« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Romney vs. Newt; The Future Of The Tea Party And Rightward Shift Of GOP At Stake

newt_romney1

It is only fitting that the mudslinging now coming out of the Mitt Romney camp is occurring here in Florida. When it comes to dirty politics, the Sunshine State stands in a class all it’s own.

After Newt Gingrich’s overwhelming victory in the S.C. primary and subsequent surge in the polls, a real sense of desperation set in for Romney.

Desperation that manifests itself in the aggressive demeanor he’s taken on and in the negative campaign ads that have inundated the airwaves in Florida.

Such as the ad that falsely claims that Gingrich “resigned in disgrace” which Romney is still running and even had aired during last night’s CNN debate. A claim that none other than Charles Krauthammer himself has stated is not accurate.

Although, were you to ask Mitt Romney about this ad, odds are you will get feigned ignorance. A bothersome trend from the former Governor, whether you’re asking about sleazy campaign ads or Swiss bank accounts, is for him to deny knowledge and divert the responsibility to others.

Yet, desperate times call for desperate measures and fortunately for Romney, his chief campaign strategist and several of his most senior campaign staff were Charlie Crist’s top political advisers who are ever so familiar with the political turf here in Florida.

And this ‘win at whatever cost’ approach now seen coming from the Romney camp is eerily reminiscent of good ol’ Charlie, leaving one to wonder if this is driven by the sense of entitlement that seems to be inherent in the political class, a.k.a. the establishment?

And make no mistake about it, the ‘establishment’ is fully behind Mitt Romney, as evidenced by the likes of John McCain and Connie Mack IV out stumping on his behalf. Individuals who are always quick to rail against the very system they have become an embodiment of.

In truth, McCain’s appearance signals something far more sinister. Mitt Romney has not put forth much effort to court tea party support, much like Crist’s moderate, ignore-the-tea-party strategy. Which makes sense considering the same individuals are behind both campaigns.

As we often see in both Washington and Tallahassee, the political class is first and foremost about outmaneuvering it’s opponents and the tea party needs to understand that the moderate wing of the GOP sees it as much of an opponent as it does the Democrats. Perhaps more so, since both parties share a common benefit from a continuation of the status quo.

And if Mitt Romney can secure the nomination without so much as crossing the street for the tea party, it will serve the dual purpose of ensuring the establishment retains control with ‘their guy’ and will go a very long way toward suppressing the rightward shift of the party brought on by the tea party.

Yes, the GOP presidential primary comes down to the moderate wing versus the conservative wing of the party – the establishment vs. the tea party.

With Newt Gingrich, in all his glory, representing the conservative tea party position.

In reality, this has been a two man race for some time now. Rick Santorum is reportedly pulling up stakes on Sunday and returning home two days before voting takes place. Simply put, he just doesn’t have the resources to compete in an expensive state like Florida where it’s winner take all.

Much like former Gov. Sarah Palin, who wants to see the nomination process continue to play out, Santorum supporters AND the tea party movement in Florida must see the long term effects of a Romney win. If he prevails here, the race is all but over.

A vote for Newt Gingrich ensures a continuation of this process and all parties involved live to fight another day.

One thing is clear, with Romney as the Republican nominee, the tea party may as well pack up and go home – it will have zero influence in his organization.

The moderate wing of the party is counting on the political immaturity of the tea party to prevail, the fierce independence of the many groups to prevent it from seeing the long term strategy playing out.

What is really encouraging here is that just as it has been from the very beginning, the people have it within their power to control the outcome. The question is do we choose to exercise this power.

Cross Posted at Florida Political Press

COMMENTS

  • Common_Cents

    Where is the tea party?

    Where is the tea party grass roots push by Redstate? It seems that Erick and this site is transitioning much more to political commentary and punditry, calling the horse races rather than advocating for grass roots conservatism.

    There is absolutely nothing wrong w/ Erick’s current and future success in a media career and I wish him tremendous continued success! But the CNN gig is already showing conflicts with a media pundit gig on a left leaning network vs. a grass roots conservative advocate on RS. Admitting bias, praising Blitz and CNN for winning a debate? really?

    When I read Erick saying CNN and the Blitz winning a debate, I know there has been a departure from grass roots conservatism. The Erick of old would have questioned anyone who would claim that a left leaning network and a liberal moderator won a GOP debate. That even being suggested should prove that something is very wrong here.

    Why aren’t there reports on Romney’s surrogates such as Jason Chaffetz stalking Gingrich campaigns? The Romney campaign sent a paid staffer to FL dedicated to have surrogates stalk gingrich campaigns everywhere in FL.

    We should all be threatened and alarmed by the DC establishment wielding its power to control the party, rather than focusing on beating Obama.

    I’m just not seeing it. Evidently not many others do either.

    The tea party and America is being dealt a huge stealth coordinated blow by the establishment. It could be all over this next week. Although I am cautiously optimistic at Gingrich’s chances because the media has not reported his largest campaign staff in SC and also largest staff in FL of all candidates. Gingrich at least has a ground game and organization there, whether you hear about it from the MSM is another subject.

    This is not specifically about gingrich, but just as he is the frontrunner in best representing the tea party anti romney anti establishment candidate. The story would have been the same had Santorum or Perry were the leader.

    The current tea party gains in congress from 2010 are teetering on the edge of being wiped out by the GOP nomination. A romney win will put extreme pressure on the few tea party congress critters to conform to old school party establishment norms. Without continuous reinforcements to the first wave of tea partiers in congress, they will weaken and cave. I don’t really blame them.

    • paladin1

      I am not hearing much from the Tea Party movement today. My local Tea Party is becoming more Ron Paulish by the week and that is frightening for the conservative movement. If the Tea Parties do not rise up and fight this establishment push-back, 2010 will have been useless. The entrenched powerbrokers in the Congress have already forced many of the 2010 members into submission and they need reinforced in this election. I don’t see that happening if Romney wins the nomination.

    • J. Leg

      Who gave a full throated defense of the progressive income tax….

      But don’t worry! He won’t let the gays get married! ::eye roll::

    • http://xmmlbchat.blogspot.com katesmith

      Will fight more viciously to defeat a conservative (challenger from the right) than they will to defeat Obama. Rush also said the GOP estab. thinks Obama will be re-elected. He says they hope to get the Senate to steer money. Regarding Mr. Erickson, he did say something quite brave the other day, ie, if the GOP wins the White House and doesn’t sweat blood trying to repeal ObamaCare, he sees the end of the Repub. Party. Which I agree with. The 8 years of George Bush was also about killing the party. We had all 3 branches of government and look what happened.

      • mikefrey

        Not Judicial branch. I don’t they GOP controlled the judicial branch!

  • Juggernaut

    called herself, Ronald Reagan and Romney. Problem is, Reagan isn’t dirty nor a moderate though he supported some bills that the party had to endure.

    I was curious about the resignation since Newt hasn’t challenged the facts. Time to take a stand.

  • znjs

    Newt supported the bailout. Newt supported the mandate right up until Obama put it in his health care plan. Newt helped Freddie/Fannie word their proposals so that they would sound acceptable to Republican legislators and was an unregistered lobbies for them. What part of this spells Tea Party to you?

    He may not be the establishment’s first choice, but he’s no Tea Partier. If he is that term has absolutely no meaning.

    • Common_Cents

      It’s a good way to lose money. Also driving using the rear view mirror is hazardous as well.

      Yep, Gingrich has warts. But in the current situation, and looking to the future, given the 4 choices we have now, who is the one who can do the best job going forward?

      Like it or not, Gingrich best represents the tea party. And this is not even about gingrich, if it was Santorum, Perry, Jindal, Daniels, DeMint, they’d all be targeted by the establishment to be destroyed.

      • znjs

        I’m not saying Newt’s warts are any better or worse then other candidates, I’m not even making the case (here anyhow) that he’s not the best candidate. I’m saying he’s not a Tea Partier if that term has any meaning whatsoever. Any candidate that could make the claim to be the Tea Party candidate (unless you want to include RP) has already been drummed out of the nomination process.

        • Common_Cents

          That is my point. They have largely coalesced around Newt much more than any other candidate. Romney has essentially zero support there. Santorum and Paul have some but not nearly like gingrich.

        • http://www.floridapoliticalpress.com/ tomtflorida

          I don’t think anyone is suggesting that Newt is a tea partier… I stated he is ‘representing’ the tea party position. He also represents the only option to get out in front of what will be a certain swing back to the middle by the GOP elite. As mentioned in an earlier comment, this is not even about Newt, just that he is the one in the position at the moment.

  • elayman

    The conservative base should focus on core principles and values of the movement: limited government, free markets, and fiscal responsibility led by established, inexperienced fiscal conservative governors without trying to be ‘all issues to all people.’ There is already an obvious split between evangelical and economic libertarian wings of the party, so leave it to other vehicles

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      to agree to the Democratic media controlled debates, to allow unfounded vicious, personal attacks to be made on our candidates without defense (like those made on Palin – not on her record – because she didn’t fit the mold), to allow the smears on the Tea Party without defense because they’re paranoid about giving up one iota of power, we’re going to have a difficult time recruiting candidates and convincing them to run and allow themselve to be vetted under the liberal microscope or by those in our own party who prefer to keep the Crists and McCain’s in power.

      • romansdaughter

        nt

      • http://www.unifiedpatriots.com/ pilgrim

        .

        • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

          . .
          .

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        Should the candidates that get unjustly attacked and their supporters in the media or not need to defend against and refute such attacks? Yes.

  • bobguzzardi

    Exactly this is about the Establishment, not even Obama. It may be we lose in November but winning with Romney? What does that achieve. Newt will, of course, sell us out, too.

    The Titanic did sink.

  • Common_Cents

    The low blow establishment has been sending surrogates to stalk Gingrich and smear him during his own events.

    McCain has called for it to stop.

    *********************

    • Xasteius

      no text

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      in his own party to get along, considering he’s done such a good job of getting along with the other side for far too long.

    • kestrel

      I can hardly believe that Chaffetz and Connie Mack, in particular, are doing this, but they are. It doesn’t reflect well on them.

  • paladin1

    Gingrich, while by no means a tea partier, is the best we have in a weak Tea field. If they help him pull this off, I think they can count on having some influence in a Gingrich administration. Romney will never give them the time of day; especially after the support he has received from the establishment. If he wins, it will assuredly be without Tea support and he will not forget. The true believers in the Congress will be ignored or intimidated and removed, and all will be right with the moderate Romney wing of the world. Conservatism will be set back a generation.

    • WillWong

      in the general. Thinking people who thought Romney is electable just need to consider two things….Romney will be painted as the Mr. One Percent and he would not be able to make Obamarecare the talking point.

      • Dave_A

        Obama is going to play the class-warfare card no matter who he runs against, and Gingrich is just as vulnerable (as a former lobbyist and career politician)…. Jacksonian populism belongs in the Democrat party, not in the GOP.

        The difference, is that Romney can turn that argument… While I don’t necessarily agree that a career in finance makes you an expert on economics, it’s something that Romney has sold very well – in fact it’s his #1 argument as to why folks should vote for him, with ‘I’m electable’ being #2.

        Republicans cannot out-class-warfare Democrats. It just won’t work. We need to counter the class-warfare with allegations of economic inexperience & ignorance, and blame for the state of the economy since January 2009.

        Newt supported individual mandates too, so he’s no stronger on that issue – the path there for Romney is ‘This is a state issue, not a federal one’… That is, IF Obama-care is even an issue in the general-election campaign – the Supreme Court may take that one off the table…

        Romney is far, far more electable than Newt. He’s also far less of a bomb-thrower, and thus far less likely to shoot himself in the foot with some bombastic and insane idea during the General.

  • ssshannon1026

    no conservative should vote for Romney if he is ordained by the establishment with the nomination. The establishment as it is currently constituted is the enemy of conservatism. It will continue to force moderate republicans and radical democrats on us forever. We conservatives do not have the power to stop it from selecting radically leftist democrats, but we do have the power to stop it from selecting moderate republicans. Destroying that status quo is far more imporatant than defeating Obama. If we conservatives would stop playing along the entire system would come crashing down – Don’t vote for Romney!

    • krish

      I agree with other posts that if it is Romney, Obama & Libertarian…..liberatarian would be the closest to conservative principles!

      1. We should always vote for the candidate with the most conservative principles – that will be the libertarian in the above race if it is Romney.

      2. More important issue for conservative movement (been trying to get through to Levin, Rush…to address this issue – no success in getting through so far!) is that if Romney wins, he will send one after another liberal to moderate policies (just as it happened during GW Bush days) and conservatives in house & senate will be forced to go along with the the new Republican president. Conservative movement will be pushed back for another 10-15 years – after a disaster like him calling himself conservative. Dems will get the House back & increase their majority in Senate since conservatives will be mad!
      As Rick Perry said, the conservative movement is more important than any one election of one moderate. If Obama is relected, the conservatives can stand together & go against the RINOs in senate & house – that will bring the energy to Tea Partyers in 2014 & throw the RINOs out of power!

      Considering all these, I hope Romney loses to Newt. Since we cannot vote for Obama & so we vote libertarianfor the President, vote for conservative senators & representatives to oppose Obama second term!

      • ssshannon1026

        they are social progressives who reject Marxist economics.

        • JSobieski

          Buckley had the word “libertarian” in the cover of his autobiography. Reagan didn’t think that most libertarians were on a different team.

          Just because there is a Constitution party doesn’t mean constitutionalists aren’t conservative

          Just because there is a Libertarian party doesn’t mean that libertarians aren’t conservative.

          • ssshannon1026

            From their web site:

            “As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others.”

            Sorry, but that just dosn’t sound like small government to me. So we’re going to repalce the UN with the Grand International Libertarian Council?

          • aesthete

            1) Libertarian Party =/= libertarian

            2) What’s wrong with wanting a world with liberty? Should their page have read, FREEDOM FOR AMERICANS ONLY HELL YEAH instead? There’s a lot wrong with the LP but yearning for one-world government isn’t one of those things: in fact, they cater towards the nutters who see one-world government behind every bush.

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            sorry, couldn’t resist. Fits in with my “Secretary shall decide” emphasis…smile

          • lineholder

            BTW, a little off-topic, but have you seen her latest? That reducing pregnancies compensates for costs of mandated contraceptives and abortifacients?

            They have the video at the website address below, if you’re interested.

            http://cnsnews.com/news/article/sebelius-decrease-human-beings-will-cover-cost-contraception-mandate

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            on the environment and threat to the planet, so that many liberals think we need less of them….evil

          • JSobieski

            just about every American President in the 20th Century.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        is far superior in advancing the latter than Obama.

  • aj_0000

    As Newt is apparently doing, perhaps wisely. There is an NBC/WSJ poll that just came out showing that Gingrich leads Romney 52-39 for the nomination in a two man race. Gingrich continues to be tied or ahead nationally. We need to resist strongly the establishment attempts to call the race over if Romney wins FL.

    I think Newt is making the calculation that he still has a shot if it goes all the way to the convention, and he can pick up Santorum and Paul’s delegates on the second ballot. It is a legitimate possibility.

    • bluerose75

      I agree AJ and that is a great analysis. I saw and read the same poll in WSJ. Newt also mentioned on Greta. Have you noticed not one TV outlet has mentioned that poll? They will mention PPP or QP or Rasmussen or Time but have noticed that NBC/WSJ poll anywhere? Even on Fox? Why?

      You are right the Establishment wants this over and that is why the Full Court Press is On to try to make the tin suit look unbeatable. It is a fraud. The truth is Florida’s primary makes little difference. I was so happy to hear Newt announce this evening he will continue regardless of Florida. I am so happy!! The longer Romney is exposed the weaker he will get! Newt, like Reagan, must continue the message. Newt’s advantage is he is so vetted already….Mitt’s vetting has not even touched the surface. Oh the material for this tin suit from the 80s and 90s….it is coming. Hang in there Newt….Mitt will fall!!

      Thank you Herman for your courageous stand!! Newt is by far the bolder and stronger candidate!! You are an outsider and will be a great asset to Newt’s Economic team!!

  • Samsara

    Cain endorses Newt.

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/72113.html

    • WillWong

      Awesome! Waiting for Giuliani, Bachmann and Sarah Palin!

  • Dave_A

    Newt is no less ‘establishment’ than Romney – and no more conservative.

    The big difference, is that Newt has pissed off more people & has an ass-ton more personal baggage…

    The closest thing to ‘baggage’ Romney has is being very, very rich – a trait he shares with every single candidate in the race, from both parties.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      Has he had many issue and big government transgressions since leaving office? Yes. But he has to be one of the top 3 or 4 conservatives of the movement that started in the 50s.

      • Dave_A

        Is that regardless of who/what Newt was when Reagan was in office, he has become ‘the Republican BJ Bill’…

        Politically, you can’t find a single thing the man actually believes in – his positions change with the winds, just like Romney. So he was for the ‘individual mandate’, now he’s against it… He was for global-warming regulation (cue Pelosi spot), now he’s against it… Government grew constantly while he was Speaker, but now he’s going to shrink it…

        He’s as morally bankrupt as Clinton – ok, he marries his mistresses & they don’t go on to work for Jenny Craig… But the point still stands…

        And IIRC, he’s spent essentially his entire life either in government, or making money off his prior time in government…

        And then there’s the whole thing about getting booted from the Speakership…

        Essentially, he’s ‘Mitt Romney plus ex-wives & political baggage’…

        In no way is Gingrich ‘the conservative anti-estalbishment guy’….

        At most, he’s ‘the establishment guy who pissed off the establishment by being a jackass in office, and now wants revenge for being fired’….

        P.S. Another issue to note, is that while Romney has the excuse of ‘I was governor of a hard-left state, I leaned left because that’s what my constituents wanted’, Gingrich has no such excuse for his left-turns…..

        • aj_0000

          Mitt Romney’s Record as Governor of Massachusetts is the record of a liberal Democrat. Newt Gingrich has a lifetime ACU rating of 90% over 20 years in Congress, and personally led one of the biggest national conservative electoral victories in modern history.

          You Romney supporters are increasingly making it clear who your candidate is: a lowlife thug in an Armani suit. He has no record to run on, he can’t sell himself to Republican voters, so he’s trying to buy the nomination by overwhelming his opponents with negative ads. Mitt Romney is a scumbag, and his methods are beneath the office he seeks. He will not have the support of conservatives in November, and he will be slaughtered by Obama who will have no reservations about going after him for who he is.

          Beyond the fact that he is not a conservative, Mitt Romney is the worst caricature of Republicans come to life. He makes the Democrats look justified in everything they claim Republicans stand for: filthy rich mercenaries who chew up “the little people” for profit, power and sport, before retiring to the country club for champagne and caviar.

          For the establishment to anoint Romney as their standard bearer, you have to conclude that either they’re monumentally tone deaf and dumber than a bag of rocks, or that they would rather defeat the Tea Party than defeat Obama.

          Which is why conservatives and Tea Party supporters need to recognize that our war is with the Republicans first, and Obama second. Mitt Romney must be defeated before Obama is defeated, or November won’t matter.

          • naysayer

            …I think Newt Gives Mitt a run for the money here. There are two types of caricatures commonly applied to Republicans — the one you mention above, and the hypocrite: the one where the Republican is portrayed as a moral crusader, pushing legislation of Christian values and bemoaning the demise of virtuous society while cheating on his wife.

            Newt’s a consummate Washington insider who moved from presiding over a huge expansion of federal spending straight to lobbying for Fannie and Freddie, and then condemning lobbyists for their role in the financial collapse.

            While Newt was preaching family values and prosecuting Bill Clinton over the Monica Lewinsky affair, he was carrying on a Washington affair himself at the same time — and not his first one.

            He’s a political and personal opportunist, never hesitating to cut loose from old ties and upgrade, whether that might be for a cushier job or a hotter wife.

            I think that’s pretty ripe for caricature, don’t you?

          • Dave_A

            I’m not so much a Romney supporter, as a Newt & Santorum opponent – which leaves me with Mitt ‘by default’ as the least objectionable candidate.

            Merely being a Republican is enough to make you ‘vulnerable’ to the ‘evil rich little-people-eater’ charge, it’s a question of how you handle it… It’s overblown, over-done, and people who consider voting GOP don’t care about it…

            However, as far as we can see, Mitt is *NOT* vulnerable to the other, more effective charge – that of being a personal scumbag while preaching ‘values’.

            Personally, I’m more troubled by Newt’s personal life & his association with the GSEs (Fan/Fred) than I am with Mitt’s history working at Bain.

            I also think Mitt can turn attacks on Bain back on Obama – ‘This is why the economy can’t grow while he’s in office – he’s hostile to business, hostile to finance, hostile to YOU getting a job’.

            Newt can’t ‘turn’ attacks on his philandering or his association with the GSEs anywhere – there’s no comeback for that.

  • bluerose75

    AJ do not get discouraged!! Florida is not conservative and believe me with the demographics of this state it is no surprise Romney is ahead. Conservatives need to stop splitting the vote. We do it every time and that allows a RINO like Mitt through the door. It happens all the time!! We let it because we get conservative candidates that are too proud to step aside. They claim they care about conservatives but it it BS! They are in it for power. Why would anyone who claims that he is conservative stay in a race he cannot win? Well lets see…a swan song in a month or two, maybe an offer to be Secretary of Defense and so on. It is not about us it is about them. That is why Mitt is where he is. Florida is a joke…outside of Florida Romney will be in trouble if one conservative stays in the race. I mean what will he win….Mass? New York? Jersey? I mean we all know they will go for Mitt over Obama in November!! NOT!!

    I wish the two conservatives left would wake up and see something bigger then themselves! I doubt it will happen! If they do Mitt can easily be defeated but if both stay in too long it will open the door to the RINO from Mass. You are right the war is with the Establishment but it stays that way because we return to same battlefield. Maybe it is time we move the field away from the GOP and see who survives? The GOP cannot survive without conservatives…we can easily survive without the GOP Establishment!!

    • WillWong

      given Rick Santorum a new lease of life and an unrealistic sense of bravado and self importance to stay in the race by endorsing him. If Romney ends up becoming the nominee and getting trashed in November, that endorsement might be seen as the watershed event in the destruction of this nation. I say this with much trepidation being a born again Christian knowing how we can make mistakes even with the best of intention.

  • BrendanW

    I feel like this post was very indicative of Red State’s general feel – amongst the editors, contributors, and members. Red State is a highly partisan conservative advocacy site. The Tea Party is more of a spontaneous political movement with some parallel tracts.

    A good example would be pro-life issues, I’d wager that self identified Tea Partiers are generally less pro-life than members of this board. (According to Gallup 26% are pro life I’d guess this board is 99%.) http://www.gallup.com/poll/127181/tea-partiers-fairly-mainstream-demographics.aspx

    IMO – the main focus of Tea Party was:
    1. Economic sanity (balanced budget, limited national debt)
    2. Rule of Law and fairness
    3. Original principles

    Now that doesn’t mean there isn’t overlap, or even that almost every RSer self describes as Tea Partier, just that the populist movement “Tea Party” is broaded than this board, and I’d guess much harder to please.

    I haven’t been able to come to any great conclusions, just think this insight is missing, where most of us on the board are posting from our own perspective and that the populist movement is broader.

    (I would say that NG vs MR has evolved into a Republican establishment versus Republican outsider election for most of the highly partisan republicans. Of course battles between brothers are always more fierce, and arguments over smaller differences are usually considered more critical than direct opposition.)

    • naysayer

      To call Big Government Newt a Tea Party candidate shows just how far the term “Tea Party” has been debased over the past four years.

      “Tea Partier” somehow morphed from its original meaning (a grassroots movement generated in opposition to TARP and Porkulus) into a synonym for “three-legged conservative”.

      When “Tea Party” still meant “Taxed Enough Already”, it was a powerful force that confounded the media and crossed party lines. When it was derailed a la the Reform Party and became a code word for “conservative Republicans only” it became marginalized, and many of its former adherents gravitated toward Ron Paul, whose economic message most closely matches the original Tea Party ideal.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    you can sign up on line to make phone calls from home here:

    http://newtsnetwork.com

    Thank you.

    ColdWarrior

  • WillWong

    Fineman on MSNBC talks with Chris Matthews and Michael Steele…..

    http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Gingrich-Fineman-soul-Republican/2012/01/31/id/426130

  • georgehenry85

    Newt or Mitt?? These 2 are big Lib-Tard Neo-Cons.

    Why the hell would the Tea Party support them?

    The tea party got shafted, the only tea party candidate right now is Ron Paul, which is why you see such a decline in the tea party events.

    Mitt and Newt both supported obama care!

    If this site keeps supporting Mitt and Newt the GOP will no longer be a respectable party!

    Redstate has turned into an ANTI-CONSERVATIVE website by supporting these two nominees.

    Redstate should have been demanding real conservatives to run for president.

    It is a sad day for the GOP when the only conservative on stage is 76 years old. Where are all the young GOP tea party conservatives and where is the push and support for them?

    • joereagan

      Newt is winning Tea Party votes consistently.

      • georgehenry85

        Hey,

        I didn’t know they were supporting him. From what I know of gingrich his record for small government is not really good. He Supported obamacare countless times and even tried to implamented his own version before obamacare.

        The guy seems to be lying his head off right now claiming he is a conservative. I thought he was a liberal progressive before he came on the GOP SCENE running for president.

        I don’t know how Cain could endorse him but maybe that’s where there are a few tea party votes coming from???

        I think he is attacking Romney for all the right reasons but all he has to do is look in the mirror and he will see he has been supporting all the same stuff!?!? I swear the liberals and the liberal media have hijacked the GOP to Guarantee Obama wins a second term.

        Are you part liberal do you support him or Romney cause all the hardcore conservatives I know see both these guys as in obamas back pocket!

        They both want to grow the welfare state and police the world. A real conservative would never be fore these things!!!

  • Pingback: URL

  • Pingback: Looking for popular Name Band fantasy aids? We have any selection: Dildos,Female Sex,Rabbit Vibrators,Male Masturbators and Cock Rings

  • Pingback: www.loanslend.com

  • Pingback: הובלות, הובלות בתל אביב, הובלות גדולות

  • Pingback: click to play

  • Pingback: เกม เกม

  • Pingback: Google Free Web Hosting

  • Pingback: handling industrial adhesive

  • Pingback: letmewatchthis

  • Pingback: Party Packages Corona CA