« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Peggy Noonan Is Wrong… Again

Yesterday we who follow such things were presented with an almost perfect example of how the moderate wing of the GOP is wrong.

It starts… well I start it with Byron York’s piece:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/When-Democrats-derailed-a-GOP-Latino-nominee-46407227.html

Wherein he reminds us of another Latino court appointment… and how that ended:

Estrada’s nomination for a federal judgeship set off alarm bells among Democrats.  There is a group of left-leaning organizations — People for the American Way, NARAL, the Alliance for Justice, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the NAACP, and others — that work closely with Senate Democrats to promote Democratic judicial nominations and kill Republican ones.  They were particularly concerned about Estrada.

In November, 2001, representatives of those groups met with Democratic Senate staff.  One of those staffers then wrote a memo to Democratic Sen. Richard Durbin, informing Durbin that the groups wanted to stall Bush nominees, particularly three they had identified as good targets.  “They also identified Miguel Estrada as especially dangerous,” the staffer added, “because he has a minimal paper trail, he is Latino, and the White House seems to be grooming him for a Supreme Court appointment.  They want to hold Estrada off as long as possible.”

It was precisely the fact that Estrada was Hispanic that made Democrats and their activist allies want to kill his nomination.  They were determined to deny a Republican White House credit, political and otherwise, for putting a first-rate Hispanic nominee on the bench.

We all know how that ended… Estrada… still with nothing to hide, having done nothing wrong… having nothing in his history… or speaking to call into question… grew tired of the Democratic filibuster and withdrew.

Byron York reminds us: “that was how Democrats treated the last high-level Hispanic court nominee.  Think about that when you watch their lovefest with Sonia Sotomayor.”

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124354585930464037.html

Peggy Noonan advises us… the GOP to ‘Grow Up”

Some, and they are idiots, look at Judge Sotomayor and say: attack, attack, kill. A conservative activist told the New York Times, “We need to brand her.” Another told me a fight is needed to excite the base.

She advises us that while true, the Democrats pound our nominees into the ground… they feel bad about it later:

A few—very few—agitate to go at Judge Sotomayor as the Democrats went after Robert Bork in 1987. The abuse suffered by that good man is a still suppurating wound within the GOP, but it is also a wound for the Democrats, the worst kind, a self-inflicted one. They damaged our national political culture and lowered their own standing with their assault, and their victory left them looking not strong and uncompromising but mean and ferocious. And on some level they know it. Ask Ted Kennedy, if he had it to do over again, if he would repeat all his intemperate and unjust words about “Bob Bork’s America” and “back-alley abortions” and blacks turned away from lunch counters. He’d be a fool if he said yes. He damaged himself in that battle.

Ms Noonan would have us feel sorry for Teddy… when Bob Bork is the one that took it in his political rear end.

This is of course… 1000% total BS… this is slave talk… this is defeatist… and much more to the point:

This is the very same attitude and advice that kept the Republicans in the minority for 40 years.

I say no… I say never… I say attack, attack, attack!

If Sotomayor isn’t made to answer to charges of racism…

If Sotomayor isn’t made to answer why she is overturned more than upheld…

If Sotomayor isn’t made to explain every square inch of her personal life…

If little bitsy Sonia isn’t made to cry at least once… then the GOP deserves to lose and continue to lose until we get some people elected that have the balls to play the game of Washington politics the way our opponents play it.

Ms Noonan: you and your intellectual brothers kept us, the Republican Party in the minority for 40 years.

NEVER AGAIN!

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://dezignworx-ae.com tsquare

    Thanks George

  • bk

    by the way Chuck Shumer and company treated Alito, Roberts, and Bush COA nominees with such courtesy, dignity, and respect.

  • stang

    http://spectator.org/archives/2009/06/02/answering-peggy-noonan-why-sot

    “Jeffrey Lord worked on five Supreme Court nominations as a Reagan White House political director, including that of Robert Bork. He is the author of a book on the Senate’s judicial confirmation process and writes from Pennsylvania at jlpa@aol.com.”

    “Republicans, Let’s Play Grown Up,” she suggests, saying the Sotomayor hearings are an opportunity for a serious debate. Along the way, she says this: “Newt Gingrich twitters that Judge Sotomayor is a racist. Does anyone believe that?”

    In the interest of obliging on her first point — the need for a serious debate — and answering her second — does anyone believe the Judge is a racist?– a response follows.

    snip-

    I enjoyed your latest on the proper response by Republicans to Judge Sotomayor’s nomination. As always, thought provoking. You raised a serious point in citing Newt Gingrich’s remark that the Judge is a racist, asking, “Does anyone believe that?”

    Between us, I have to say the answer is “yes” — I do believe it.

    A personal story, if I may.

    I highly recomend reading the rest of his piece here. http://spectator.org/archives/2009/06/02/answering-peggy-noonan-why-sot

  • Pingback: Nick Carnes

  • Pingback: Gail Mulligan

  • Pingback: Lane Reindeau

  • Pingback: Alexis Fyler

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: distill definition

  • Pingback: distilling brandy

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: distilled spirits

  • Pingback: charles david pumps

  • Pingback: organizzazione matrimoni toscana

  • Pingback: rubinetteria

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: Tune Up

  • Pingback: right here

  • Pingback: read what he said

  • Pingback: Sneak A Peek At This Website

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: karos registraciya

  • Pingback: property in jaipur

  • Pingback: madam lux

  • Pingback: jobs working from home uk

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Darwin Glatt

  • Pingback: Ruben Vossen

  • Pingback: Store Fixture Installers

  • Pingback: aloe vera juice for hair

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: Theron Mifflin

  • Pingback: Franklyn Solliday

  • Pingback: Emanuel Swim

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: spirits drink

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: แทงบอล

  • Pingback: phone number look

  • Pingback: weight loss

  • Pingback: แทงบอล

  • Pingback: uniform supplier

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: kids bikes

  • Pingback: distill water

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: darmowa strona randki

  • 6eorge Jetson

  • Leopard1996

    She honestly believes that they feel bad for lowering the standards of discourse. They don’t give a rat’s ass about the standards of discourse, unless they can use that standard to beat conservatives over the head with it.

    Peggy if you read this, and have any type of loyalty to the republican or conservative cause, STHU. You are not helping anybody except getting your dumb ass into the next cocktail party on the upper west side.

  • itrytobenice

    way more often than she’d right. I’ve long since quit reading her.

  • Rod_Patrick
  • janis

    And yet he apparently didn’t damage himself much in the Chappaquidick affair, did he, Peggy dear. How stupid do you have to be to think that Kennedy damaged himself anywhere along the line when he is regularly touted as the Lion of the Senate?

    I’ll take “Pundits More Dense than a Black Hole” for $500, Alex.

  • eburke

    coffee….meet computer screen.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    Afterwards, yes, but damaging his liver during the hearings?

  • eburke

    or are they just in some sort of LSD-induced self-delusional flashback?

  • Martin Knight
  • izoneguy

    that the congressional democrats have a room under the capitol were they drop acid. I cannot believe that any clear headed rational person would come up with the drivel that they call legislation.

  • eburke

    pulled out the Durbin memo the first time the Dems played the “Latino Race Card”, read it into the record, and said “We don’t plan on doing what you guys did to Miguel Estrada”

    Oh, and btw, Frist’s linguini-spined refusal to shut down the Senate over Estrada’s racist treatment may have been *the* most pathetic example of the
    $#@&#$!! ‘NewTone’ squishiness, let’s play nice BS that’s turned out *so* well for us the last two cycles.

  • eburke

    to figure out if the Noonan’s and Parker ‘conservative’ wing of journalism truly *believe* the type of bilge Noonan wrote about the Dem’s feeling bad about sliming a respected jurist, whether they *know* that they’re just angling to get the fat rear ends into a cocktail party, or, as I inquired above, are the LSD flashbacks just starting to finally kick in.

    Inquiring minds want to know :-)

  • janis

    any more of those. :-)

  • eburke

    and just hit the screen. You’re only out a couple of paper towels :-)

  • janis

    the utter incoherence of the GOP “leaders” as they write their columns. They veer off in one direction or another to see if that point or this point will get some traction, but they never seem to have a guiding moral principle that informs their writing. Much as our “leaders” went on the listening tour to see if we voters could come up with some nifty jingles and logos that would move whatever their product du jour is these days.

  • eburke

    find the ‘silver bullet’ that will enable us to ‘sweep to power’ (‘power’ used purposely).

    I consider it the legacy of what I call ‘Rovian’ politics. As a result, ‘we’ keep looking for the crafty electoral strategy, the identity political issue, the big bucks, the latest internet fund-raising strategy, the ‘right tone’, the ‘we’re listening to you’ tour, yadda, yadda, yadda, because ‘we’ don’t want to face the cold hard fact that all this squishiness has put us into the same position as that of General Motors: consumers think that our product *sucks* and they don’t trust us anymore because they don’t have any idea what we’re ‘selling’ anymore (when election night polling data shows that more Americans trust The ONE and the Dems on lowering taxes and controlling spending than the ‘Pubs, ya might just have a problem with your ‘brand’) .

    The problem is – the leadership (if they can be called leaders) ain’t figured that out yet so they keep thinking the answer is more Crists, Ridges and Gerlachs. Unfortunately, that doesn’t help the real problem because they *are* the problem.

  • larueladue

    that causes one’s brain to atrophy… or turn to sponge and absorb the leftwing tripe that is rampant there….

    Perhaps we need the EPA to look into it…. |;^)

  • http://www.cityonahillpolitics.blogspot.com cityonahillpolitics

    I used to enjoy her writing so much, but she has really lost her mind.

  • janis

    The rest of the time she’s simply a disgrace.

  • janis

    ?

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    They are moderates BECAUSE they are idiots.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    Of course, to anyone here, or anyone with a modicum of perspective, the study is a revelation about as profound as the one linking drinking to an increase in the perceived attractiveness of the opposite sex.

    a study by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism shows. It concludes: “President Barack Obama has enjoyed substantially more positive media coverage than either Bill Clinton or George W. Bush during their first months in the White House.”

    The study examined 1,261 stories by The Post, the New York Times, ABC, CBS and NBC, Newsweek magazine and the “NewsHour” on PBS. Favorable articles (42 percent) were double the unfavorable (20 percent), while the rest were “neutral” or “mixed.” Obama’s treatment contrasts sharply with coverage in the first two months of the Bush (22 percent of stories favorable) and Clinton (27 percent) presidencies.

    Unlike George Bush and Bill Clinton, Obama received favorable coverage in both news columns and opinion pages. The nature of stories also changed. “Roughly twice as much of the coverage of Obama (44 percent) has concerned his personal and leadership qualities than was the case for Bush (22 percent) or Clinton (26 percent),” the report said. “Less of the coverage, meanwhile, has focused on his policy agenda.”

    Pew Research Article

    H/T Robert Samuelson

    (H/T)^2 National Review

  • Kowalski

    It has something to do with living in New York, I think. It gets into their veins and then the water tastes horrible so they start ordering it bottled, and they start going to Broadway shows and talking with other New Yorkers, and pretty soon they sound like Peggy Noonan.

    That’s harsh, but it’s the truth: Peggy Noonan has in fact been infiltrated by aliens.

    OK now here’s the truth: She’s used to the country-club lifestyle. She enjoys it and doesn’t intend to give it up, and the hard and cruel facts are that the rich and powerful in this country right now are Donks. Peggy isn’t about to stop being pampered.

  • Kowalski
  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    He has never been a liberal and as an economist, he is regularly cited by conservatives. His recent book chronicles the brilliance of Reaganomics.

    What we see here, I think is his academic groundwork for more heated attacks on his liberal friends.

  • Mike gamecock DeVine
  • WarEagle01

    The nonsense this woman is peddling is just unbelievable. We’re supposed cave because otherwise it will hurt us politically and, even worse, we’ll feel bad about it later on? What drivel. As if the Democrats, Teddy included, ever experienced the faintest remorse over their treatment of Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas, or Miguel Estrada. They view those episodes as great victories. Heck, they still talk about “Borking” this or that Republican nominee. Peggy, give it up. You are Vichy. Therefore your advice is neither needed nor wanted.

  • peg_c

    She used to be OK, we used to have a greatParty, and life in America used to make sense. Goodbye to all that.

    Noonan, Frum, Brooks, and their increasingly incoherent and repugnant ilk are desperate for relevance. I’ve written the WSJ that I will never subscribe again while Noonan is on board. Pure lefties are easier to tolerate than her truly supercilious blather. She’s really bad on TV – pompous, smug, incredibly boring, and without a lick of substance. She’s the perfect Obama cheerleader. We should be happy to reject her.

    These folks also never really were conservatives – they just rode that bandwagon when it was the power base. These people live for their social stratas. Their incomes now DEPEND on bashing conservatives and sucking up to the most heinous people in this country. How sad are they?

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    the delivery vehicle, not the taste or health concerns. People don’t want to bottle it for transport themselves.

  • Flagstaff

    Hardly necessary, because this is a great blog.

    She says some pretty laughable things.

    it is also a wound for the Democrats, the worst kind, a self-inflicted one. They damaged our national political culture and lowered their own standing with their assault, and their victory left them looking not strong and uncompromising but mean and ferocious.

    Does she really think they care about that? Now, 22 years later? It is to laugh.

    And on some level they know it. Ask Ted Kennedy, if he had it to do over again, if he would repeat all his intemperate and unjust words about ?Bob Bork?s America? and ?back-alley abortions? and blacks turned away from lunch counters. He?d be a fool if he said yes. He damaged himself in that battle.

    At precisely the level that two thugs who stole a nun’s lunch money “know” it. Just well enough to snicker about it. As for Kennedy, he’d not only say “yes,” he’d say, “Damn straight. Now hand me that towel. My hair’s still wet. If Chappaquiddick didn’t ‘damage’ me, what can?”

    “If Sotomayor isn?t made to answer why she is overturned more than upheld?”

    This is an issue that the Pub’s should hit especially hard. Give her a chance to say that it’s because she’s been reviewed by white male appellate judges, so of course they’d get it wrong.

  • booksum

    I used to read Peggy every week. Then she jumped on the Obama bandwagon and “poof”..she was gone…

    I now view Peggy as practically soaking through her seat every time she writes about Obama

  • RedWhite_and_Truth

    ——————————————————-
    Noonan:
    And on some level they know it. Ask Ted Kennedy, if he had it to do over again, if he would repeat all his intemperate and unjust words about ?Bob Bork?s America? and ?back-alley abortions? and blacks turned away from lunch counters. He?d be a fool if he said yes. He damaged himself in that battle.
    ——————————————————–

    Can she, or anyone, point out evidence to support the contention that these Demoncats were damaged by anything they have said or have done? They have no remorse about ANYTHING. They NEVER apologize, nor admit that they were harsh, wrong, or vindictive.

    On some (no, ALL) levels, they DON’T KNOW IT, Peg.

  • 6eorge Jetson