Rick Perry and the HPV vaccine: Trying to save lives


Rick Perry’s position on the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine may be unpopular with some conservatives and it may be seen as an opportunity for political gain by some opponents, but his decision to require 11 – 12 year old females enrolled in public schools to be vaccinated for the HP virus was both morally correct and within the school  law tradition regarding vaccinations.

Let’s begin with school immunization laws—every state requires school children to be vaccinated against certain specified diseases prior to enrolling in public school, and most states require parents to provide proof from a health care provider as a condition of enrollment.  According to the Center for Disease Control, “These may include vaccination against diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough), tetanus (lockjaw), Haemophilus influenzae type b, measles, mumps, rubella, polio, and hepatitis B. Some states have added varicella (chicken pox) vaccination to the list of required vaccines. Smallpox vaccination was once required, but the disease has been so successfully eradicated that this vaccination is no longer needed.”   The states are required by federal law to provide information to parents about these vaccines, but case law supports the state’s right to require vaccines against communicable diseases.  Parent’s right to “opt out” of these vaccinations is limited to a health exception and a religious exception.  There is no state that has an “opt in” provision for required immunizations and the “opt out” provision is severely restricted.  Requiring female students to be vaccinated for the HP virus is totally consistent with other state immunization laws which virtually no one questions.  The HP virus is a communicable disease.  According to the CDC, it is the most common sexually transmitted disease, and 50% of all Americans who are not vaccinated for HPV will contract the virus.

More importantly, Perry’s decision was morally correct—this vaccine saves lives.  Gardasil protects girls and young women, ages 9 to 26, from 4 types of HPV, including 2 types of HPV that cause 75% of cervical cancer cases and 2 types of HPV that cause 90% of genital warts.  In addition Gardasil has been shown to protect against 70% of vaginal cancer cases and 50% of vulvar cancer cases.  Because Gardasil is a preventive vaccination, it is recommended that it be administered prior to the onset of sexual activity.  Once the HPV virus has been contracted, Gardasil has no curative effect.  Gardasil has been determined to be safe as well as effective.  There are only minor side effects that have been reported and confirmed, and these in a tiny portion of the population receiving the vaccination.  World-wide there are approximately 470,000 cases of cervical cancer annually with an almost 50% mortality rate.  There are 11,000 cases of cervical case reported in the United States each year .  Gardasil prevents the spread of a deadly virus and saves lives.  Every state should add this vaccine to its required list.  And anyone who thinks that 12 year old girls are not becoming sexually active hasn’t been in a public school lately.

Governor Perry did the right thing by requiring the HPV vaccine with only an “opt out” provision.  Every state that cares about the health of young women should, in fact, add this vaccine to the list of required school immunizations.  Cervical cancer can be virtually eliminated in the same way that small pox, polio, diphtheria, and german measles have been primarily through required immunization of children.  The real tragedy here is that his executive order was never carried out—that the Texas legislature overrode his decision—and the no young girls were required to be vaccinated for HPV.



RSS feed

11 Comments Leave a comment

Perry undermined abstinence education

LiveStronger Tuesday, September 13th at 1:20PM EDT (link)

When a governor orders 12-year-olds to get vaccinated for an STD (with that order to be carried out unless parents get their opt-out waiver turned in on time), that has the same consequence as the government passing out condoms in school.

Would Perry sign an executive order mandating that all 12-year-olds get condoms to try out (with an opt-out waiver for those parents who would prefer for their tweenagers to wait before starting to have sex)?

It appears that Perry’s decision was good for Merck, good for Perry, and good for Perry’s former chief-of-staff who worked as a lobbyist for Merck. But it was bad for parents who believe that an “opt in” would have been much better than an “opt out”.

And it sent the wrong message to pre-teens.

Romney Republican

Stupid argument.

Tbone (Diary) Tuesday, September 13th at 1:29PM EDT (link)

A vaccination against cancer is not the same as passing out condoms. Only a fool would think so.

Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.

The vaccine was to protect against an STD

LiveStronger Wednesday, September 14th at 5:29PM EDT (link)

Nice try, though.

Romney Republican

 
 

I think that Perry was dealing with reality.

snowshooze (Diary) Tuesday, September 13th at 1:29PM EDT (link)

And he undermined nothing.
Start vaccinating at 12.
So, by logical thought … that endorses promiscuity?
It just so happens to exist, with all the education in the world..but I see that as a seperate issue entirely.
One which is being used as a land-mine.

Not all transmission of HPV is consensual.

revivefederalism (Diary) Wednesday, September 14th at 2:25AM EDT (link)

As highlighted in a prior debate, there are evil people who commit heinous crimes against our children. Governor Perry favors the severe punishment of these criminals and he also cares to alleviate the plight of the victims to the extent possible. That being said, he went about it in the wrong way.

I do not have the statistics on the rate of adverse reactions to the vaccine relative to the rate of receipt through both consensual and non-consensual encounters. To some extent these rates are not fully knowable as medical effects may not reveal themselves for many years and the future aggregate behavior of the recipients and everyone with whom they may interact in the future is unknowable. Beyond this, the relative severity of reactions is not easy to compare. I’d appreciate it if someone else could flesh this out.

 

Why age 12?

LiveStronger Wednesday, September 14th at 5:30PM EDT (link)

Why not age 5? or 4?

Romney Republican

Because some vaccines tend to have a stronger initial benefit that fades over time

rogershru2 (Diary) Wednesday, September 14th at 5:45PM EDT (link)

So it makes sense to vaccinate shortly before the highest risk time period.

If you are worried this takes away restraints on promiscuity, we can still tell our kids about numerous negative consequences to premarital sex that no vaccine or condom will prevent.

“We used to have the best infrastructure in the world here in America. We’re the country that built the Intercontinental Railroad …” – President Obama

 
 
 
 

Rush just characterized this issue as a "distraction"

JSobieski (Diary) Tuesday, September 13th at 1:26PM EDT (link)

I wonder what the reaction would have been to Daniels if he said social issues were a “distraction”.

Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf

 

What's that they say

jonnymadison (Diary) Wednesday, September 14th at 1:48AM EDT (link)

about the road to hell and what it is paved by?

Sorry, I just cannot except the “good intentions” arguement. It’s the same thing libs use when they want to mandate their pet projects.

I mean really, if this drug saves so many lives and is so great, won’t people just use it voluntarily?

It’s really an arrogant stance to take, that you know better than anyone else and you have the right push your opinions on how to live on others.

 

Perry was neither misguided nor arrogant

tooncesthecat (Diary) Wednesday, September 14th at 9:23AM EDT (link)

Perry’s response was not well thought out, but his position is hardly arrogant, unless you believe that it is arrogant for state’s to require school children to be immunized for polio, diptheria, whooping cough, german measles and other debilitating and deadly communicable diseases. His error, as he admitted, was not seeking legislative action to add this vaccines to the list of those already required by the state of Texas and by every other state. He erred because he wanted to save lives and correctly believed the legislature would not act.

And the people traveling the road to hell are those that try to scare people about vaccines that have been proven to be safe and effective with false claims that they cause autism. These people are putting children at risk of contracting preventable diseases.

“Obama’s Last Day” @ www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com

 

The Government Has No Right to Tell Parents What Health Care to Provide To Their Children

sdsali (Diary) Wednesday, September 14th at 10:13PM EDT (link)

As I said on my own diary, there is a world of difference between mandating vaccination against diseases which are spread through casual contact like varicella (chicken pox), measles, mumps, polio etc. HPV is not spread through casual contact. Some of these diseases are literally transmitted through droplets floating in the air. Thus, the requirement that your child be vaccinated is justified to protect other children, since widespread vaccination cuts down on the spread of the disease.

The comparison of the HPV vaccine to other vaccines is like comparing the requirement of auto insurance to mandatory health insurance. The only REQUIRED auto insurance is liability insurance which primarily provides financial protection to those whom you injure. It provides protection to you only in the sense that your own assets are less at risk. The original purpose of requiring vaccination was to protect children against epidemics.
Just because something may be good for you does not give the government the right to force you to do it.