« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

HOMESCHOOLING: An Alternative to the Progressive Indoctrination Machine

By Caitlin Nicholas

 

“You can’t make socialists out of individualists. Children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society which is coming, where everyone is interdependent.”
- John Dewey, 19th Century Philosopher, Education Reformer

“The philosophy of the schoolroom in one generation will be the philosophy of Government in the next.”
- Abraham Lincoln, Self-Educated, Lawyer, U.S. President

 

In the past couple of years, our public school system has become more and more inefficient. Schools also continue to cross the line, when it comes to what is being taught— or what is no longer taught— to our youth.

Sex education is one of the most controversial –subjects taught to middle and high school students. Schools are no longer -emphasizing abstinence in health class. Schools are -educating students about birth control, safe sex, abortion, –including the best methods to use in order to prevent pregnancy. Can you believe that this is actually happening?

Planned Parenthood is influencing the sex education curriculum used in public schools by offering their own curriculum for teachers to use. Your kids are being taught that it’s okay to have sex. They are being told that if they do happen to get pregnant, it is also okay, because there are “options.” Planned Parenthood will help. In fact, parents don’t have to know about it!

Why is this happening? Because of the progressive left. They are trampling our traditional values. . But here is an important question: should sex-ed be taught in schools at all? I don’t think so! Sex education should be taught at home, by the parents, according to their own beliefs.

Our education system is teaching our children that their parents are stupid. The progressives say, “Don’t listen to them. You know things that they don’t know. You have rights!” The parents are not “educated” enough or “qualified” instructors. Progressive government leaders say, “Listen to us, we are your parents!” In fact, government officials have already coined the term “co-parenting.” Move over, mom and dad. The government is the new “parent” of your children. This indoctrination leads many youth away from traditional American values and faith doctrines taught by their families. It leads them to question what they have always known to be true and it encourages them to think more like their peers. They learn to think like a progressive. “Religion isn’t the most important thing in the world.” These are the results of the progressive left infiltrating schools, and it will only get worse if we don’t do something about it.

ELMINATING COMPETITION: ADVERSE, CONSERVATIVE THOUGHT

Very recently the Occupy Wall Street movement called for homeschooling to be outlawed because it’s “religious indoctrination and propaganda.” They also said they wish to reduce the adult age to 16. Why? So they can control the youth who are so easily manipulated and so easy to indoctrinate. It would give parents even less authority over their kids. Our government and schools leaders, television and media, as well as Hollywood, are all teaching our kids that their parents do not know what’s best for them, but the government does.

In one particular high school textbook, Glenn Beck is an evil figure in modern America. The progressive left, no doubt behind the editing of the textbook, eagerly casts him in a negative light, as well as his Restoring Honor rally that took place on August 28, 2010.

Like Glenn Beck, great Americans throughout history are misrepresented in school books in order to fit the progressive agenda. The American Sunday School Union published a book in 1923 called “The Life of George Washington,” a book that gave examples of faith in American history. At the time, the book was used as church curriculum. Would it be acceptable curriculum today? Certainly not. Teaching youth about George Washington, a “deist” in their words, as an example of a man who lived by faith, would be an outrage. Progressives will not teach the truth about American figures like George Washington or Martin Luther King Jr. because it does not fit with the progressive agenda.

If you need more proof that those controlling the public education system actually are indoctrinating your children, read on. In 1952, the National Educator’s Association said, “By moral and spiritual values, we mean those values which, when applied to human behavior, exalt and refine life and bring it into accord with the standards of conduct that are approved in our democratic culture.” The NEA also stated that “[t]he public schools of the United States stand firmly for freedom of religious belief. A common education must be given based on a respect for all religious opinions. Furthermore, such as education should be derived, not from some synthetic patchwork of many religious views, but rather from the moral and spiritual values which are shared by the members of all religious faiths.” According to these statements, written only sixty years ago, the NEA’s goal was to transform the religious education system into a secular system that better suits the “collective.”

A statement found in R.J. Rushdoony’s “Intellectual Schizophrenia” better reinforces my thought. “They (teachers) have no part in securing acceptance of any one of the numerous systems of belief regarding a super-natural power and the relation of man thereto.” Robert Owen, a man who was very influential in the transformation of public education, remarked that a generation of young people must be indoctrinated with religion free education in order to create a socialist society. Was his goal to create a religion free society or just brainwash the youth into accepting the religion of Secular Fundamentalism? According to the statements above, the secularists’ plan was to teach all faiths. But in reality, it’s a plan to erase the Judeo-Christian principles from our schools and our children’s minds.

 

HISTORY OF A PROGRESSIVE AGENDA

Horace Mann, a U.S. Senator (1833-1837), said that the state was to be the “true parent” of the child. Sound familiar? “Society in its collective capacity is a real, not simply nominal sponsor, and a god father for all the children.” Owen and Mann were only two leaders out of many that are actively seeking to destroy our society through our educational system. Flipping the education upside down is only one small step in a much bigger plan to fundamentally transform the United States of America.

In Germany in the 1940s, Mein Kampf was sold to the German public. Obviously it was a very popular book because over 200,000 copies were sold. Mein Kampf was Hitler’s propaganda book. It was his blueprint for socialism and totalitarianism.

Under Hitler’s regime, school children were forced to go to Socialist Nazi Youth camps where they were taught that all Catholics lied and all Jews ate little children. These children were indoctrinated to hate whole groups of people. They were also taught the only superior race is themselves. The children who were forced into those “education” camps later became soldiers in Hitler’s Nazi Army. This is happening now in a more subtle sense.

The idea is to brainwash today’s youth and use them later for their progressive gain. The German “collective” taught the innocence and superiority of man over the basic teachings of the Bible. Though many were traditionally “religious,” their consciences had been desensitized by the idea that man was not born into sin with a sinful nature, as Scripture teaches, but that society is responsible for the outcome for every individual. Barack Obama also believes that society as a whole is responsible for the redemption of everyone. Scary, wouldn’t you say?

“The non-Christian is hopelessly moralistic by nature, and in his insistence on viewing life as a battle between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ gives the Christian church a ‘common ground’ with the world. As long as a non-believer desires something that is good, are we to automatically determine that his/her agenda is the best for us to follow?” So what does society consider “good?” What does the government consider “good?” What about the government taking over farms? Is that good because this is the “collective?” The government can deem anything good if it suits their purposes. It could be the most evil idea on the planet and still be considered “good.”

 

HUMANISM VS SPRITUALLY-GUIDED REASON

America’s problem is that we’ve turned away from God and the Christian principles this country was founded upon. It is quite a challenge to find a Christian Conservative teenager. Those that I do know are homeschooled. I’m 16 years old, a sophomore in high school, and I’m also a Christian Conservative. Crazy, right? Don’t hear that very often do you? I am one of the few teenagers that have not bought into the indoctrination taking place in our schools because I’ve been reared by parents who know the Truth.

I was reared with the shield of God and reared in knowing what is really true. God is guiding my life and I know without Him, I would be a progressive rooting for Occupy Wall Street. I’m not home schooled in the traditional sense. I go to a virtual school where I read the same textbooks and curriculum as public schools but I am not exposed to the teachers and a school’s propaganda. My schooling is at home, therefore, I have a wall between me and the education. I don’t mindlessly soak information in. I “question with boldness even the very existence of God.” When I study, I question everything. I research, “is this really the truth?” That way I know what is true and what is propaganda.

When it came to my faith, I didn’t just accept that God is there, and I didn’t simply accept the Scriptures as true because my parents told me so. I questioned His existence and today, I know with everything in me that He lives and He is my savior.

Our youth will be the generation to save America. If our youth buy into the progressive agenda and lose the Christian faith that founded this country, what will happen to America? Right now, everything the left is teaching in schools the children are accepting. As President Reagan said, “What one generation accepts, the next embraces.”

How do we right our society without God in the mix, when our society and nation was FOUNDED on Divine Providence and the Holy Word? You can’t. God is the answer. We’ve turned away from God, and in order to right our society, we must turn back to God. We must put God back into our education, our society, and our personal lives.

Statistics show that four-fifths of our youth leave their faith when they leave home, especially if they go off to college. They get sucked into the secular college lifestyle. If parents do not instill their most cherished beliefs and values into their children before they leave home, children are very likely to adopt the beliefs, or agendas you might call it, taught by the “educational elite” that rule the universities. Your children are becoming slaves to the university system and their progressive agendas.

 

IT CREATES AN ECONOMIC PROBLEM

Today, 23.8% of our youth are unemployed in America. Among black youth the statistic is even worse: 48% unemployment. Why is this? Are these numbers just consequences of the economy? Or is this because our youth are less educated? Or maybe it’s the entitlement mindset many teenagers and twenty-something’s have adopted?

Between 1980 and 1992, the number of high school graduates decreased by 20%. Today it’s much worse. Only seven-tenths of ninth graders will receive their high school diplomas. As of this year, 26% of state spending goes towards education. That’s $260 billion annually. Where is that money going? If our youth are doing so poorly, how are all those tax payer dollars helping? They aren’t! Your money is being wasted! Obviously the current system is not working.

Who is better suited to teach your children? Teachers who have been indoctrinated by the very educational institutions they serve? Or you — a loving and caring parent who seeks the truth and actually cares about what your children learn? Those who have bought into the secular agenda should not be the ones in charge of your child’s education.

 

 TRAIN UP A CHILD IN THE WAY THEY SHOULD GO

If you’re not very familiar with homeschooling, it is a home-based, parent-led education. Twenty years ago, homeschooling was considered a very uncommon form of education. It was even considered “strange.” Even though homeschooling is still not accepted by all, it is gaining in popularity. Homeschooling tends to grow the fastest amongst mainstream Christians and conservatives, although atheists, Mormons, libertarians, liberals and families of every race and economic background are also becoming interested. Homeschooling is not only growing in America, but all over the world. In 2012, there was an estimated 2.04 million American homeschoolers in K-12 grades. That number is growing faster every year.

 Why are so many choosing to school at home? There are many reasons parents choose to switch, such as individualized curriculum and learning environments that might better suit their child. It gives children a chance to accomplish more academically without the distractions or a “one size fits all” public school curriculum. Choosing to school at home also gives parents more supervision over their child’s social interactions and gives them a safer social environment. Homeschooled children are less likely to experiment with drugs, alcohol, violence, and unhealthy sexual activity commonly associated with the behaviors of youth who attend public, and sometimes even private, schools. Homeschooling provides a lot more one-on-one time with a child, giving parents more opportunities to instill the values and beliefs into their child. Also, given all this time spent with their child, parents are able to create stronger family bonds.

An abundance of information exists showing the intellectual advancements in home school children. According to the National Home Education Research Institute, homeschoolers score 15-30% higher than public school students on standardized tests. It also shows that children who school at home score above average on achievement tests, SATs and ACTs regardless of parent’s level of education or income level. In the past few years more and more colleges are recruiting home school students, because home schooled children develop in self-motivation, a highly valued skill that is hard for many kids to learn in public schools.

Studies by the National Home Education Research Institute show that children who have been schooled at home also develop better socially, emotionally, and psychologically. This research includes peer interaction, self-concept, leadership skills, family cohesion, self-esteem, and community participation. The NHERI states that “home educated girls develop the strengths and the resistance abilities that give them an unusually strong sense of self.” It also states that “some think that boys’ energetic natures and tendency to physical expression can be more easily accommodated at home.”

When a home schooled child gets out into the real world, they tend to succeed at a higher rate and are more involved than the public schooled population. They participate in local community service, vote, and attend public meetings more frequently than does the general population. They succeed in college at an equal or higher rate than the general population and also internalize the values and beliefs of parents at a much higher rate.

If parents are unable to home school their child, they can consider virtual schooling. Virtual schooling provides a home-based public education that is self-paced. But as I mentioned earlier, it still provides a healthy distance between a child and the indoctrination that occurs in brick and mortar public schools. It also allows a child to grow spiritually without the negative influence of the culture that is so prevalent in regular schools. Even though virtual schooling is still “public,” it does separate child from the secularist agenda in the school system today. It allows you time to teach children about faith and Constitutional principles.

As scary as the infiltration in the public school system is, be thankful that there are still options in which to teach a child based on a parent’s preference, allowing for spiritual and emotional nourishment. Both types of schooling provide the time and environment to teach a child the very principles erased from public school curriculum, such as the Christian aspect of our American founding and the principles upon which our Constitution was created.

A MOVEMENT HAS BEGUN

One amazing group that is fighting for your children’s right to learn about their faith, and their religious and Constitutional history is As A Mom, a 9/12 Project group started by Yvonne Donnely. As A Mom’s mission is to teach children about the Christian and Constitutional history of America. They have started a Constitutional Chat Club where high school teens can meet and talk about topics most important to them, such as Constitutional rights. The Constitutional is a non-for-profit that provides elementary school students the resources to learn about the “history of our great country’s founding”. There are individuals and conservative groups out there that are standing up for your religious freedom and are fighting the Secular Fundamentalism that is taking over every aspect of society. We have a lot of work ahead of us, but with the guidance of Divine Providence, we shall overcome.

__________________________________________________________

 

Ed Willing contributed to this article with research notes, published material and references.

COMMENTS

  • lineholder

    I read your comments above in response to jeremy stating that Ms. Nicholas is a teenager. She’s done well in writing this piece. I hope she will continue doing so.

    It’s encouraging to know that we have young people who are consciously aware of what the truth is in regards to quality of education that currently exists within our public school system. I hope they will set higher standards for themselves and strive to succeed in those standards, come what may come.

    • libertas91

      lineholder

      Thank you very much for the compliments. “I hope she will continue doing so.”
      I absolutely will continue writing. It’s what I love and what I’m passionate about. This country needs more young patriots.

      God bless

      • lineholder

        If young people such as yourself are willing to speak out in the way that you have in this article, we stand a good chance of reviving patriotism and loyalty to this nation of ours.

        Write again soon, please!

  • cheetah2

    Home schooling is worth fighting for. If parents want to protect their children from the destructive influences you talk about here, public school is not even an option. I believe that parents who take this seriously can find a way to do it.

    • http://foundersintent.org FoundersIntent

      A calling from God, a common sense solution to todays problems, a proven alternative

  • brettstevensmn

    Keep in mind there was a man arrested for his daughters drawing of a gun as school and the administrator of the school said the public education system ‘co-parents’ children. Very good post and it’s necessary to get the word out homeschooling is highly successful and far better for children than public schools.

    • http://foundersintent.org FoundersIntent

      We agree. Caitlin did a great job with this post.

      This message of statism in the public schools must be exposed.

  • samcoastie

    I believe many more people would homeschool if they could overcome their own fears of failing their children. The stat that homeschooled children do better on standardized exams, including college entrance exams, REGARDLESS of the education level of their parents should be shouted from the rooftops!

    My oldest child spent 2 months in the first grade. He got on the bus at 7:30 and got home at 4:00. An hour of home’busy’work, mostly below his learning level, followed by supper pretty much brought us to the time his 3 younger siblings were getting their PJs on. Our whole family missed him, After much thought and prayer, my wife and I could not deny that despite our doubts and fears we needed to homeschool our children. Five years later my wife and I feel like we are still struggling to do right by our children. There is nothing I would rather work hard at. And despite our faults and all too common failings we cannot deny that somehow our children are thriving. I am so grateful for my wife’s willingness to press on each day while I am at work.

    One of my favorite sayings is ‘no success at work can make up for failure in the home.’ When we stand before our maker, He will not ask us why the schools failed our children.

    • steve962

      As much as I’m often on the other side on political issues involving public education, I *do* believe that education starts at home with the parents, and shouldn’t end just because their children are in public schools. I believe the majority of the failures of public (and private, for that matter) education can be traced back to the parents.

      A school is not a replacement for a parent. It is not a babysitter. It’s not a one-size-fits-all thing. It provides students with knowledge and some experience, but it’s up to the parent to follow what the child is learning, expand on it from their own life experiences and beliefs, and help them put that knowledge into perspective.

      If parents do not spend the time to do this, then how can anyone expect the child to form any coherent life picture? How can they place any value on the things they learn? Too often parents simply ignore this part of the education process, and it’s no wonder that their children turn out with issues later in life.

      So I fully respect those who support Home Schooling — it’s the ultimate expression of parental interest in their child’s education. It’s not something I personally would choose to do, but I respect those who do it.

  • libertas91

    Great comment! God bless you and your wife for taking that huge step to homeschool. It’s a huge decision and it’s taking on alot more responsibility at once

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    are smart, well-rounded, respectful thinkers, and in hindsight, I wish I had either homeschooled my son or at least sent him to a small private Christian school.

    Well done, Miss Nicholas. I hope you’ll consider submitting future diaries to help keep us informed of the younger POV. We definitely need young citizens like you to get involved.

    • libertas91

      Thanks so much for the compliments Melody. They are really appreciated, I worked hard on this piece and I was hoping it would pay off. Looks like it did :)
      And I agree with you, all of the homeschoolers are such a wonderful contrast to the average teenager.

      I will hopefully be submitting future diaries, Lord willing. I’m blessed to have gotten my article on RedState.

      Thank you and God bless

  • lastgopinillinois

    I have never had children of my own, but I do know parents that homeschools their children. The kids are courteous, helpful and act like little adults. A lot of extra devotion is required of parents who homeschool.

    On the downside, even though parents who homeschool dont use public education, they still have to pay the high education taxes imposed by their county. I think they should not have to pay any education tax.

  • aph4

    I’ve lurked around redstate for a number of years and this post finally got me to register.

    First, let me say thank you. This post is a great summary of why we decided to begin homeschooling our children. We had been thinking about it for a few years and finally decided that we would start when my son was going into 4th grade.

    However, we started to have more and more concerns during the third grade which culminated in a “social studies” assignment about great American heroes. When I heard this topic, I immediately thought of the Founding Fathers or some of the great scientists, inventors, etc in our history.

    I was appalled when I actually saw the assignment though. The page from their social studies workbook(which was from a very commonly used textbook publisher) had two “heroes” on it that the kids had to look up and write about. These “heroes” were Cesar Chavez and Eleanor Roosevelt.

    That was the straw the broke the camel’s back and we pulled him out the next day. All of our kids are now homeschooled and our only regret is that we didn’t start doing this much sooner.

    • lineholder

      Glad to have another advocate for higher quality education for our young people. Maybe you’ll share some your experiences with us.

  • macduff

    http://www.amazon.com/Weapons-Mass-Instruction-Schoolteachers-Compulsory/dp/0865716692/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1333117592&sr=1-1

    While his writing is undisciplined and disorganized, and some of his statements are just plain wrong (like his interpretation of Plato), he usefully points out the highly disturbing political and intellectual agenda behind government schools, based on German social and political scientists of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Those men aimed to create subjects of the state – to remove them from the influences of religion and family and make them loyal solely to the government.

  • Pingback: Heriberto Woolwine

  • Pingback: Hien Jou

  • jeremyz

    There are so many myths and untruths that are perpetuated about homeschooling, but the research more and more is proving it to be a GREAT option or alternative for parents and children. We home school and are experiencing wonderful results thus far.

    I appreciate the effort this diary has taken to touch on and begin to correct the numerous untruths about homeschooling. This is such a complex issue but you did a good job summarizing many of the most important issues and communicating a broad scope of information pertaining to homeschooling.

    If the public schools are attempting to indoctrinate the majority of our children into liberal, state-centered thinking robots, how important are these little bastions of constitution-centric learning centers and more importantly God-centric learning centers to the next generation of our country? Crucial!!!

    Thank you for posting this diary!

  • http://foundersintent.org FoundersIntent

    You’re welcome JeremyZ.

    It was an honor to help put this together. Caitlin is a distance-learning student, but has a unique perspective as a young teenager on the negative impact of public education already.

    Thank you for your encouraging words. Most of the folks who run FoundersIntent.org are homeschooled, and most were homeschooled the majority of their lives. Feel free to spread the encouragment ;)

  • deVere

    John Dewey was a socialist and humanist, but I really doubt that he ever said or wrote that scandalous quotation that he is supposed to have said in 1899. It reeks of being a made-up quotation. Is there any proof that he ever said or wrote that?

    I also rather doubt that Lincoln is really responsible for the other quote. It is “credited to Lincoln”, but my bet is that a thorough search will not find it in any of his speeches or writings. Since Lincoln never went to school, and had somewhat urgent preoccupations other than public education, I am quite skeptical that he ever said that. It is common that once a person becomes very famous, wise sounding sayings get attributed to that person.

    Here’s an unquestionably genuine quotation by Dr. Michael Crichton:

    “I have been asked to talk about what I consider the most important challenge facing mankind, and I have a fundamental answer. The greatest challenge facing mankind is the challenge of distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda. Perceiving the truth has always been a challenge to mankind, but in the information age (or as I think of it, the disinformation age) it takes on a special urgency and importance.”

    In my opinion Dr. Crichton was a great man, even if he did go to school.

  • http://foundersintent.org FoundersIntent

    While appreciating the irony in your statement, I somehow doubt that’s what you intended. Since you cannot establish that those quotes are not authentic, you are merely throwing waterballoons.

    And while not understanding what point you were really trying to make – other than being contrary for sport – I assume your deference to the remainder of the article is a tacit approval of the content.

    In which case, your strange and ironically unproven dissent will be seen as just that. ;)

    Glad you enjoyed the article.

    P.S. Going to school isn’t a bad thing, and Ms. Nicholas never said so. It’s the elements created by the factions intending to control it that are. So please, no straw men.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Yeah, because we should always assume the Progressives were reasonable men.

  • aesthete

    is that you can never be too sure about their authenticity.” — Mark Twain

  • acat

    If Dewey said something along these lines in, say, 1920 .. when aping the European Socialists was all the rage, it wouldn’t have raised any eyebrows. Had Dewey said this after 1945, it would have mattered more where and to whom… but the educracy would still have lapped it up.

    I will echo your respect for Crichton .. but I will use it to ask if you know when critical thinking was removed from the curricula in most schools…

    Mew

  • http://foundersintent.org FoundersIntent

    Except this quote was not drawn from the internet. It was drawn from research done in 1997 at a library. it was requoted in a Coulter book in 2006, and has been attributed in numerous articles since.

    Tell us what you think about the article. Not the quote.

  • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

    : )

  • lapert

    Usually the burden of proof is on the one claiming the quote to be authentic.

    In any case, the Lincoln quote is now acknowledged by Barton to be ‘unconfirmed’ and the Dewey quote I believe is actually the from Rosalie Gordon in What’s Happened To Our Schools and not a direct quote of Dewey.

    It is one of my pet peeves when people use, and reuse without doing the primary research to confirm, fake quotes from past figures.

  • deVere

    “you cannot establish that those quotes are not authentic”; what a standard! if it’s not provably a lie, we will consider it true. No thanks.

    Well, to be fair, that’s still better than that infamous line from the movie “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance”, “This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend”. Shame on you, John Ford.

    I do not think that conservatives are just like liberals but with a different point of view. Liberals routinely lie to advance their political agenda, and we conservatives normally respect the truth. At least I hope so.

    Homeschooling is a very superior methodology that doesn’t need fabricated quotations to sell it. Many of the most famous people in our society have been home-schooled, including Abraham Lincoln, Louisa May Alcott, Andrew Carnegie, Thomas Edison, Alexander Graham Bell, Booker T. Washington, Robert Frost, Frank Lloyd Wright, Pearl S. Buck, The Williams sisters, Tim Tebow, Erik Demaine (MIT professor at 20!). The list goes on and on. Now that Salman Khan has given us his great instructional internet videos, homeschooling is truly on an “anyone can do it” basis.

    The American people worship success. While I sympathize greatly with the desire of parents to avoid Liberal indoctrination of their chidren in the public schools, I believe that the best way to market homeschooling is as the most flexible and successful instructional methodology; which it actually is. Success sells much better than ideology.

    As to your statement that “Going to school isn’t a bad thing”, I actually believe that going to school is almost always inferior to practical work experience in one’s chosen field of work. John Dewey wrote

  • http://foundersintent.org FoundersIntent

    No date has been assigned to this quote, and the book from which it was derived was no longer cited i my notes from 1997. But it was legitimately published in a book. At a library. :) Either way, any number of the dozens of Dewey quotes could have been used.

    Funny, we’re not talking about the substance of the article, because deVere would rather discuss the opening quote.

  • lapert

    Yes, providing quotes of questionable origin rather than sticking to arguing your point offers an easy distraction from that point.

    Hopefully, lesson learned.

  • aesthete

    and can vouch for the OP — it sounds very much like something Dewey would have said, and he said similar things in the books I read.

    There’s a whole thought experiment about theories for teaching at the beginning of one of his books, which mirrors the above quote.

  • aesthete

    The best quotes for my money were not the ones at the top; they were the ones in the article. I was homeschooled myself, and am simpatico with much of what is written above.

    The problem with public education in a nutshell is that it is geared towards shoving all manner of nonsense not related to learning down the gullets of its captive audience — it is dedicated to what can only be termed propagandizing children. The school system has days and weeks dedicated to sex education, racism, drugs, etc, and puts children in a Swiftian environment which implicitly encourages them to act on their worst impulses. This is to the detriment of both actual education and the development of morals — even if you accept the premise that public schools should be in the business of teaching morality, moral development doesn’t occur as a result of abstract and anecdotal tutelage. It develops as a child interacts with the world, learns from elders whom he respects or books that apply morality in a non-abstract sphere, applies the principles learned in real life, and develops as a person — none of which is promoted in a public school. It’s really not shocking to see confused young people emerging from these dystopias — I’m more shocked by how many come out with any glimmers of a moral system intact.

    I like homeschooling, because it a) places the authority for teaching morals where it belongs (the parents), and because b) it places education of a child in the hands of an interested party with the proper incentives (again, the parent). Moves away from the prison-like and antiquated public school system are to be encouraged, I think.

    I will add a caveat, however, in that I’m not of the view that humanism and Christianity are in particular conflict. Humanism is simply a term used for a grouping of ideas and philosophies which place the dignity of the individual as a higher-order, or as the highest-order, value — and which states that morality and ethics precede from our interaction with this value. There is nothing about human dignity and freedom that is in conflict with Christianity; quite the contrary. Interestingly enough, most of the intellectual godfathers were very critical of humanism; Karl Marx, for instance, thought that the notion of rights which proceeded from humanistic ideologies was ruinous to equality.

  • deVere

    The biggest performance advantage of home schooling is the ability of students to learn at their own pace. For this very reason even many Liberals home school their own children. And it is a non-controversial ideology-neutral argument for advancing home schooling. Everyone wants their own kids to be successful.

    I asserted at a recent school board meeting that high-quality low-cost instructional videos will allow the public schools themselves to be reorganized on a go-at-your-own-pace basis, with the teachers acting as mentors, monitors, and tutors. My suggestion was met with ridicule and disbelief, but eventually it will happen.

  • aesthete

    you should bring up the Montessori school system — it works extremely well, given a certain class size, and the success of the system would be strong proof for your idea.

    I 100% agree with you on homeschooling being a good thing simply from a choice standpoint — education and learning differs from individual to individual, teaching our young is a *universal* skill that Homo Sapiens (and most animals, really) are born with, rather than a profession, and there’s strong evidence regarding the pedagogy of individualized learning.

    I’ve soft-pedaled and made non-controversial arguments for homeschooling, and agree that it’s the approach that works for the average person — but I do like to be more radical on a conservative political forum :)

  • rightland1111

    When we are mandated for Healthcare…we will be mandated with what school to attend. Guess who the government will choose…PUBLIC SCHOOLS…run by them.

    Think that the two are not connected…Well…I don’t see where Wicker and wheat have anything to do with healthcare…but then…here we are.

    We, as a society, have chosen to shoot ourselves in the foot each and every time by either voting for people who voted against OUR CHOICES or allowing Executives Orders without bringing this practice in front of the Supreme Court. Thank You….Kitty.

    I agree…we should have the freedom to school our children…but the government…day by day is taking EVERY SINGLE RIGHT away.

  • lapert

    The supreme court has already established precedent on that and the right to choose an educational path for your children is a protected constitutional right – nothing in the obamacare ruling could change that.

  • http://www.manerlittle.com Jonathan Crumly

    Unfortunately, as of Troxel v. Granville, 120 S.Ct. 2054 (2000) this is not the case. Troxel is a 6-3 plurality decision with 6 separate opinions issued (3 concurring and 3 dissenting) none of which garnered a 5 vote majority. Only Justice Thomas, concurring in result, found that a fit parent’s right to the care, custody and control of their children was a fundamental right subject to strict scrutiny. Every other justice refused to apply strict scrutiny to parental rights. This means that any government can interfere with a parent’s right to direct the education of their children upon a showing of simply a rational basis for the infringement. Once strict scrutiny protection is lost, the right is a “fundamental right” in name only.

  • ntrepid