« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

He Did So Much.

All too often, we miss the little things.

Cradle Catholics in this country disproportionately aren’t. Some obscenely large portion of those raised Catholic in this country — presumably “raised Catholic” means “baptized Catholic,” because practice has fallen off so much even among nominally active Catholics I’m not sure there’s a meaningful way to aggregate the practicing ones — no longer self-identify as Catholic. Amazingly, however, some who were raised Catholic keep being Catholic, and somehow instill the Faith in their children.

It’s a funny thing, American Catholicism. Jody Bottum, in his own way one of the two or three greatest Catholic observers of his generation, wrote a deeply moving observation on the shallowness and brittleness of American Catholic culture and practice in the wake of Vatican II and Humanae Vitae . But with due respect to Jody, I think, as often happens to faithful men and women who spend too much time in New York City and Washington, D.C., that Jody came to believe that the terrible state of Catholic practice in those two archetypical sinkholes was indicative of how the rest of us live.

It’s not. Parishes consolidate (this is a nice term for “close”) in the Northeast and Upper Midwest, traditional homes of immigrant Catholicism, and open in the new homes of immigrant Catholicism, American immigrant and variously-legal immigrant alike. Every Sunday, three, four, and sometimes five Masses happen, packed during the holiday seasons, comfortably unpacked during the deepest doldrums of Ordinary Time, and ranging from sparse to packed depending on the Mass time on every other Sunday. For all of Jody’s correct observations that the urban, parish-centered life that defined American Catholicism before the Second Vatican Council is a fading memory, somehow, we struggle on.

That overlengthy stroll through bush and glen, past the broken towers and mills of yesterday, is a prelude to telling you how very much we lost when Bernard Nathanson died earlier this week. Rarely has a man done so much evil in this world; even more rarely has he spent his every waking moment since trying to atone for that evil. The abortion regime owes so much to him; the pro-life movement does, too.

Catholics like to joke that we instinctively believe that the Bible only has about two hundred pages, broken up with hymns and intercessory prayers. It’s a joke to make Protestants feel better about us, to confirm their old cutting remarks after they left Tradition and the Magisterium and adopted sola scriptura . Every Catholic home — by the unqualified term “Catholic” from this point on, let’s assume I mean people who attend Mass weekly and don’t think the Pope is trying to force a theocracy down their throats — has a family Bible, used to record births and baptisms and weddings and ordinations and consecrations and deaths; to clarify not-infrequent arguments over doctrine; and to cover for those days when we can’t make it to Mass because of weather, illness, or unfortunate oversleeping.

A lot of us have a second Bible, one without the Teaching, but which is almost as well-worn. It’s not the Catechism (my family has a copy, but the ending doesn’t have a twist, so it’s no fun to read after the first time through), and it’s not the hagiography of John F. Kennedy Catholics of a certain age would keep on the coffee table to remind themselves of their votes for a man who was neither a very good man nor a very good Catholic. (Nor a very good President.) Because seven men (including a nominal Catholic) decided that it would be a good thing to invent a right to kill babies in the womb, that second Bible all too often involves abortion somehow. And that book was almost always written by Dr. Nathanson.

In my house, it was a copy of Aborting America , given to us by my youngest sister’s godfather. It was a later edition, with a cover I can’t find any more, with a foreword by Nathanson that expanded, in terrible detail, on what followed, and how his thoughts had evolved over time. My father and mother both read it cover-to-cover, and after that, it just sat there for months. My younger siblings couldn’t care less about that sort of thing for years, but I had been into politics since I was four. (In my third grade class in a suburb on the outskirts of the People’s Republic of Austin, I was the only kid in the room to stump for Reagan over Mondale.)

And it sat there and mocked me, because I couldn’t bring myself to read it. I was a ten year-old kid, and I knew intellectually that horrible things happened to children at the hands of the very people who are most charged with protecting them; but I didn’t want to read this. I didn’t want a graphic reminder of how awful moms and dads and doctors could be. And I started to get angry, as if this book was literally mocking me. (Hey, I was a ten year-old kid into politics. You’ve gotta figure there were issues.) Why the Hell should I care about this stuff? Why was it forcing its way into my life? Why are all of these people making such a big fuss out of this when there are starving people and people dying from wars and disease?

It says something about the quality of modern thought that so many nominal Catholics today rationalize along the same lines as an angry ten year-old.

The neat thing about being a kid is that you can and usually do talk yourself into doing just about anything. So I got so damned angry, I finally picked the book up and read it. I know I’ll hate this. I’ll say so when I’m done. That’ll show that jerk whom I’ve never met and who doesn’t even know I’m reading this.

Kids cry, even boys, over small things. That was the first time I’d ever sobbed from the gut. Nathanson did not spare details. The enormity of what was happening — and how it had happened, how Americans had accepted glib lies and the destruction of their centuries-old prohibition on the murder of the most defenseless with barely a shrug — shook me to my core. For the first time in my life, I, a child of the Reagan Revolution and all of its simple love of America, a kid whose parents had kicked their rears to make his life as comfortable and sheltered as they could, truly thought that maybe America had some evil in her, or at least a fondness for the cads.

I tell you all of this not to tell you a story of how I came, multiple times, to a John-Brown-at-Harpers-Ferry conclusion in my adolescence or anything as boring, predictable, and ultimately futile as that. I tell you all of this so you’ll understand the incredible work Nathanson did, his whole life after seeing a baby in utero in ultrasound. I tell you this because in the obscenely brief obituaries for this man, who went from a founder of NARAL to a man whose work littered Catholic (and non-Catholic) living rooms and coffee tables and dinner discussions and motivations for decades, you’d never know that he touched the lives of millions. I want you to understand the lesson of a life lived passionately working for evil — by his own admission, willingly and gleefully lying in its service — and then spent desperately trying to atone, to do penance at every turn, to undo the terrible thing he’d done.

The lesson of that life is that words and deeds matter. That something as simple as a book can change, can activate, can drive. That a life spent trying to right a wrong is not in vain, and to the contrary, can make a difference. The Silent Scream changed the terms of the debate on abortion; it made ready the soil that cheap 3-D ultrasounds have seeded and in which the pro-life movement is reaping good harvests.

Votes win elections; boots on the ground win votes; but cultural shifts win both boots and votes. Two generations of the pro-life movement put boots on the ground in elections in no small part because a short, earnest, aging man put himself body and soul into righting an atrocity he’d helped create. That is activism of the highest order, and we are eternally indebted for it.

The Catholic Church, into which Nathanson was received over a decade ago, teaches that almost every sin is forgivable. (Let’s not have the debate about which sin is the unforgivable one; it’s fun, but maddening.) Putting to the side whether his conversion from a detached belief in the absence of God to a belief in a Triune God who suffered, died, and rose again for us all is sufficient to clear that stain from his soul — and based on what we understand from his friends and colleagues, he clearly never thought it was — I feel comfortable saying that if his penance was insufficient, we’re all damned.

God has taken you home, weary warrior. Requiem aeternam.

COMMENTS

  • Aaron Gardner
  • Kenny Martsolf

    This was a good diary, but I only meant to recommend it once. For some reason, it is showing up that I recommended it 4 times. I apologize for that. It was good, but not *that* good. ;)

    • Thomas Crown

      Because I’d vote for it twice, but I worry I’m biased.

    • Dan McLaughlin

      ;)

  • jimmyneutron

    that mentioned him many years ago while I was in college (early 90′s?). I was pro life than and had been pretty much all of my life without really thinking much about it or anything. That was the first time I read about how they had made up the numbers on women who died from back alley abortions in order to help the progressive supreme court justices find the right to death enshrined in the Constitution. I was glad that he turned and joined the Right side. I put a write up I found after his death in a note on my facebook page which emphasized the numbers lie.
    On a related but somewhat of a side note, my wife was watching Hannity a night or two ago and he had a young woman on the all American panel. They were talking a about Abortion and she brought up the same lies to defend it that Bernard had high lighted, that she didn’t want to see women die because of unsafe practices, etc. She was a conservative I believe, but she still had not freed herself from this mis truth. Hannity did not call her out on it, but hopefull someone can mention that to him so he can share it with her in the future.

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    I was raised a catholic by my Dad, who still goes to Mass every Sunday. Years ago, I went in another direction, fully embracing the more evangelical, Assembly-of-God faith which has bloomed and blossomed in the mega-churches,and so forth, here in America.

    I must say, this happened primarily because of what I was perceiving, as a young man, the rather moribund feeling in the church itself (I live in one of the geographical areas you highlighted) and because I was left a little cold by the “rote” approach to religious practice, as I viewed it.

    But, I still have tremendous, tremendous respect for the Catholic Church, the Catholic hierarchy and Catholic parishioners. It is a beautiful, awesome religion. And they remain one of the monumental forces for Good in the fallen world.

    I know this is a bit in the weeds vis-a-vis your diary, but, I find, after reading your diary, that you would be a person who could articulately explain something to me: Transubstantiation, and what takes place in the body, according to Catholic doctrine, of the individual Catholic. I find this very, very intriguing and mysterious, and I’ve been looking for some answers.

    If you have the time, I would be in your debt.

    • itrytobenice

      I’m an AGer myself. I knew there was something about you I liked.

    • Thomas Crown

      Not least because I’m not sure what you mean. Are you asking me to explain transubstantiation, to explain (given the nature of the doctrine) what happens to the Host in the body, and/or what happens to the person who partakes of Communion? Not trying to be coy, just not sure what you mean.

      Incidentally, and this is why I’m not Protestant (well, one of several reasons): I like the rote. By this I mean, I find comfort in the Order of the Mass, in the real and symbolic purpose of each step, in the entire process, and in knowing that across the globe, functionally the same liturgy is being said, even if it is in a hundred vulgates.

      One of my failings as a Christian is a tendency to what I call transactionalism: While I appreciate Christian mysticism and the spiritually expansive parts of the faith, I tend to see each Mass and each parish as interchangeable. Well, not the hippy-guitar-strumming Mass, but you get the idea. That failing’s flip side is that the order and sense of centuries of weight and Tradition bring me closer to my Lord than I find it easy to achieve in their absence, and I can experience that anywhere in the world that there is a Catholic parish.

      I’m always amazed at anyone who remains Christian, let alone Catholic, in those places. God bless you.

      • Doc Holliday

        and are comforted by it. Of course this requires that some do not follow tradition and are into new wave stuff, and I am not even speaking of Evangelicals, I can’t speak in a knowledgeable way about them. The fact is, some will always be comforted by tradition and some others might need new ways to be brought into the fold.

        My philosophy in its most simple terms is that the Reformation, Counter-Reformation, Evangelical movement and splits into so many denominations could actually be a good thing, they could be God’s work. My reasoning is that God decided to offer a buffet instead of just one course, the reason being to satiate as many people as possible. It is possible that the multitude of faiths brings more to Christ, not fewer. Not many dogmatics would agree with me, it is just my theory.

      • conservativecurmudgeon

        and the effect it has on the individual Catholic. I understand the belief that the Host actually becomes the Body of Christ, and it is at this point that I want to know what becomes of this divinity, once it is consumed. Does it become a part of you? Does it pass? Is there some other third way the partaking of the Host changes inside the body of the individual?

        This is a crucial question of doctrine, in my view, and, as I say, you are a very thoughtful and articulate spokesman, and it has never been adequately explained to me. So, again, any help you can afford is very much appreciated.

        Also, please understand my deep reverence for the traditions and institutions of the Church that Peter undertook to build. I also understand how this history could bring great comfort, and help in those times of quiet worship.

        I simply chose a different route.

        • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

          …when I was a non-Catholic seeker struggling with the issue of the Eucharist, “Meditate on the Incarnation.”

          • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

            E = mc2

            Energy and matter interchangeable.
            Big Bang. God said, “Let there BE…”
            Jesus is the LIGHT of the world.

            That stuff all fits together in my head and offers insight into the Eucharist — but I’ll be danged if I can actually EXPLAIN it.
            Go back and re-read John 6. The Twelve didn’t understand the Eucharist either; but Peter said, well, whether we understand it or not, where else we gonna go? We’re sticking with You for better or worse because we know you are The One.

  • Bill S

    …I point you also to this diary, from RS member heartlander

    Dr. Bernard Nathanson, RIP

    Good read there, also.

    • Thomas Crown

      I’m humbled. I regret that I missed that.

    • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

      I had missed it as well. Excellent read. And my darn allergies are acting up yet again.

      • Danielle Davis (ocleverone)

        Thank you for writing it.

  • Marcus_Traianus

    I would only add one note from a work that helps me through the day;

    man has a natural aptitude for virtue; but the perfection of virtue must be acquired by man by means of some kind of training.

    I believe Nathanson understood this fully and worked at it every day.

  • ATG

    Thomas it’s great to see you here on the odd day I drop in to poke around.

    Your remarks on ritual and it’s associated comfort struck a chord with me as I too find solace there. There is such feeling of rightness with the world at such times that I can’t imagine who I would be without that “I’m home” sensation

    Good to see you old friend!.

    • The_Gadfly

      for quite some time. If God’s grace is so great, what could possibly be that evil? I think, that had he not committed the unforgivable sin, even Judas’s betrayal of Christ could have been forgiven. Eventually it occurred to me that in my human frailty, I was rephrasing the question incorrectly. It is not the sin which is so evil that is unforgivable, it is the sin which cuts off access to the forgiveness.

      Bernard Nathanson avoided that sin, and thus was able to find his way back to God and His perfect forgiveness. And I think we can know that from the fruit he bore through the rest of his life after the forgiveness was received.

  • polemos

    You write from a gifted pen

  • Thomas Crown

    My writing tends to be workmanlike. If it was better this time, credit the subject.

  • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

    I suppose I was in the last generation to have a really innocent childhood. I never even heard the word “abortion” until I was in about sixth grade — and when someone told me what it was, I didn’t believe them.

    (A friend of mine who is a missionary in Africa told me that, similarly, African adults simply don’t believe her when she tells them how common abortion is in America. They can’t believe even one person would do it, much less millions!)

    I always have at least one pro-life bumper sticker on my car — but not with the word “abortion” in it; I’m too afraid of some kid seeing it and asking his or her mom “What’s abortion?” — and having their innocence ruined. I tried to shelter my children as long as possible. I’m not condemning those who don’t; I just couldn’t stand for my kids to hear about such a ghastly thing at any younger an age than I did.

    The day I will never forget in my teenage years was January 23, 1973, a Tuesday if I remember right. The TV news the night before had mentioned the Supreme Court ruling — but I didn’t believe it. I thought that surely I must have misunderstood. The next morning, I came to breakfast — I was a high-school sophomore at the time — and there was the Dallas Morning News sitting on the breakfast table, with a huge black headline announcing that abortion was now legal in all 50 states. So I hadn’t misunderstood the TV news the night before, after all. I will never forget that sinking, overwhelming feeling of horror and disbelief. Utter SHOCK.

    I was in a horrified daze the whole rest of the day. When I got to school — which was a Catholic school, by the way — everybody was acting normal, classes were going on just as usual… and I was appalled. The world had just ended, as far as I was concerned, and everybody was going about life normally, as if nothing had happened. All my life, I’d been a loyal little America-loving patriot — but now I lived in an America where the supreme authorities of justice, who should have been the most just of the just, had turned justice, truth, and the whole universe on its head, and declared that MURDER should henceforth be legal — provided that it was the murder of the one person in the whole wide world I could never imagine murdering: my own child — and at the time in that child’s life that I could least imagine attacking it, the time when it is most vulnerable and needy and trusting, and right there inside my own body! In the very process of being formed out of my own flesh!

    I have often wondered, in later years, if the loss of my Catholic faith a year or so later might have been partially brought on by the way life went on at that Catholic school on January 23, 1973, the same way it always did. Nothing different. Nothing unusual. No big deal.

    Praise and thanks be to God, I rejoined the Catholic Church in 1997 — after several years of intense study and prayer and discernment — all of which was triggered by the realization that, however flawed in practice, the Catholic Church has ALWAYS been THE single greatest voice for the unborn.

    By way of contrast: Some of the most pro-life people I know are Southern Baptists — and yet the Southern Baptist Convention filed an amicus curiae brief in Roe v. Wade — forRoe!! It was not until 1980 — millions of dead babies later — that the SBC reversed itself and came out against Roe.

    I started wondering about why it was that the Catholic Church, uniquely, had always gotten it right on that issue. I started thinking: If social doctrine emerges from theology, then what is it in Catholic theology that is so different, and that necessarilygives rise to the pro-life position? (Hint: It has to do with the centrality of the Incarnation.)

    Catholics have been imperfect in practice — they abort at about the same rates as the rest of the population, which appalls me even more than it bewilders me — but the teaching of the Church has never wavered. Of course, as an idealistic teenager, I judged the Church by its members; when one is young, one is hypersensitive to others’ hypocrisy — and virtually blind to one’s own. It’s the same kind of reasoning that enables so many Protestants to just dismiss the Catholic Church; the Church founded on the Rock (“Kepha” is the Aramaic word for “large rock” that Jesus renamed Simon) is judged by the Spanish Inquisition, say, rather than by the teachings (Acts 1:1-3) that it has faithfully passed down through twenty centuries.

    A priest once said that when a person comes back to the Catholic Church, they will know it’s right because it’s home. It will NOT be comfortable, it will not be easy — but it will be home.

    I am glad that Bernard Nathanson found his way home — and I rejoice that he is now HOME home!

  • ATG

    I also went through a period of questioning and remained at odds until through self examination and self forgiveness I had an ah ha moment where the “light” filled me when I realized that the teaching is perfect while it’s messengers are not.

    I’m not expressing that well, but for me it was a being touched by God experience.

  • rightwingmom52

    In 1978, I was a junior at David Lipscomb College in Nashville (now Lipscomb University). DLC was a much smaller and more conservative church of Christ affiliated college back then. At the time, the Equal Rights Amendment was rapidly gaining ground. Thankfully, women like Tottie Ellis and Lottie Beth Hobbs were paying attention. Tottie, who was the wife of one of my Bible professors, helped organize Eagle Forum with Phyllis Schlafly. She almost single-handedly descended upon the TN state legislature with 500 women which led to TN rescinding its ratification of the ERA. She also led 56 buses of women from Tennessee, most of whom were members of the church of Christ to the anti-ERA rally in Houston where Mrs. Schlafly was speaking, among others. I was on one of those buses with my mother, 2 sisters, and other family members and friends. Abortion was a prominent issue at the rally, and continues to be condemned as sinful in churches of Christ today. We believe and teach that life begins at conception and that God hates hands that shed innocent blood (Prov 6:17). I just wanted you to know that we are pro-life but since each church is autonomous, i.e., we have no national hierarchy or association, we generally do not get any recognition as a group per se like Catholics or Southern Baptists.

    One final note, I happened upon a 12 minute video of a Pro-Life Flash Mob that countered a pro choice rally in Chicago. I’m not tech savvy enough to know how to embed a video here, but I’ve linked to the Townhall page. The story is by Guy Benson who points out how joyous the pro-life group is compared to the pro-abortion group. It’s a little long, but left me with a huge smile on my face and encouraged at seeing the young faces in the crowd. I wanted to be sure you saw this video.

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2011/02/28/video_pro-life_flash_mob_surprises_chicago_march_for_choice.

  • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

    Islamofascists are the Nazis (only worse!)
    Obama is Neville Chamberlain (only worse!)
    USA right now is England ca. 1938-39.

    The British scoffed and sneered at Churchill for being an alarmist and a warmonger until…. Germany invaded Poland, September 1939. Suddenly, it was “Oh, that Churchill, he was right all along!” They finally made him prime minister in the spring of 1940.

    We are in greater danger than England was. But most of our fellow Americans seem to have their head in the sand. What will it take before people realize “Oh, that Allen West, he was right all along!”

    If we would LEARN from history, maybe we won’t have to repeat it. Maybe we’ll have the good sense to make Allen West our Commander in Chief BEFORE things get as bad as they got in Britain.

    At any rate, that was why I started my blog, West to the West Wing 2012, which I hope you’ll come and visit.

    http://westforwestwing2012.com/about/

    Be sure to check out the “Great Speeches” page. It has some that you didn’t mention.

  • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

    L was living in Houston then. But I’m sorry to say, I was a chip-on-my-shoulder feminist at the time and bought all the media tripe about Phyllis Schlafly, so there was no way I’d go near her. On the other hand, I was not pro-ERA, either, because I was the extremely rare (at that time) creature, a PRO-LIFE feminist. I was worried that the ERA would enshrine abortion forever and ever.

    I’m a little ashamed, in hindsight, that I was not with you and your friends boldly fighting against something I knew in my heart was wrong. It just goes to show how powerful the media are. Since I was not a Christian at the time, I didn’t have alternative sources that would have given me a different narrative from the Schlafly-is-a-demon line that the MSM promoted.

    It saddens me that this is why many good people such as my friends who are Mennonites simply will not get involved with the pro-life movement. They’re pro-life personally, but they’ve been brainwashed by the MSM stereotype of pro-lifers as fire-breathing Spanish Inquisitors.

    Thanks for the video link. That was fun — and definitely breaks the grim-and-humorless stereotype! No Spanish Inquisitor ever waved yellow balloons!

  • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

    This was supposed to go on wdleeper’s “Open Letter to Allen West” diary. I APOLOGIZE!