« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

What the latest polls tell us: Romney 285 Electoral College Votes

In poll after poll in the Battleground States during the past two weeks the movement has clearly been in Mitt Romney’s direction.  The RCP Electoral College Map shows Obama with 221 ECV and Romney with 170 ECV with 12 states that have a combined total of 147 ECV rated as Toss Ups.  Based on the most recent polls in those states, Romney is leading 8 of the 12 states for an addition 115 ECV; Obama is leading in only 3 toss up states (Virginia, Nevada, and New Hampshire) with 23 ECV; and Colorado (Rasmussen Reports) with 9 ECV is a tie.

The most recent polls in Arizona (PPP) and Missouri (Rasmussen Reports) have Romney at +7 in each state.  Those two states have slipped away from Obama and should move in the near future to Lean Romney.  Because of problems elsewhere, the Obama campaign will not be able to put the time and resources into these two states, which were won by McCain, to try to make them competitive.  With Arizona and Missouri, Romney’s base is 191 ECV.

Here’s a summary of the latest polls in the other Battleground States where Romney has taken the lead:

Ohio (18 ECV):  +3 (Purple States Strategies) and +2 (Rasmussen Reports)

Florida (29 ECV):  +3 (Purple States Strategies)

North Carolina (15 ECV): +2 (PPP)

Michigan (16 ECV):  + 1 (EPIC-MRA)

Wisconsin (10 ECV):  +3 (Rasmussen Reports)

Iowa (6 ECV):  +1 (Rasmussen Reports)

If (and that’s a big if) Romney carries these 8 states, he would have a total of 285 Electoral College Votes.  The two major warning signs in these results are the Michigan poll, which may be an outlier, and Obama’s continuing lead in polling in the state of Virginia.  If Romney were to lose Michigan as well as Colorado and Virginia, we would have an electoral college tie at 269 each.  Romney would still win, because Republicans control the House of Representatives, but Romney’s margin of error is very small.

On the other hand, we also may very well be headed toward a Romney landslide if these trends hold up, and there is no reason to believe that they won’t.  Romney could very well sweep all 12 of the Battleground States, which would give him a total of 317 Electoral College Votes.  There are also indications that both Pennsylvania (20 ECV) and Oregon (7 ECV) may be in play.  This explains why there is widespread panic in the Democrat Party outside of Team Obama’s inner circle.

 

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • gregorysstewart

    Yes, I went to look up the “facts”, and assumed that you were cherry picking the polls to make your case.

    You were not cherry picking the polls.

    In every state that you mentioned the latest poll shows exactly what you said it did.

    You even used PPP polls!

    • http://www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com tooncesthecat

      although I may use data to my own advantage. But despite the different sampling methods and ideological bents of the various polling organizations, the trend in Romney’s direction in state after state is very clear. It will be interesting to see a recent poll from New Hampshire (there hasn’t been one in two months). Also watch Pennsylvania closely. It’s gone from +12 to only +6 in a two week period. Romney’s campaign is clearly on target with its 5 day bus tour of New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Iowa.

      • gregorysstewart

        I agree that New Hampshire should be very interesting if there is a Likely Voter poll there. The RV polls tend to reflect the registrations more than the momentum.

        But… Pennsylvania?

        I do not believe that Romney even has an office open in Pennsylvania. It is doable, but it would require an expensive ground game that should have already started, (but hasn’t) backed up by an air war, perhaps aided by a super pac. The voting in Phili is also suspect. It reports late and conveniently for the Dems.

        I dunno Cat, Pennsylvania always shows up at the dance, but never dances with the elephant in presidential contests.

        • http://www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com tooncesthecat

          You’re right about Pennsylvania, at least since Reagan carried the state. But there is some indication that this election might finally tip the balance to Romney. The latest Quinnipiac poll (http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-and-centers/polling-institute/pennsylvania/release-detail?ReleaseID=1761), which shows Obama ahead by only 6 points is of Registered Voters. Digging into the tabs, however, when voters were asked “Who would do a better job with the economy?”, Romney had an overall +8 advantage (49 – 41) and significantly he had a +17 lead over Obama (51 -34) among independents. I’m personally waiting for Rasmussen to release a Likely Voters poll for Pennsylvania before I concede the Keystone State to Obama. As for the Romney campaign, he will be in Pennsylvania this Saturday on his 6 state bus tour.

  • gregorysstewart

    Well, That is good news. A poll just came out showing that Christie is at the high level of his popularity, and buying the Philly market can do double duty in NJ.

    Now I do not think that NJ is seriously in play, but if it gets close, Obama will have to spend super big bucks in Philly and NY, which will spread him thin. The Dems have more cash on hand, but they are falling behind in fund raising and they are way behind in super pacs.

    Romney will need to graft a Wisconsin style ground game onto that swing through Pennsylvania.

  • Kyle-MI

    From the 2008 results:

    Obama/McCain
    MI 57/41
    WI 56/42
    CO 54/44
    NV 55/43

    and PA 54/44

    So in 2008, PA had a better split than MI, WI, and NV. It was similar to CO. Of course, it is early, but all of those states are toss-ups. Why wouldn’t PA be in play?

    • http://www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com tooncesthecat

      …and I agree (for what that’s worth). My point, however, was two-fold: all of the Battleground states are trending toward Romney, and he is currently leading in the most recent poll in 8 of those states. Adding Pennsylvania into the mix, doesn’t change anything, because Obama still holds the lead in the most recent poll.

      The numbers from 2008, however, are not really relevant in the current election cycle. Based on current polls, Nevada ( which Obama won by + 12) is still in the Obama column, but Michigan (which Obama won by +16) and Wisconsin (which Obama won by +14) have moved towards Romney in the latest polls in those two states. One can’t overlook the 2010 election results, when Republicans swept those two states, plus Ohio and Pennsylvania. Yet Harry Reid held his Senate seat in Nevada.

  • mikeymike143

    obummer is not going to win reelection

    • checkmate2012

      decision to toss the whole bill out. Hey, it’s woman’s intuition, what can I say :)

      Unlike Pelosi’s predication of 6-3 for the SC upholding, my guess is 6-3 with a total toss out.

      O’s numbers are so bad now that even casual spectator voters realize the pain and damage he’s caused. Landslide it will be IMO but don’t want to become passive or over-confident.

      • zachv

        I wouldn’t claim Romney win just yet. Overconfidence can and will screw you over if you aren’t careful. We need to treat this like it could go either way WHATEVER the polls are saying.

      • gregorysstewart

        To you and I it should seem obvious that Obama will lose.

        He has not done what he promised to the left, like close Gitmo, or raise taxes to a confiscatory level on our most productive citizens. He has not produced for Latinos, ignoring their grievances for three years. No Cap and Trade, and no Card Check for unions. He promised to put on his comfortable shoes and join the unions on picket lines, but last week he was MIA in Wisconsin. Remember he had a veto proof majority for two years. Yes! He is a left winger, but clearly he is an incompetent left winger.

        He has been worse for the right. He has acted imperially, but without effect. His regulations have killed the coal industry and hampered the aviation industry. He has convinced small businesses to close or shrink. He has picked the winners and losers in the new green economy, but then they all turned out to be losers. Companies like Solyndra folded like a bad hand in poker, leaving you and I holding the bag.

        But it is the middle class that was hurt the most. The average family has seen their net worth decline by 40% in the last ten years. Now to be clear, Obama has only been around for three and a half of those years, but not coincidentally, most of that decline happened in those three and a half years.

        So, Obama is a disaster. Heck he is the poster child for disasters, BUT… he still leads in the aggregate of the polls! He still leads in Ohio. He still leads in Virginia. That is important. If the election were held today, Obama would win!

        Why the disconnect? Because no one out there is paying attention.

        As an experiment, my wife asked her three Ma Jongg partners, all teachers, “Who is Eric Holder?” Not one of them even knew who he was. If its not on the front page of the New York Times, it simply does not exist.

        Here’s a mind experiment. What if Bush were president and his office leaked the names of Pakistani confidential informants, or explained how they inserted a virus into the Iranian Nuclear program. Do you think the story would be ignored, or belittled, or do you think that every reporter from the political reporters through the sports reporters would be weighing in on the “Most egregiousness breach of American security since War World II”?

        Imagine the blow back if Bush sent 3000 small arms to Mexican drug lords with tracking devices on only two of them that lasted only 30 hours until the battery ran out, and American border guards were killed as a result. Do you seriously believe that the average teacher, or truck driver for that matter would not be familiar with every detail?

        The mainstream press here is more disciplined than any editor at Pravda ever was, and the non-political folks out there are only hearing that which the press wants them to hear.

        We have a huge mountain to climb! We cannot become complacent. We must forget about keeping our political opinions to ourselves. Talk to anyone and everyone. Write letters to the editor. Give to your candidates until it hurts. Proselytize. Get energized and stay energized. It is not a good thing that more people know who won “Dancing With the Stars” than who is running for president.

        • http://www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com tooncesthecat

          I see the glass half full. Romney is making significant progress in the polls, so apparently his message is getting through. On the other hand, the Obama campaign appears in disarray and Democrats are panicking. So is the mainstream media. W. said it best: “Full me once, shame on you. Full me twice–we won’t get fooled again.” I have ever confidence your wife’s mah jongg partners will wake up on election day and do the right thing. Even if they don’t know who Eric Holder is.

          • gregorysstewart

            Undecided should break towards Romney in this theory. I hope that is true, but in the last two months the undecideds have gotten smaller but the polls have not moved significantly.

            I like the glass half full too Cat, but I am not willing to assume everything goes our way. We will not win unless we realize how hard the slog is and how much work we have to do.

      • trimulchio

        issue that draws the base. On teh other hand, it is tough to run on “competence” when your signature achievement and main effort gets tossed.

  • trimulchio

    http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/contract/?contractId=743474

    Right trend, Obama had been at about 60%, but it appears Romney still has some resistance to deal with . . . .

  • trimulchio

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/06/14/1099409/-Romney-gains-Obama-s-Electoral-College-lead-narrows#comments