« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Some Tea Party Advice For Mitt Romney

mitt romney_tea _party

Romney suggests that the Koch Brothers ‘Fuel’ Tea Party

Let’s be clear on one thing before we go any further, I do not support Mitt Romney as the Republican nominee for the 2012 presidential race. Nor do many in the tea party.

And for good reason.

From a story in the Washington Examiner yesterday;

Mitt Romney is quietly courting the Tea Party as it becomes increasingly clear that the conservative grass-roots movement, which has stubbornly refused to embrace him, represents a bigger threat to Romney’s quest for his party’s nomination than any of his rivals.

Less than two months before the Iowa caucuses, Romney is skipping a major Iowa event Friday — where every other GOP hopeful will be — to deliver a keynote speech on fiscal policy to the conservative advocacy group Americans for Prosperity.

Americans for Prosperity is led by billionaire Republican donor David Koch, whose endorsement Romney seeks. An Oct. 4 internal Romney campaign memo obtained by The Washington Examiner describes Koch as the “financial engine of the Tea Party” even though Koch “denies being directly involved.”

The reason I clarified that I do not support Romney is because I am going to offer him some friendly advice because it looks as if he desperately needs it.

As to be expected of an elitist big government proponent that just doesn’t quite get what all the fuss is about, Romney approaches the tea party as a top down entity. In staying true to the age old GOP tradition of successful deal making in smoky backrooms, he starts at the top – or at least what he percieves to be the top.

He did the same thing when in town back in April, holding a “quiet” meeting with a local tea party leader, as if a single individual controls the spigot, capable of turning the flow of support on and off at one’s choosing.

As the Washington Examiner story indicates, for Romney to believe that the Koch Brothers direct the tea party not only gives the Left the vindication they seek in diminishing the tea party, it also shows just how little he knows about the movement.

Americans for Prosperity has been a tremendous ally of the tea party, providing much needed support at every opportunity. However, AFP has never controlled the tea party. It holds it’s own events, pursues it’s own agenda and even though the organization is very active here in Florida, it does not try to influence the direction of local tea party groups.

To believe otherwise is buying into the propaganda of the Left.

And that is because AFP understands the movement and the fierce independence of the local groups. Other than showing up at a tea party wearing a ‘Che’ t-shirt, about the worst thing one could do is start telling tea partiers what to do. The two entities share common goals and often partner together in advocating on behalf of these shared beliefs, but that’s where it ends.

As for Romney, if he wants to curry favor with the great awakening known as the tea party, he will need to kick off his Ferragamo loafers, roll up his sleeves and mix with the ‘great unwashed’.

He’ll also need to understand that the tea party is not about so called leaders, it’s about we the people. If in doubt, just look to Herman Cain as an example.

Of course, in doing so, he will need to be prepared to address the concerns the folks have about many of his policy positions. He will not receive the kid glove treatment he’s grown accustomed to from the national media – which may explain why he hasn’t already traveled down this path.

Nonetheless, if Romney is not up to the task of successfully taking on a bunch of racist, far right extremists that want to wipe out women and the elderly, well… is he the man for the job in these very troubling times in American history?

(Sorry there’s no love for Perry herein)

Cross Posted at Florida Political Press

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • jackdaniels11

    leaderless AND rudderless.

    I admit that the lack of a movement-core was the GOP’s biggest weakness in 2008. The Tea Party did fill that gap. But because no individual has the right to speak on behalf of who the Tea Party is and what it stands for, it means many different things to different people.

    To the far left, it is a bunch of racist, religious zealouts who hate BHO because he’s black, wants to ban all non-Christian religions, and wants to cut every government spending program except for the national defense.

    To the conservatives who support the Tea Party and identify with its objectives, it is either: (1) a movement based on restoring low taxes and fiscal responsibility in government, (2) a movement based on returning to Judeo-Christian values, or (3) a movement that aims to pull the GOP to the right on both social and fiscal issues.

    There is no consensus as to where the Tea Party stands on issues like defense spending and foreign interventionism v. isoloationism.

    The Tea Party seems to be very conservative on social issues like abortion, gay rights, and prayer in school, but there must be some conservatives within the movement that are either pro-choice, libertarian, or who just don’t have a strong opinion on those issues.

    I do not believe that Mitt Romney needs to call himself a “Tea Party Republican” to become the GOP nominee. Mitt just needs to be Mitt. He governed Massachusetts from the right-of-center. If that is not conservative enough for the Tea Party, they can vote for some other candidate. But by doing so, they will increase the odds that Obama will be re-elected. (Source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/150554/Obama-Romney-Tied-Nationally-Swing-States.aspx)

    This recent poll squares with every Rasmussen Reports poll which all show Romney as the Republican who has the best chance of winning over independents and beating Obama.

    • gekster

      All he can get is his blind followers, and if they ever take thier blinders off, they will pick anybody else.
      And Obamas best hope is for Mitt to be the nominee.
      Obama can say
      “I have been a liberal all mylife, and havn’t changed.
      Romney has been a liberal, or a conservative, or neutral,
      or a liberal, or, well, you will just have to ask him what he is today.
      And believe me it will probably be diferent tomorrow”.

      Voters prefer a candidate who at the least are firm in thier beliefs