« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Who won the debate? What others are saying.

There is a general consensus that Mitt Romney won last night’s debate.  And not just from the left.  Interesting and quite unexpected.

Erick Erickson:  RedState

I think Mitt Romney did not just win the New Hampshire debate by holding his own, but legitimately won it with his answers and composure. He was unnecessarily defensive on the Afghan question, but largely showed his experience with Presidential debates.

Rich Lowry:  National Review Online

Mitt’s Night.  Romney was on his game — smooth, relaxed, and unflappable. He did well in the debates in 2008, but benefited tonight from his increased stature in the context of the rest of field.

Charles Babington:  Associated Press

Romney, the former Massachusetts governor who leads in the early polls and fundraising efforts, had a surprisingly easy two hours Monday night. He looked calm and steady, criticizing President Barack Obama on the economy and health care while rarely being forced on the defensive despite some well-known vulnerabilities of his own.

Guy Benson:  Town Hall

Romney – Tonight’s winner, in my book.  He looked and sounded like he deserves the front-runner label.  Poised and informed. He breezed through the Romneycare non-gauntlet virtually unscathed, which is a shame.  If the rest of the pack wants to dislodge him from front-runner status, they’re going to have to aggressively challenge him on this issue.  The former Governor appeared to be in full command, and even had the awareness to sneak in the Bruins score (good news for the crowd), a savvy move in front of a New England audience.

Carol Platt Liebau:  Town Hall

One of the big questions going into tonight’s debate was whether Mitt Romney would credibly be able to claim “frontrunner” status — and handle the presumptive attacks that would be coming at him from the other candidates.  Clearly, he answered both questions in the affirmative, with a strong performance.  That — coupled with the fact that though other candidates performed strongly, none “blew away” debate observers — was probably enough to give Romney a de facto win.

Emily Goodin:  Ballot Box, The Hill’s Blog

Rep. Michel Bachmann (R-Minn) stole the early spotlight in Monday’s Republican presidential debate, but it was front-runner Mitt Romney who escaped the evening unscathed.  Bachmann grabbed headlines early in the evening by saying she had filed the paperwork to run for the 2012 GOP nomination.  But it was the former governor of Massachusetts, who leads in polling of the GOP field, who came out on top by the end of the evening–mainly for what wasn’t said about him.

Toby Harnden:  The Telegraph

Bottom line: a big night for Michele Bachmann, Mitt Romney came across as the assured frontrunner he wants to be and Tim Pawlenty appeared to lack the courage to push home an attack on Romney. . . . Mitt Romney was fluent and relaxed throughout. He made a slip when he talked about handing over Afghanistan to the “Taliban military” but that didn’t seem to matter. Romney’s focus appeared to be on the general election against Obama and he rose above the fray as a front runner should. His candidacy still has significant challenges to overcome but his aides clearly felt good about the night.

Stewart J. Lawrence:  The Guardian

So who won the debate? Two people did. One was clearly Romney, who managed to stare down Pawlenty. Apart from a strong statement on Americans in uniform, inspired by a questioner who was a veteran, Pawlenty by contrast looked every bit the wimp he’s been accused of being. If there was any hint of “fire in his belly”, then Monday’s group hug effectively extinguished it. And so Romney emerged as primus inter pares.

The other big winner was Michele Bachmann, who far exceeded everyone’s low expectations for her – and her showing may well have knocked Palin out of the race (assuming she’s still considering running).

Taegan Goddard’s Political Wire

There’s a reason Mitt Romney is the frontrunner: None of these candidates is nearly as experienced at these debates. No one landed a punch.

COMMENTS

  • Bill S

    What, that Romney would win, or that it would be perceived that way by both sides?

    As I have pointed out a number of times since last night: people need to disconnect their dislike for a particular candidate from their debate performance. Romney did win – and I don’t like him. But he won for exactly the reason that Taegan Goddard said: he is very good at that sort of thing.

    The only one who was predictable was Paul. Everyone expected him to wander off the ranch, and sooner or later, he did. The only endearing thing about his appearance was that he did use a bit of self-deprecating humor with his crack about the Fed.

    But I think one could safely say that Romney’s performance was, at worst, not unexpected…he knows how to do debates. He’s not so hot on doing policy.

    • http://www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com tooncesthecat

      But actually what I didn’t include were all the glowing things that NPR and Daily Beast said about Michele Bachmann, which was also “unexpected” (to me at least).

      I personnally felt that Romney and Bachmann would both do well. I predicted before hand that the media would give the win to Romney, but Bachmann would be the real winner. Despite the consensus of opinions, I think Bachmann was the winner and began to establish herself as the anti-Romney candidate. Pawlenty, on the other hand, stumbled and then fumbled when given the opportunity. Seems like he wants to be Romney’s running mate.

      • Bill S

        You’re right. That would be unexpected, but I think the majority of those giving the win to Romney ARE looking at it from a debate-only perspective. The right-leaning pubs will go back to critiquing his positions instead of his TV performance, as they should.

        You called it well in your prediction, it seems. :)

        • Flagstaff
  • morstar150

    The Republican Party…

    I think this debate showed that there are a list of good republican candidates out there. This idea pushed by the media that our candidates are weak is just not true.

    Romney was smooth and held the aire that he is the front runner.

    Pawlenty I thought was good and was wise not to jump on Romney when baited. I only wish that he attacked the fake format that tried to create a controversy and draw blood before the campaign even begins.

    Newt was great. Unfortunately for him he’s Newt. I hope he stays in as the pit bull attack dog.

    Lots of people say Michelle Bachmann won. I disagree. What she accomplished was to open people’s eyes to the idea that another woman can represent the Republican Conservative message besides Palin. She was high energy but low on substance, a knock that hit Sarah.

    Ron Paul was a winner because people no longer view him as a wack job. We understand that he has a libertarian view but we accept that and understand that that is a valid view, much more valid than a socialist or progressive view.

    Santorum, Cain, had trouble rising up to the higher level of the debate.

    John King was horrible! His sputtering sounds during thoughtful discussions were senseless, rude, and distracting.

    I wish someone up there called him out on it. King acted as though we Republicans are too stupid to pay attention to an answer that would last longer than a 15 second sound bite. On the contrary, I wish the candidates were able to go into more detail about their answers. They could have save twenty minutes of debate time by not asking the liberal based gay rights questions, and right to life questions, and religious pandering questions.

    Now the only home run of the night was Newt’s declaration that he’s not ashamed to insist on loyalty to our country by muslims before they serve our nation, and his “I lied because you are my enemy” comment was right on point.

    • http://www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com tooncesthecat

      were also the real winners. Maybe now people will quit pining away for Perry, Palin, and Christie. This is a solid field with great diversity of views and backgrounds.

      • YnotNOW

        I hope that Republicans can project a hopefull narrative (so that even the MSM will pick it up), that we do have excellent choices among our candidates. Even those we do not prefer, are still much preferable to the current occupant of the White House. And several of them would make an excellent President.

        No more depression or whining about so-and-so not being “perfect” in all aspects.

      • YnotNOW

        I hope that Republicans can project a hopefull narrative (so that even the MSM will pick it up), that we do have excellent choices among our candidates. Even those we do not prefer, are still much preferable to the current occupant of the White House. And several of them would make an excellent President.

        No more depression or whining about so-and-so not being “perfect” in all aspects.

      • Flagstaff

        the pining will not stop. Folks are still not convinced that Romney is really conservative enough or that Bachmann can really win if in the top spot.

        Bachmann did get one thing accomplished which nobody has specifically mentioned anywhere else that I’ve looked: She got the attention of the people. Now she has to keep it.

  • jlue

    To see a poll on what others are saying and/or to vote in the poll go to:

    http://jlue.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/which-republican-candidate-did-best-in-nh/

    • http://www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com tooncesthecat

      is that Ron Paull’s supporters systematically contaminate the results. They have done that with your poll, Jlue, and with the FoxNews poll (vote and see results: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/index.html )

      • rightwingmom52

        after listening to the CNN pundits this morning claim Romney won the debate, they followed up by saying that not a single person they interviewed agreed. Now, I missed if they were interviewing folks in the audience, on the street, or people who just watched, but whoever they were, CNN reported those folks thought Bachmann & Newt won. If that’s the case, I think that’s good news because it shows people are paying more attention instead of just listening to who the media wants.

        Sorry for the sketchy analysis, but I was packing to come home after a few days vacation and just caught the end of the story.

  • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

    When Pawlenty would not get in his face about Obamneycare.

    • Jim Tomasik

      Fox just re-run Pawlenty’s crappy answer just a minute ago and according to FOX now is “Romney is clearly the front runner.”

      • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

        instead, he just enabled Romney to perpetuate the charade.