« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Allen West Out In Florida Senate Race, How About Tea Party?

Allen-WestRep. Allen West made it official this week that he will not be entering the Florida GOP primary race for U.S. Senate.

“Over the last several weeks, numerous leaders of the Florida Republican Party, including current and past elected officials, have spoken to me about the race for the United States Senate. Out of respect, I was willing to listen,” said West in a statement.

“I have been given one of the highest honors to serve in the House of Representatives and I will continue to serve the citizens in that capacity. I will not seek the Republican nomination for the United States Senate in 2012. With regard to my future, the only goal I have is to do my very best to represent the constituents of the Congressional District and to restore the exceptionalism of our nation.”

So the race to challenge incumbent Sen. Bill Nelson (D) remains wide open with recent polling showing that more than half of registered Republican voters are undecided. The embattled candidate Mike McCalister, currently engulfed in a major controversy over questions from the veterans organization Stolen Valor Task Force about his military record, came out on top in that poll.

The other key candidates in the race are Adam Hasner, George LeMieux and Craig Miller, who just entered the race this past month. For the established politicians Hasner and LeMieux, it cannot be an encouraging sign when a relative unknown such as McCalister finds himself leading in the polls. Yes, it’s still early, however, with the exception of Miller, the others have been at it for months now.

McCalister ran in the GOP primary for governor last year, giving him a slight advantage in that his name has been on a statewide ballot before. He finished with 10% of the vote, despite the fact that he raised no money and operated on a total of $8,000 which he loaned his campaign. It’s widely believed that a vote for McCalister was a de fact vote for ‘none of the above‘ in that race as voters became very disenfranchised over the negative tone between Bill McCollum and Rick Scott.

What may be working against Hasner and Lemieux and is difficult to measured is just how much of an anti-incumbent feeling there is among voters. With support for Congress now at historic lows and voters very disappointed over the recent debt ceiling debacle, political experience may actually be a detriment at the moment.

In fact, generic polling on the race indicates that voters see a non-politician with strong business experience as the best type of candidate to take on Bill Nelson. A factor that favors former CEO Craig Miller and most certainly contributed to his decision to enter the race. And possibly the reason he came within the margin of error of second place in the aforementioned poll after just 3 weeks in the race.

What should not be overlooked in Allen West’s statement is that he said he was approached by “numerous leaders of the Florida Republican Party, including current and past elected officials”.

Clearly a sign that the state party structure is less than enamored with the field, despite Hasner and Lemieux being products of that entity.

For those tea partiers who continue to sit this race out, West’s statement is also a tell that the Republican Party is alive and well in determining who the candidates will be, despite previous claims to the contrary about staying out of primaries and “allowing the people to decide”.

As for who the tea party supports in the U.S. Senate race, to borrow from Colonel West, the best term to accurately describe what’s happening may be schizophrenic. There’s a small but loyal faction that has become enamored by McCalister’s rousing stump speeches, accuracy aside, while others surprisingly are lining up with Hasner.

Working in Hasner’s favor here is the surprising endorsement from FreedomWorks, a tea party oriented group that espouses ‘limited government, lower taxes and more freedom’ – apparently FW looked past the Florida budget that grew from $50 Billion to $70 Billion during Hasner’s 8 years in Tallahassee, as well as his vote in 2009 for a $2 Billion tax and fee increase.

As the newcomer to the race, Craig Miller has also been working hard to introduce himself to the tea party movement around the state and has gained the support of a few notable leaders who see him as the most viable non-politician in the race and it’s a safe bet that he will continue to add to this support.

In reality, the tea party’s real strength is when it’s able to pull together and coalesce around single issues and individual candidates. An idea that seems to be lost on too many in the movement as we see them splinter in one election after another, adding credence to the idea that the tea party is it’s own worst enemy much of the time.

And George LeMieux may be the one to benefit most if the tea party continues to minimize it’s influence in the race. Despite his voting record in the U.S. Senate that was for the most part, with one or two exceptions, fairly conservative, he’s viewed by many as the moderate in the race. Yet, with the best name recognition of the group and a marginalized tea party vote, he’s got to like the odds.

With West’s decision to stay out and the hesitation from other notable names to enter based on the improbability of a politician defeating Bill Nelson, we very well may see the final field as it stands today. If you put any faith in polls, Craig Miller could be the man to watch – ultimately, he’ll have to show the ability to raise money.

As for Hasner, in spite of several key endorsements he has surprisingly low name recognition and continues to perform poorly in the polls – a trend he must change soon. Lemieux just has to hope that the tea party continues to shoot itself in the foot – history is on his side. And McCalister will have to find a way to rise above the self imposed mire of controversy he finds himself in and regain some momentum – an unlikely occurrence.

Cross-Posted at Florida Political Press

COMMENTS

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    I envy his constituents, they have a great Congressman to represent them. Here’s hoping Rep West continues to serve them well.

    • mikeymike143

      seem to be split between hasner and mccalister. tom you are 100% correct when you say hasner is getting more ”big name” support from conservatives and tea party groups but a lot of my conservative activist friends are backing mccalister.

      miller is a pro amnesty fringe candidate and shouldnt even be mentioned in a discussion of legitimate contenders. the only other time miller ran for office he took third in a republican primary for a house seat.

      for better or for worse lemieux is going to be associated with charlie crist. and in politics, perception is reality.

      by the way, if jeb had gotten in this race he would been unopposed the primary and beaten nelson by 10 points. nelson is extremely vunerable. i know why jeb decided not to run(the extreme unpopularity of his brother george down here) but jeb is well regarded in florida by voters and we wouldnt hold george being his brother against him.

      and freedoms truth, my congressman is allen west and yes i am honored to have him representing me.

      • http://www.floridapoliticalpress.com/ tomtflorida

        You could not be more wrong my friend. Let me preface this by saying I’m an enthusiastic supporter of Craig Miller… Nonetheless, you are buying into the smears of the political motivated to label him pro amnesty. I’d be very happy to counter any specific claim you may have.

        As a hard core tea party activist that very much believes in strong immigration policies, I’m very comfortable with where Craig lines up here, having discussed it with him personally on many occasions.

        As for McCalister, he took a major step backwards in the past week and I don’t see him recovering. As much as certain folks are rallying around Hasner, he’s just not resonating with the voters. I submit that, providing no one else enters the race, this race will eventually come down to George LeMieux and Craig Miller, with Miller prevailing. Which is a plus for Florida because polls clearly show that a non-politician with extensive business experience is the preferred candidate to beat Bill Nelson.

  • Martin Knight

    [nt]

  • gawken

    makes it even more curious that Haridopoulous took himself out of the race a while back. It appears to be wide open.

    Two thoughts come to mind:

    1. Rubio will NOT make an endorsement until a candidate has shown the ability to break out from the pack to some extent.
    2. If, as I suspect, this chaotic condition continues throught the end of the year, look for everyone, all the top party and elected officials, to ask Jeb to run,

    It actually makes the most sense. It will effectively end the race, though maybe not officially. One of more may still stay in, but Jeb will then be the nominee. We won’t have to waste our resources on a primary..and since Jeb would beat Nelson easily, we can focus on the WH race….winning the state’s electoral votes.

  • Scope

    who are making their voices known and heard, are not the same ones who promised to primary Allen West because of his debt ceiling vote. The demands of purity in candidates, meaning purity with respect to the description of those making the demands, is getting old and tiring.

    I also disagree that candidates should run on single issues. When a Senator is seated in Washington they will have the responsibility of voting on much more than just any one single issue, and it is important to know where they stand on a variety of issues. Maybe I just misunderstood you.

    • GregInFla

      I was appalled with comments I saw on another website (theblaze) with regard to Congressman West’s vote on debt ceiling. I won’t visit that site anymore. All that really matters regarding the budget and spending is getting control of House/Senate/POTUS, then all he cuts we want to make can be made.
      Did Lemeiux vote for Dodd-Frank? I know he strongly considered voting for the DREAM act, and he voted with the Dems on one lame-duck session bill that passed.

      • Scope

        I read the articles at the Blaze for a little while, and when it started looking more like the National Enquirer, I took it off my list of sites. The posters are some of the worst I’ve seen anywhere. Rude, crude, lewd, lacking in intelligence, and absolute purists. It’s almost like herd mentality, or being mind numbed there. A few start the threads, and that sets the tone for the threads. Gos help you if you don’t agree, it’s like being gang raped.

        I’ve been saying all along that we need to gain the WH, Senate and House, and, then take a machete to the budgets and spending.

        One of my biggest fears is that the purists will try to harm the gains we already made in the House, and then we will be right back where we started before 2010. Just don’t put Boehner, Cantor et al in any leadership positions. I wouldn’t mind seeing primaries for Hatch, Lugar, Snowe, Collins, Brown, Graham, McCain, and I’m sure a few others as their terms end. We all knew it would take a few election cycles to takeover Washington.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      It sounds good, but it is just stupid and it boxes you in. We may have to raise some taxes in order to get many other needed things.

      Right now taxes are very very low compared to recent memory and it has not spurred economic growth. That is because there are other factors involved, not just taxes.

      Further, there are certain taxes or fees that could be raised that would create a lot of revenue but would not have a big negative impact on growth.

      I am not saying I like taxes, I am just saying that you have to be flexible in politics.

      • Scope

        When we could get control but cutting spending, and then cutting it some more. There would be a tremendous economic setback if any taxes are raised, even if the economy was healthy.

      • acat

        ‘s the rate of spend, the rate of debt growth, and the rate of growth-killing legislative and bureaucratic growth paid for by the former two.

        To put it in Reagan-era terms, if we take a slash-and-burn approach to red tape, we could try to grow our way out of debt…

        Mew

        • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

          I agree that the way to go is to cut spending and regulation. But in order to get some of those cuts you might have to compromise with some small tax increases, that is my point.

          It is silly to think you can have it all your own way with no compromise unless and until you have a filibuster proof majority in both houses and the presidency, and even then you may have to mollify many Rinos.

          • acat

            There’s a real easy revenue increase available – insert a “floor” clause into the existing tax code. As in, “everyone who files a 1040 must pay at least 1% of gross income.”

            Those at upper income levels can still use deductibles to reduce their level to 1%, but no more avoiding it entirely.

            Those at lower levels who currently pay nothing (or, and this is more common than it should be, who get a “refund” on top of paying nothing) would begin contributing to the feeding of the federal beast.

            That gets everyone some skin in the game, and would increase revenue without really increasing tax rates.

            Mew

            p.s. Now, let’s talk about my plan to require proof of having filed a 1040 to be allowed to vote…

          • acat

            They’re pointless. They have a literal net negative value.

            Those who are smart enough to see the flaws in a pledge and not sign it get hammered by ….

            Those who are willing to lie about it (I’m looking at you, Stupak) for whom the pledge offers a fig leaf to hide behind while bashing the candidate we really want….

            Those who would follow the policies that the pledge calls for already , so don’t need ‘em.

            Net negative. Do away with ‘em. Candidates to post their own positions and be voted on based on those merits, not based on lies or worse.

            Mew

          • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

            I don’t like those pledges at all because they only serve as ammunition to your political opponents if necessity causes you to have to change your opinion.

            As for your idea about a tax floor, I agree, the various tax reforms we have had in the last 30 years have caused too many middle class people to pay literally zero income tax. That gives them no personal incentive to vote for low tax, low spending candidates.

          • pacajka

            Do you work at the Tampa Bay Rays games as “DJ Kitty”?

          • acat

            No, but so what? What’s your point?

            Mew

  • ashland_avenue

    nt

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      cast his vote, run for a touchdown, walk on water, and circumsize an orphan all in the same day.

  • pacajka

    McAllister is out hustling around Florida already, as is Hasner. Both of them are good candidates and they can unseat Bill Nelson. Send Bill up to the ISS as a permanent crewman to keep it up there.

    Don’t nominate LeMieux, please. There’s enough RINO’s up there already. The only worse “Republican” would be Charlie Crist, but he’s a No Labels guy now. Actually Crist has a label, “self-centered”.