« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Liberals Hate Tax Facts

Liberals Hate Tax Facts

By Herman Cain
November 28, 2010

Here we go with the liberal rhetoric again. You’ve seen the Democrats whine that keeping the “Bush tax cuts” would stuff the pockets of the richest Americans, while doing nothing to help the middle class. But that simply isn’t the truth.

Here’s the truth:

Congress is not voting on tax cuts, but rather, whether or not they should allow tax increases to take effect January 1, 2011.

The Democrats have tried to convince the American people that the Republicans want to pass “tax cuts for the rich.” But, in reality, conservatives want to provide a bit of economic certainty by maintaining the current tax rates for all. In fact, Speaker-elect John Boehner (R-Ohio) says that keeping these tax rates is the most sensible way to “reduce the uncertainty in America and help small businesses begin to create jobs again.”

This may come as a shocker to liberals: He’s exactly right.

If the Democrats block the attempts of Republicans to permanently extend the current tax rates, taxes will rise for the first time in 14 years! And this will certainly stall economic recovery, as the Heritage Foundation projects that letting these rates expire would cost an average of 799,000 jobs annually from 2013-2019. If the Democrats continually promise that their number one focus is job creation, why are they insisting upon blocking legislation that would do exactly that?

The Democrats in Congress resist the facts and the truth. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) wants to introduce two different pieces of legislation – one that would include maintaining the current tax rates for the middle class and another for the highest-income filers, many of whom include small business owners. He and his liberal colleagues are insistent upon making this class warfare legislation instead of economic growth legislation.

Most people can see through this. We see that letting the current tax rates expire would simply cause taxes to skyrocket for everybody, especially the small businesses responsible for most of the new jobs created. And that’s no stimulus!

The rhetoric of liberals isn’t working. They figure that if they keep saying it, enough of it will stick with enough people who will believe it. But guess what! Most of us aren’t that stupid!
Just like we understood that when President Obama and liberals in Congress said health care “reform,” they really meant a takeover of the American health care system. And we also knew that “cap and trade” were code words for “energy taxes.” And we also realized that bailouts and the stimulus agendas were simply an unacceptable expansion of government. The Democrats must face the facts: We will not be fooled!

We understand that raising taxes in a deep recession would only further complicate our economic woes and worsen conditions for the American families struggling to make ends meet. We recognize that policy, not politics, will help steer this country on the right path.

We know that ignoring the facts doesn’t make the facts go away. Most Americans realize that the surest form of economic stimulus is for the federal government to get out of the way. Raising taxes gets in everybody’s way, especially businesses. Tax facts don’t lie. And most Americans know the truth.

Herman Cain is a radio talk show host in Atlanta, Georgia broadcasting weekdays from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. on 750 AM and 95.5 FM WSB. Previously, Mr. Cain served as an executive of several major American corporations, including Godfather’s Pizza, where he took the company from the brink of bankruptcy to profitability. Mr. Cain also served as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve in Kansas City and as a senior policy adviser to the Dole/Kemp campaign in 1996. For more information, visit http://www.thehermanatorpac.com.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Flagstaff

    and WE can understand that, why can’t our elected officials even muster the discipline to use the terminology, “prevent Democrats from increasing today’s tax rates”?

    Instead they follow the Democrats’ lead and talk about “Bush tax cuts.”

    You’re exactly right:

    “Congress is not voting on tax cuts, but rather, whether or not they should allow tax increases to take effect January 1, 2011.”

    To increase taxes now on ANYBODY will hurt any recovery that might attempt to break through the Democrat economic roadblocks.

  • pilgrim

    If the Democrats block the attempts of Republicans to permanently extend the
    current tax rates, taxes will rise for the first time in 14 years!

    There is no such thing as a Congress doing anything permanently. If they have
    no sunset kanguage in the bill that does not make it permanent.

  • godot

    I like your effort. But this statement is not exactly correct –

    “Congress is not voting on tax cuts, but rather, whether or not they should allow tax increases to take effect January 1, 2011.’

    Better to be precise.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    I think the use of the word permanent is shorthand (given the limited time we have on Earth) for the fact that tax and spend laws remain the law permanently UNLESS Congress takes affirmative action to pass a bill; and that in the context of taxes, given the reluctance of political animals to overtly raise taxes, they are likely to remain permanent.

    Consider, that we have not had a tax increase in this country since Clinton and the Dems held majorities in both houses in 1993.

    The only reason we will have a tax hike in 2011 is because of the Dem-forced sunsetting of a tax CUT law! Even the ObamaDems couln’t raise taxes the last two years by affirmative act (I think? could be wrong).

    But in any event, on the issue of semantics and the use of the term “permanent” I think it fits in the context of a world in which the only permanent thing is GOD himself…smile and of course many don’t believe in God.

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    This is the Obama Tax Increase.

  • blooch

    Something like this?:

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • blooch
  • KBDay

    Democrats are enabling a tax increase just as an enabler partners with a substance abuser.

    Considering the federal lapse in oversight and accountability, it is the height of arrogance to even entertain a tax increase.

    And considering the record of Congress when it comes to tax increases, this one is particularly outrageous.

    In 1993 when President Bill Clinton proposed his drastic tax increase, the Heritage Foundation pointed out the concurrent proposal to expand the federal government.

    In Heritage Backgrounder #928, Daniel Mitchell, Ph.D., wrote: “A Joint Economic Committee report found that every dollar of higher taxes since 1947 has resulted in $1.59 of higher spending. This statistical survey is supported by recent history. Tax increases in 1982, 1984, 1987, and 1990 all were enacted for the alleged purpose of deficit reduction. In every case, however, the deficit rose the following year because lawmakers could not resist the temptation to spend the expected new revenues.”

    The only way to downsize this government is to halt a tax increase in its tracks, regardless of what we call the increase.

    A nod to The Bard’s words in ‘Romeo and Juliet’: “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose. By any other name would smell as sweet…”

    Or in the case of a tax increase, as putrid.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    You can never cut the deficit with higher taxes, because they just spend all of it and more.

  • GregInFla

    that the Bush tax cuts only helped the rich. So are they noe admitting that they lied all these years? Now maybe that could be because the middle class folks who benefited from them are now rich (what a concept).

  • GregInFla

    (corrected above) that the Bush tax cuts only helped the rich. So are they noe admitting that they lied all these years? Now maybe that could be because the middle class folks who benefited from them are now rich (what a concept).