« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Making Congress Afraid Again…These Things They Fear (Part II)

In December I wrote that this is not likely to end pretty. We saw, since the ’09 summer of our discontent, that rather then retreating, the Obamailis were actually quickening their pace, as if to negate any effect the coming November election might have…not only on health care, but their grander design and the fate of the nation. Although we could be wrong, pray we are in fact, that feeling has only intensified. With the advancement of this “Slaughter Rule” to bypass the very essence of this republic, I am convinced now more than ever that they are in a Victory-now-at-all-costs mode, and we must plan ahead for the unpretty-case scenario…which will reveal itself very soon, not November.

A little cold analysis.

We also wrote here about the tacit understandings as to who the players are in the Constitutional framework. You know, the Enemies, who are like a fixed star in the heavens, “Those guys”. They’ve been there from the beginning. Then there are The People. Finally, there are the Protectors, made of the 1) elected and 2) un-elected sort. We here at RedState are of the un-elected sort. But we are also the People.

There are several things that we can do here at RedState as protectors, but much of what has to be done now is with our other hat on, as a part of The People. So strap it on, folks. There are many things the People must do very quickly, and continue to do until this is over. The ball is about to start rolling.

First among them is to re-establish that most fundamental of relationships with our elected representatives. Fear.

What follows is only about the redefining of that relationship.

The Constitution assumed, in fact, expected, that elected representatives would be afraid of the People. That was always its major fail safe. Now without going all philosophical on you, the Constitution inferred that elected officials would be held in check from their natural tendency toward excess and corruption that the power to tax would confer on them, by the fear that the people would find them out and at the very least, throw them out of office.

But the notion that this resort (throwing them out of office) was also the only resort is rather modern in American politics. Arguably, the Constitution seemed to expect that the People, being of the more common sort, would have a variety of ways to convey this sense of fear to their representatives. We’ve tarred and feathered them, run them out of town on a rail, hung them in effigy, stormed their offices, poured white paint on their favorite black poodle, cow dung on their cars, and a host of other things, which, while only slightly illegal, resulted in no deaths or serious injuries that I can find. And it really did seem to do the good job of always keeping the threat in front of the representatives’ noses that they (and their families) could come to a lot of inconvenience, up to and including financial ruin, if they betrayed the People’s trust. (By the way, these are the same threats, by way of blackmail, held over their heads already by the special interest purchasers of their votes, including now, the Party leadership.) We’re just leveling the playing field…back in the Constitution’s favor….when we bring fear back to its proper place in the constitutional scheme.

The past fourteen months have proved what many of us in the analysis business have seen trending since the Clinton years: Not only is the elected class no longer afraid of the People, but so much so they have become indifferent to us. Now, they barely send us a card while courting their purchasers with wine, flowers and fine chocolates…which makes the job of a Marxist insider who rubs elbows with them daily all the more easy.

The invoking of the Slaughter Rule (highlighted here this week by E Pluribus Unum, then Mike DeVine, then Ausonius, and AndrewHyman) is that bridge too far, the straw that broke the camel’s back, that one egg too many for an edible omelet. In my view, it is criminal. (See below.) In the Comments of EPU’s piece, you can see the questions, the what ifs, coming from every direction. What will the courts do? What about the GOP? The states? Even the Armed Forces and National Guard?

But not a lot is really speculated about what the People can do…or should do. I see no suggestions of civil disobedience, by open outrage or by stealth and skulduggery, i.e, what can we get away with? (A lot, you betcha) But everyone does agree, we should not take up arms, or even take to the streets with pitchforks. I agree as well. But neither can we, I argue, simply bide our time, or take the Gandhi-MLK Jr-Glenn Beck tack, by linking arms and peaceably protesting and getting in touch with our inner selves if this Slaughter Rule actually materializes. (Right now it is just a floating balloon.) For one, the other side, once secure in power, will be far more ruthless than anything Gandhi or Dr King faced. More importantly, as we’ve seen, after their initial impact, our Tea Party marches and protests and sit-in, while still necessary, did not serve to make them afraid for very long. We saw this after the summer recess. When things got hot out in the districts, they simply left the fief and returned to the central castle, barricading themselves in the manor house, content that we would not only just have to get over it, but we would also have to lump it. 

The media and the GOP, and sadly too many conservatives seem to have fallen into the trap of believing that the People’s power is limited to throwing those dirty rotten scoundrels out. But as early as summer ’09, those DRS’s have been telegraphing a sense of “so what?” Not, “I dare you.”, but “So what?”, as in “It won’t matter by then.” (by Nov 2010.)

Do they know something we don’t know? Probably. Do they have another shoe to drop, another plan? Possibly. But in both cases, those plans, that other shoe, are also based on the same notion laid out above, that all the People (us) can do is wait til November then try to throw those DRB’s out.

Obvious, we have to do much more, and very soon…without taking to the streets with Old Betsy.

Another regular diarist here, RoguePolitics, carries a quote from Orwell about the liberals of his own time, who were playing with fire, without ever knowing it was hot. This is the one imponderable about this standoff existing now between the Democrats in Congress and the People. (Forget about the Republicans, if they come to our aid, good, just don’t rely on it. Assume you are on your own.) Do they really know what they’ve let themselves in for here? Are they naive and silly, even a little stupid, or do they really have all their ducks lined up in a row as their body language suggests? Who will blink?

With the Slaughter Rule vote, if it takes place, win or lose, they have gone all-in coming out on the blind, and dared us to call. Do they really know what this means? Do we also? Maybe we should tell them, now, before the vote. I think so.

Do they not understand that once the thunder begins to roll, we are not just going to go back to 2005. We are going back to 1860 and begin by freeing the slaves all over again. And this time, for real. We will take back the schools. The universities. We will be writing new textbooks. And we will also be building new jails. We need to let them know what we have in store for them. Not what Mitch & the Gang have. What we have.

So, what can the people do now, for E Pluribus Unum is right, if the Slaughter Rules is actually enacted, the ball starts to roll. The Rubicon has been crossed. Whether by mere expedience and accident, or by long term design, the Slaughter Rule signals a naked attempt to dismantle the Constitution. It is an imminent threat. A crime. A high crime And don’t be surprised if the Supreme Court probably can’t so easily undo it, without the several militaries choosing up sides. For all Obama has to say is “OK, you made your ruling. Now enforce it.” to make that so.

These are mere speculations by me, but they are not mindless ramblings, for as I’ve said for some years now, the Enemy has gone “all in”, so what we confront is a new reality with this vote.

So what do the People do once again to make their elected representatives be afraid? This I consider a first step.

We’re sort of in this kind of business, (Agitprop of various dimensions) but I’m never comfortable talking much about it in the public domain, for fear I’ll be “Stokely Carmichaeled”. We’ve witnessed local wrecking operations all over the world. We instituted a few. We’ve seen them work. And seen them fail. So, what I write below is intentionally a little cavalier and tongue in cheek.

Wreck, Defy, and Agitprop.

First, make it personal. Put a face and a name on your wrath. Let every Congressman who votes for this bill know that every act of defiance, or wrecking in his district comes embossed with this name on it.

Wrecking is but one part. And it comes in all forms. It can be done solo. With or without the help of your state legislature, we can deny the federal government what it wants to achieve. People are already lining up to do this with the census. Moses was a born wrecker. He died without ever letting the state know he was dead, and he chuckled all the way up that roost in the Rockies where he went to sleep, I am quite sure. But wrecking only creates an atmosphere for your target congressman. Much like the bleak shades of black and grey of Gotham City, it makes his world much darker than he wants it to be, and from time to time, in various ways, you let him know the darkness and gloom is his doing, and it won’t be sunny again until he’s out of office, in jail or working for 7.50 an hour down at Taco Bell.

Agitprop involves more stealth and planning. It also requires teamwork, and some risk of being arrested and cited, and seeing your name in the paper. We’ve had some success with this in various parts of the country. Agitprop generally involves a series of events always keeping an issue in the public eye. It can work just as well to keep a person (a bad guy) constantly in the public eye. It is constant, pulsating, coming from all different directions, sometimes singly and sometimes all altogether. It can be as bodacious as a truck load of manure in the front yard, a 2 AM wake up call to a very loud hidden cassette of Klaus Nomi going falsetto, or a simple quavering, crooked middle finger from a 90 year woman in a wheelchair at a rally.

Here I are only speaking of the things that can keep an Democrat congressman worried, annoyed, inconvenienced and eventually fearful. He will still pay close attention to you even though he does not always know who “you” are. All Congressmen have their own notions as to what is “too close for comfort” (see below), and what deserves serious consideration. I think the folks in each district know better than I what those soft, exposed or sore points are. Just poke them as often as possible. Swarm like flies and sting like bees. Whatever comfort they require, deny them.

Civil disobedience works, but this involves a little more than just showing up with a bunch of placards on the Capitol steps. Show up at 2 AM at his home in Georgetown. Remember how quickly those Koreans pulled out some loudspeakers, sang a song, then disappeared? Or that aforementioned loud cassette player hidden in a bush under the bedroom window. (Wear gloves.) But always leave a card. Let him know it is not random. Even the call into the cops is an annoyance and aggravation. As for ideas, read up on PETA; they are very clever and aren’t afraid to take risks. But so were Laurel and Hardy and the Three Stooges, if you like gags. (Actually I don’t like custard pies…unless there are fifty all at once blotting out the sun as they rain down on an entourage. That I like.) There are all sorts of things you can do inside his office, and never get caught. We’ve known people to set off alarms and sprinkler systems with cigarettes, then skedaddle. But you may get caught. One alarm may cause a commotion, but five in two weeks will really annoy a lot of people, all with Congressman X’s name on that card. Always leave a card.

(There are even a few flatulence tricks I learned from the Russians, but can’t seem to find any useful purpose for them here. If you do, let me know. I’m always for expanding my repertoire.)

And you can even up the ante in violence, if you are willing to be arrested, and go before a judge and plead Not Guilty for hitting a person across the nose with a rolled-up newspaper. Really? No, try it. Hurts like hell. A park ranger in the Smokies told me about that several years ago during a bear outbreak. The great things about a rolled-up paper is you can carry it openly and anywhere. Pitchforks are better, yes, but you can never get them through security. Besides, they’re just for show anyway.

I can take my trusty newspaper with me everywhere. I’ve been contacted by various Tea Party groups asking me to join and I say, “But I already come to meetings. I’m the one with the newspaper.” (Being anonymous is twice the fun, and in reading this, you’re beginning to see why.) I even got to use it once, at a rally, when a twerpy little Leftist got in my face a bit too close (both for comfort and for me not to get a good arms-length whack at her), but even a short chop stings. The nice things is, who’s going to run off crying to the cops that some mean old man hit me with a newspaper?

I have visions of Tea Partiers carrying rolled up newspapers to rallies. Just watch the union thugs hunker back. Watch the Congressman poop his pants the next town hall when 200 citizens stride in striking the palm of their hands with a rolled up newspaper. When they put up signs saying “Please check your newspapers at the front door” you’ll know they are afraid. Just remember, you hit someone with it, it is a battery. Expect to be arrested. Just ask for as a jury trial and look for one of “our” lawyers. Acquittal’s a sure thing.

The ONE MAJOR thing we must never do is behave like those children who protest the G8 summits. Adults don’t go around breaking the law intentionally, and then pitching a fit because they were caught at it. Draft card burners always annoyed me on that account. Don’t curse, don’t scream or screech, or kick. Always carry the squared jaw of resolve and the furrowed brow of sorrow, as someone who has just had to go out and shoot his favorite dog, who’d become rabid. This is a dirty job, it has to be done, but is also a terribly sad thing for fine decent folks to have to do. So, be arrested with class, like adults…for many of the police will be on your side. And anyone who sees you on television will also.

As I’ve laid out, there are hundreds of way to publicly put yourself on the line and 1) wreck, 2) defy and 3) instill fear. Agitprop is as Agitprop does. Our intention is to intimidate, and, to the extent a rolled up newspaper can convey it, terrorize.

But if you’ve noticed, what I’ve just outlined hardly makes congressmen afraid. It just makes them nervous. But like those 50 soldiers guarding the fort all night, while just outside, in the pitch dark, the drumbeats going on relentlessly, it does keep a fellow on edge. It is necessary.

These are the things they Fear.

What we want the left side of Congress to do is to have to sneak back to the home district under the cover of darkness. To peep around corners. And over the shoulder. Make them think they are quarry, being hunted. Hell, they are so paranoid, just a cruel smile can send that message. Make them afraid to shake hands with anyone they don’t know, especially 90-year old ladies. Cause them to drive to work in a dressed-down ’94 Toyota, and around to the back door of the congressional office building, where the kitchen help comes in. Have them wondering why DeMint and Boehner can still come in the front door and they have to sneak in the back? Do that and Boehner may break out his Parrothead shirt and wear it in one day.

These are the things they fear: 1) The aggravation, 2) the Inconvenience 3) the inability to enjoy the perqs of their station, 4) the loss of their wealth 5) going to jail, and 6) physical pain…more or less in that order. Loss of reputation actually is involved in each.

1)The aggravation comes from what I have just described above, a relentless, never-ending cacophony of outrage, displayed to them daily, from the first moment they open the local newspaper back home, to the daily email and phone briefing from the local office. It is just noise, but it is essential. They think they are important but the squeakiest portion of their constituency wheel does not agree. It’s not the disagreement that aggravates, it’s the noise! (Sound familiar? So, go the Left one better, for remember Evil cannot aggravate Good the same way Good can aggravate Evil using the same device. It’s a law…the law of inner peace.)

2) The inconvenience comes when the Congressman’s wife comes home, or calls from from St Louis, screeching “I can’t even go to the mall to buy some underwear anymore! Look at me! Is custard really my best color on this new Nino Cerruti pants suit?” Despite what you hear, the most important people in the Congressman’s life is not the guys down at the House racquetball court. They are their significant others…and their inner staff. The people they see daily. When your chief of staff is afraid, you’re inconvenienced. When your secretaries are crying you are inconvenienced. When you wife is bitching because the only place she can shop in peace is at Big Lots or Dollar Generals Store, you are inconvenienced. Bernie learned this some time ago, when a friend of his on the West Coast called her congressperson, and in a very condescending and rude manner, was blown off by a staffer. She taped the whole thing, a la the Wilsons, told Bernie, who then called in a favor from another staffer working in the same building in DC, who, over a period of a month, took photos of that staffer…you know, the type that makes you think you’re under the watchful eye of a stalker out there…going into the building, in the parking area, that sort of thing…then simply sent them to her, one at a time, in a plain envelope over a period of a month. She quit and returned to Washington State within a month. The Congressman was no doubt inconvenienced.

Lesson: you have many friends inside the belly of beast you don’t know about, and with some networking, you can connect to them. Also, you don’t have to do a single thing to the congressman directly to let him know he should once again be afraid.

3) Take away the perqs of power. This is already happening to a degree, for many congressman already cannot move freely about their districts anymore. Just intensify it. And as described above, make the only custard-less shopping day for the congressman’s wife be at Dollar General, not Sachs. Rearrange her perqs of power and fame and the congressman will suffer mightily. Make him sneak, always looking over his shoulder, around corners. Make him feel besieged.  Destroy his visual horizons. Don’t let him drive down the street without seeing a sign, or a big middle finger, obstructing his view. Leave them asking why Republicans can move around so much freely than they can. Signal this is your intent and few Republicans may even play along.

These are they they fear the most, and are things you only need to threaten.

4) Make them fearful for the financial wealth they’ve amassed while in Congress.

5) Make them fearful of being indicted and going to jail

This is where we turn from semi-serious to deadly serious.

Assume corruption and that they have a lot of money stashed away in the wife’s name or other safe houses. (This can get sophisticated.)  Many Democrats in Congress have been engaged in a criminal enterprise for a very long time…so long, and so successful, that many no longer even believe what they do is a crime. The Slaughter Rule is a different, but in many way, far more serious crime than the mere pilfering of billions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Make sure ALL these Congress members know this is how we see it, and make sure they know that throwing them out of office will not be the end it, but only the first step. Putting them in jail for 36 months on the front end of a 10 year sentence while the wife bathes in the sun of the Virgin Islands, will not be the end of it. Reducing the entire family fortune to the size of an illegal’s stash inside the gas tank of his Honda will. Let them know we’ll go after the retirement plan, the 401K, the whole shooting match. And when they bring up ex post facto, tell them to consult with Bill Clinton. Special dispensation. This i consider to the lynchpin of their fear…to have spent so many years being legal “criminal” and ending up paupers anyway/

6) They fear the threat of physical pain. I know everyone out there has his or her own personal one-arm tied-behind-your-back fantasy of just slapping the snot out of at least 100 of these criminals, but still, it’s the fear that hurts the most. That’s as it should be. You don’t have to lay a glove on them.

All the rest is very doable. Just let them know you mean business. The House side of Congress has already promised to make the “repeal” of health care the central campaign issue in 2010. This they don’t fear…unless tied to those things, above, they do fear.

COMMENTS

  • Viet71

    Why aren’t you front page here?

    Clearly, you are front page material.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      …But I’m long winded, have only opinions, no real newsy stuff, but most of all. I like the anonymity and they know it.

      Keeps us safe. But thanks for the compliment.

  • michael_68_1999

    actually feels the fear, it won’t matter at all. The Leadership is making their own members walk the plank and feel the fear as it is.

    Ain’t nobody going to go after Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer, Clyburn, Schumer and Durbin where it hurts. Besides, these sociopaths would regard any civil disobedience at the hands of conservatives a validation of everything they stand for.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      Fear trickles up.

      • http://www.thesubstratum.com GJ Merits

        I recommended this diary but would like to address it more after I have a chance to review it more carefully. At the risk of being called a spammer – believe me I have been called worse – I am going to link to what I believe to be the solution to the problem and get your feedback.

        Nullification – Our Constitutional Option: http://www.redstate.com/gman2008/2010/03/05/nullification-our-nuclear-option/

        and

        On The Edge Of Revolt – A Thoughtful Appraisal Concerning Violent Reaction In America: http://www.redstate.com/gman2008/2010/03/11/on-the-edge-of-revolt-a-thoughtful-appraisal-concerning-violent-reaction-in-america/

        I am not sure if you will experience the sheer amount of vehement backlash I have for daring to suggest an actual solution to our problem. If you do, you seem like the type who, like me, won’t let it deter you.

        A word of caution. There is assault and then assault and battery. If you make them think you are going to hurt them, you can be arrested for assault. The battery is the part where actual contact occurs. At least that is how it is in Oklahoma, where my brother is a police officer.

        • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

          Yessir, the hard things are harder to say.

          I am in favor of states individually nullifying acts of Congress, Virginia just did that to this health care bill, at least after a fashion. 20 states is about right. Not sure how the courts would rule, but I see the same re a lot of other legislation coming down the pike.

          But in truth it’s not a thing you can discuss or even think about “generally”. Hands-on.

    • E Pluribus Unum

      Harry Reid is in his last few months in Congress, and he is very, very unwelcome back home. As is Ben Nelson in NE, and you better know that is no small thing.

      Like Vassar said (or suggested) start with the low-hanging fruit here. There’s plenty of them you can reach. They are struggling mightily to get 216, EVEN for the Slaughter Rule. You reach 1 or 2 or 3 Congress-critters, you can change the world.

      • nessa

        wasn’t that Tip O’Neill? Just because they aren’t on TV or in the headlines is no reason NOT to share the fun with your city, county and state representatives. We wouldn’t want the enablers to feel left out would we?

        • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

          What we can do over the next year is very little to what we must do in the next 5 days. Win these 5 days, and the job the next 1, 3, and 30 years will become a lot easier. And it will come down just a handful.

  • penguin2

    The Leftists have had us cringing in fear, wringing our hands. It has been because of fear. You have pointed out their vulnerabilities. They have them, just have forgotten them, or they see us as wimps. It really isn’t just about the Republican Party in opposition, it has transcended that, it is about the people. Perhaps that is why the Tea Party activists seem to be taking such a prominent role. I have hoped that our GOP leaders would have some teeth…but it is going to take folks from all the divisions to voice or make there displeasure known.

    The worse thing we could do would be to acquiesce. As you said it is not about November, it is about now. I hate living with fear……

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      …but living with ordinary fear, you must. Unjustified fear, No.
      VB

    • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

      especially when attacking their own constituents like Lindsy Graham.

      The big problem they have is the lack of an overriding vision. (not all of them, but most) People like Mitch McConnell will do what they think is necessary, but they don’t really understand what they are dealing with, and just how far the Donks will go.

      • acat

        And I stole that, but I forget who from. Could have been Vassar Bushmills … never been good at remembering who said what, although I’m pretty good at remembering what has teeth. (grin)

        We need to keep one thing in mind, Kyle – the problem isn’t Democrats or Republicans, it’s “those who believe government is the solution” (henceforth “statists”) vs. “everyone else”.

        When phrased this way, it becomes very clear why Repubs have problems rolling back anything – both parties are riddled with statist, big-government types like Graham and McCain.

        What I read Vassar Bushmills as saying is to go after the statists, not just “dems” or “repubs”, but in general. I presume I will be corrected if I’ve misunderstood this. (grin)

        Mew

        • PostalMed

          Recall our discussions on my diary regarding my suggestion that the Democrats’ ramming through their healthcare reform bill would engender a backlash of epic proportions? And that I welcomed it? I’m glad to see that I am not the only one who sees that this could happen. EPU’s entry actually went as far as I did in stating that he could see the Democratic Party being so crippled that a new center-left party would emerge from the rubble. Not that I’m trying to say that I’m prescient. My ranting was based on listening to people — people who are of The People — and seeing just how angry they are, only they need that one more thing to drive them from their complacency to action I actually like some (most) of Vassar’s suggestions.

          • acat

            A light switch can be either on or off. In the same way, many pundits (and apparently the Dems) seem to be assuming We The People can be either in a revolutionary mood or not, either tea partying or not, either-or. Viewing people as being boolean, that is, capable of only two states – on or off. Enraged or quiescent. Happy or sad.

            This is, obviously, complete crap. People are not boolean, we are not “either-or”. We are analog – “somewhat happy” is just as valid a state as “mad as hell and not going to take it anymore”.

            Further, different people go through these states at different times, based on their beliefs, when they hear what their government is up to, how much they feel it affects their lives, etc.

            This is analog – and if the Dems keep pushing, the volume is going to go to 11.

            Mew

          • PostalMed

            but they do have to be motivated to change — or to fight against what might seem to be the inevitable. I agree that people are analog. There is a gradual progression along the curve of being pissed off. But there is also a threshold along that analog curve that has to be reached before a person or a population will take action. That is what I want to see — the majority of the people being pushed past that threshold. And the Democrats are so generously helping out in this regard. (But we don’t need their help anymore. We passed 11 a long time ago. Else we wouldn’t be here disucussing this.)

          • PostalMed

            I agree that people are analog. There is a gradual progression along the curve of being pissed off. But there is also a threshold on that curve that a person or a population has to be pushed beyond before they will be motivated to take action, especially against what would seem to be the inevitable. What I want to see is the majority of people pushed beyond that threshold. And the Democrats are generously helping out in this regard. (But we don’t need their help any longer. We passed 11 a long time ago. Else we wouldn’t be here having this discussion.)

          • acat

            We’re not to 11 yet. You’ll know when we get there.

            It doesn’t take 50% to make a revolution, you know. What it takes is enough people who no longer believe they’ve got anything to lose.

            It’s also not those of us who post on Red State that the current regime needs to worry about. It’s the lone wolves. Once they decide they’ve nothing to lose, the volume is going to go up scary-fast.

            Mew

  • E Pluribus Unum

    I have been thinking about this for a long, long time. I have a rich and deep hatred of the American newsmedia.

    And I think if they started feeling personally inconvenienced, made to suffer on a personal level, for their criminally bad behavior, you might get some really good ROI for not very much work.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      I’m sort of anxious to try it.

      • acat

        Not that papers are folding – in fact, local-local-local papers seem to be thriving – but big-city dailies like the Chicago Tribune and New York Times are seeing circulation drop, advertising dry up, huge losses on the balance sheet, and .. well, if it were happening to manufacturing outfits we’d be reading about how the industry is going through a significant crisis – perhaps the papers should be covering themselves?

        Mew

        • E Pluribus Unum

          Yes, sliding fast. But they successfully defined the Obama campaign narrative, and that of Sarah Palin.

          They got Obama elected. So, we aim some of our attention toward them.

  • http://www.dcworksforus.com Kenny Solomon

    Fear is going to the golf course by yourself and betting the three long-time buddies you get hooked up with $10 each on the round of golf you’re about to tee off………. and a few minutes later, realizing you only have $5 in your pocket.

    Statists fear nothing, because they “know” people fear them.

    So then, I say this to the Marxist, Statist, Communist, Socailist Jihadists in the current administration and Congress, plus those who will do their bidding:

    No.

    No you can’t.

    This is our nation.

    Through the grace of God, We The People have charged you with representing us, our nation and her sacred documents of freedom.

    You are forcing our hand to levy a charge against you for misrepresenting us ; pushing aside all that you have sworn before God to uphold and defend.

    I pray to God daily that you do not force anyone’s hand to charge at you.

  • Achance

    I think ROPE is a good acronym and a rolled up newspaper is a good symbol.

    The one thing you leave out is that virtually every one of the male Congresscritters and senior staffers have a squeeze somewhere either back in the district or in DC. Yeah, a Congressman is going to be uncomfortable with his wife bitching at him, but most of them are just political accessories and the last thing he or she would want to do is sleep with each other. The squeeze is another thing altogether; that silly little girl actually thinks she loves him, see Edwards’ squeeze’s interview in GQ and he’s actually sleeping with her an liking it. Since he’s a Democrat, just outing him over his squeeze won’t cause much more than inconvenience, but inconveniencing and frightening the squeeze will cause him serious physical, excessive sperm count PAIN. Has to be in the toolkit.

    • Beasley Beesmeal
      • Achance
  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    not only making them fear us but fear us more than they fear their blackmailers. There is only so much money that can be used to bribe them for votes but blackmail, now, that’s a whole different horse. The Clintons were masters at it and Hillary once said that she admired Hoover greatly. I believe she stated that he was her “hero” politician before it was more prudent to say Jefferson or FDR.

    I’ve been ill (still am but recovering now) and I’ve tried to keep up with happenings if not discussing. I’ve watched as scandals are hitting the congress critters, seemingly out of nowhere.

    I don’t think those are coincidences when one, a Republican, is resigning over something that happened long ago having to do with a nude hot tub and a teenager(s). I think I saw that one on Fox, a little short thing that mostly went unnoticed, mainly because the congressman wasn’t one of those well known. I don’t believe they are timed merely as distractions, either, but have the more concrete goal of keeping the others “in line” out of fear that their dirty laundry will the next aired to the public.

    The statists will remove the obstacles in their way no matter how ruthless they must be. We have to be as resolved.

    • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics

      That says a person

  • redneck_hippie

    Maybe that is one of the reasons the whip count seems to be stuck.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      I can’t countenance rolled up newspaper violence or middle fingers. I do favor peaceful acts related to the liberties denied, even if the laws are legally passed by elected representatives.

      We should drill for oil, burn Edison’s bulbs, smoke on private property, and refuse to buy BCBS.

      see below

      http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Atlanta-Law–Politics-Examiner~topic549477-civil-disobedience?selstate=allcat#breadcrumb

      • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

        I see your point, just can’t go along with it. The objective here is to reestablish fear. Without it, the Constitution is lost.

        • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
      • Finrod

        The newspaper tactic should only be done by those that aren’t afraid to be hassled by the police, but the middle finger should definitely be used whenever possible, along with the palm on inside of other arm’s elbow with raised arm motion (alas, I don’t know the appropriate name for it, but it goes well with the middle finger). Let these bastards feel the hostility; after all, the netroots used it so often that President Bush got used to seeing 1 finger more often than 5.

    • mbecker908

      was the story of Nelson and his wife and another couple getting chased out of a pizza place.

      • redneck_hippie

        critters from presidential propaganda pep rallies in any critter’s district who says him Nay. Some may think that’s a feature of a No, not a bug.

    • huskerchuck

      Truthfully, I found that story hilarious. He’s still the brunt of anger here, and will be for some time, I believe. He honestly thought that voting for health care after getting payment for it, and somehow thinking he hadn’t sold the pro-life movement he purports to represent down the river, he vastly underestimated the intelligence of Nebraskans.

      We didn’t want the Nebraska portion paid for to buy his vote. We don’t want it AT ALL, regardless of whether it’s paid for. And then to try and lay the blame off onto a popular Republican governor in the state… that was the final straw for many. I doubt he’ll run in ’12, and if he does, that very same beloved governor will run, and I believe will steamroll Nelson. Heineman wasn’t afraid to take on Tom Osborne, ‘the Coach’, here in Nebraska, you think he’s scared of Nelson after that? Not a chance.

  • texasgalt

    It’s come to this and more’s the pity.

    I had all the G-kids and their moms with me today at Disney World. It was wonderful – the fantasy. . . . and the incredible skills required to put such a thing together. My oldest daughter reminded me, “This couldn’t come to be any where but in this country.”

    As I held my little 3 year old grandaughter on my shoulders for her very first view of the Magic Kingdom and the Castle, she said, Oh, oh it’s true. Princesses do live here!”

    And I wondered if I have done enough to “earn this”. I could not help thinking, what am I willing to do to keep the dream alive?

    Ask and answered . . . rolling up my newspaper.

  • johnconstitution

    To as many as I can get email addresses for, including Speaker Pelosi:

    Speaker Pelosi,

    As I am sure you are aware, and I think it is time that every American be made aware, the Slaughter Rule, which will be used to “pass” healthcare reform in the House of Representatives is in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 7, Clause 2, which states, in part: “Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it…” The problem arises in the fact that using the Slaughter Rule the bill will never be passed by the House of Representatives.

    I demand, that as a representative of the people of the United States, “We The People”, that you follow the Constitution of the United States, which you are sworn to uphold.

    To others I have also demanded that if the rule is brought up that it is their obligation (to their oath) to resist implementation of the rule and that they make every effort in their power to defeat its implementation.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    In the Bush years, I surreptitiously proposed drilling for oil in national parks to protest the 30 year democrat moratorium on expanded oil drilling.

    Then came the recent Manhattan Declaration echoing the Rooster.

    see here:

    http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Atlanta-Law–Politics-Examiner~topic549477-civil-disobedience?selstate=allcat#breadcrumb

  • avgjo

    Thanks for writing such an awesome post.

    I’ve been pushing the last two days an idea about founding a wiki, to keep track of these pols after they are voted out.

    I firmly believe that we can get what we want if they fear us.

    I thought of Nelson’s hellacious situation since the dirty deal he cut with Obama, and I thought if we could make this an assurance for pols in the future,

    Take their peace. Take their cushy jobs.

    With such an information source as I propose, we can keep track of them, when they get a nice new lease on life in the third, fourth, fifth city (having left the others because of constant haranguing), they will be greeted by protests outside their new place of work. Their boss, not wanting the neg. publicity, will have to let them go.

    (I can feel my heart breaking now.)

    What do you guys think? Is it worth the effort? If I get enough pos. feedback, I’ll get to work on it.

    Thanks.

    • Finrod

      .

    • pathfinder81601

      I double-dog dare you.

  • Wubbies World

    Republican Senators need to learn this fear too. They are just as bad as a lot of the Democrats.

    At least the House is now starting to show signs that they “get it”.

  • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics

    But even the insane have their fears. Couldn’t agree more with your proposal.

    The other thing people need to keep in mind, and you touched on it, is the crushing response the left will be prepared to deliver to active opposition.

    Gandhi and MLK were able to do what they did because they were essentially appealing to moral people. Their goal was to show the other side their own hypocrisy. They were simply asking for people to actually live their stated values. Once they were able to demonstrate the hypocrisy, the battle was over. (Alinsky makes use of this tactic.)

    The left has no moral foundation, no moral core to which we can appeal.
    Global Warming is a perfect example. If we had been pushing that cr@p, we would be hanging our head in shame by now. Not so with the left. They just go on pretending. We cannot shame them with their hypocrisies because they have no shame.

    When the fire hoses come out, and the dogs are next turned loose, there will be no appeal to decency with this crowd. No cries for mercy will reach their ears.

    It sounds a little like postcards from the edge, but we all know we are that close. We may not wish to admit it. The day still seems sunny and we wonder that

      evil

    could actually be afoot.

    It would be so much nicer if we could recline back in our BARCO Lounger and watch the game. When Marx said religion is the opiate of the masses he forgot what Rome actually used to

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      I learned a long time ago that even the most erratic and irrational still have an underlying logic. Find it, and you can move ahead.

      Your comments are better than many posts.

      • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics
  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    we do, “we the people” vote for tax increases.

    We had a little election in Tempe, AZ on March 9, 2010. For city council members. And a proposed tax.

    We have 84,629 active voters in Tempe.

    15,295 bothered to vote. That’s a whopping 18 per cent.

    And a tax increase measure, to tax the out-of-towners who use our hotels, passed 71.3 to 28.7 per cent. Nah, let’s not cut spending — let’s just tax the out-of-towners when they come for spring training baseball and conventions, etc.

    18 per cent turn out. Overwhelming vote for tax increases.

    I think things are going to have to get a lot worse before the American people wake up in droves and “do something.” At least here in Tempe, AZ. Oh, and by the way, the biggest vote getter in the council race (the top three vote getters win) was the most well-known Dem in the field.

    Here’s the official tally: http://www.tempe.gov/CLERK/election/Election%20Results/2010%20Primary%20Final%20TallyWeb.pdf

    Just pathetic.

    Thank you.
    ColdWarrior
    No More Scozzafavas!
    Become a Republican precinct committeeman. NOW!

    • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

      It was an outgrowth of the ban on so-called “assault weapons.”

      The prices you see give you some idea of the value of the information contained in the book.

      http://www.amazon.com/Unintended-Consequences-John-Ross/dp/1888118040

      There are some good reviews here:

      http://www.buy.com/prod/unintended-consequences/q/loc/106/30346916.html

      Thank you.
      ColdWarrior
      No More Scozzafavas!
      Become a Republican precinct committeeman. NOW!

  • Scope

    In Charlottesville VA, the Tea Parties have been in Tom Perriello’s face for months. They have protested in front of his office, several times. That was until his staff started calling the police to have the protesters removed. Unfortunately the police complied. He bragged that he had more townhalls in August than any other Rep. The first few were filled with protesters, that joined up with the Tea Party folk. He then had to call the SEIU to bring bus loads in to make it appear that he had support. Then he started having telephone townhalls. He has been retreating more and more. He doesn’t have many appearances or events in C’ville lately. His staff media person here has been complaining about the phone calls. Today, there are some bus loads going to DC, and they are going to his DC office to “meet up” with him. Those that cannot go to DC have been urged to drive by his C’ville office between 12 and 12:30. They are to keep blowing their horns, while calling his office on their cells. I don’t think Perriello easily walks the streets in C’ville any longer.

    I can’t wait until he is sent back to daddy Soros in New York come November. He lived in NY for 7 years co-founding non-profits funded by Soros. He only moved back to VA to run for his Congressional seat. Prior to his 2008 election, he had no known income other than from Soros funding. It must be an awful feeling to know you sold your soul to the devil, especially a Communist one. Now he has to dance to the strings, and is not allowed the first independent thought.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      This isn’t really an idea, but a known set of practices, we’ve seen work. It can become quite sophisticated. I recommend you guys raise the ante a little. The idea isn’t to get him out and get a Republican in, but rather raise the bar of fear, for the GOP member as well. Push on a national level to have participants in this theft denied their retirement benefits.

      • Scope

        but, tell that to the 7, seven, 6+1, candidates that all think they can beat Perriello. Some couldn’t win dog catcher position, but, they all think they can win, and, everyone of them have dug in their heels. Some good candidates, some bad, and I mean really bad. It is destructive to the R party, and, will most likely re-elect the communist yet again. How do you get rid of the losers, far before the primary, and far before they take support away from the few strongest? It is the biggest mess I have ever seen. What was that saying, something like Republicans can snatch defeat from what can be victory, or something like that.

        • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

          I think Goode had some baggage, can’t remember what, but he would end this party slugfest. I hate when they think about their nest egg and run for high cotton in times like these. Tells me a lot about them I’d just as soon not know.

          Watch for the same thing in Utah this month. Whoever loses is not likely to provide any real support for the winner. …helping you know who.

          They don’t call Marxism a lock-step movement for nothing…not since Stalin had Trotsky shot, that is,

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    I knew there was a schwartze in the woodpile in thta election. Goode just gave up. We tried to get him to investigate. 5 will get you 10 it was stolen, but no one paid any attention since it was aHouse seat that didn’t matter. That how ACORN works, try some dry runs in districts where it doesn’t matter. I’ll bey the county registrar was in cahoots.

    • Scope

      But, I think Goode gave up because he knew that no matter how many votes he was ahead, the ACORNS would find at least that many more in their trunks that were missed. I’m not sure that that wasn’t why Goode refused to challenge Perriello again this year. The same uphill battle is going to happen to any R in 2010.

  • archer52

    Public officials cannot complain about being photographed as long as they are in public and there is no threat to their safety. I did this against career criminals and they went NUTS!! At some point all they see is potential photographers. They spend ENERGY trying to make sure they aren’t followed, or meet in places that can’t be watched. I jumped out of a bush one time (after laying there for a while) and caught a couple of them doing a dirty deed. Years later, one of them talked to a rookie they met. When they asked if I was still working (I retired) they were relieved. The rookie came by and said, “They kept calling you Batman.” Apparently, it got so bad they saw me and my partner even when we weren’t there!

    I suggest this- list their homes. Remember when Rove was harassed by constant protesters outside his home? Encourage people just to drive by and when someone comes outside, take the photo. Create a website- Ask “Who is this person?” Post your congressman eating lunch or dinner, or going out, if he is with another person take their photo, is it a lobbyist? A donor? A girlfriend?

    They are public officials, they bought whole deal of public life when they accepted public money to represent us. Can you imagine if a clerk or a cab driver had took a quick cellphone snap shot of Edwards and his sweetie? How about the late Murtha getting on a donor’s plane?

    One rule, do not give them a reason to have you arrested. And remember the cop they send out is just doing his duty. Trust me, been there, done that. Politics is everywhere. The Chief gets a call, he call the Captain, the Captain calls the Lt. and then we get called. The politician demands something to be done. Stay within the law. The cop you are talking to, for the most part of all personnel in law enforcement, may love their jobs, but secretly agree with you. They HATE bulls**t politics. They hate politicians, especially liberal spoiled big government types. But they still have to feed their kids, so if it is between bagging you and walking away, they’ll bag you.

    Research your state’s laws. Get some legal advice, but then do what you must. Remember the numbers here people. 300 million citizens, give less than a fifty are lefties. The vast middle are uncommitted and don’t care, we control maybe fifty million including most independents. The whole Congress and WH is less than a thousand with important staff. The total amount of police in the country are less than a million. That’s a lot, but most are not feds. Most are regular guys and girls just making a living. There will always be a certain percentage of what I call “hut-hut” cops. Those who love SWAT, love the guns, love the power, but they are a small percentage of all police both local and federal.

    What they will do, and respectfully I ask you read my book REVOLT (www.revoltthebook.com), is they will target several of you and make examples of you, hoping to scare off the rest. Can they hurt you? Absolutely. Remember who these people are and what they are playing for. They believe, and I mean BELIEVE the ends justify the means. This is for all the marbles. So they’ll get into your websites, your history, they’ll trump up complaints. you may find yourself being counter surveilled, you may find yourself identified as “domestic terrorists” (why do you think Obama is pushing so hard to control that designation?? He’s 007? Not hardly.) Once ID’ed as one, your entire life will be become a file that will be filled with everything you’ve done, who you know, where you’ve lived, maybe your emails, certainly your cell records and other things. Now under the law, there is a strict protocol they are supposed to follow. Yes, the intel unit can have it, but it can’t spread it around or keep it. HOWEVER, these people are the feds. The laws they made us follow are THEIR laws which means no one will be watching them when they violate them. You can bet Huffington Post or Washington Post or the NYT will have deep background about everything you have ever done, if you rise up to the level of getting their attention.

    And that is the key. I suggest you have just regular folks contribute. They send the photos in, post them and the people move on. Mom and Pops types. If you have a thousand submission there is no way the feds or the locals will have enough energy to chase everybody down, especially if it is within the law.

    Again assuming someone at DHS doesn’t pull the trigger and make us the domestic terrorists they would love to make us to put the thumb down. Once again, they aren’t playing by any rules, and there is no one left, outside a few conservative Republicans to carry your water, unlike back in the nineties when this crew was at it the first time.

    Good luck. Be safe, obey the law but remind the politicians they are in power only because WE say so. They have forgotten, on both sides of the aisle, and should be reminded. Nothing would say it quicker than having to say “cheese” a hundred times a day.

  • http://www.usawatchmen.com/blog usawatchmen

    archer52 – I think in this age of electronics, computers and the internet your idea could work very well.

    Vassar – I love all of your posts and your passion and intelligence sets you apart from all other writers. But I think we need some modern agitprop. Cyber bullying is much harder to catch or prosecute.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      just so long as it works, and makes them afraid.

      What we all want is a Congress that looks at our money and our freedoms and thinks, like the old cartoon, “If I dood it I get a ‘panking”. Sometimes they do it, but more often as not, they won’t.

  • archer52

    http://truthandcommonsense.com/2010/03/18/in-california-two-democrats-trade-healthcare-vote-for-water-the-feds-control-anyone-see-a-problem-yet/

    According to the Republicans, two California democrats traded “yes” votes for a few more drops of water released by the feds into the Central Valley. The audacity of this bribe, especially after the horror the man-made eco-nut driven drought has reigned on the valley, is so bad it is almost maddening. It is almost as sadistic as cutting off the hand of a man and then offering back to be re-attached, if he only will cut off his other hand in exchange! Marie Antoinette would blush and turn her head away in embarrassment.

    As I said in the post, what is happening in California mirrors Mao GLF in 1957. Except Mao worshiped the “state” and the eco-nuts worship the “earth”. But it is the same result, farms ruined, no progress, people devastated and bankrupt, and for WHAT! Power? Control?

    As I’m glancing over the fact that we have reached a point where people will willingly be starved out of existence by the government, I wonder just how much more we can take. Yes, most people are sheep. Most people in America make the mistake of looking for the good in others, even when there is no good, but this…
    At some point we are going to reach that tipping point. I don’t know when, but I do know we are a lot closer to it than we were a year ago, or even thirty days ago.

    Here’s a thought, how about a small container of tar and an envelope full of feathers sent to each turncoat congressman with a little note. “There’s more where these came from, a whole bunch more!”

    Just saying… I’d suggest guillotines but the shipping cost would be prohibitive.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      Otherwise, agreed