Comments on: Real Tea Party gets angry!

By: mikeymike143

mikeymike143 — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 02:48:16 +0000

you are very very wise, my friend.

By: Moe Lane

Moe Lane — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:18:28 +0000

Seriously, folks: you know that we’re going to ban them as soon as one of us notices the open shilling for Ron Paul. Why do you encourage them? ‘Tis cruel…

By: Neil Stevens

Neil Stevens — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:13:26 +0000

Now we have time.

By: conservativerock5

conservativerock5 — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:46:22 +0000

Yes

By: acat

acat — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:39:01 +0000

Just want to be clear on this.

Mew

By: conservativerock5

conservativerock5 — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:37:08 +0000

Some are more willing to obey men than the Constitution. The whole diary is blatantly defending government tyranny.

However, if anyone is foolish to accept state of emergency pretenses, their ignorance will be their downfall.

By: acat

acat — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:28:55 +0000

streiff on the malignant nature of the oathkeepers movement... Perhaps your intellectual curiosity, rocky, needs to move beyond how a thing relates to Ron Paul. Mew

By: bbjaylive

bbjaylive — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:27:35 +0000

This kind of nuttery should have been dealt with when the Tea Party started.

By: conservativerock5

conservativerock5 — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:23:56 +0000

Would not the Founding Fathers have applauded such an organization?

Or does your Paul-phobia arise because it was started by a Paul supporter?

By: acat

acat — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:48:40 +0000

in the system so we know what it looks like, but not so much it shuts everything down.

The Red State moderators hit the balance about right, I think.

Mew