« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Issa’s Bombshell

It sure isn’t looking good for Attorney General Eric Holder nowadays.  Last Thursday a certain bombshell landed in the congressional record, courtesy of Congressman Darrell Issa.  If last week weren’t so chock full of news already, this bombshell would be the talk of the town.

The affidavit Issa inserted into the congressional record outlined what was known about the Fast and Furious Operation as of March 2010.  The affidavit has it all: straw purchasers of assault weapons, walk-overs to Mexico, deliveries to drug cartel thugs, termination of surveillance, everything.  Kind of like a Vince Flynn novel, except this operation was real and had an actual body count.  The Fast and Furious operation was in full bloom, and this was only March, 2010.

The date is critical because a February 4, 2011 letter from the Justice Department to Senator Grassley of the Senate Judiciary Committee stated that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) did not allow assault weapons to be sold to straw purchasers and then walked into Mexico.  In other words, the February 2011 letter stated that there was no Fast and Furious operation at all.  The letter was withdrawn by the Department in December, 2011.

As he inserted the affidavit into the congressional record last week, Issa said “The enclosed wiretap affidavit contains clear information that agents were willfully allowing known straw buyers to acquire firearms for drug cartels and failing to interdict them-in some cases even allowing them to walk to Mexico.  In particular, the affidavit explicitly describes the most controversial tactic of all: abandoning surveillance of known straw purchasers, resulting in the failure to interdict firearms,” Issa said.  “The affidavit explicitly describes the most controversial tactic of all: abandoning surveillance of known straw purchasers, resulting in the failure to interdict arms,” Issa wrote in a letter he placed in the Congressional Record, found here.   Seems Darrell Issa has no sense of humor with letters that mislead.

The internal Justice Department deliberations about that February 2011 denial were the subject of the recent contempt of Congress vote – Holder didn’t want to disclose the internal deliberations about what to do about this misleading letter, so memos and e-mails of those deliberations were withheld.  Hence the vote to hold Holder in contempt of Congress.

Adding to further suspicion to the whole operation of the Justice Department, in June 7 testimony Attorney General Eric Holder testified that Justice Department wiretap applications did not contain any details and that the applications were reviewed narrowly for probable cause, not for whether any investigatory tactics contained followed Justice Department policy.  Holder should consider withdrawing that testimony too.

As with other scandals, this one has a certain drip, drip, drip of repeated evasions and skirting of the truth.  Recall that in congressional testimony in May, 2011, Attorney General Eric Holder testified to Congress that he had first heard about the Fast and Furious scandal within the past few weeks.  Subsequent e-mails showed that Mr. Holder had been briefed on Fast and Furious almost a year earlier.

So, given the misleading February 4, 2011 letter to Senator Grassley, the false claim that he had only heard of Fast and Furious “within the past few weeks,” even Holder’s false description of wiretaps affidavits with the Justice Department, the obvious question arises:  for how long and how often has Attorney General Holder been misleading the Congress about Fast and Furious?

 

COMMENTS

  • trimulchio

    I wonder why Obama isn’t that might be your “cui bono” moment.

    • wennejunk

      They fully expect that they will be able to walk away from this, with media help, and basically stiff-arm those who care about this.

      Based on the seat-warmers we have in Congress – on all sides – I expect they are probably correct, regardless of how diligently Issa pursues this.

  • funwithknives

    This is what someone snuck to him. The mind reels and does gyrations at what is not yet seen.

    …and yet there are many of Progressive ‘stature’ that call this anything but what it is.
    This abandonment of Basic Law Beliefs and principles , is Twilight Zone-like, to this writer. Rod would-a’ had a field day.

    Will we ever find out who the whistle-blower was? Am I the only one who would cover their bar bill for one night, or help them if it was needed?

  • bk

    There are all these euphemisms like “misleading statement”, “withdrawn letter”, etc., but all they really mean is that Holder committed perjury repeatedly.

    Luckily for him, no one at DOJ will bring him in. He has stated for 6+ months that the only reason anyone would disagree with him is because he and Obama are black. Next thing you know, Issa and company will be getting investigated by the IRS and accused of hate crimes by DOJ.

  • westcoastpatriette

    in comparison.

    I heard a brief clip on Fox a week or so ago that Holder offered to resign but Obama rejected the offer. Wonder why? Loyalty is not a strong suit of Obama’s when someone becomes a distraction. Wonder what Obama knows about all of this?

    • Common_Cents

      he will be protected at all costs.

      Kinda like borrowing $100,000 from a bank and you are a debtor, borrow $100million and you become a partner w/ leverage.

      obama’s bus rule: know a little, and you are thrown under, know a lot, and you are a protected partner.

      • westcoastpatriette

        still would like to know what they are all hiding. I’m waiting for the pressure to mount until the left start turning on each other and implode from within.