<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s first ad buy and the Electoral College map</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/tooncesthecat/2012/05/08/obamas-first-ad-buy-and-the-electoral-college-map/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/tooncesthecat/2012/05/08/obamas-first-ad-buy-and-the-electoral-college-map/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:54:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tooncesthecat</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/tooncesthecat/2012/05/08/obamas-first-ad-buy-and-the-electoral-college-map/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>tooncesthecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/tooncesthecat/?p=432#comment-1202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[to turn purple in the next two months.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see the race tighten up in California, for example.  But this still want change the key states to a Romney win.  Just makes a landslide possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to turn purple in the next two months.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see the race tighten up in California, for example.  But this still want change the key states to a Romney win.  Just makes a landslide possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commonsenseobserver</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/tooncesthecat/2012/05/08/obamas-first-ad-buy-and-the-electoral-college-map/#comment-1201</link>
		<dc:creator>commonsenseobserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/tooncesthecat/?p=432#comment-1201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama 47%, Romney 43%???

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=19eb906a-ae83-463b-9daa-3c3bda489d7d

Republicans won&#039;t make up 35% of voters, and Democrats make up at least 40%, but this seems rather strange....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama 47%, Romney 43%???</p>
<p>http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=19eb906a-ae83-463b-9daa-3c3bda489d7d</p>
<p>Republicans won&#8217;t make up 35% of voters, and Democrats make up at least 40%, but this seems rather strange&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naraht</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/tooncesthecat/2012/05/08/obamas-first-ad-buy-and-the-electoral-college-map/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>naraht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/tooncesthecat/?p=432#comment-1190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One issue that Obama has in spreading his money is that three states that they think the current polling makes *possible* are states where the Democrats want to spend money helping their Senate candidates: Arizona, Missouri and Indiana. But this buy doesn&#039;t reach out that far...

Obama certainly spent money in Pennsylvania in 2008, spending zero there in 2012 would be stupid of him... If he spends *more* on PA than in 2008, then that is a significant sign...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One issue that Obama has in spreading his money is that three states that they think the current polling makes *possible* are states where the Democrats want to spend money helping their Senate candidates: Arizona, Missouri and Indiana. But this buy doesn&#8217;t reach out that far&#8230;</p>
<p>Obama certainly spent money in Pennsylvania in 2008, spending zero there in 2012 would be stupid of him&#8230; If he spends *more* on PA than in 2008, then that is a significant sign&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
