« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Catholics: The Cavalry is in the Pews, Not at the Pulpit

+

(This diary is not intended to be a sermon to the choir. Instead, I hope that you will forward the link to your awakening giant Catholic friends who are not confident about becoming active in civic affairs. –U.R.)

My worldview was wrenched into recalibration recently when I watched the video of Cardinal Timothy Dolan’s March 2012 address “Lifting Up Our Voices: How Catholics Can Make an Impact on Public Policy,” in which he said the following:

You lay people have the specific charism of bringing a religiously informed political consciousness into the public square. We bishops and we priests don’t. We stick to principles, all right. We leave a lot of the messiness of politics up to you.

Now, I say that in some ways, everybody, out of self-defense because it seems to me a lot of Catholic folks don’t get that. They still come running to daddy, namely to me and Bishop Murphy to say, “Why don’t you bishops do something? Why don’t you excommunicate So-and-So? Why don’t you throw these people out of the Church? Why don’t you say that this is a mortal sin?” In other words, they will want us to do the dirty work of politics.

Now as Bishop Nicholas Dimarzio, our brother in Brooklyn, who perhaps says things a bit more bluntly than Bishop Murphy and I do, he is responding to them, “Get off it! You’re the ones who vote. You’re the ones who can run for office. You’re the ones who can write your representatives. You’re the ones who can get into political organizations. So do it!”

(Full speech video here. Quoted selection begins at 21:00. Run time is 51 minutes.)

Cardinal Dolan is saying loud and clear that the Catholic Church leadership in America is not the cavalry. The US Conference of Catholic Bishops isn’t even the signal corps relaying the “Charge!” command from the Headquarters-Element-in-the-Sky. Instead, they are a doctrine center, producing volumes of information on a gamut of issues, but leaving the choices of where, when, how, and which evil to engage in political battle up to us. And, by the way, don’t expect a formal excommunication of Nancy Pelosi anytime soon.

This is new information for me and others like me. My whole adult life I’ve been what blogger Mark Shea calls a “whipped Catholic.” Throughout my formative years, it was subtly instilled in me that it is sinful to get involved in the “messiness” and “the dirty work of politics.” I’m self-conscious about the little bit of grassroots activism in which I participate. I certainly never thought it legitimate to bring my politics to church or vice-versa. Further, it is my impression that from the Reagan years forward, the American Catholic Church has sided with the supposedly peacemaking doves and the social spenders in government, except on the third Sunday of January, when we receive our annual reaffirmation that abortion is intrinsically evil.

So what is a faithful Catholic to do? Considering that all power is derived ultimately from God (Romans 13:1), those of us fortunate enough to be shareholders in a government “of the people, for the people, and by the people” have an obligation to use not just the ballot, but all of our basic freedoms and civil liberties to ensure our Republic remains a “shining city on the hill.” Much prayer and reflection has led to my sincere belief that the Republican party platform is infinitely more consistent with Catholic teaching than the Democratic party platform, and so I offer the following suggestions to my fellow papists who are ready to take a stand:

Flex your free exercise of religion. Every law, policy, regulation, and budget item has a moral implication, denoting a given activity as right or wrong, good or bad; consequently, religious people, struggling sinners though we all may be, have a bona fide role in the public square. Now more than ever it is time to embrace your Catholic faith. Pray and receive the sacraments regularly. Remove the log from your own eye through habitual confession, and you’ll be amazed how clearly you can see the wrongs that need to be righted in our country, and which among them are in your power to improve.

Defend against attempts to establish a government sanctioned Catholic Church. The Democrats and the media ceaselessly attempt to
define acceptable faith in action
for Catholics by quoting biblical passages and Vatican statements out of context. You can counter their efforts by studying authentic Catholic teaching in relation to the pressing issues of the day. Keep your Bible handy and refer to the Catechism of the Catholic Church as needed. Additionally, visit the websites CatholicVote.org and The Pulpit (a Catholic kind of Drudge Report) for current events updates.

Find your voice and speak up. If you are like my beloved mother, for eight years you politely simmered in silence while the liberal in your office or seniors’ breakfast group waxed toxic about the Bush administration. In 2008, you knew that an Obama presidency would be detrimental to our country, but your friends were so emotionally invested in “hope and change” that they were impossible to reason with. Last January, you were horrified by your sister’s Facebook postings of support for Planned Parenthood against the Susan G. Komen Foundation. The Democrats in your life may cry, get hysterical, use diversion tactics and possibly defriend you, but it is time to offer alternatives to the steady stream of liberal groupthink in their intellectual diet. You don’t have to be skilled in polemics to assert yourself with a simple, “I disagree, but I hope we can still be friends,” or “Are you just venting, or are you open to hearing what I really think?”

Reclaim your freedom of assembly by rejecting the prevailing conservative caricature. Liberals in government, academia, the media, and unfortunately the Church have labored successfully to convince America that conservatives and Republicans are hypocritical, heartless, inbred, ignorant, racist, misogynistic, neo-Nazi domestic terrorists. I can understand why someone might be apprehensive about associating with such a tainted brand. If you take the time to read the diaries and comments on Republican sites such as Red State, to visit your local Republican party office, or to attend a conservative candidate’s event, I think you will find that, in truth, most conservatives are very average, freedom-loving, law-abiding Americans, grateful for the opportunities that allowed them or their ancestors to immigrate, and whose hopes and dreams for our country are a lot like yours. When you are tempted to equivocate that both parties are equally repugnant, remember that even when you can’t bring the Republicans in line with your faith, they will, unlike the Democratic party, respect the morals behind your argument.

Use your freedom of assembly to take over the Republican Party establishment. If the Republicans do not measure up to your principles because more than a handful of prominent leaders are lukewarm, self-serving consumerists, you can become part of the grassroots movement to steer the GOP ideologically back to the right. The organization is called the Precinct Project and aims to allow “We the People” to reclaim the party through a trickle-up process starting at the precinct level. More details can be found at their website.

Petition the government. This oldie but goodie still counts. If you haven’t been doing so all along, start now. E-mail, call, write, and visit your elected officials regarding the issues you care about most.

Give 10th Amendment federalism a fair hearing. Do you believe that the amount of money allocated for social programs is a reliable measure of Christian charity in Congress? Does the intention to do good justify wasteful spending on ineffective social programs? Should the loving work of a struggling private charity be supplanted by a more predictably funded, but impersonal government organization? Does social justice demand that you clothe, shelter, and feed the poor using a credit card obtained under your newborn’s name and Social Security number? If you answered, “No,” to any of these questions, read this interview in which Representative Paul Ryan explains how Catholic teaching influenced his budget proposal. You may be surprised to find that you agree with him in both principle and substance.

Still not convinced? Still caucusing with the Democrats? Then I have three recommendations. First, labor union Catholics who oppose union support of pro-abortion candidates should exercise their right to file for refunds of dues that are not used for direct representation of workers. This website can help you get started. Second, unionized Catholic workers in healthcare and education should communicate to their local union leadership the need to include conscience protection clauses during contract negotiations. Third, American Catholics need to sustain the Church’s work in areas where taxpayer funded organizations directly contravene Catholic beliefs, for example, pregnancy crisis centers as an alternative to Planned Parenthood, and Catholic education as an alternative to God-free school zones.

“Then he said to his disciples, ‘The harvest is abundant but the laborers are few; so ask the master of the harvest to send out laborers for his harvest.’ ” (Matthew 9:37)
I know that this is a long, but not exhaustive list, and I am not demanding that anyone try to do everything on it. All I ask is that you keep the words of Blessed Teresa of Calcutta in mind when discerning your role as a faithful American:

It is not how much we do,
but how much love we put in the doing.
It is not how much we give,
but how much love we put in the giving.
[snip]
You can do what I can’t do.
I can do what you can’t do.
Together we can do
something beautiful for God.

May God light our paths and bless America abundantly.

COMMENTS

  • trimulchio

    are demanding a place at the “grown-up table,” and not just in secular matters. The clergy abuse scandal damaged the legitimacy of the heirarchy. However, lay people seem to have largely stayed in teh Church to work for change (or, at least, stewardship of teh stewards, to misquote Juvenal).

    • Uma Richie

      Your point that the Church has a politics all its own is well-taken. As for the Catholic laity — well we’re a pretty diverse bunch. I can’t make a general statement about us.

  • gekster

    I have missed your posts. ;)

  • westcoastpatriette

    to all your fellow servants of the Lord. A lot of us in the non-Catholic churches suffer from the same timidity you describe with respect to getting involved in politics. And I am still struggling with finding my way, but I finally realized that our Republic was designed for active participation and will not survive if those of us who care about morality stay in the pews. We have allowed these corrupt people to overtake the country and we are suffering the consequences of that.

    Good luck with your endeavors. We could use more input from you here, too, as discussion is always taking place regarding the correct Biblical response to government policies.

  • Uma Richie

    for the kind words and the reco. I hate to call myself a lurker, but I do check in on RS several times a day. My lack of posts are a compliment to the site — I found my voice and discerned my mission here and then went forth to do my part.

  • massachusettsdemocrat

    Democrats are also for minorities. Those 800,000 illegal alien infiltrators Obama extended permission to stay by saying he won’t enforce the law? Guess which party the Democrats expect them to vote for after they are fast-tracked into citizenship?

    It is an article of faith on DailyKos that the expansion of Latinos in the United States will cause Democrats to win every election soon. After all, thinking that either Latinos or white people might vote differently in the future sounds pretty RACIST.

  • gekster

    You have posted wise words here before.
    Your input is not only relevent, but needed at times.
    But you must do what you must.
    No problems. ;)

  • Uma Richie

    I really appreciated Cardinal Dolan’s candor in his speech. The problem is that I had to commit to watching an hour-long video to hear his message bluntly. The youtube video is a far cry from viral, so I doubt that many Catholics are aware of the leadership vacuum.

    It would be nice if leaders of congregations across the land stood up on Sunday and said that even though they themselves cannot be politically active, taking part in political activity is not sinful. In fact, failing to correct injustice when it is in our power to do so is a sin of omission. I think a lot of people would take courage from that.

  • streiff

    I’m not in complete agreement with this post.

    I am perfectly happy to encourage Catholics to agitate for religious freedom and for various life issues. I am much less comfortable with the “take over the Republican party” part of your post. We Catholics are united in certain theological matters but there is nothing in Catholicism that says it is either conservative or would be at home in the Republican party.

    Catholics are beginning to vote for Republican candidates, breaking a century plus history, because of abortion. As euthanasia and gay marriage gain importance, they, too, will pull in Catholics. We’re also blessed by a cadre of younger and very orthodox Bishops flushing out the detritus brought to us by “the spirit of Vatican II.” Other that the social issues, you won’t find Catholics to be any more conservative than Olympia Snowe.

  • kipling

    I agree that Catholic laity must rise up and engage in politics and the culture.

    I disagree with the reluctance of the bishops to exercise church discipline. The Apostle Paul was not reluctant in curbing heresy and direct defiance of Christian principles. One of the largest problems with all churches is the reluctance of the clergy and lay leaders to take a stand on Biblical principles and require their “members” to adhere to the doctrine.

    One does not have to agree 100% with a church to attend. However, to become a member or to accept a leadership position, one needs to be in agreement with core Biblical doctrine.

  • streiff

    Uma, are you Catholic?

    The Catholic Church has a long history of political activism and there is no prohibition against the clergy supporting causes and ideas. This document has been released http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/faithful-citizenship/forming-consciences-for-faithful-citizenship-document.cfm and part will be read during the homily in virtually every parish in the country before November.

  • Uma Richie

    with grades 1-12 at a Catholic school. I got the social justice message loud and clear. I got the “don’t be judgmental” message loud and clear. I got the “abortion is wrong” message loud and clear. I still have a hard time reconciling the three.

    I reasoned on my own that compassionate Conservatism is neither, but I felt no support for that position in the Church. I reviewed just war theory in the Catechism in the lead up to Desert Fox in 1998 and Iraqi Freedom in 2002 to 2003 because I contributed to both. I believe both operations were justified, but I felt terribly guilty about being in disagreement with the Pope.

    I read the Faithful Citizenship guide every even numbered fall before I vote. At least until 2008, I found it to be wishy-washy. 2010 was a little bit better.

  • streiff

    your comment implies you aren’t.

    I didn’t feel guilty about my support for the Gulf War or Iraq because those issue are not issues of “faith and morals” and the catechism allows me to use my own prudential judgement. In fact, Catholic Just War Doctrine clearly states that the balancing of the factors for and against war is under the purview of national leadership.

  • Uma Richie

    convert or a revert. I am a Generation X Catholic school kid who got all the social justice, and the turn the other cheek, and all the corporal works of mercy, but none of the apologetics. We got a warning on the spiritual works of mercy that you’d better be pretty saintly yourself to warn the sinner or instruct the ignorant etc. So, yeah, you can say that I am only half Catholic.

    You are a RedState front pager. You may have had the confidence to hold up your Catechism when the PJP II, one my childhood heroes, publicly wondered why anyone would want to start a war. I did not have your conviction. I still believed we were correct and I carried out my duties. Upon examining my conscience, I never felt the need to discuss my participation in a military operation during confession, but I had the nagging feeling in my mind that perhaps I was in error. Heck, I still get painful twinges when Iraqi Christians are persecuted and the Catholic blogs blame OIF.

    My diary is not for you, as I noted in my intro. It is for the whipped Catholics like myself.

  • Uma Richie

    The Vatican recently released a reflection on the duties of businesspeople. A main point was that you can’t divide yourself — you have to hold up the same moral standards at the office as in your personal life.

    I don’t understand why apostate politicians seem to be allowed to divide themselves.

    The point of my diary is that the discipline isn’t coming. Catholics who are looking for acts of discipline to be the sign from the Church to get moving are going to be waiting a long time.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    across the board, not just in the Catholic church. We preach it, but there’s little enforcement. We’ve fallen into the “tolerance” trap.

  • Uma Richie

    is linked again here:

    http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/rep.-ryan-we-have-pursued-solidarity-but-abused-subsidiarity

    The Catholics I am looking for are the ones who could be persuaded to agree with Rep. Ryan if given a chance to hear his unfiltered arguments.

  • streiff

    I’m an adult convert.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Imagine if every conservative of whatever faith heeded your advice to get involved in their “political neighborhood” — their precinct — as a full-fledged, voting member of the Republican Party.

    Imagine if every member of a right to life group did the same.

    List off in your mind every other conservative group. All “pivoting” into united and organized political action, in addition to the conservative group(s) they belong to, into one more “group” — our political party, the Republican Party.

    Now get every “conservative political activist blogger” to do the same.

    We have the numbers to take over the Republican Party completely from the precinct level and then on up. Because it’s the precinct committeemen who ARE the Party. If we could get all these conservatives to unite and organize politically inside our preferred political party, the Republican Party, we’d be DRIVING the Republican Party rather than complaining about it from outside the car.

    In a few days, we’ll learn, here in AZ, whether the libertarian/anarchists here in AZ were numerous enough, and smart enough, to fill up the 45% or so the PC slots around the state by the simple one page application/affidavit for write-in candidacy for precinct committeeman. If they succeeded at this strategy, our AZ GOP will get the shock of its life.

    Thank you,
    CW

  • kipling

    I only know of a few churches that actually practice church discipline. As one wag put it, their are more rules to riding a bus than being a church member.

  • Uma Richie

    now because Cardinal Dolan has said it out loud. I wish he would have expanded on this more, because I am still confused that he would equate declaring something a mortal sin and interfering with politics. Still, I’ve got it – Don’t expect discipline for apostasy in politics. I will do my part faithfully no matter what comes out of Nancy Pelosi’s mouth.

    As an analogy:
    When I was a teenager, my parents expected me to behave chastely, and they took steps to protect me, such as knowing where I was, setting curfews, forbidding dating until I was 16, etc. etc. Once I was dating, I understood from my parents and some discussion in school that premarital sex was bad. I had the (albeit incorrect) impression that pregnancy was the worst outcome of premarital sex.

    Between junior and senior years, 5 of my classmates gave birth (a whopping 10 percent of our female population). My parents’ interaction with the girls and their parents whom they knew well was the exact opposite of what I expected. Two of the girls made a point of telling me how cool my mother was and how good she had been with their babies.

    So I questioned my mother about it. It seemed to me like she was giving her approval of each situation. I understood that it was not her place to judge, but I thought that she was going out of her way to be nice. My mom’s response was that motherhood is difficult, and the girls’ lives would never be the same. At the same time she was quick to reiterate, in the mom tone, that it had better not happen to me.

    Fast forward a few years. I found out that one girl’s dad was never really around. Another girl’s mom had a problem with alcohol. Then it all started to make sense. If I could go back in time to ask my mother to do things differently, the only advice I would give her would be to fill her 15 year old daughter on more of the differences between my home life and theirs. I could have handled it at that age, and I would have been more sympathetic. Even further, knowing that I was the kid who got 5 talents in the loving upbringing department might have strengthened my resolve in chastity.

    So I look at Nancy Pelosi from a big Catholic family. Daughter of the Democrat mayor of Baltimore. I can’t imagine ends justifying the means she saw as a child and teen. She was an intern in Congress during the era when the philandering Kennedy brothers were lionized as a great Catholic family. At the time, did she have to deal with more advances from married Christian men than a secretary on Mad Men? If so, that experience could have contributed to her becoming the dissenting Catholic and left wing harpy from San Francisco that she is today.

    I know that a sin is still a sin. We’ve got the 10 Commandments that cover most *actions* in black and white. I also understand that the guilt of a *person* for committing and embracing a sin, based on their own physical and mental state, is much more complex, and that is why we don’t cast judgments. In the case of politics, the Church leadership has to balance condemning sins done in public against publicly leaving the gate open for sheep to come back into the fold. I can’t say whether they’ve struck the balance correctly or not.

    Now that I know what the Catholic bishops will and won’t do, I’m finished worrying about the others. I’m not going to bury my talents under paralyzing humility anymore (with the still humble realization that I’ll make some mistakes along the way because only God is perfect). I just hope my diary will reach Catholics who have struggled with the same issues I have and spur them to action.

  • norris

    don’t condemn sinners or even the sin ,to keep more people in the seats and more money in the collection plate. This is called the big tent where everyone feels comfortable .

  • Uma Richie

    Keep looking.

    You can also do a congregation search in the opposite direction. Examine your weaknesses and the things that constantly come between you and God then find a church with a ministry that helps people like you.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    and having some experience with unwed mothers in my own family, I understand your mother’s reaction. As a Christian, we have to show compassion as Christ did, even when we disapprove of the actions. What other choice is there? We can’t just throw these mothers or the babies out, especially if they have a penitent heart. In fact, in the case of my family, the child literally breathed new life into my aging parents and is a blessing (as are all children) to our family. But yes, that compassion was followed up with tears, disappointment and stern warnings.

    However, with regard to the struggles or backgrounds you mention, I’ve seen kids from wonderful homes get in trouble, yet I have friends who are an asset to their families and society despite having grown up with multiple issues in their homes. Sin hits us all.

    I guess what I’m trying to say is that at some point, regardless of what has occurred in our lives, we are responsible for our own choices and behavior. Maybe Ms. Pelosi had terrible childhood experiences that helped to shape her values, but she’s not an uneducated woman without resources, and if she studied the Bible, she would surely learn that there are issues she supports that are not pleasing to the Catholic church (even I know that and I’m not Catholic), much less to God.

    That said, I don’t pretend to understand the workings of the Catholic church or its members. I belong to a nondenominational church that is autonomous and under the oversight of our appointed elders. We look solely to the Bible for direction. My main point is that we suffer from a lack of discipline as well. We’ll hear a sermon on immodesty, yet see teenage girls dressed inappropriately.

    I agree that we each must use our talents and do what we can. One path I’ve chosen to take is to get more involved in politics. I happen to believe that dovetails quite well with my spiritual life and my values, not just because of my strong socon beliefs. For example, I stand with the Catholic church on the mandate issue. If the government can tell the Catholic church what they can and can’t do an issue, they can tell mine on another. That is a freedom issue.

    I pray that your diary will have the effect you desire as well.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    I hope it gets frontpaged or at least gets up to the top of the Recommended Diaries list.

    Thank you,
    CW

  • Uma Richie

    and a million thank yous for your support.

    When then Archbishop Dolan first announced the problems he was facing with HHS last winter, I thought that the Obama administration had us in check. The Catholic Church’s teaching on artificial birth control is about as popular as a skunk and is a constant source of ridicule. I didn’t expect other denominations or dissenting Catholics to rally around the First Amendment aspect as they have. I am so very grateful for you and others like you who have been willing to go to stand up with us. The Obama administration needs to divide the faithful to conquer us. Ironically, this is one area where he has proven himself as a unifier.

    You make excellent points about personal responsibility, all well beyond my ability to rationalize how today’s religious leaders handle the political souls in their care.

    Thanks for your prayers too!

  • Uma Richie

    I appreciate your recommendation and kind words. There are plenty of excellent diaries currently running down the right hand column, so I am happy to have broken into the top 10 at all.

    As for the front page – streiff has two concerns that he airs in the comments above. First, my diary is written from my experience in the pew rather than according to the way the Church is supposed to work. I think if a front page diary has the word “Catholic” in the title, he wants it to be more orthodox.

    Second, streiff does not want to appear to be endorsing the idea for Big Government Catholics to take over the Republican party. I think that there are a lot of Catholics who see the welfare state as eroding human dignity, but feel that they have to keep that opinion private because the Church leadership so vocally supports Caesar’s social spending. My intention was to attract those Catholics; however, I concede that I may be suffering from acquaintance myopia.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    read my diary here about the religious freedom rally I attended here in Birmingham last week – in case you missed it. In particular, go to the statement from the Southern Baptist Convention to which I linked. There were rallies all over the country. We may differ in doctrine, but we are united on this issue. God bless you, too.