« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Real-Life “Fast and Furious” – More Twists and Turns Than a Hollywood Movie

The Obama Administration is responsible for killings on both sides of the US-Mexico border

Barack Obama and Eric Holder are hiding behind Executive Privilege in the hope that their involvement in the ATF program “Fast and Furious” – which ultimately resulted in the deaths of US Border Patrol agent Brian Terry and at least 300 Mexican citizens (possibly including the brother of then-attorney general Patricia Gonzalez Rodriguez) – will not come to light.

Whether they like it or not, this issue is not going to disappear.

While Mr. Obama and Mr. Holder may not have been the ones who fired the guns which caused these deaths, it has become increasingly clear that the chain of evidence in this case can be traced back to the very highest levels of this administration:
.

The Gunwalker Scandal Made Simple
(h/t: Sipsey Street Irregulars)

There are five key accusations against ATF and DOJ made by ATF whistleblowers and other sources within FedGov:

1.) That they instructed U.S. gun dealers to proceed with questionable and illegal sales of firearms to suspected gunrunners.

2.) That they allowed or even assisted in those guns crossing the U.S. border into Mexico to “boost the numbers” of American civilian market firearms seized in Mexico and thereby provide the justification for more firearm restrictions on American citizens and more power and money for ATF.

3.) That they intentionally kept Mexican authorities in the dark about the operation, even over objections of their own agents.

4.) That weapons that the ATF let “walk” to Mexico were involved in the deaths of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and ICE agent Jaime Zapata, as well as at least hundreds of Mexican citizens.

5.) That at least since the death of Brian Terry on 14 December, the Obama administration is engaged in a full-press cover-up of the facts behind what has come to be known as the “Gunwalker Scandal.”

.
.
Mere weeks after Obama took office, Americans were treated to high-level administration officials – Mr. Obama, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, Janet Napolitano, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Sen. Dick Durbin, and Rep. Eliot Engel, among others – telling the public that the Federal Assault Weapons Ban needed to be reinstated, as over 90% of all guns seized at crime scenes in Mexico were purchased in the United States.

Unfortunately for the administration, it was quickly and easily proven that those numbers were fabricated. When the truth came to light, it is believed that the ATF – under orders from people high in the administration – was directed to make sure that those fictitious statistics became a reality.

In the fall of 2009, the “Fast and Furious” program started picking up speed. ATF agents were directed to conduct business in ways that went against every protocol that was in place. Despite repeatedly voicing their concerns to their superiors that something terrible was going to happen, agents were instructed to keep quiet and to continue following orders.

In at least one case, stimulus funds were used to purchase some of these weapons, which were then knowingly sold to illegal buyers. One Federal agent was forced by his supervisor to facilitate a sale because the supervisor wanted to “dirty him up”.

In March, 2010, two Arizona undercover police officers’ lives were put in danger when they attempted to stop two Mexican nationals in a stolen vehicle south of Phoenix. Among weapons seized at the scene, two were found to be connected to the Fast and Furious program (this story didn’t see the light of day until September, 2011).

On December 15, 2010, the agents’ worst fears came true – Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed in the line of duty by one of the guns that had been “walked” across the Mexican border. (Initial reports stated that only two guns at the scene were connected to F&F; however, it appears that a third gun was also recovered at the scene which may have had ties to the FBI; it somehow “disappeared” immediately afterward.)

And that’s when longtime ATF agents – upset with how their calls for concern had been ignored all the way up the chain of command – began to blow the whistle.
.
.
Among the first to break this story was Mike Vanderboegh at Sipsey Street Irregulars, in conjunction with David Codrea (whose exhaustive links are in the sidebar at SSI). These fine folks have been on top of this story since it first broke in late 2010/early 2011.

Their posts were picked up by conservative blogs like Ace of Spades, Hot Air, Legal Insurrection, Nice Deb, and The Other McCain, just to name a few. At first, authors and commenters at these sites were hesitant to attach ulterior motives to Project Gunwalker (aka “Fast and Furious”), but it didn’t take long for many people to start connecting the dots.

As more and more evidence started to come to light, it became clear that this administration had been hell-bent on creating circumstances which would bring about their ultimate desire to severely curtail the ability of Americans to exercise their 2nd Amendment right to obtain and bear arms.

In order for Fast and Furious to “succeed”, crimes in Mexico involving US guns – up to and including murder – were NECESSARY in order to achieve the “desired” end result. If guns purchased in the US couldn’t be tied to crimes in Mexico, the Obama administration could not take steps to restrict United States citizens’ access to guns.
.
.
For the past 18 months, this administration has conspired – with the full support of members of the mainstream media – to hide the truth about this program, even going so far as attempting to deflect attention away from a House Oversight Committee meeting convened to hear testimony from ATF whistleblowers.

They have ridiculed conservative bloggers who were willing to do the research and investigation that so-called “professional journalists” – with the notable exception of Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News, who has been covering this story since early 2011 – have pointedly refused to do.

The always fantastic Bill Whittle lays out the reality behind this administration’s massive cover-up:
.

.
Many people are trying to compare the “Fast and Furious” cover-up to the Watergate scandal, but Watergate was a purely political undertaking.

“Fast and Furious” was responsible for the death of an American Law Enforcement Officer and at least 300 Mexican citizens.

Watergate didn’t have a body count.
.
.
[Cross-posted at Koch's Tour]
.

COMMENTS

  • Common_Cents

    Yeah a short time frame but America needs to know the story.

    • Viet71

      n/t

      • gekster

        Where was Nixon insulted.
        Just asking.

        • westcoastpatriette

          get it?

          • gekster

            I thought the comparative was that what Nixon did had all the Dems and libs in a bunch, and calling for impeachment,
            to the point of him resigning,
            where F&F is much worse and not a peep from the Dem and libs, and go as far as to the point of defending Obama and Holder.
            Am I wrong?

          • westcoastpatriette

            I think Teresa mentioned Nixon in the diary just to compare Watergate as mild in contrast to F&F. And Viet71 reinforced that notion by saying the contrast is so different (F&F being way worse) that it was an insult to Nixon.

          • gekster

            Looking at it from a different angle, I guess I can see it.

      • http://teresainfortworth.wordpress.com/ Teresa in Fort Worth, TX

        and the frenzy that the Dems went into over the Watergate incident and subsequent cover-up when juxtaposed against their treatment of this incident as a great big nothing-burgerwas just too hypocritical to pass up an opportunity to use those pictures.

        Just saying “Sauce for the Goose” and tossing it out there…..

    • davenj1

      A great idea for a film.

  • Tbone

    Watergate was an over-parked car compared to F&F. Further, had Nixon been a Democrat NOTHING would ever have come of it.

    • http://teresainfortworth.wordpress.com/ Teresa in Fort Worth, TX

      Somebody far more talented than I came up with them – they just struck my “irony” bone…..

      • Tbone

        Thanks for sharing how little you know.

        • http://teresainfortworth.wordpress.com/ Teresa in Fort Worth, TX

          Watergate was a great big nothing, and the Dems went bat-s*** crazy over it; F&F is a HUGE scandal, and the Dems have been trying to keep it under wraps.

          So, they think Nixon was evil? Well, their golden boy is even dirtier. If they think Nixon was so bad, then they “own” Obama’s bad works as well.

          I’m old enough to remember Watergate, so please don’t assume that I am unaware of what went on.

          • Tbone

            Tou piece is still an insult to Nixon and truth.

          • Viet71

            But merging Obama into Nixon pains me. I voted for Nixon and think he was a great president.

          • gekster

            It is curious that so many commenters don’t get the jist of this diary.
            I’d explain it again, but last time it didn’t do any good.

          • Viet71

            I appreciate your wish for focus.

            T-bone and I (not intending to speak for T-bone) take offense at comparing Nixon to Obama. Nixon was a man of character, despite his faults.

          • aesthete

            who created the organization which created and was in charge of the F+F operation.

            IMO, F+F is just one more (particularly large) nail, along with Waco and Wide Receiver, in the coffin of the utterly execrable ATF bureau.

          • aesthete

            definitely in the top five for foreign policy, as far as modern Presidents go.

            Not so great on domestic agenda.

          • Viet71

            Does ATF suck? yes.

            Is Nixon responsible? No.

          • aesthete

            a result of the core competencies and areas that were delegated to the agency. The original purpose of the organization is to regulate alcohol, tobacco, and firearms. It did such a “good” job with Waco that it now also regulates explosives. I have yet to hear a good reason for why this agency should exist (esp at the federal level), and have yet to hear of a positive program which the agency has been involved with.

            I do think that Nixon (as well as Carter, for that matter) gets a bad rap for being President at a time when many New Deal and Great Society programs imploded. I give him a lot of credit for truly inspired China policy, and a hard-headed, realistic look at our Cold War policy which IMO was his greatest legacy. Still, I’m not really a fan of his domestic agenda.

          • gekster

            Can you tell me what they are.

          • checkmate2012

            Can’t tell but see you didn’t get an answer….if you really want to know I can tell you.

          • gekster

            He compared WR and F&F together, and I wanted to know more or less why he did that, and let him know the difference between the two, and as to the reasons why both were implemented.
            I was asking in the hopes of sharing knowledge.

          • aesthete

            Things can be different, and still be bad. Things can be different levels of bad. Wide Receiver does not have to be a good program in order for Fast and Furious to be a good one. Wide Receiver was a bad program. It was shut down because it was a bad program that wasn’t doing its job, that made the US look bad, and that unintentionally provided guns to cartels on the taxpayer dime, and involved private gun dealers who were (rightly) very uncomfortable with what the federal government wanted them to do.

            F+F was an even worse program which involved many of the same people who conceived of Wide Receiver. It involved no tracking of guns, no cooperation with Mexico, no plan other than to see if/when these guns ended up in crime scenes. It was like a grotesque science experiment where Mexican citizens were the unwitting subjects. It took a program that was already ineptly handled and conceived, doubled down on these bad aspects, and added its own unique horrors.

            Why this would be a controversial point, I don’t know.

          • gekster

            It was a question, not a dig.
            And by your comment, you are a little misinformed.

            WR was a gun tracking program where tracking chips were put into the guns, Mexico was informed of the program and was on board.
            The aim being to catch the gun runners and those who bought the guns.
            It was sucessfull until the runners found out about the chips, and started taking them out.
            It was ended in 2007 by the Bush administration.

            F&F was a gun running program, without the knowledge or approval of Mexico, and the sole intent was to point to the ease of obtaining guns in an attempt to stifle the second amendment.
            It wasn’t stopped until two Federal agents got killed and someone in the ATF blew the whistle.

            Although simular, was by no means identicle as you implied by your comment.

            Again, it was just an honest question, so unbunch your boxers.

          • aesthete

            and there’s nothing in your comment which contradicts my comment.

            Both programs were bad. I don’t want to let extremely flawed programs like Wide Receiver off the hook just because F&F was a clusterfrak of epic proportions.

            All that I said, and all that I have ever said, is that they share similarities (including some of the top personnel involved in both programs).

            It would be quite nice if Republicans in power seized on the opportunity while in office and dismantled completely valueless programs and agencies like ATF. Sure, that type of cut can’t balance the budget by itself, but you have to start somewhere and the ATF’s yearly budget is a great place to start.

          • gekster

            WR was a good program that was working, until the chips were found, and then it was stopped.

          • aesthete

            Despite having trackers during Wide Receiver, we lost track of the vast majority of guns when they went to Mexico.

            http://articles.latimes.com/2011/oct/03/nation/la-na-atf-guns-20111004

            Same people were involved as those who ran and created F&F.

            http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/the-guns-that-got-away-11172011.html

            The program met none of its advertised goals. It was a failure and no cartels or kingpins were knocked down a peg as the result of the operation. Government incompetence at its finest.

            If anything, this is even more of an indictment of F&F: we already knew that gun tracking with GPS tracers was a failure, and we got nothing after two years except more guns in the hands of bad people. What the hell did Holder, Obama et al think was going to happen if they removed the tracers but ran it similarly otherwise… and when did they know it?

          • gekster

            nt

          • aesthete
          • Dave_A

            Presumably because as soon as they realized the druggies had found the bugs, they stopped the op…

            Repeating the same thing WITHOUT the bugs, is the height of incompetence…

            Or a sinister conspiracy…

            You pick…

          • gekster

            That part I didn’t know.
            Of all the things I read on it, I don’t believe I came across that.

          • Dave_A

            When the Department of Homeland Security was created…

            That was the chance for Federal Security Services reform – to essentially do something like:

            Roll all federal agencies with arrest powers into 4.
            -FBI
            -US Marshalls
            -Secret Service
            -ICE

            Roll all civilian intelligence agencies into the CIA

            Use the structure of the new DHS to downsize the number of middle-managers & ‘assistant directors’ in federal LE –

            THAT would have been good…

            The FBI can do everything the DEA and ATF do just fine… We also don’t need Post Office cops, Farm cops, EPA cops, etc… FBI can do all that…

            The savings in salary & benefits from cutting all those high-paid desk-jockey positions would have been SUBSTANTIAL…

          • gekster

            it was a comparison of the reaction by the Libs and Dems
            to the two different offences.

            At least that is my take on it.

          • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

            Good? Nixon never met a single Great Society program that he didn’t add a lot of money to. He created the EPA, he instituted wage and price controls. Race based affirmative action? That came out of his administration.

            And I am not even touching upon his other well know failures that resulted in an increase in Democrat power.

            His only area of competence was foreign policy. Nixon should have been the Secretary of State in the administration of a real conservative.

  • audax

    …and Bill Whittles great video.

  • olsmithie

    Perhaps we should prosecute Holder and Obama under the RICO statues. Non-governmental persons conducting identical activities would be doing hard time in a federal prison by now. Are the elitists government officials not subject to the same laws? Apparently not. [yet]

    Regards

  • davenj1

    The whole political point behind F&F was Holder and Obama’s disdain for the Second Amendment in particular, the Constitution in general, and especially the US Supreme Court. As if there were not enough reasons to kick this bum out of office, the disregard for the Constitution this alleged constitutional scholar has is another nail in his coffin. The agent killed as a result should be a martyr for the Constitution of the United States. With Obama, it is a sad day when when we even need such martyrs.

  • renny

    and don’t let the MSM bury the story.