« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The NRSC, DeVore, and the fight at hand.

When Ben Domenech, Mike Krempasky and I founded RedState over five years ago, we spent much time discussing the new site’s mission: Would it be conservative first, or Republican first? What happens when the interests of conservatives and Republicans conflict? Are there lines that we as conservatives will not cross for the sake of Republicans; and are there lines that we as Republicans will not cross for the sake of conservatives? We settled on some answers to these questions that generally remain in effect for the site today — but we did not settle on the answers to those questions. The tension between movement and Party is, outside of foundational principles, the defining characteristic of our unwieldy, fractious, and beautiful union of partisan and principle: and I believe it’s a creative and necessary tension that anchors idealism to pragmatism, and preserves pragmatism from surrender.

It is in this light that we view the conflict between the National Republican Senatorial Committee, and the Senatorial campaign of California Assemblyman Chuck DeVore on which I am privileged to serve as communications director. Enough has been written about it here at RedState and elsewhere, and it’s sufficient to note two things: first, that the conflict was consciously chosen by the NRSC when it decided to recruit and sustain Carly Fiorina as a moderate-pragmatist alternative to the conservative stalwart; and second, that this conflict is not the foundation for conservative victory in California in 2010.

It is therefore over as far as we’re concerned.

This is emphatically not to say that the story is irrelevant. What the national Party and its organizations do matter a great deal, and they should be held accountable. Conservatives are right to critique their operations, and push back when they ill serve our cause. No entity or campaign gets a free pass — and that includes the campaign on which I serve. “Ye shall know them by their fruits,” says Christ in the Book of Matthew, and that’s as true for political endeavors as for souls. If conservatives approach office seekers and party functionaries alike with skepticism, a preference for action over words, and a focus on outcomes, we’ll have a healthy movement — and a majority to boot.

It is to say, though, that the story and its resolution are not within the purview of DeVore for California. Certainly we’re concerned at the pattern of support by the NRSC for the Fiorina campaign. Certainly we’re disappointed by the NRSC’s favoritism toward our opponent. Certainly we’re dismayed by the dissembling and rancor that accompany the exposure of these things. So be it. Who, to borrow a phrase from the former next President of the United States, is the controlling authority in all this? It’s not us. It’s the activists, the donors, and the grassroots. It’s you.

Mission-driven conservative warriors have a penchant for wanting to clean the Augean stables. But it turns out King Augeas has more than one stable. You, the activists who read and sustain this site, can and should focus your energies on the Augean stable that is our national-Party establishment. Here in California, we’ve got our own Augean stable to clean: the mess that Democratic governance and left-wing ideologues have created, bringing to ruin what by right ought to be the most prosperous spot on the planet. The impoverishment of California is the greatest act of policy-driven vandalism since the Fourth Crusade, and the human suffering that results is the sole moral burden of Democrats — of whom Barbara Boxer is the witless archetype.

That’s our fight. That’s Chuck DeVore’s fight. That’s the fight we at DeVore for California focus on every single day. And fighting that fight — not the fight with D.C. Republicans — is how we’ll win. We must earn the right to lead this fight in 2010, by beating Fiorina for the right to take on Boxer. You can help us do exactly that. What role the NRSC wishes to play in this is its choice. It may continue as it has, and that would be a pity, but also beyond our control. Or ….

Let me close by sharing with you news of an e-mail that NRSC spokesman Brian Walsh sent me yesterday. It’s a critique of Boxer’s ineffectiveness on the Obamacare Senate bill, and is actually a useful bit of information. “I wanted to make sure you were up to date with the latest,” wrote Walsh, “Let me know if you need additional information.” Well. If I quoted Christ from Matthew before, let me cite Him from Luke now: “[B]e glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found.”

DeVore for California is moving on.

COMMENTS

  • hoosierteacher

    …the powers that be, or is he going to continue to be snubbed? If he is going to continue to be snubbed (for the sake of his opponent), will RS continue to report on it?

    Your campaign is already aware of Boxer’s shortcomings. I’m afraid I don’t understand how Walsh becomes an “alive brother” for letting you know Boxer is so bad.

    I’m sure I missed the point entirely. I got pretty riled up by the reporting on this matter, and now it seems to be getting brushed to the side. ?

    • http://joshuatrevino.com Joshua Trevino

      Not at all. Just acknowledging that DeVore for California can’t be consumed by it.

      I do need to clarify that I do not at all speak for RS or its editorial decisions.

      • hoosierteacher

        I think that’s a fair way to look at it. Thanks for the clarification.

  • RedBeard

    Here in Florida, Marco Rubio is charging hard, and has evened up the polling score with the NRSC’s RINO darling, Charlie Crist. Focusing positively on Rubio, while basically driving around Crist and the NRSC interference on his behalf, is probably the best overall strategy.

    This isn’t to say we should ignore the outrageous nature of the NRSC’s interference in primary contests, but rather that we can’t allow ourselves to be consumed by that nonsense.

    I’m assuming that Josh is saying much the same about how to proceed in California.

    • RedBeard

      I was typing the word “consumed” as Josh was doing the same. Great minds, etc. etc.

    • http://joshuatrevino.com Joshua Trevino
  • E Pluribus Unum

    I think that is the path to success.

    We’ll take care of the NRSC. On that you can count. Before this election cycle is over, the NRSC will be our prison b*tches, and they’ll be buying us cigarettes and dirty magazines. It’s not going to be even a little bit civil or nice.

    But like I say, and like you said, it’s a job best left to us.

    • http://joshuatrevino.com Joshua Trevino

      …. jailhouse shenanigans, I believe you’re well on the case. ;-)

  • jbopinionated

    as I do, then the “cleaning of the stables” begins at the state level, where the stronger powers were delegated to government. At the same time, if we believe in federalism, as I do, then the “cleaning of the stables” of a particular state belong to the people of that state.

    Sadly, since the ratification of the 17th amendment, the people of each state as a whole have continually focussed less and less on their state level of government and the related politics and more on the national level. This of course opens the door for outsiders (folks of other states and perhaps even beyond) to poor money into national level campaigns for elections/choices should be handled by state legislative representives of the people, the Unites States senators. Part of the checks and balances to “ensure a Republican form of government was that both the several states and the people would have a house in Congress.

    Maybe a bit off the original post, but still related food for though amongst thinking originalist conservatives.

  • smagar
  • http://onefinejay.com Jay C.

    And that’s to get Chuck DeVore elected. This is an excellent post, and something for us to ponder. Josh is keeping the eyes on the ball.

    It also shows that he’s not a self-destructive revanchist, and if someone thinks that an email from Brian Walsh wasn’t olive branch enough, well, that’s his opinion.

    To Josh, I’ve been behind Chuck DeVore from the beginning. I have a bitter dislike of Carly Fiorina and I just want her banished from the public sphere. May a defeat of the primary accomplish this.

  • http://joshuatrevino.com Joshua Trevino

    Clearly I’m no Fiorina fan either, though I do applaud her conversion to conservatism in the past six weeks. Any support for Chuck DeVore is welcome, so thank you.

  • Aaron Gardner
  • RedBeard

    …the contribution link to DeVore:

    https://www.fundraisingbynet.net/fbn/contributeFederal.asp?guidRegistration=585B5B5B

    Come on, take the rubber bands off those wallets, let the moths out, and pony up. ;-)

  • http://erickbrockway.wordpress.com/ Erick Brockway

    I don’t think so.
    The point is, and has been, that they need to stay out of primaries.
    Not just claim to stay out, or jump in by omission, but stay out!
    Cornyn himself said;

    Each Party is fundamentally a coalition of individuals rallying around core principles with some variations along the way. My job as Chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee is to recruit candidates who have the best chance of winning and holding seats ? and to do so in as many states as possible.

    He then went on ahead and endorsed Crist;

    …with his record of leadership and astronomical approval ratings, including strong numbers among Republicans, Democrats and Independents, Charlie Crist represents the best chance for Republicans to hold this seat in Florida. That is why I endorsed Governor Crist for the U.S. Senate.

    How are those “astronomical” ratings holding up? Think maybe there would be some backtracking about now?
    Well, because the NRSC will no doubt continue attempting to meddle in primaries and blessing us with Collins/Snowe clones, money from me goes straight to the candidates.
    Not one thin dime to NRSC.

  • http://www.the41stvote.org rcov092

    he has proven himself a liar. If you are from Florida and go to the NRSC website, you see an add for Crist, but not Rubio, seems like an endorse to me.

    Then he has contradicted himself on several occasions about DeVore and his Comms guy (as domueted here) is a idiot who would bury the NRSC in the “big tent, more moderate or else we lose” mentality). Idiot and arrogant to boot. That is why I have given no money this cycle to either NRSC or NRCC, they keep trying to elect liberals.

  • AceInTX

    It’s good to have someone pull on the reigns and bring our heads up before it’s too late.

    You post does that without insulting those of us who are frustrated with the lack of fight from our Senators in DC without insulting our intelligence with the usual “Big Tent”, “the moderate Republican is the only way to win” crap we’re spoon fed every day

  • audax

    …in contact with the Club For Growth? Did not see DeVore on the CFG PAC candidate list. Contact Chris Chocola at two-zero-two nine-double five double five-double zero.

    CFG will bundle money to ANY candidate and help fund raise for approved candidates. CFG has regular candidate meetings around the country with members who quiz them on their bona fides and then make recommendations to the Club on which candidates to support. These meetings are open to ANY Club member (membership is free).

  • http://joshuatrevino.com Joshua Trevino

    …. in DC last week. Good meeting, from what I hear. They’ll have to make their own call on whether and when they get involved in CA, of course.

  • Cheryl

    in early February. Will you be there?

  • http://joshuatrevino.com Joshua Trevino

    That frustration is legitimate, and that fight is neither won nor over. My only point here is that DeVore for California must focus on a different fight: against Barbara Boxer.

  • http://joshuatrevino.com Joshua Trevino
  • Cheryl

    those women are crazy. If I see ya, I’ll introduce myself.

    Thanks for the great post Josh.

  • AceInTX

    What I mean by the torch and being tempted to burn it all down is dealing with wondering sometimes who is the bigger enemy…the Dems we are fighting to stop…or the losers in our party who are sabotaging everything we do…it’s hard to tell sometimes who is doing the most damage to us!

  • soljerblue

    For how can man die better
    than facing fearful odds,
    for the ashes of his Fathers
    and the temples of his gods.