« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why Prop 23 HAS to pass in California

The well-meaning liberals as well as the hard-core leftists who drive the liberal’s reasoning are out in mass of late pushing for a “No” vote by Californians on Proposition 23. What is their reasoning? Now that California has been forced to turn to “green technology” to power the engine of the economy (which technology still doesn’t exist in any economical form), there will be a huge prosperous increase in Green Jobs in the state as we Californians scramble to comply with the massive changes their mandates force on us. Proposition 23, which only seeks to push back the mandates until such time as this state has been able to sufficiently recover economically, they see as a threat to their ideology which is people last, planet first. No bending, no compromise.

YesProp23

It matters not at all what damage is wrought to people struggling in an already battered California economy, there’s always supposedly unending unemployment benefits and social programs to handle those who can’t find work and struggle to survive. The evil rich will be taxed more to pay for whatever their little heart’s desire; no problem.

Actually, there are problems with their reasoning, quite a few in fact.

The rich (in California that would be anyone making a little over $47k per year for tax purposes) are leaving the state for saner pastures in other states without insane environmental legislation. Business owners are cashing out in record numbers and relocating just to survive as the leftists running the state legislature find any excuse to hammer them harder to pay for their pet programs; programs they refuse to roll back.

In the three weeks since my last tally, I’ve learned about another 14 companies that have left California completely or re-directed capital to build facilities out of state. The names of the 14 and justifications for listing them appear below. Today’s entry builds upon the Sept. 21 entry 144 Companies Shrink from Calif. This Year – Three Times the Total for All of 2009.

In short:
Total for 9-1/2 months of 2010: 158
Total for all of 2009: 51

Five enterprises represent the type of operations coveted by many California politicians — “green” companies — namely DayStar Technologies, Vetrazzo, SMA America LLC, Enfinity Corp., and Power-One. Those companies have opted for Georgia, Arizona, Colorado and an apparently as-yet-undetermined “overseas location.” More-

Sooner or later, they will run out of other people’s money. All the “well-meaning” liberal types who believe the class warfare talking points about making the rich “pay their fair share” will find out they’re out of targets. The leftists who fooled them to begin with will want their money next, that’s all that’ll be left.

Passing Proposition 23 will roll back AB-32 and merely postpone its destructive impact on the California jobs market and economy as a whole; it won’t stop AB-32 from eventually kicking in full force once the economy turns around. Who could argue with that but someone completely out of touch with the real working world?

If you’re a small business person you can see nearly exactly what failing to pass Prop 23 will cost you, check out the calculator here.

In these last few days before November 2, the opposition to Prop 23 is gearing up with a potential $5 million infusion of cash and a lot of propaganda to dissuade voters from voting for the prop, while those supporting the prop are finding themselves hamstrung by an Alinskyite attack on their sources of funding. We are all there is to get the word out.

Go here and see what you can do, we have to push this back.

17 days left.

Crossposted

COMMENTS

  • joenca

    In California we have some of the most stretched water resources of any state in the nation, especially considered we are not on the most populous state, but one that is on track to be the equivalent of moving every Texan here by 2050. Our water resources are stretched thin as it is, and global warming threatens to stretch it even thinner, at a time when rising oceans threaten trillions of dollars of coastal development. These consequences will stunt our growth and cost us far more than finding a few efficiencies today.

    Completely lost in this debate is the cost of our inaction, the cost of continuing down a destructive path we’re on, to the point of geoengineering the planet to a climate the human species has never had to adapt to in history. What will be the costs tomorrow of our inaction today?

    We can take a lead, and we can tell our grandchildren that we took action, or we can do nothing and cost us far more than just the almighty dollar.

    • Jack_Savage

      Is that you guys can’t agree on where to go to lunch, but you think you can change the temperature of the earth.

      California in danger? Move, pal. Just not here – maybe to Minnesota, where there are lakes a’ plenty and they don’t take democracy seriously either.

      And take your inane, shopworn, pathetic talking points with you.

  • http://xmmlbchat.blogspot.com katesmith

    Ordinary Americans have begun to catch on to the trillion dollar water scam in California perpetrated to this day by politicians and business interests who care nothing about the environment. 9/22/09, Senate rejects measure to turn California water on. “Carbon Capitalists warming to climate market using derivatives,” 12/4/09. $9 trillion in climate funds invested in Soros INCR. 10/8/10, “Murder on the Carbon Express: Interpol takes on emissions fraud.” “Emissions related tax fraud surrounds EU Carbon program.” More than 80% of carbon trading houses in Denmark were fronts for tax fraud. The lack of water in California has been deliberately engineered by profiteers. Most informed environmentalists realize these people couldn’t care less about the environment.