in Vitamin C.

I still stand by my endorsement issued a couple of weeks back. I would prefer that Senator Rick Santorum win the primaries and rise to the challenge of taking Barack Obama out like yesterday’s garbage. It would also be cool if somebody gave me a pony. (Not really, but I always tell my kid that when he wants me to buy him a Hot Wheels car at Kroger.) It feels good to go with my heart, but some days life just sucks and you have to engage with your brain instead.

Read More →


Gingrich, Romney, Santorum and Paul: Integrity in the Presidential Primary


It looked until very recently like either Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney, who were jockeying back and forth in the polls, were a “shoe-in” to win the GOP Primary.  But that was before Rick Santorum took off, i.e. Rick Santorum’s Presidential campaign blasted off form the Primary launch pad.  It blasted off like a giant Atlas V Rocket with two solid propellant booster tanks strapped securely to its sides, and a Presidential candidate’s capsule mounted firmly atop the powerful launch vehicle, which was aimed directly at Washington D.C. with a soft targeted landing planned for 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue sometime between November 2nd 2012 and January 20th 2013.

All of this was going on while Newt Gingrich was expounding about colonizing the moon, and Mitt Romney was somewhere out in deep space trying to figure out where his next shift in policy position was coming from. I’ve heard it said that Mormons actually believe that God is going to give them their own planets to rule in the hereafter. I think it is just the men that get to have their own planets. I don’t know what Mormon women are supposed to do in the next world while their husbands are out busy ruling planets, but maybe that’s why the women have so many children, because there are so many planets out there to colonize… So I guess the only difference between Newt and Mitt is that Newt wants to colonize the moon right now, while Mitt is content to wait until the hereafter for the colonization of the planets to begin! Maybe by then somebody will figure out a way for them to breathe up there in outer space.  Just a minor detail, I know.

Right now about all I can say is, Go Rick Go!  There is just way too much stuff to overlook in order to vote for either Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney.  I mean what with Newt’s perennial marital infidelities and his disregard for solemn vows that he swore to uphold, his twenty year career as a big government politician who grew the size of the federal government, voted to create the Department of Education, voted to surrender American sovereignty to GATT, voted for NAFTA, his affinity for Alvin Toffler’s books calling for the destruction of the existing world order and the creation of a new world order, his resignation from Congress in disgrace in 1999 over admitted ethics violations, and his most recent career as a Washington D.C. lobbyist cashing in on all of his political connections, “Newt Gingrich the sequel” would make a much better movie than a President.

And what can you say about Mitt Romney? Or what can’t you say about Mitt Romney for that matter? What do you say about a guy who has changed his positions on the issues over the years more than the weather changes in Oregon? The joke about the weather in Oregon is that if you don’t like the weather just wait a few minutes and it will change!  And that’s just about how long you have to wait for Mitt Romney to change his position on some important issue too!

To be fair I could also vote for Ron Paul, who along with Rick Santorum are the only two honest candidates left in the race. Paul like Santorum seems to have learned not to tell a lie at a very early age, and they didn’t forget that very important lesson after they grew up, like Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney did.  Our Founding Fathers warned us about the importance of good character in selecting our leaders.  George Washington, John Adams, John Quincy Adams, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Benjamin Harrison among others all told us that honesty and integrity matter more than anything else when selecting our leaders. Heaven help us if we don’t follow their advice. Oh there I go talking about outer space again.

Ron Paul and Rick Santorum both have the kind of character that our founding fathers would be well satisfied with. Just like George Washington and Abraham Lincoln who learned not to tell lies at an early age, Paul and Santorum have never forgotten that lesson later in life just in order to become successful.  In fact Benjamin Harrison, our 23rd President put it best when he said, “Vacillating and inconsistency are as incompatible with personal success as they are with self-respect and human dignity.” Reprisal

So my motto for this Presidential Primary Race is to vote for an honest man, not for a candidate who will tell you just about anything you want to hear in order to get elected.  Vote for an honest man, even over a much smarter man, because without integrity all of the intelligence in the world won’t necessarily be helpful!

You can read more of Scott’s work at www.LessGovIsTheBestGov.com.


Before You Vote This Week…


An appeal to my reasonable conservative friends:

If you are not reasonable and open-minded, don’t read any further. I’m not looking for “zots.” I’m looking for reasonable people who are serious about making the right choice. When I know I’ve chosen wisely, I feel at peace, without doubt in my mind, and start to get excited – like Chrissy Mathews, I get “that tingle.” How do you feel when you know you’ve made the right choice?

At this point, you’ve been following the primary race for months, and that means you are looking to make the right choice. Are you aware of how important making the right choice is in this primary process? I agree, and that’s why it is important to keep an open mind. That’s why you’ve read this far, so you might as well hear me out.

Obama has made it clear that he is pinning his reelection efforts on class warfare. So, think about whom you would want the GOP nominee to be if you were Obama, and you needed a target for class warfare? I agree – Mitt Romney. Understand that Obama uses Alinsky tactics, and Alinsky tactic 13 is “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Simply put, it is much easier to attack an organization or an idea if you can ‘put a face on it’. If you can find a single individual who both represents your opponent, and who, given the right spin, can be portrayed as the face of evil, you can use this person as a proxy for your attacks on your adversary. What face would you put on the 1%? Mitt Romney.

You may think that Mitt Romney is a great guy, and a great example of success, and I agree with some of that (and certainly applaud his success), and I would add that you should have no doubt in your mind that this is exactly what Obama will do (stick a big, fat 1% on him), and you can imagine that he is licking his chops in anticipation of doing it. If Mitt Romney is the nominee, this is what the general election will look like. Click Here. No matter what he says or how well he says it, he will not be able to shake that label. How does that make you feel about Mitt? And it doesn’t help that he has a habit of making mistakes and saying the wrong thing. Click here. Even Romney booster John McCain no longer believes Romney can win. Click Here.

Besides the “1%er” card that will be played against Romney, the Democrats also have their old favorite: the race card. Mitt is a very committed member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, aka the Mormons, and until 1978, Mormon theology relegated blacks to a kind of second-class membership in the church. After considerable social and political pressure, the church’s “living prophet” declared a new “revelation” changing the previous position which had been held since the church’s inception. Already, many on the Left are raising a stink about this. We can be sure that if Mitt were the nominee, this ugly issue would only get uglier — much uglier. The Democrat-Media Complex will make sure of that.

Obama’s second trick is throwing “red meat” distractions to keep us from discussing the areas where he is most vulnerable, such as economic and foreign policy. The biggest distraction so far has been the contraception controversy. And Rick Santorum took the bait — big time. Rick Santorum is a great father with great moral values, but he is also a one trick pony. Social issues are important, but he just can’t stop talking about them, and that has gotten him in a ton of trouble. The issue isn’t that he talks a lot about social policy, the issue is that he just can’t change gears quickly enough to avoid the damage caused by Obama’s intentional deceptions and sleights-of-hand. Consider how many distractions Obama will throw out there if Rick is the nominee. We’ll be talking about birth control all the way through November. By the time Rick manages to shift the debate back to Obama’s weak points, it may be too late.

Rick also tends to make serious, and very public, mistakes. For example, he loses his cool very quickly. Click Here. Cringing? He also gets confused regularly – in this instance, he gives Obama credit for CREATING jobs, publicly, on CNN! Click here. Just imagine if he makes even ONE mistake like this in the months between the nomination and the general election. Understand the very real risk with Rick. How do you feel about that, given the stakes?

The issue of contraception is problematic for Santorum not only because the Left is skillfully and shamelessly using it to sidetrack discussion away from Obama’s staggering malfeasances in both foreign and domestic policy — but for another, more subtle but perhaps more important reason: The driving force behind Obama is the “Shadow Party” funded by George Soros, who has an obsession with population control. Soros and other Agenda 21 promoters believe that world population must be reduced by literally billions of people. Remember the Left’s over-the-top, hysterical, screaming reaction to the VP nomination of Sarah Palin? Her being the mother of five children, one of whom has Down’s Syndrome — a genetic disorder to which many leftists believe abortion is the only appropriate response — was a huge component in that. It may not have been openly admitted in the “mainstream” media, but Left-wing blogs were full of unimaginably cruel, sick attacks on little Trig Palin and the mother who bore him. Rick Santorum, the father of seven children, one of whom has Trisomy-18, has the Left’s bull’s-eye on his back.

That leaves Newt.

Newt is a flawed man, but recognize that his flaws are less subject to substantive attack. For example, Freddie and Fannie? It may be a big deal in the Republican primary, but Democrats do NOT want to go there! Yes, he’s had multiple marriages, but how many times has Rush been married? Do you still listen to Rush, at least here and there? And, of course, Democrats cannot launch credible attacks on the subject of adultery.

Nevertheless, we know that the Left will demonize Newt just as viciously as they would Romney or Santorum — because, after all, that’s what the Left DOES. A key difference, however, is that Newt fights back. Like the late, great Andrew Breitbart, Newt is a “happy warrior” who both understands the Left, and loves taking them on. Plus, like Breitbart, Newt understands that Big Media is every bit as much our opponent as is the Democratic Party. He is smart, articulate and confident enough to be able to answer their attacks on the spot, without hemming or hawing. People in media continually try to nail Newt with their “gotcha” questions — but they never succeed, do they?

Newt realizes, in a way few others do, that America’s very survival is threatened not only by terrorism and rogue states outside our borders, but by two major enemies within: communism and radical Islam. Yet, no other candidate besides Newt even mentions Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers and George Soros. Newt is the only one who seems to recognize — or at least, will publicly say — that Obama is not a misguided incompetent with well-meaning intentions, but rather a Marxist radical who believes America is more evil than good, and who is committed to destroying the freedoms that have made America great.

As for radical Islam, while Rick Santorum recognizes the threat from Iran, and is very knowledgeable on national security matters, only Newt will tell you about the giant strides that sharia (Islamic law) has already made right here in the U.S., thanks to CAIR, ISNA, ICNA, MAS, MSA and the whole alphabet soup of Muslim Brotherhood-spawned groups that, despite proven connections to Hamas and other terror groups, are presented as legitimate “moderates” in our media and have infiltrated our government at high levels, including within the Department of Homeland Security.

We look around and see a perfect storm of economic collapse, national-security threats and inflamed social passions converging on us. America is — whether or not we yet realize it — in as much danger now as Britain was in the spring of 1940. Almost too late, the British people finally recognized that Winston Churchill — whom they’d previously despised as “impulsive” and “arrogant,” and castigated for his “poor judgment” and “grandiose ideas” — was actually the best man, perhaps the only man, who could lead them through the crisis. I’m not saying Newt is Churchill — but having studied Churchill, I am struck by the remarkable parallels between the two. Just as Churchill saw who Hitler really was long before most of his countrymen woke up, Newt understands the dangers to America that many people have so far been unable or unwilling to see. Newt will help open their eyes — because, like Churchill, Newt has a gift for explaining things in ways people can understand. Just as importantly, Newt has the bulldog tenacity and unabashed can-do attitude that the nation needs in its leader if we are to make it through the tough times ahead. As we saw so clearly during the South Carolina debate — when standing ovations kept erupting as Newt spoke — Newt has, as Churchill did, the power to inspire.

Before I close, I urge you to do one thing, and one thing only… please watch this video – click here. You’ve read this far, so another minute or two won’t kill you. Click here. Now, how do you feel about this man going up against Barack Obama?

As Thomas Sowell has said, “This is not just another election.” This is about the survival of our Constitutional Republic. That is why Sowell, as well as Gov. Rick Perry, former Sen. Fred Thompson, former Congressman J.C. Watts, Herman Cain and Michael Reagan, among many others, have endorsed Newt Gingrich to be our next President. He’s not perfect — but neither was Winston Churchill. Newt Gingrich, like the Prime Minister during the Battle of Britain, is the right man at the right time.


Questions Romney Didn’t Answer at Today’s Townhall


Mitt Romney held a “townhall” in Dayton, OH today.  While he chose to answer several questions, he left many answered.  The following is a list of a few which warrant a response by the governor. Just a precursory glance at the Romney record file compiled more than four years ago is enough to cause committed conservatives much discomfort.
  1. Do you regret your support of abortion pill RU-486?
  2. How can you claim to strongly support 2nd amendment rights when you supported Clinton’s assault weapons ban, increased gun licensing fees 400%, and claim to not  “line up with the NRA”?
  3. Do you think your myriad of state “fee” increases is partly responsibility for Massachusetts underperforming the national job creation rate?
  4. Do you consider the 24% increase of state spending during your final three years as governor to be a fiscally responsible example?
  5. Do you still support the internet tourism tax you once proposed?
  6. You once stated capturing Osama bin Laden would result in “very insignificant increase in safety for America.”   Do you still subscribe to that analysis?
  7. Do you still support a 10% tax on private donations to political campaigns?
  8. How can you be trusted to defend First Amendment free speech while advocating capping election spending and abolishing PAC’s? Have you changed your views on this?
  9. Do you still believe that “those here paying taxes and not taking government benefits should begin a process towards application for citizenship? Or have you changed your mind on this since 2006?
  10. Do you still support increasing excise taxes on vehicles with low MPG?
  11. Were you surprised at the praise your state health care plan received from Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry?
  12. Do you regret signing into law a health care plan which required Planned Parenthood to be a representative on a state health policy panel?
  13. Do you believe that a self-described “progressive-on-social-issues governor of Massachusetts” should be trusted by conservatives to nominate constitutionalists to the court?
  14. Did you misspeak when you stated “Hillary Clinton is very much right, it does take a village”?
  15. If you admire Reagan so much, why did you emphatically proclaim, “I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush.  I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush”?
  16. Why did you appoint a pro-choice judge to state district court after supposedly becoming pro-life?
  17. Do you still “think it’s important that people not see me as a pro-life candidate”?
  18. Do you still believe we “should sustain and support” Roe v. Wade?
  19. Do you support your wife’s decision to give funds from your joint checking account to Planned Parenthood?
  20. Why did you appoint a strong supporter of abortion rights to the Somerville District Court AFTER you’re conversion to the pro-life cause?
  21. Do you think it fiscally responsible to subsidize insurance, as your health care plan did, for those making THREE TIMES the poverty level?
  22. Do you regret signing into law Commonwealth Care, which subsidizes abortions?
  23. Are you still a “rodent and rabbit hunter”?
  24. Do you regret your decision to “recommit the commonwealth to affirmative action”?

Pro-Choice, Anti-Fracking Protesters– Santorum “More Dangerous” than Romney


According to a boisterous group of protesters chanting outside of a Chillicothe, OH Santorum campaign stop, Romney is less “dangerous” than Santorum.  The Occupy sympathizers listed a myriad of grievances against Santorum including his support of “fracking”, opposition to Obamacare, vocal pro-life advocacy and support for entitlement reform.

Based on Romney’s policy stances as governor of Massachusetts, Romney may indeed be “less dangerous” than Santorum– at least from a liberal’s point of view.  As governor, Romney indicated support of a cap-and-trade scheme, crafted a state health plan quite similar to Obamacare, and declared himself to be pro-choice.