Let’s Not Give Up on the Constitution
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | January 8th at 12:36 AM |
Some brouhaha was stirred last week by an op-ed in the New York Times by Georgetown University law professor Louis Michael Seidman entitled Let’s Give Up on the Constitution. Of course, the Times did not print my letter to the editor on the article, but did print some excellent rebuttals, including one by none other than Laurence Tribe of Harvard. In his letter Professor Tribe | Read More »
Professor Levinson and the “Imbecilic” Constitution: Speaking Liberty to Power
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | June 11th at 06:37 PM |
In a recent piece in the New York Times, Professor Sanford Levinson bewailed our Imbecilic Constitution. In his article Professor Levinson claimed that “critics across the spectrum call the American political system dysfunctional, even pathological. What they don’t mention, though, is the role of the Constitution itself in generating the pathology. … Our vaunted system of “separation of powers” and “checks and balances” … means | Read More »
Obamacare: Winning the Battle but Losing the War?
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | April 2nd at 11:52 AM |
Americans who respect the Constitution have been heartened by the oral arguments in the Supreme Court over the constitutionality of Obamacare. Based on the thrust of the questioning and comments by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Scalia and Alito, there is good reason to hope that not only will the individual mandate be ruled unconstitutional, but that as a result the entire 2,700 page | Read More »
HuffPo Exposes Obama Without Even Realizing It
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | March 13th at 01:42 AM |
Two recent articles from the other side have put the lie to several Obama administration talking points without even realizing it. One is that the bank bailout money is well on its way to being repaid and that the government has made a profit on it. However, in an article entitled Banks Repaid Fed Bailout With Other Fed Money the Huffington Post reports that 48% | Read More »
Newt, the Judges and the Constitution
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | December 26th at 04:10 PM |
Part of the attention Newt Gingrich has attracted recently, both good and bad, has focused on his proposals for reining in an activist federal judiciary. Some of the proposals include congressional legislation limiting the federal courts’ jurisdiction in certain areas, abolishing particularly out-of-c0ntrol courts, presidential defiance of decisions he deems unconstitutional and calling judges before Congress to explain their decisions (hysterically translated in the | Read More »
Here’s a Good Budget Compromise: Apply the “Fairness” Doctrine to PBS and NPR
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | March 31st at 01:01 AM |
One of the arguments in the current budget battle is over funding for public broadcasting, which fiscal conservative Republicans want to cut and Democrats and RINOs want to keep. Separate from the budget battle but still very active at the present time is the argument over the so-called “fairness” doctrine. This is the view that anyone with a broadcast license can be required to give | Read More »
Anchor Babies and the Real Problem with the 14th Amendment
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | March 30th at 11:14 AM |
Now even the New York Times is reporting on the phenomenon of “anchor babies” or “birthright citizenship,” where women come to the United States to give birth so that their babies can claim automatic citizenship under the first sentence of the first section of the 14th Amendment. The story reports on a home in San Gabriel, California which housed expectant Chinese women who paid $9,000 | Read More »
Of Libyas Past, Present and Future — the Constitution and Making War
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | March 24th at 01:12 AM |
There is much being said and to be said about President Obama’s decision to send US military forces to do whatever it is they are doing in Libya. Some of this commentary is even noting that there is something in the Constitution about going to war, even citing Section 8 of Article 1 which vests in Congress the power “To declare War.” Since the last time the | Read More »
The Constitution and Obama’s threat to shut down the government
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | February 25th at 02:47 PM |
Democrats and their propagandists in the mainstream media are hard at work trying to portray the Republicans in the House as responsible for any shutdown of the federal government. For example, in the New York Times Gail Collins declares that “all hope for averting disaster lies with Speaker John Boehner,” as though Barack Obama and Harry Reid had nothing to do with the issue. Erick | Read More »
Remember, Wisconsin is Greece, not Egypt
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | February 22nd at 12:33 PM |
Just a short post to note an important point of rhetoric. Often dismissed, rhetoric, or “spin’ as we now call it, is critical in political persuasion. The point is the distressing number of conservative commentators who have compared the scene in Madison to the scenes of the protests in Cairo. The resemblance is only superficial and making it is dangerous. While I am aware that | Read More »
Where Dems get their definition of who is “rich”
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | February 17th at 07:38 PM |
President Obama’s new budget again proposes raising the tax rates for the “rich” people who make over $200,000 a year (singles) or $250,000 a year (marrieds). Capital gains and Medicare payroll taxes would also rise for these horrible rich people, and their deductions for mortgage interest, charitable contributions, property taxes, sales taxes, state and local income taxes, medical expenses, and employee business expenses would be | Read More »
Obamacare in the Supreme Court
By: timelyrenewed (Diary) | February 8th at 02:52 PM |
Opponents of Obamacare have welcomed Judge Roger Vinson’s decision that not only is the individual mandate unconstitutional, but that that renders the entire 2,000 plus page scheme unconstitutional. (The previous ruling that the individual mandate was unconstitutional by Judge Henry Hudson did not overturn the entire statute.) Although everyone recognizes that the issue will ultimately only be settled one to two years from now in | Read More »