« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

When Arrogance Rules A Nation: Part I on Same Sex Marriage (Part I of III)

The Ruling Class Elite on Both Sides Now Engaging in Incest, Breed A Heirarachy In Contempt of Morality, Traditions, and Liberty

You know one of the things I hate most about our political class is the rampant arrogance spreading like a bad case of genital warts from one promiscuous lot to another. I mean, I really can’t stand these suit and tie talking heads who for some of them have forgotten what it’s like to have a real job with real responsibilities and a real sense of accomplishment through hard work. For the others, this arrogant stench flowing from their mouths like the heavy smell of Scotch after a long round at some Beltway cocktail get together.

They’re constantly telling us what we should accept because according to them the debate is over on this and the debate is over on that. Specifically on same sex marriage Matthew Dowd over at ABC said this issue is over and that history is but an Amtrak bullet headed toward the station, and the GOP ought to reconsider standing in front of it. Excuse me, but last time I checked myself and plenty of other real Christians, and true to principle social conservatives still oppose this idea that somehow the sinner elite in this country can set as new doctrine one that corrupts the age old doctrine of the most high God. That God’s creed so sacred and blessed as he sought to unify himself with his creation called man and woman, that somehow such a divine principle is no longer above contortion.

On the issue of guns, they’ve decided the debate is over, this time is different so let’s pass as many laws and measures that threatened the 2nd Amendment as possible, millions of legal gun owners be darned. Now, I support the right to bear arms, and while I completely grasp the difference between an automatic rifle and a rocket launcher, I also understand the fundamental concepts of free will. You simply cannot regulate free will to the point where the federal body in perfection, dictates the motives of man. One could only assume federal powers that be have access to crystal balls and other tools of the psychic world, but they do not. You cannot determine what a man does before he does it.

Meanwhile you have a young man who stabbed his mother to death, cut her body up and had the audacity to hold her severed head as a prop in a photo he took of himself. And do you know why he killed his mother? He killed his mother because she told him to grow up, get a job, and move out her apartment. This is the end result of a nation ruled by people who only pretend to pretend to know the concepts of moral living within a civil society.

We give the citizens just enough to have them hooked, we shift their mindset inch by inch, we divide them based on skin color, economic standing, religious beliefs, and we plant seeds of discontent and they grow into plants of grievance and jealousy.

I don’t want to hear that the debate is over because I don’t agree with what these clowns are trying to impose on me and my family. If I don’t support two stank dirty men getting married, or two women getting married I’m not going to just sit down and say “Oh well, history isn’t on my side anymore, oh well, this issue is done I might as well just give in” n*gga please you must be crazy.

Now I’m not suggesting that I can automatically flip people to agree with my views but at the same time to say social conservatives should just accept things they don’t support is nonsense. I accept one thing only: That God gave his only son for the sins of the human race and for my sins, therefore I accept his son as my Lord and Savior, and that no other way into the kingdom of heaven is granted but through the Son of Man Jesus Christ.

That’s the only truth at this point in my young life that I’m willing to promote and to accept. Homosexuality has no truth in it. Distorting God’s union between man and woman see, you know it’s wrong when you have to infect something and distort it in order to make it suitable for your own lifestyle. Heterosexual couples had marriage and gay people came along and said “you know what, we want what they have.” Why do you think they want to change the definition of marriage as badly as they seem to want to do? Its because God is the author of marriage and they hate God. If God wasn’t involved they wouldn’t bother. Think about it, if they’re already doing the opposite of what God says why wouldn’t they try to pervert what God made pure and holy?

This isn’t like people of difference races who at one time weren’t allowed to get married in certain states. Discrimination based on color is immoral, and is valid discrimination, one cannot decide what color they are at the time of birth. You are not born homosexual because it contradicts the origin of God’s blueprint for creation. The bible says God created man in his image (Genesis 1:27), go to the book: “God created man in his own image, male and female he created them.” The book, again in Matthew 19:4, “Haven’t you read he replied, that at the beginning the Creator made them male and female?”

If you want to get upset or object to anything I say don’t bother, express your objections to God because his word is the bible, and it’s the law to which I craft my life, not the laws of immoral men who want to force me to accept their definitions of good and just.

Good was the man who walked this Earth for thirty three years. Just was his presence, good was the fact that he taught us how to pray. Just was his price for the sin of man, good was the news he shared with the flock. No, I don’t know the good you speak of because your so called good and just don’t line up with the word homie.

You know I’ll end on this nugget: What if our federal government were trying to impose same sex marriage on a majority Muslim America as oppose to a majority Christian America? Would the Supreme Court even think twice about taking this issue on? Would gay “rights” supporters attack people coming out of mosques like they attacked people coming out of the churches? I can tell you flat out Prop 8 would be set in stone in a majority Muslim America. President Obama wouldn’t have dared come out in support of gay marriage if 78% of all Americans were self described Muslim.

First of all the Christian president so called, has more respect and would have more respect for the Muslim faith than his own faith; that’s a subject for another time. Second of all, that man ain’t crazy, he knows what they did over there that got Christopher Stephens killed. Imagine the government and the Supreme Court telling millions of Muslims that they have to accept something in direct conflict with their faith, man this country would burn literally overnight.

But Jesus said, “they will hate you because they hated me first.” I mean they really hated Jesus back then. The world, ever since Jesus was old enough to walk and talk coherently and upset the apple cart as they say, the world was like, “Man this guy Jesus, dude is killing the game with all that truth he’s speaking. Nah man we gotta get a handle on him because he’s causing people to think about their lives and actually reconsider the way they live”

They wanna tell you how to live and what you should accept but if you even utter any evidence of moral living the’r faces turn up and twist and contort like they smelled some dook or something foul. Hollywood, politicians, everybody, they want you to live like them but as soon as you say they need to change they start with the f-bomb this, Fascist that, right wing Jesus freak this, and all kind of stuff.

And why do they get so angry, almost on queue? It’s all being convicted.

They know same sex marriage is wrong, they know its against God but for the sake of trying to prove they know better than the most high God they’re going ahead with it regardless. President Obama opposes gay marriage and has from the beginning. But in his case nothing speaks louder than money and votes.

 

Sincerely,

El Fantasma, Estudiante de Manos de Piedra

(The Ghost: Student of Hands of Stone)

 

“What about, Roberto Duran vs Floyd Mayweather Jr.?”

“That’d be a tough fight”

“Why?”

“Cause Duran was a beast, especially at lightweight”

 

 

COMMENTS

  • http://www.stridentconservative.com stridentconservative

    Right on!! We should never surrender morality simply because an alleged “majority” says we should.

  • irishgirl

    Amen brother.

  • GremlinJones

    That was unreadable. Often, taking dictation for your inner monologue does not result in good prose.

    The simple fact is that taking a stand against gay marriage is a political loser. Gay marriage was adopted in some states and it simply didn’t result in the end of our nation as loudly proclaimed ten years ago. More and more people are realizing that giving gays the freedom to marry doesn’t impact their quality of life in the slightest, and people generally, over time, bend towards more freedom and not less. Does anyone honestly believe that our society will go back to treating gay marriage like we did in 1980? We can continue to fight it, and keep losing national elections, or we can bite the bullet, marginalize the issue, and bring back small government as our rallying cry instead of social conservatism.

    • Bill S

      Funny…there are a lot of positions that conservatives support that are also considered “political losers” … Opposing loose immigration laws, opposition to abortion, not raising taxes on “the rich”, opposing gun rights restrictions, etc. And yet we don’t care. Why? Because unlike leftists, we are concerned about maintaining values that are beneficial for our nation and not swinging in the cultural breeze like a left-wing wind sock.

      • exitsfunnel

        With all due respect none of those issues you mention have swung 20 pts in 7 years. I understand not wanting to give up an issue that is important to you, but this ship has sailed. The only open question is whether the end game plays out quickly through the courts (I hope not) or grinds out through the states over the next several years or maybe even a decade.

        To the original poster, I would suggest that the kind of explicitly religious appeal you are making is spitting into the wind. To be clear, I’m not saying that you don’t have the right to make them, because of course you do, but you’re not going to convince anyone to your side through scripture who isn’t already on your side.

        • Bill S

          So what? You obviously didn’t get the jist of my comment. We shouldn’t base values on public opinion. That’s why the GOP is full of cowards…they are windsocks like the Left.

          • exitsfunnel

            I did understand the gist of your comment Bill, but reality is what it is. Let me try to put this to you differently, because I think that we’re kind of talking past each other. No one is saying that individual conservatives can’t be opposed to gay marriage, because of course they can. But the 18-29 demographic supports gay marriage by upwards of 70%. So individual conservatives will never agree on everything and for sure some will remain opposed to gay marriage until the day they die, but the GOP can never by a 30% party.

          • Bill S

            No, I don’t think we’re talking past one another. You think we should accept gay marriage because teh youth think we should. I think we should not succumb to culture for the sake of a vote. I don’t sell my values for votes just so we can win.

        • westcoastpatriette

          And I would suggest that you are the one spitting into the wind. You will see that soon enough and your strong-arm tactics are not well-suited in this discussion. Not that I expect you to get it, but that’s okay.

  • checkmate2012

    Another excellent post by tjghost! The opinion of some commentors that this ship has sailed is not supported by most Americans, including on of the left most leaning state of CA. with Prop. 8, which the voters approved and is being threatened by activist judges.
    .
    Over 30 states, a majority, have language in their state constitutions that gay marriage will not be legal in their states and 6 states have banned it. Nine states have legalized it ME, MD, MA, CT, IA, VT, NH, NY, and WA and the District of Columbia so let gays marry there if they want to wed.
    .
    The fact is, only about 4-5% of the population in the U.S. is LGBT. So don’t tell me the ship has sailed when it’s a small percentage of the overall population- they just happen to be a very vocal minority looking for victim status and forcing their agenda on the rest of us.
    .
    The best point of this diary is “What if our federal government were trying to impose same sex marriage on a majority Muslim America as oppose to a majority Christian America?” tj’ghost is spot on as there would be hell to pay if this was imposed on a religion willing to commit jihad against those that don’t fall in line with their thinking. I’m sick of a few trying to wield their voice against the majority of Americans.

    • marymargaret

      Activist judges? I don’t think so. No less a conservative thinker than Ted Olson, former Solicitor General under George W and a founding member of the Federalist Society is part of the legal team challenging California’s Prop 8. Prop 8 was upheld by the courts in California. This is where your moral/religious beliefs come into conflict with the Bill of Rights. It’s not the federal government who is trying to “impose” same sex marriage.

      • PowerToThePeople

        Do you ever say anything that is not pure stupidity? And do you ever stop repeating the same tired arguments that have already been shown to be in error?

        • marymargaret

          Am I wrong? Please make a cogent argument instead of just calling me names.

          • Viet71

            Cogent argument: Prop 8 is immune from an Equal Protection challenge; ask any knowledgeable, unbiased constitutional lawyer.

            Prop 8 also is immune from a Due Process challenge, because it does not invoke a right of privacy.

            Judge Vaughn Walker may or may not be “activist”, but he is surely out to lunch.

            eom

          • exitsfunnel

            Strategically, from the pro gay marriage, prospective, Prop 8 always seemed like the worst case to take to the courts especially when they almost surely could have reversed (or rather replaced) it at the ballot box in 2012. I am generally supportive of gay civil marriage but I wouldn’t be bothered at all if the SC overturned the 9th on this one.

        • checkmate2012

          You have greater patience than me PttP, for I gave up responding to this poster after her first very rude comment to me. She still wants to debate the issue of activist judges after Bill the Mod corrected her. Moving on :)

          • PowerToThePeople

            Yeah, she shows up about once a month and makes some smug comment, some absurd nonsense comment, or just shows her true colors and makes some cliche lib comment and I am there to harass her. This time she cried.

            And you are right to not respond to her as your intellect far exceeds hers so you would only be talking above her head.

          • checkmate2012

            Keep up the great work and I’ll humbly take your compliment, in this case anyway- Thank you.

      • Bill S

        Please do a bit of research before writing things that are patently untrue. Two federal courts (US District Court, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals) have already ruled against the California Supreme Court on Prop 8. Yes, the federal government IS imposing homosexual marriage by tromping on the rights of the State of CA and its citizens. So much for “federalism”

  • freemkts

    Thomas Jefferson would be rolling in his grave if he ever read the ebonics filled drivel that was written in his name in this diary. And Jefferson despised theocrats who tried to legislate based on their narrow views of religion. If you want to honor Jefferson support true limited government and keep it out of people’s personal lives!

  • mcrow44

    The marriage at issue here is a legal construction dealing with spousal rights. The states have already dealt with many of these matters, case-by-case, in their legislatures
    This is a pointless argument about who owns the word ‘marriage’

    I propose.that we label heterosexual legal unions marriage and homosexual legal unions ,civil unions. If the voters determine that homosexual partners should be treated exactly like married couples for legal purposes, they should pass a law making civil partners the equivalent of married spouses under federal law. If there are circumstances unique to homosexual partnerships, those debates can also take place in the Congress,

    Every example noted by the moderator has a constitutional basis that justifies (even requires), our conservative position, I don’t see it on this issue. This debate is about property rights, taxation, spousal privilege, adoption and inheritance. It is not about the preservation of cultural values or enshrining religious belief.

    • marymargaret

      You are wrong. This is not “a legal construction dealing with spousal rights.” It is about the equal protection clause enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment which states: no State shall make any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the US.

  • iowaguy

    I’m looking forward to part II and III of this disaster.