« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The end of Ron Paul forever!

By: thearmedforcesteaparty (Diary)  |  June 12th, 2012 at 09:21 AM  | 

RESIZE: AAA

For months I’ve said his movement is really just an overblown cult with a the loud crowd drawing all the attention and the moderate fiscal hawks seeing value in his message on debt but sickened by the crazy crowd like Alex Jones and co to the point they stopped following the guy.

I’ve been validated over and over as these cult of crazies posedt one nit-wit, hair brained conspiracy after another over the past five months further proving how crazy they are.  Things like “he won the FL primary” or “the Bilderbergs got the Rand with a death threat and why he endoresed Mitt.”  Here is a great quote from Capitol Hill Blue:

“The implied suggestion that Ron Paul is George Washington or Jesus Christ should give one pause. More fundamentally the dust-up over Paul the Younger’s endorsement of his party’s nominee reveals the overwhelming flaw in the Paulitian movement. It is less of a political movement and more of a cult, centered around Ron Paul and his ideas, which his followers seem to regard as holy writ.

The campaign is Ron Paul’s swan song. He is in his 70s and is not as spry as he once was. He is leaving Congress, his claim to political legitimacy. And sooner rather than later, he will be with the ages, a departed prophet. Then his cult will die or subsumed into the greater conservative movement. Either outcome would be satisfactory.”

The fact is folks Ron Paul inc. was always a money machine because he is 70 plus years old, retiring from his 30 years as a career politican, and filling his PAC with wheel borrows full of money he can live off of for years as the lead consultant of his PAC.  That’s what his most cult like freakoziods never got, the guy is buildig a business not a following with those moneybombs.

My take is Rand just is softening the blow for his Dad before he comes out and endorese Mitt….and he WILL!  That his endoresment is more an admission of the political reality that the ReVolution was never a revolution at all but just a big money grab that went after the fringes of the  libertarian and progressive left (code pink), along with some fiscal hawks in the GOP.

The readers and suscribers at the DailyPaul have been fleeing in droves faster then rats on a burning, sinking, flea infested ship.  Alex Jones has gotten even more radical with his fake youtube videos from the bilderberg meetings trying like hell to stir the kook wing of the Ron Paul base with people like Gary Stein still reposting his cult videos of rapes and forced injections (good luck with them ever posting a correction to the false story they posted as fact).  All signs that the end is HERE….not nere.

The kooks will still show up on facebook, make silly claims, and rally around cult events like area 51 UFO zommbies do with cameras in the desert.  Sad thing is that I insulted area 51 folks by comparing them to the crazy Ron Paul cult that is one of the most radical in the history of American politics.

 

More at: www.victorluebker.com

Founder and chief, The Armed Forces Tea Party

www.armedforcesteaparty.com

Tags: , , ,

COMMENTS

POSTING RULES  |  LOGIN TO COMMENT  |  REGISTER TODAY
  • PowerToThePeople

  • Pingback: Make More Money via YouTube | vpibasketball community blogs

  • trimulchio

    his Campaign for Liberty folks gave a lot of early form and drive to the Tea Party. He got a lot of very bright people to care (worry?) about politics and the wrong direction the Country was headed in both before and after 2009.

    Many of those people have been disappointed with Rand Paul supporting Romney and the like. However, two things are clear: 1) Romney is a better choice than Obama; and 2) failure to support Romney on Rand Paul’s part is a leap off the cursus honorum and a quick end to any aspiration he might have for continued or higher office, especially if Romney were to lose.

    Were Ron Paul not an honorable and able man, he would not have had the support he enjoyed from the military, especially those on “active service” (i.e., in harm’s way). That he was a politician and had to live by politician’s rules will vastly disappoint many of his followers.

  • gekster

    That doesn’t sound like the RP I know who is from Texas.
    Did you find another one?

  • citizenkh

    on those Campaign for Liberty claims.

    The man has suckered a lot of OWS types with rhetoric Being fiscally responsible does not mean having a history of the highest paid staff in Congress, nor does it include doling out earmarks for the sole and direct benefit of private entities as “for the public good.”

    The man is a cha-ching master with YOUR and MY tax dollars, that is unless you don’t pay them.

  • jwebb

    …to get involved in party politics and get him replaced as my rep. My dream is coming true. Glad to see him go and glad to see Rand may not be crazy like his dad.
    Seriously, if The Ronulan Overlord cannot endorse Romney and RP’s over-bloated ego saddles us with a 2nd Obama term….

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    It’s been rebutted dozens of times, I’m not doing it again, Mr. Google can be your friend. The really obnoxious part of that is the “military” chunk. It’s absolute crap.

    He is not “able”, he’s been in Congress 30 years and accomplished nothing. He’s not “honorable”, railing about spending and being the king of earmarks. It simply goes on and on.

    His followers are rank idiots.

  • mikeymike143

    and his hygiene challenged cult followers are leftists and loons.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    .

  • trimulchio

    was THE driving force behind the Tea Party. They have moved on to trying to elect candidates to local office and to control the local Republican Party.

    They also try to spend some time teaching basic economics and government concepts to the Occupy types (most of whom are dumber than rocks).

    Most of them are young, smart (lots of advanced degrees from nationally known engineering schools and liberal arts colleges) and far too idealistic. Given the above, most of them will become the future leaders of American Conservatism.

    Give Ron Paul the credit due: he got them started. Further, while Paul is an Anti-federalist, he asked the hardest and least palitable of political questions (hence, the most important): did the 1787 Constitution pave the way to the current Federal Leviathan?

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    I don’t hate him as much as some here do, but he is old, he is retiring , and he just is not a factor anymore, and never really was much of one.

    Let’s just all stop talking about him.

  • trimulchio

    the Republican Party, if they don’t lose heart.

    The 2011 election saw a lot of “Tea Party/Liberty Movement” Candidates seek local office and more will follow.

    As with the Republican House Class of ’94, many will be too idealistic to survive in politics. Some will become too cynical to deserve to survive in politics . . . and some will be responsible public servents.

  • mikeymike143

    soon this loser will have been rejected 3 times by every state in the nation, including his home state of texas.

    these results are a DIRECT REJECTION of both nutjob paul and his lowlife paulbot cult following by american voters.

  • commonsenseobserver

    To submit his name at the convention. More than three states have yet to select their delegates, and he already has a plurality in two.

  • Dave_A

    And the LAST thing we need, is Paulistinians recuriting OWS by teaching them cracker-jack Rothbard garbage disguised as economics…

  • Dave_A

    Especially the pernicious & destructive issue of Austrian economics infesting the GOP…

  • dudleydewright

    Just curious. Seems like he is less popular than Hugo Chavez on this site. I can hear it now, “I despise Chavez’ politics and I think he’s obnoxious, but at least he’s not Ron Paul”. Here’s a real toughie: Who do you hate most….Ron Paul or….Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? (I told you it was tough!)

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    isn’t an election, it’s a suicide pact. Fortunately, the voters did not force that choice on us.

  • gekster

    It’s an extreme understanding and dislike for both of thier policies.
    It’s for ones loony policies and the other for his marxists policies.

  • gekster

    well, I’ll just let it play out.
    Usually isn’t long.

  • dudleydewright

    I understand disagreement with his policy stances that are a little out of hte mainstream. But it can’t be just the drug decriminalization and other “crazy uncle” stances (“auditing” a Federal Reserve that has gone on a monetizing binge to end all monetizing binges? Just not that crazy, really) And his cut spending, cut taxes credentials are second to no other redblooded conservative. It just has to be his anti-militarism.

    He opposes foreign intervention, especially undeclared, preemptive, nation “building” invasions – when we are flat broke, no less. Paul supports a strong national defense (our nation) and opposes borrowing money from Japan to defend Japan (and Britain and Germany and France…). Forgive me for being a crazy uncle but this sounds reasonable to me!

    Paul believes the interventions don’t do any good, or worse. Let’s face it. After nine years of war, we’ve essentially handed Iraq to the Iranians — who we want to bomb — and done it at the cost of over 4000 of America’s best and countless borrowed billions. In the even longer war in Afghanistan, our “allies” in the Afghan army are fragging our boys left and right while we give billions to our other “allies” in Pakistan, who protected our arch enemy and jail the man who led us to him. Is it any wonder our troops’ suicide rate is 1.5 times our KIA’s?

    With this kind of morale, it’s no surprise that Ron Paul received 10 times as much money in campaign donations from active duty military as all other candidates combined. Do they know something you guys don’t know? (Gotta tread carefully here as I might be in penumbral violation of the impossibly cool anti-Chickenhawk rules of this site – I thought it was a joke at first).

    Another thing I noticed here: the “Paulbots” — to use your terminology — offer comments on policy and principles, while the anti-Paulbots (APB’s? — again, your nomenclature, not mine) offer accusations of mental imbalance. Forgive me for asking, but if reasoned criticism of an arguably insane foreign policy earns one the label of “crazy”, who is in need of the psychiatrist here? At the very least, I would ask for more adult debate and less playground name-calling.

    But in spite of it all, I plan to return to this site — if only to engage in some sportive jousting with my new pals — the Anti-Paulbots!

    Unimpressed in Petosky

  • gekster

    And the names he gets called he has earned.

    Let me ask you, who are you going to worship when he’s gone.

  • PowerToThePeople

    you are a moron, and each and everyone of his followers are morons.

    And with posts like this one, you will not be here long enough to engage the anti Paul section of this site. But even if you were, it is painfully obvious you would be unequipped mentally to spar anyone.

  • trimulchio

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/austerians-versus-keynesians?tw_p=twt